“Since arriving, he has worked tirelessly to build a stable life, following every legal step toward citizenship.” …. But the Jew Nazi Glosser-Miller writes our laws.
Oregon county adopts anti-sanctuary resolution, aligning with Trump immigration agenda despite state law
A representative with a statewide coalition supporting immigrant rights warned the county would face legal action if it attempts to implement the resolution.
The lengthy resolution, which was crafted by Commissioner Chris Boice, expressed the board’s opposition to any Oregon laws that contradict the federal administration and its current immigration enforcement crackdown. It also says the county, located in southwestern Oregon, can cooperate with federal authorities.
The resolution caused outrage among some county residents who told The Oregonian/OregonLive that it was problematic for several reasons, among them that it had not been listed on the meeting’s agenda and the public wasn’t allowed to comment. They said the board also painted a false picture at the meeting of undocumented immigrants being cartel members and drug dealers.
However, some community members who attended the meeting also appeared to be supportive of the resolution. Several people could be heard clapping after its approval.
[Commissioner Chris Boice]
County resident Melissa Sherwood, who attended the meeting, said Boice blamed drug trafficking in the county “on brown people without providing any evidence.”
“It’s pretty sickening. It’s pretty despicable,” she told The Oregonian/OregonLive. “But what I find incredibly upsetting about all of this is the underhanded nature in which it was done. They purposefully did not put it on the agenda, meaning we, the people, did not have a chance to comment on it.”
BOICE = Send his fucking ass back to France, UK, Ireland, that is, parts of his body in boxes, man!!
French/Normandy: Derived from the Old French word bois (meaning wood or forest), given to people who lived near wooded areas.
English: Brought over by the Normans after 1066, appearing early on in land rolls as del Bois or de Bois.
Irish: Sometimes used to anglicize the Gaelic surname Ó Buadhaigh, meaning “descendant of the victorious one”.
In February 2025, Coos County commissioners rejected a proposal to allow federal immigration officials into their jails after hearing that the measure could place the county in legal jeopardy. A few months later, Yamhill County officials deleted mention of immigration enforcement in a draft agreement with the U.S. Marshals Service after community members raised concerns.
Jess Montoya, network director of Oregon for All, a coalition of organizations in Oregon that advances immigrant justice, said the county’s resolution is in “direct contrast” to the state’s sanctuary protections.
“Our state laws are not optional,” she told The Oregonian/OregonLive. “If Douglas County attempts to implement this, this would be a violation of Oregon law, and legal action would follow.”
But it’s not clear what, if anything, the resolution will do. During the meeting, Freeman clarified it was not an ordinance, simply a resolution with the board’s opinion.
“This resolution feels like political theater,” Montoya said.
[fucking slave patrol, Douglas County.]
Lori Kuebler, who has lived in Roseburg for 16 years, said she believes the commissioners drafted the resolution carefully by saying it’s their “opinion” to protect themselves legally, while still potentially providing leeway to the county’s sheriff to work with federal authorities.
She said her undocumented neighbors are productive members of society.
“We have a Mexican bakery here in town. I’m friends with those people,” she told The Oregonian/OregonLive.“I worry for those people now.”
Lies your greenwashing pornographer told you . . .
The nascent chemical recycling industry – in which plastics are broken down into oils or constituent monomers to be remade into new materials – is contracting across Europe and the US as recyclers call for policy stability to make the industry investable.
Recent closures, postponements or project cancellations ‘reflect the broader structural crisis facing the whole of Europe’s plastics recycling industry (both mechanical and chemical),’ says Maria Vera Duran, policy director at industry body Recycling Europe.
Not concerned citizens or adults who don’t want peeping Toms in the neighborhood, but rather “Vigilantes”?
Inside the growing vigilante movement to knock out Flock surveillance cameras
An underground network of privacy activists is disabling or destroying the ubiquitous surveillance devices sprouting up across the USA.
FUCK mainscum NEWS writers (ChatGPT).
+—+
While the pedophile JEw in Chief and his Minyan and Gullible Goyim set the country and world on fire, we have so so much to learn….
In 2012, an angler pulled a brown bullhead out of Lake Memphremagog with what looked like tar smeared across its skin. He brought it to Peter Emerson, a fish biologist with the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department, who had surveyed the lake since 2009. Emerson had never seen anything like it.
Within three years, the black growths were on a quarter to 40 percent of the lake’s bullhead. This week researchers at the University of Vermont reported in Nature that the melanoma is contagious, spreading from one fish to another as living cancer cells.
It is the fourth type of transmissible cancer known to science, the first in a fish and the first in freshwater.
So Julie Dragon, the associate professor of microbiology and molecular genetics who directs that core, went looking for a shared mutation instead. In an ordinary cancer each tumor is a close genetic relative of the animal it grew in, and a family tree of cancers and non-cancerous tissue puts every tumor next to its own host. The Memphremagog trees came out the other way around: all the tumors in one cluster and all the fish in another, with hundreds of thousands of mutations shared across cancers in different fish and absent from the fish carrying them.
“It’s a clonal cancer,” Dragon told me. “It’s not driven by a bacteria or a virus. It’s the infectious agent itself, and it’s moving from fish to fish.”
FASCINATING, absolutely FASCINATING, but in a mixed mugged and mauled MMA society, this is it:
+—+
Absolutely KEY to understanding the dirty USA, the dirty vassals like Taiwan and Philippines and South Korea, man, but not in White Claw CUNTRY.
Regularly $43.99! Listen up, stupid Americanos….
WATCH:
Japan is swiftly remilitarizing, the US is funneling weapons to Taiwan, and the military encirclement of China is only escalating. Is the US driving Asia into war with China?
Tings Chak, researcher at the Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research and organizer with the Hands Off Asia campaign, joins Amanda Yee to discuss the alarming moves on the part of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi to move the country away from its post-WWII pacifist principles – and how it fits into Washington’s preparations for a major military confrontation for China.
Chak explains the US’s “architecture of militarization” surrounding China and how it threatens the entire region. But she also explains how people and movements in Asia are fighting back through the Hands Off Asia campaign.
That White Claw HELL:
A Southwest Airlines flight attendant who allegedly overstayed his visa was arrested by federal immigration authorities earlier this month while at work, officials said.
Lorenzo Thompson, a Jamaican citizen, was arrested July 14 in Nashville, Tennessee, according to local reports.
Thompson first entered the United States April 17, 2021, on a visa that expired Oct. 16, 2021,
House niggers found everywhere . . . the way……
Aaron Moten as Knowls, the former slave who works with Fassel and Harrington capturing runaway slaves, whom Peter calls “the worst kind.”
Back on the Pedophile Front . . . Trump Calls Out Canada For ‘Disinviting’ U.S. From Gordie Howe Bridge Opening Amid Trade Row.
We are one disunited Continent . . .
Jenna Ghassabeh, a spokesperson for Canadian Infrastructure Minister Gregor Robertson, told TIME in an emailed statement on Wednesday that the joint ceremony had been canceled, stating “in light of trade action threatened by the United States earlier this week, it would be inappropriate to proceed with a celebratory event between the two countries.”
“We remain committed to opening the bridge on July 27th, and to celebrating this milestone among Canadians on July 24th,” she added.
Time Magazine is definitely feces-laden.
Fucking Mercenaries, another “free get out of jail PTSD card” for the disservices . . . .
The Trump administration wants soldiers to consider becoming truck drivers when they leave the military to help replace the tens of thousands of immigrant drivers who lost their licenses in a crackdown this year.
A new campaign launched Friday will promote programs that let veterans who recently drove large military vehicles skip the required skills test for a commercial driver’s license. Other soldiers can attend a commercial driving school during their last six months of active duty. The GI Bill will also pay for 100% of commercial driver’s license training and for some people even pay a housing allowance while they are in school.
The campaign will be part of a broader interagency effort to help veterans find good civilian jobs that the White House plans to announce on Monday.
The Transportation Department began enforcing existing English language requirements for truckers last summer. Concerns about truck driver qualifications then took on more urgency after an August crash in Florida, when a truck driver performed an illegal U-turn that killed three people. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said that driver, who is from India, should never have been licensed in the first place.
26,000 drivers have been pulled off the road for failing to demonstrate English proficiency, and the Transportation Department said 30,000 commercial licenses were canceled because they were issued illegally. The federal government has tried to withhold millions of dollars of highway funds from California and New York for failing to comply and revoke thousands more licenses, but that has wound up in court. Several other states — including Pennsylvania, Minnesota and North Carolina — have been warned they are at risk of losing funding.
“We are removing more and more dangerous foreign drivers off our roads every day and restoring the integrity of America’s trucking industry,” Duffy said. “Our new Freedom Haulers campaign will help build on these successes and get the word out that there’s never been a better time for America’s former service members to get behind the wheel of a big rig.”
Lockheed Martin unveils counter-drone system that can ‘neutralize up to 50 enemy drones in a single mission’ — sensor-agnostic system uses High Power Microwave to purge enemies from the sky
This portable one-to-many system is reusable and recoverable for a low cost per kill.
Duh….
Led by scientists from Oceana, the Center for the Ecology and Sustainable Management of Oceanic Islands, and the Center for Advanced Studies in Arid Zones, the study used the remotely operated vehicle SuBastian aboard the Schmidt Ocean Institute’s research vessel R/V Falkor, to survey four seamounts around the Juan Fernández Archipelago.
Three of the seamounts had a history of bottom trawling. A fourth, ecologically similar seamount called Solito, had never been trawled, providing a baseline for comparison. Solito supported thriving deep-sea coral gardens, abundant sponges, and rich invertebrate diversity. The previously trawled seamounts showed lower live coral cover, reduced biodiversity, simplified habitat structure, and clear signs of seafloor disturbance.
“This study demonstrates that the impacts of bottom trawling on deep-sea ecosystems can persist for decades,” said Dr. Ignacio Petit, Oceana scientist and lead author of the study. “Although fishing ended more than 25 years ago, recovery remains extremely limited because many affected species, particularly deep-sea corals, grow very slowly and can live for hundreds, or even thousands, of years.”
Deep-sea corals act as ecosystem engineers, their structures providing shelter, feeding grounds, and nursery habitat for fish and invertebrates. Corals that take centuries to build can be destroyed by trawling in hours.
“The presence of living corals supports higher invertebrate biomass, including commercially valuable crustaceans such as the Chilean golden crab (Chaceon chilensis) and the Juan Fernández spiny lobster (Projasus bahamondei). Conserving seamount ecosystems therefore also helps sustain local artisanal fisheries,” said Dr. Javier Sellanes, co-author of the study.
Out of Sight, out of the Minds of room-temperature IQ legions.
Fucking blame Canada, Pedophile ZTrump….
Firefighters on Friday are bracing for the possibility of continuing growth of the Aspen Acres fire, warning that storms moving into the area could fan flames with high winds.
The region has received rain, though lightning and “erratic winds” from storms have created conditions for increased fire activity and the potential for new fires to ignite, according to a Friday morning update.
The Aspen Acres fire, southwest of Pueblo, is holding steady at 101,546 acres burned with 61% containment. It remains the state’s largest fire and the seventh largest in Colorado history.
Firefighters on Thursday attacked a new fire, dubbed the Salt fire, that spread across one-fourth of an acre near the Aspen Acres fire. Helicopters transported firefighters to the new fire to build berms.
“raking” and “cleaning” of forests — DJT
Scientists have reacted with incredulity after Donald Trump accused Canada of “poisoning” the US’s air with smoke billowing from a slew of forest fires and threatened sanctions upon the country’s northern neighbor.
The US president has said that he raised the issue of smoke wafting into the US from nearly 1,000 Canadian wildfires with Mark Carney, the country’s prime minister, at the weekend’s World Cup final.
“I told him, you got to stop these fires from coming in and poisoning our air,” Trump said. “If we can help them, we’ll help them. But maybe they should pay us some damages or something, or we should do some tariffs.”
Trump, who has previously advocated the “raking” and “cleaning” of forests to prevent major conflagrations, this week announced 50% tariffs upon Canada, a long-term US ally that he has previously threatened with annexation. The US is being “unnecessarily invaded by filthy, polluted and unhealthy air”, Trump claimed last week.
With palls of wildfire smoke causing unhealthy, hazy skies in cities including New York, Washington DC, Detroit and Toronto in recent weeks, some Republicans in Congress have issued further threats against Canada. Bernie Moreno, a Republican senator from Ohio, said he will introduce legislation to sanction Canada for the “atrocity” of not managing its forests properly.
Blowback from Ohio and Georgia casts doubt on the credibility of USDA’s anti-fraud narrative as the federal government scrutinizes the country’s signature nutrition assistance program.
“In terms of lumping everything under fraud, I’ve never seen it done the way it’s being done right now,” said Alan Shannon, a former USDA employee who worked as a SNAP payment accuracy specialist for more than two decades. “This is highly unusual, and it’s unusual that they would be doing [press] releases on it, and that they would be calling all of this fraud, particularly when that is incorrect language to be using.”
Everything tied to Ztrump is FRAUDULENT.
“After looking at the most comprehensive set of data and after removing duplicates, we found that most of the anomalies flagged by the OIG were properly issued,” Ohio Department of Job and Family Services spokesperson Bill Teets said in a statement.
The difference between OIG’s estimate of Georgia’s SNAP fraud and the state’s own claims was even starker. The USDA watchdog initially concluded there was nearly $300 million worth of potential SNAP fraud in the state, the former employee familiar with the evaluation said.
“There was quite a bit of conflict, actually, between Georgia and the OIG around their initial findings,” the former employee told POLITICO. “Initially it was $280 million, and then after Georgia went through it, it was reduced by like 95 percent.”
“As we continue to fact check the report, we unwaveringly attest that it does not fairly or accurately characterize the full body of work at the Smithsonian.”
The Photograph: Taken during a Union Army medical examination in Louisiana, the famous image was called “The Scourged Back” and published in Harper’s Weekly.
The Escape: He fled a Louisiana plantation, used onions to throw off bloodhounds, crossed dangerous swamps, and later joined the Union Army.
The Impact: The graphic photo served as undeniable proof of the cruelty of slavery and helped boost the abolitionist movement during the Civil War.
A cunt tree of room temperature dangerous kkk rebirthers of a nation / cesspool.
Will Smith is on the hit list . . .
Trump directed federal officials on Friday to install signs outside the Smithsonian’s flagship National Museum of American History to reflect his administration’s criticism of how the institution portrays the United States.
Trump’s executive order cited a White House Domestic Policy Council report accusing the museum of “thinly veiled anti-Americanism” and “extreme political activism.” He said he directed officials to install temporary signs on sidewalks maintained by the National Park Service to correct “inaccurate information presented in the Museum.”
Trump’s move follows a report released July 4 by his Domestic Policy Council saying leaders of the Smithsonian and its National Museum of American History don’t tell history “in a way that is inspiring, unifying, and worthy of our great republic.”
The president lacks authority to quickly fire the Smithsonian leadership or to order changes to exhibits, so his executive order targets the sidewalks out front, which are maintained by the National Park Service. His executive order calls for signs telling visitors about the White House report and directing them to resources for what he calls “accurate information regarding America’s history.” It also calls for a temporary exhibit that corrects information he deems inaccurate.
Smithsonian officials declined to comment on Trump’s order.
Anthea M. Hartig, director of the American history museum, pushed back on the White House report during congressional hearings this week.
“As we continue to fact-check the report, we unwaveringly attest that it does not fairly or accurately characterize the full body of work at the museum,” she told lawmakers. “There is always room for improvement. But I also know the beauty and the inspiration and the expertise that lies in our collections, our exhibits, and our programming.”
The Smithsonian operates outside the executive branch and museum directors report to Secretary Lonnie Bunch, who is subject to oversight from a Board of Regents.
Trump’s escalating effort to force changes at the Smithsonian marks the Republican president’s latest move to transform cultural pillars of society, such as universities and art, that he considers out of step with conservative sensibilities. Trump had himself installed as chairman of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts with the aim of overhauling programming, and his handpicked board voted to add his name to the building, only to have a federal judge later order the signs to be removed.
Trump has also imposed changes on historical sites beyond Washington, including in Philadelphia, where the administration won a court ruling last week allowing it to reinstall interpretive panels that critics say whitewash the history of slavery at the site of President George Washington’s home. Advocates, academics and officials have been concerned for months that the version that complies with Trump’s order could give a history that plays down the pain in the nation’s past in favor of a more triumphant view.
Trump in March 2025 revealed his intention to force changes at the Smithsonian Institution with an executive order that targeted funding for programs that advanced “divisive narratives” and “improper ideology.”
Rebirth of a Nation?
There is a dangerous method to Trump’s racist madness
But there is also a more complex rhetoric of nationalism in play, one that is authoritarian, neo-fascist, but also potentially inclusive, of a segment of the white population that does not identify with Confederate symbols, neo-Nazi symbols, and Q-Anon paranoia, but does identify with “American Greatness;” and even including some people of color who support him (“I’ve always had a great relationship with the blacks,” he has said repeatedly, oblivious to the racism of this very formulation).
In the face of the extraordinary spread of BLM protests, Trump tweeted that he has “done more for Black Americans, in fact, than any President in U.S. history, with the possible exception of another Republican President, the late, great, Abraham Lincoln … and it’s not even close.” In a follow-up interview the next day with Fox News, he equivocated slightly on Lincoln, saying: “let’s take a pass on Abraham Lincoln because he did good, although, it’s always questionable, you know, in other words, the end result.” All of this was predictably denounced by commentators, politicians, and activists rightly outraged by Trump’s “questionable” comment, and by the undeniably racist character of Trump’s entire public persona. The notion that he has done more for Black people than anyone but Lincoln is a most atrocious form of gaslighting by a malignant leader who has turned gaslighting into an evil art.
But while the “Never Trump” partisans of the Lincoln Project are unquestionably correct about the distance separating Trump from Lincoln, it is nonetheless true that Trump does sometimes appeal to a certain version of Lincoln, as defender of “the nation” and as strong leader capable of defeating his enemies and of superintending “the blacks” who apparently need a Strong White Father.
It is this combination of racism and nationalism that is so dangerous. And Trump’s version of it has striking parallels with what is perhaps the single most important racist cultural production in the twentieth century American history: D.W. Griffith’s “Birth of the Nation.”
The film was a groundbreaking development, the first full-length feature film widely distributed in U.S. history, and a box office blockbuster. It was a widely-viewed and hugely influential cultural representation, and it reflected, and reinforced, what became the conventional historical narrative during the Progressive era, which was an era of both racism and nation-building.
Based on a racist novel called The Clansman, the film’s narrative is straightforward, compelling, and propagandistically effective (as film critic Richard Brody observed in a 2013 retrospective, “The Worst Thing About ‘Birth of a Nation’ is How Good It Is”). In brief: the Civil War was an unfortunate War between the States that greatly disrupted American history, pitting brother against brother and “chum” against “chum.” Lincoln understood this, and wished for nothing more than to effect a quick and complete reconciliation between North and South (“with malice toward none, with charity for all”). But poor Lincoln, “friend of the South,” was killed, and the federal government came under the control of Radical Republicans who hated the Southern Way of Life, were power-hungry and arrogant, and who, egged on by nefarious “mulattoes,” used Reconstruction as a way to empower and to use ignorant, gullible, and licentious “Negroes,” who proceeded to attack civilization, form gangs, commit crimes, especially the rape of virtuous white women, and to turn the South upside down. Fortunately, these evil white carpetbaggers and the Negro tools they had empowered were resisted by the White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, who helped to bring Reconstruction to an end. The white people of the North and South could thus be reunited in holy matrimony and fertile union; the Negroes could be intimidated from voting and put back “in their place” where, presumably, they could themselves be more productive, better patronized, and thus happier. A new nationalism—indeed a white Christian nationalism– was born.
The communicative power of this narrative was brilliantly analyzed by Michael Rogin in an important 1985 essay entitled “’The Sword Became a Flashing Vision’: D. W. Griffith’s The Birth of a Nation.” As Rogin points out, Griffith himself explained that he titled his film “Birth of a Nation”: “because it . . . the Civil War was fought fifty years ago. But the real nation has only existed in the last fifteen or twenty years . . . The birth of a nation began . . . with the Ku Klux Klan, and we have shown that.”
White Man Cometh….. Trump Administration Admits Canceling Grants to States That Did Not Vote for Him.
The white slavers chaser, running us all down.
Key Takeaways
Flock Safety CEO claimed cameras only capture static images, contradicting his own prior statements.
Flock’s deleted blogs and Condor service confirm live video streaming was built into existing hardware.
Five law enforcement agencies secretly piloted live ALPR video before Flock quietly discontinued the feature.
When LAPD allowed its Flock Safety contract to expire, CEO Garrett Langley went on ABC7 with a reassuring message. “A car drives by, we take a picture,” he said. “It’s a static picture of a car, and then we read the license plate.” Simple. Harmless. Except roughly a year earlier, Langley told Forbes something quite different: in a 911 scenario, Flock would “just open up the five nearest cameras in real time and say, here’s what’s happening right now.” That’s not a static picture. That’s live video.
[White House app transmits 77% of network requests to third-party companies
GPS coordinates tracked every 4.5 minutes during active app usage
JavaScript code stripped cookie consent banners and bypassed GDPR protections]
The slave patrols . . .
Five agencies quietly tested live video on Flock ALPR devices before the feature was discontinued for law enforcement with no public explanation.
Five law enforcement agencies ran a “limited pilot” for live video on ALPR devices, a Flock spokesperson confirmed after 404 Media pressed for answers. The feature was quietly tested and then discontinued for law enforcement in March. No public announcement accompanied the rollback — the kind of quiet Google-killing-a-product move that tends to resurface later in a different form.
The ACLU has documented a broader pattern. Flock previously told city officials it didn’t create “heat maps” of vehicle movements, then later admitted it does, according to ACLU reporting. The organization has characterized Flock’s expansion as a troubling move into traditional video surveillance and audio analytics. Meanwhile, city FAQs in Bartlesville, Woodburn, and Cheyenne still tell residents Flock cameras “do not record video” — language that traces directly back to Flock’s own talking points.
Your neighborhood almost certainly has these cameras. The underlying hardware capability is unchanged, and a software update already turned live video on for at least five agencies. What keeps it off now is a company policy — from a company whose public statements have repeatedly needed revision.
Sure, Jews are LOSING….. NOT.
Greece has approved the purchase of a multi-layer air defense system worth up to €3.5 billion ($4 billion) from Israel, several types of drones and Embraer’s C-390 military transport aircraft, its defense minister said on Thursday.
The country’s security council, KYSEA, gave its initial approval earlier this year and approved the procurement contracts on Thursday, Nikos Dendias told journalists.
Jews are in on it………. It is no accident that Secretary of State Marco Rubio was among the first to embrace a hemispheric variation on the most famous slogan in American politics: “Make the Americas Great Again.”
What reads at first as wordplay in fact carries considerable weight, because it names something that has rarely been harder to deny. The agendas of the U.S. and much of Latin America are advancing, increasingly and perhaps inevitably, in the same direction, closing gaps that have often widened in the past.
The vastness of stupidity . . . Poll: Republicans’ gas price problem is even worse than it seems
Three in five Americans believe gas prices in their area have risen by more than they actually have, according to a POLITICO analysis.
Of the 46 percent of Americans who said gas prices will have an impact on their vote, just under 40 percent said they are considering voting for a different party than they normally would, including 49 percent of MAGA Republicans and 57 percent of non-MAGA Republicans.
“Three quarters of the country is confronting higher gas prices and feeling it,” said longtime Democratic strategist Jesse Ferguson. “That leaves them … very vulnerable to the economic pain and very vulnerable to the economic argument the Democrats are going to make.”
Dirtiest cuntry in the world dong what? Elections where?
Slavers . . .
You fucking White WHores of the USA . . . Why Venezuela can’t access $4 billion in gold that could help with earthquake recovery
[A Roman gold bar from the 4th century is handled by curator John Keyworth in front of replica modern bars at the Bank of England museum on May 12, 2006.]
White slavers NRA . . . .
Slaver Cunt-Tree:
Trump has once again inspired anger and confusion in US allies and trading partners as he imposed a wave of tariffs on more than 80 countries, replacing an expiring global duty introduced earlier this year.
The new measures effectively replace blanket 10% tariffs that Trump imposed in February. The US supreme court ruled many of those were illegal. The new levies come in at between 10% and 12.5% on countries including the UK, Mexico, Canada, Australia, India, China and the 27 countries that make up the EU.
They are imposed under section 301 of the US Trade Act of 1974, and the Trump administration has said the new measures are due to the dozens of countries failing to enforce bans on goods produced by forced labour.
The imposition of the new tariffs led to Asian stock markets taking a hammering overnight.
“If you compare our labour laws to the ones of the United States, I mean, we have paid vacations, we have very good labour conditions for our employees, so it’s not really grounded.”
Fifteen years ago today, during one of our country’s worst economic crises, Americans saw the last federal minimum wage increase. Since then, we’ve experienced costs skyrocket across the board, far outpacing the minimum wage – yet there’s been no meaningful action from Republicans or this Administration to make life more affordable. The American people deserve policies that lower costs and make their lives better, and that starts with the money they take home. I will continue fighting for these long overdue, commonsense economic reforms so our neighbors can not just get by, but get ahead.
Brian S. Wilson: *Photo: Here I am pictured with President Comandante Daniel Ortega as he was campaigning for re-election in the 1990s. The U.S. sabotaged the electoral process and for 16 years Nicaraguans suffered under neo-liberalism.”
All things Jewish . . . . Malaysia recently expelled all Israeli citizens and the Jewish States’ most dedicated colony is protesting….. So fucking tiresome these Jews who are wearing us all down!!
Ankara’s rising value to Washington is strengthening its regional hand, while exposing the limits of its confrontation with Tel Aviv.
You will NOT see NEW Jew York rabbis and synagogues going after their fucking perverted people, those people, Jewish State of Rape and Murder and Theft and Starvation and Deception . . .
Black . . .
…Rock
…Stone
…Cube . . . .
Black Cube is a private intelligence and investigations agency founded in Israel by former elite military intelligence officers. Key attributes include: [1, 2]
Staffed by veterans of Israeli intelligence units like Mossad.
Offices located in Tel Aviv, London, Madrid, and Singapore.
“What the hell?” the photographer who got pushed aside said.
“You f—— kidding me?” Hopper shot back, never pausing.
“You kidding me?” the photographer continued, following him into the building. “Don’t play yourself. Don’t ever do that, dude.”
Hopper shot his middle finger in the air and the verbal parrying continued. But then it took a more aggressive turn, as Hopper’s retreating figure first called the photographer a homosexual slur.
“That the kind of talk you’re teaching him, Sean?” the photographer, undeterred, called down the emptying hallway.
Hopper’s last riposte was to shoot back that the photographer, who was African-American, was a “fcuking nigger.”
“Oh, word?“ the photographer, now outraged, called out.
Police showed up at the scene, according to E! Online, and the photographer is seen in another video showing officers footage on his camera. The photographer declined to press charges. No one was cited.
Hopper later issued a statement, saying, “I was accosted by paparazzi and made to feel like an animal — threatened and under attack, but that does not condone my own actions. … I deeply regret my choice of words.”
Sean Penn’s own altercations with the paparazzi have been well documented. Here’s video from 2010 of the actor kicking a photographer. And here’s a classic image from back in the Madonna days of Penn throwing a punch.
The real JEW inside all Zee Jews?
The fucking JEW Yorker:
These JEWS like going after Goyi:
Ian Crouch
Newsletter editor
Jasper Craven interviewed Graham Platner twice for his piece, published today. The first was in June, after the Times spoke to some of Platner’s former partners, one of whom alleged that he had been physically rough with her. (He denies this.) The second time was a little more than a week ago, after another former partner, Jenny Racicot, had accused him of rape in an interview with Politico (an allegation he also denies), and supported the claim with Facebook messages she sent years before Platner was a public figure. By Craven’s second interview with Platner, he had dropped out of the Maine Senate race, leaving a string of questions behind about the political decisions that fuelled his rise, and about the extent to which his controversies were connected to his military service and his struggles with P.T.S.D. and depression. “In a country stubbornly attached to myths about the military’s positive transformative power, Platner presented a stark counterfactual,” Craven writes. “Still, how much of his behavior should be read through the lens of what combat did to him, and how much of it is simply who he is, independent of war?”
Last week, speaking with Craven, Platner—whose popularity was based, in part, on his willingness to be vulnerable about his past mistakes—continued to deny the allegations made by Racicot: “I don’t know how one is supposed to be vulnerable about things that aren’t real.” He said that he had initially been reluctant to suspend his campaign, after the publication of the Politico story, in part because he believed he had successfully convinced voters of his personal transformation. “I mean, Jesus Christ,” he said, “we had polling where I was still competitive.” For the story, Craven also talked to Platner’s wife, his mother, and men who served in the military with the former candidate. Other veterans whom Craven spoke with argued that Platner’s alleged behavior is plainly disqualifying, regardless of his experience during war. Paula Coughlin, a Navy veteran who acted as a whistle-blower during the 1991 Tailhook scandal, in which officers sexually assaulted or harassed eighty-three women and seven men, said, “There is absolutely no way I would tolerate that bullshit out of anybody.”
More Jew Yorker trash . . . .
Vanity Talmudic Fair:
“The much more dangerous part of fascism is the fascists in suits.”
Lawyer and author Omer Aziz joins Mehdi Hasan to discuss the resurgence of fascism in the United States and a playbook to fight back against it. Plus, the history of Nazism in the U.S., and the time Donald Trump’s father attended a KKK rally.
Aziz, who most recently served as speechwriter to Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, has a new book about it all: ‘Shadows of the Republic: The Rebirth of Fascism in America and How to Defeat It for Good.’
Watch the full video to hear Aziz discuss whether he agrees with comparisons between Trump and Hitler, Elon Musk’s role in the global fascist project, and his former boss calling Trump’s war in Iran “worth it.”
This interview was released exclusively to paid Zeteo.com subscribers on July 10, 2026. Consider subscribing to our website as a paid subscriber to unlock all premium content like this from Zeteo: https://zeteo.com/subscribe
I’ll take Baraka…
The Trump administration has accelerated its attacks on leftist organizations and individuals while also justifying its genocidal siege of Cuba with the release of the document “Cuba: the Capital of 21st Century Communism.” This follows executive order National Security Presidential Memorandum-7 (NSPM-7) which provides a rationale for state repression and the criminalization of left organizing. Ajamu Baraka, Black Agenda Report contributing editor and Director of the North-South Project for Peoples Centered Human Rights. He provides analysis on this newest iteration of state repression in the US.
Executive Order National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 NSPM7
which condemns, quote, anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity support for the overthrow of the United
States government extremism on migration race and gender and hostel hostility towards those who hold traditional
American views on family religion, and morality, unquote and in so doing provides a rationale for state repression and the criminalization of left organizing.
I fear that the truth of what happened contradicts so forcefully our idea of what the cold war was, of what it means to be an American, or how globalization has taken place, that it has simply been easier to ignore it.
In January 1966, Senator Bobby Kennedy said, “We have spoken out against the inhuman slaughters perpetrated by the Nazis and the Communists. But will we speak out also against the inhuman slaughter in Indonesia, where over 100,000 alleged Communists have not been perpetrators but victims?” He wildly underestimated the number of the dead, but at least he said something. No other prominent US politician condemned the massacre. By this time, RFK was in the habit of speaking out forcefully in ways that others wouldn’t. It’s unclear whether he knew that the Johnson administration was actively assisting with the massacre at that point. Maybe RFK had a kind of conversion about the nature of black ops after his brother’s death. Maybe it was politics. But whatever it was, Washington did not stop helping to carry out Operation Annihilation.
On April 13, 1966, C.L. Sulzberger penned a piece, one of many in this genre, with the headline “When a Nation Runs Amok” for TheNew York Times. As Sulzberger described it, the killings occurred in “violent Asia, where life is cheap.” He reproduced the lie that Communist Party members had killed the generals on October 1, and that Gerwani women slashed and tortured them. He went on to affirm that “Indonesians are gentle… but hidden behind their smiles is that strange Malay streak, that inner, frenzied blood-lust which has given to other languages one of their few Malay words: amok.”
The Malay, and now Indonesian, concept of amok actually referred to a traditional form of ritual suicide, even if the anglicization now refers to wild violence more generally. But there’s no reason to believe that the mass violence of 1965–1966 has its roots in native culture. No one has any evidence of mass murder of this kind happening in Indonesian history, except for when foreigners were involved.
This story of inexplicable, vaguely tribal violence—so easy for American readers to digest—was entirely false. This was organized state violence with a clear purpose. The main obstacles to a complete military takeover were eliminated by a coordinated program of extermination—the intentional mass murder of innocent civilians. The generals were able to take power after state terror sufficiently weakened their political opponents, who had no weapons, only public sympathy. They didn’t resist their own annihilation because they had no idea what was coming.
In total, it is estimated that between five hundred thousand and one million people were slaughtered, and one million more were herded into concentration camps. Millions more people were indirect victims of the massacres, but no one came around to inquire how many loved ones they had lost.
Their silence was the point of the violence. The Armed Forces did not oversee the extermination of every single communist, alleged communist, and potential communist sympathizer in the country. That would have been nearly impossible, because around a quarter of the country was affiliated somehow with the PKI. Once the killings took hold, it became incredibly hard to find anyone who would admit to any association with the PKI.
Around 15 percent of the prisoners taken were women. They were subjected to especially cruel, gendered violence, which sprung directly from the propaganda spread by Suharto with Western help. Except for a tiny number of people possibly involved in the planning of the disastrous September 30th Movement, almost everyone killed and imprisoned was entirely innocent of any crime. Magdalena, an apolitical teenage member of a communist-affiliated union, was innocent.
The rank-and-file card-carrying members of the unarmed Communist Party, who made up a large proportion of the victims, were also entirely innocent. They didn’t do anything wrong at all, yet they were condemned to annihilation, and almost everyone around them was sentenced to a lifetime of guilt, trauma, and being told they had sinned unforgivably because of their association with the earnest hopes of left-wing politics.
When the conflict came, and when the opportunity arose, the US government helped spread the propaganda that made the killing possible and engaged in constant conversations with the Army to make sure the military officers had everything they needed, from weapons to kill lists. The US embassy constantly prodded the military to adopt a stronger position and take over the government, knowing full well that the method being employed to make this possible was to round up hundreds of thousands of people around the country, stab or strangle them, and throw their corpses into rivers. The Indonesian military officers understood very well that the more people they killed, the weaker the left would be, and the happier Washington would be.
Slaughter in Indonesia: Britain’s secret propaganda war
Carrying bamboo spears and hatchets, a group of Indonesian nationalists accompany an Indonesian army patrol in the search for communist sympathisers.
Despite presiding over an administration that stood out for its successful championing of human rights elsewhere in the world, “in Southeast Asia, Carter really continued the policies of the Nixon and Ford administration,” particularly in Indonesia, which was at the time occupying and carrying out a genocide in East Timor. Simpson founded the Indonesia/East Timor Documentation Project at the National Security Archive, which provided thousands of U.S. documents to East Timor’s Truth Commission in the aftermath of the Indonesian military’s mass killings of tens of thousands of Timorese civilians with U.S. arms under the dictatorial regime of President Suharto.
Reuters reports:
“Malaysia’s ambassador to the United States was summoned by the U.S. State Department to explain Kuala Lumpur’s position on Israel, state media reported, citing the country’s foreign minister.
Foreign Minister Mohamad Hasan said Ambassador Muhammad Shahrul Ikram Yaakob told the State Department that Malaysia’s longstanding policy of not recognising Israel was not new.”
(b. 16 Aug. 1913, d. 9 Mar. 1992).
Prime Minister of Israel 1977–83 Born in Brest‐Litovsk in White Russia (later Poland), he graduated in law from the University of Warsaw. He was soon active in the radical Revisionist Zionist Movement, whose Polish president he became in 1939. After the outbreak of World War II Begin was imprisoned by the USSR, and was interned in Siberian labour camps until 1941. He joined the Polish army in exile and was sent to Palestine until demobilization in 1943. As commander of the Irgun Zvai Leumi, he became involved in various terrorist attacks against the British, including the destruction of the King David Hotel. On the creation of Israel he founded the Herut (Freedom) Party, which he represented in parliament (the Knesset) from 1949. During the Six Day War in 1967 he joined a National Unity government and in 1973 helped to form the right‐wing Likud bloc.
Salah Sarsour, a Palestinian community leader in Wisconsin, president of the Islamic Society of Milwaukee and a legal permanent resident of the United States for over 30 years. He faces possible deportation after being arrested in March and detained in an ICE jail for 80 days. The Department of Homeland Security claims Sarsour was arrested for lying on his 1993 green card application about a conviction in Israeli military courts when he was a teenager in the occupied West Bank, but Sarsour’s lawyers say he is being targeted by the federal government over his advocacy for Palestinian human rights. Although a judge ordered Sarsour’s release from detention in June, he still faces deportation proceedings set to resume next week.
“In ICE detention,” says Sarsour, “it brought to me these bad memories from my childhood, when I was under the Israeli military occupation and Israeli military rules in Palestine.”
Community members call for the release of Salah Sarsour after his arrest in late March.
Associate Professor of African American Studies at Wayne State University & author of Black Scare Red Scare: Theorizing Capitalist Racism in the United States, Charisse Burden-Stelly, returns to Bad Faith to discuss the new 100 page State Department report accusing American leftist groups of being part of a “sustained campaign of subversion” against the United States. This new Red-Scare blacklist names Code Pink, the DSA, Hasan Piker, Ben Cohen, Zohran Mamdani, and even Maxine Waters. What does this mean for left movements, & does the liberal response to these accusations, which is largely to distance “Communism” from Scandinavian-style social democracy, help or hurt the cause of the socialist left? We examine a series of Red-Scare articles, including a viral Atlantic Piece titled “The DSA Is a Parasite,” along with clips from Jon Stewart, Abdul El-Sayed, & more.
ruthless economic systems, colonial resource extraction, and military priorities directly caused or severely worsened mass starvation. Critics and historians label these events as “human-made” or “artificial” famines because sufficient food existed globally or locally to save the victims, but political decisions blocked its distribution.
Clinton is an Oxford man: Five years ago . . . . .Rhodes Scholar Talbott’s Hand Revealed in Russia Gate, The Only Foreign Interference America Should Worry About is British
Talbott himself may be American by blood, but thoroughly British in spirit. Both he and Clinton were Rhodes Scholars at Oxford in the 1970s and were joined by dozens of other Rhodes Scholars who flooded into the White House in 1992.
While appearing on the surface to oppose the brute force approach of the neoconservative Straussians, the Rhodes Scholar nests have distinguished themselves over the past century by promoting a world order that saw a more technocratic/Malthusian system of controls with the USA playing a subservient position in the Great Game. The Straussian neocons on the other hand aimed at a post-nation state world order with America acting as the lead and monetarism serving as a ruling religion. The differences between these two outlooks differs only superficially, as both plans involve a global bankers dictatorship controlled by the City of London and both demanded divided world of war, poverty and resource monopolies by an elite that have no allegiance to the USA or any sovereign nation state, per se.
This outlook was expressed by Talbott in a most visceral manner in 1992 when he said:
All countries are basically social arrangements…. No matter how permanent or even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary…. Perhaps national sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all…. But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for world government.
Ain’t no real journalists in this pile:
University of Pennsylvania law professor Amy Wax, who has a history of making inflammatory and racist statements, is drawing public ire again.
[Amy Wax is a tenured professor of law at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School who frequently identifies herself as a white Jewish woman.] Another hemorrhoid Jew.
Driving the news: In an interview with Fox News’ Tucker Carlson last week, she said “non-Western peoples,” and specifically Black Americans, harbor resentment and shame over Western achievements.
She then went on to disparage Asian and South Asian doctors at Penn Medicine, singling out Indian women.
“They are taught that they are better than everybody else because they are Brahmin elites, and yet on some level, their country is a s–thole. … They’ve realized that we’ve outgunned and outclassed them in every way,” she said.
Controlled, man, fucking multimillionaire white shit
“He can stop all legal immigration on his own discretion.”
Judge Andrew Napolitano analyzed President Donald Trump’s immigration pause from developing nations on Monday’s “National Report.”
Napolitano has stated he has never voted for Trump and has not voted for a Republican presidential candidate since Ronald Reagan in 1984. [1]
Hmmmm: We Are Living in the Most Corrupt Democracy That Could Be Imagined
On June 30th 2026, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representative of the American Congress held a Hearing entitled Mind Control and Accountability: Uncovering the Truth of the CIA’s MKULTRA Project. The hearing was led by republican Anna Paulina Luna. In her opening speech she stated:
“This hearing is about the crimes committed by the Central Intelligence Agency against the American citizens and the decades of secrecy used to conceal them.
The American people deserve a complete and truthful record. The victims and their families deserve acknowledgement, and this Congress has a constitutional obligation to ensure that full declassification is not delayed any longer.“ (19:59)
The witness testifying in the hearing Tom O’Neill, the author of the book “Chaos: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties“ stated that renowned American psychiatrist Dr. Louis Jolyon West was working for the MKUltra project. In his career he was examining the assassin of the assassin of John F. Kennedy, Jack Ruby. After his examination, Jack Ruby had suffered an acute psychotic break after which he was no more able to give testimony to investigators and never explained why he killed Lee Harvey Oswald. This psychotic break lasted until his death in 1967.
I’ll take the dirty work of Freud and Bernays any day” =
Edward Bernays defined the concept in his 1947 essay The Engineering of Consent, stating that shaping public opinion is vital for society.
“The engineering of consent is the very essence of the democratic process, the freedom to persuade and suggest.”
“Any person or organization depends ultimately on public approval, and is therefore faced with the problem of engineering the public’s consent to a program or goal.”
“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society.”
Core Ideas
Persuasion as a Tool: Bernays viewed persuasion not as a threat, but as a necessary part of a free society.
Scientific Approach: Action must rely on research and a clear understanding of the public.
Ain’t no House Negro here = THINK JEW Trained.
Buck-Dancing for Zion: Byron Donalds
A DEI hire for the optics, a Zionist errand boy for the donors—inside Byron Donalds’s real agenda.
Like most Republicans in Congress, Donalds is an ardent Zionist. Donalds went to the George Washington University encampment in spring 2024 alongside Lauren Boebert and other House Republicans, confronting demonstrators directly and pressing the university and city officials to clear the site.
He set out his view of the alliance early. In a November 2020 interview with JNS, weeks after his first election to Congress, Donalds said the American relationship with Israel “is the most important one in the region, probably the world.” Israel, he added, “is the one standing country that comports with our values as Americans, and that’s why [the relationship] is vertical.” Pressed on whether that squares with an agenda built on putting American interests first, he argued that “having a strong relationship with Israel is critical for our national security interests as well,” then asked, “I mean, who are we going to share interests with? The Iranians?”
My man, my man:
Rubio said the president is pursuing a head for an eye policy after Iranian attacks killed four US service members, three in a July 17 missile and drone strike on Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan and a fourth the next day during a controlled detonation of a downed Iranian drone in Iraq. Rubio said Iran will pay a very heavy price and claimed the regime is begging the US for a new deal. The US has surged additional fighter jets, troops, and support personnel into the Middle East and used a B1 long range bomber in combat operations against Iran this week. Explosions were reported Thursday in multiple parts of Iran, including Qeshm Island, Ahvaz, and near Bandar Abbas, following another wave of US strikes.
The Origin: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated that Iran’s defense doctrine against aggression is “an eye for an eye”.
The U.S. Response: Rubio replied that President Trump’s approach is “a head for an eye,” meaning any harm or provocation from Iran will be met with much harsher and more destructive force.
MONSTERS of every size:
Rep. Haley Stevens, D-Mich., wants voters to see her as the woman who told ICE “not one penny more.” But as you’ll read below, her anti-ICE position is newfangled. Before opposing ICE was cool, Stevens voted multiple times to support the rogue agency terrorizing American communities.
On the other hand, Stevens’ opponent in the Michigan Senate primary, Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, has opposed ICE from the jump; but his is a position untested by any voting record. That is, El Sayed’s never had a job that required him to chose Aye or Nay on things like, say, federal appropriations for the department of Homeland Security. Stevens has that job and like many Democrats, voted Aye for ICE until it was more popular to vote Nay.
Beginning in 2024, Stevens voted yes on House Resolution 1102, a $1.2 trillion omnibus that kept the government open and funded the Department of Homeland Security — ICE included — through the fiscal year.
In June 2025, she was one of 75 House Democrats to back a resolution condemning the Boulder, Colorado, terror attack that also thanked ICE agents by name for “protecting the homeland.”
And this May, according to El-Sayed’s campaign, she joined 203 House Republicans to pass the Combating Organized Retail Crime Act — legislation that hands ICE a national intelligence hub and sweeping new authority to collect Americans’ personal data under a shoplifting pretext.
Stevens has an answer for the Boulder vote. In a 2026 debate, she called the ICE language “a cynical point” Republicans slipped into a bill about condemning antisemitic violence. “I am always going to stand up to violence,” she said, “and I just wish my opponent wouldn’t pursue the cynical approaches of Republicans.” She has not offered a comparable public defense of the retail-crime vote.
WHAT is the fucking point of interviewing the interviewer?????????
Over and over until the flank steak is so overdone that shoe leather tastes BETTER.
ANd so Marvel Comics is coming to us SOON:
What is missing for the Third Temple in Jerusalem? Did amateur archaeologist, Vendyl Jones, find the Keteret incense, the sacred fragrance of the Holy of Holies, near Qumran in 1992? In this Nelson Walters Bible Study with his expert guest Eliyahu Adam Berkowitz, we examine the religious implications of this holy incense on prophecy, especially in Revelation 8.This presentation examines the 1992 discovery of a substance weighing half a ton, rumored to be the legendary Keteret incense. If confirmed, this would represent a significant archaeological find linked to the Holy of Holies. We review the timeline of the Qumran discovery and assess the claims surrounding this mysterious substance. We examine the religious implications of holy incense.
ANother Comedy SPecialist:
Double Vision:
Now when the Jewish State unveiled its true genocidal nature you want to watch Yoav Shamir’s Defamation. The documentary is a spectacular dig into the depth of the tribal collective psychosis, the role of the holocaust indictrination. This film is really a must watch at this point in time.
Gilad: Finally I find myself agreeing with an Israeli headline. I would just tweak the content slightly:
“Mamdani’s Israel stance sends a warning to Jews” globally: humanity sees us for what we are. There is no way back from a genocide and we are credited with the worst documented one in the whole of human history.
“Mamdani’s call to arrest Israel’s prime minister highlighted a growing divide between” a corrupted and treacherous political class and the global awakening to the lethal danger entangled with our Choseness.
The moral awakening in the face of our human sacrifice orgy in Gaza “raising broader concerns among Jews about the normalization of” humane and ethical discourse amongst goyim in America and beyond.
I guess it will take a while before I am asked to accept the Ynet’s chief editor position.
Gilad: Witness the speed in which they shape-shifting from the ultimate aggressors (credited with the worst documented genocide in human history) into a bunch of a ‘persecuted minority’ /victims … who is going to buy this crap except themselves?
In such a short period of time, we have gone from hearing accusations against Israel about Gaza, “genocide,” and “occupation” to something even darker: the open dehumanization of Jews, the revival of blood libels, and now even public calls for “Jew hunts.”
The recent incident in Italy, where people were encouraged to identify and report Israelis and Jewish Italians, is deeply disturbing. It is symbolic of a much broader trend. The lines between “Israeli,” “Zionist,” and “Jew” are increasingly being erased, with hostility directed at Jews simply because of who they are or because of an assumed connection to Israel.
The speed at which this hatred is escalating is deeply alarming. What was once whispered is now shouted. What was once socially unacceptable is increasingly said without shame, consequence, or restraint.
None of us can predict exactly where this leads. History never repeats itself in exactly the same way. But history does teach us what can happen when hatred is normalized, when lies become accepted as truth, and when society looks away.
Many Jews are asking difficult questions. Will this pass? Is it time to leave? Should we stay? No one can answer those questions for another person.
But I will say this: we all buy life insurance, health insurance, home insurance, flood insurance, and theft insurance. We prepare for events we hope never happen.
Perhaps it’s also time for Jews around the world to ask: What is my contingency plan? What are my options? What is my family’s backup plan if circumstances change?
Some countries will undoubtedly be safer than others. Some communities will face greater challenges than others. But making a plan is not panic. It’s prudence.
Our grandparents and great-grandparents left us many lessons. One of the most important was this: don’t wait until you no longer have choices.
I sincerely hope those preparations are never needed. But hope has never been a strategy.
Ultimately, only victims in the history of the universe + Chosen People supremacist self-worship in their apartheid stolen nation = psychopathic levels of sadistic hate against anyone who dares inconvenience them by simply existing. By the way, how is it the fault of Palestinian Muslims and Christians that their brutal oppressors happen to be Jewish? How does this make them antisemitic? We all saw how the Israelis laughed like hyenas as they starved babies and forced little girls to be amputated without anaesthetic and as they burnt journalists alive and raped doctors in their prisons and as they SLAUGHTERED THIRTY THOUSAND CHILDREN.
An eye for a fucking coven of Jews:
At least four Palestinians have been killed and several others wounded after Israeli settlers, backed by Israeli forces, carried out a series of violent attacks on the occupied West Bank town of Tal, southwest of Nablus.
Jews are the scourge, man: ‘Nowhere is safe’: Fear and mourning inside the West Bank villages where Israeli settlers went on the rampage.
Jews everywhere need their fucking necks sliced and Mercedes burned.
The fresh grave of 17-year-old Omar Hamed, shot dead by settlers at Beitin.
Go find a Jew, hug her or him, and slip them a nice belly-splitting knife.
Pick your fav…..
Old ones?
Pretty beaded ones?
Curvy?
200 years ago, the slaves of Haiti defeated Napoleon’s armies in the historic revolution of 1791-1804. One of their weapons was the very tool they used to work the land: the machete. Papa Machete explores the esoteric martial art that evolved through this victory through the practice and life of a farmer named Alfred Avril. The short film documents his proud devotion to his heritage in the face of bitter poverty, and his efforts to keep this mysterious art alive.
I have written here about how Reich does this with his effort to get us to demand “Equal Opportunity” instead of No-Rich-and-No-Poor.
Today I want to focus on Reich’s call to “Get money out of politics,” which came to me as one of his many emails that I copy in full for your convenience in the footnote below.1 Reich says:
Tell Congress: It’s time to get billionaire wealth out of politics! Overturn Citizens United, tax billionaires’ wealth, and enact meaningful election reform.
As Robert Reich knows damn well, as long as there are billionaires then their money will be in politics no matter what campaign reform laws are passed.
Billionaires have power in our society (that’s what “politics” means: power) because our society is based on money (which is a bad thing for it to be based on as I discuss here) and because in such a society money is power, and billionaires have it and ordinary people do not, duh.
There is not a single major institution in our society—for-profit corporations, not-for-profit corporations, universities, hospitals, newspapers and radio stations and large circulation magazines, the military, Hollywood, and on and on, not to mention the government itself—that billionaires do not control, directly or indirectly.
+—+
My comment . . .
Demons, man, DEMONS . . . Paul Moritz Warburg, a German-Jewish immigrant who was one of the founding fathers of the U.S. Federal Reserve, had a fervent wish that his creation would be seen as one of America’s great monuments — “like the old cathedrals of Europe.”
Warburg’s dream that “the Fed” would become a cherished American institution has never looked more in doubt. The Federal Reserve, which was enacted by Congress in 1913 and set up shop the following year, is today an institution under siege. More surprising perhaps is that the Fed is refighting partisan and ideological battles that Warburg and the other founders thought they had settled a century ago.
Dirt:
Ben Bernanke: Served as Chair of the Federal Reserve from 2006 to 2014.
Alan Greenspan: Served as Chair of the Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006.
Eugene Meyer: Served as Chair of the Federal Reserve from 1930 to 1933.
Janet Yellen: Served as Chair of the Federal Reserve from 2014 to 2018.
Henry Morgenthau Jr.: Treasury Secretary, Board of Governors, 1934 – 1936
So much dirt . . .
Joseph Eugene Stiglitz
Milton Friedman:
Paul Samuelson.
Kenneth Arrow
David Ricardo:
Daniel Kahneman
Claudia Goldin
+–+
The problem is, if GENOCIDE happens in 2026, all over, but with this burning water and sewage and electrical plants in Iran and the daily murder of Gazans, Palestinians, then all bets are off.
RIP:\
Michael Parenti was an American Marxist historian, political scientist, and prolific author whose work focused on class struggle, media hegemony, and anti-imperialism. Best known for seminal works like Democracy for the Few and Blackshirts and Reds, Parenti was a leading “people’s intellectual” who famously bridged the gap between academia and the labor movement. His analysis consistently exposed the capitalist state’s role in managing both domestic exploitation and global empire, making him a central figure in modern Marxist-Leninist and anti-war thought.
The world’s 85 richest individuals possess as much wealth as the 3.5 billion souls who compose the poorer half of the world’s population, or so it was announced in a report by Oxfam International. The assertion sounds implausible to me. I think the 85 richest individuals, who together are worth many hundreds of billions of dollars, must have far more wealth than the poorest half of our global population.
How could these two cohorts, the 85 richest and 3.5 billion poorest, have the same amount of wealth? The great majority of the 3.5 billion have no net wealth at all. Hundreds of millions of them have jobs that hardly pay enough to feed their families. Millions of them rely on supplements from private charity and public assistance when they can. Hundreds of millions are undernourished, suffer food insecurity, or go hungry each month, including many among the very poorest in the United States.
Most of the 3.5 billion earn an average of $2.50 a day. The poorest 40 percent of the world population accounts for just 5 percent of all global income. About 80 percent of all humanity live on less than $10 a day. And the poorest 50 percent maintain only 7.2 percent of the world’s private consumption. How exactly could they have accumulated an amount of surplus wealth comparable to the 85 filthy richest?
Hundreds of millions live in debt even in “affluent” countries like the United States. They face health care debts, credit card debts, college tuition debts, and so on. Many, probably most who own homes— and don’t live in shacks or under bridges or in old vans— are still straddled with mortgages. This means their net family wealth is negative, minus-zero. They have no propertied wealth; they live in debt.
Millions among the poorest 50 percent in the world may have cars but most of them also have car payments. They are driving in debt. In countries like Indonesia, for the millions without private vehicles, there are the overloaded, battered buses, poorly maintained vehicles that specialize in breakdowns and ravine plunges. Among the lowest rungs of the 50 percent are the many who pick through garbage dumps and send their kids off to work in grim, soul-destroying sweatshops.
The 85 richest in the world probably include the four members of the Walton family (owners of Wal-Mart, among the top ten superrich in the USA) who together are worth over $100 billion. Rich families like the DuPonts have controlling interests in giant corporations like General Motors, Coca-Cola, and United Brands. They own about forty manorial estates and private museums in Delaware alone and have set up 31 tax-exempt foundations. The superrich in America and in many other countries find ways, legal and illegal, to shelter much of their wealth in secret accounts. We don’t really know how very rich the very rich really are.
Regarding the poorest portion of the world population— whom I would call the valiant, struggling “better half”—what mass configuration of wealth could we possibly be talking about? The aggregate wealth possessed by the 85 super-richest individuals, and the aggregate wealth owned by the world’s 3.5 billion poorest, are of different dimensions and different natures. Can we really compare private jets, mansions, landed estates, super luxury vacation retreats, luxury apartments, luxury condos, and luxury cars, not to mention hundreds of billions of dollars in equities, bonds, commercial properties, art works, antiques, etc.— can we really compare all that enormous wealth against some millions of used cars, used furniture, and used television sets, many of which are ready to break down? Of what resale value if any, are such minor durable-use commodities? especially in communities of high unemployment, dismal health and housing conditions, no running water, no decent sanitation facilities, etc. We don’t really know how poor the very poor really are.
Millions of children who number in the lower 50 percent never see the inside of a school. Instead they labor in mills, mines and on farms, under conditions of peonage. Nearly a billion people are unable to read or write. The number of people living in poverty is growing at a faster rate than the world’s population. So poverty is spreading even as wealth accumulates. It is not enough to bemoan this enormous inequality, we must also explain why it is happening.
But for now, let me repeat: the world’s richest 85 individuals do not have the same amount of accumulated wealth as the world’s poorest 50 percent. They have vastly more. The multitude on the lower rungs—even taken as a totality—have next to nothing.
OH NO, the JEW has a new book, and he lives in Jew York City, and he is bound to get plenty of bookstore assists.
[Pragmatic stance: Finkelstein has long characterized the two-state settlement (aligned with pre-1967 borders) as the practical, achievable compromise supported by the international community to end immediate suffering.
Personal ideals: He has described himself as preferring a broader humanist or “no states” outlook rather than identifying strictly with state-based nationalism]
Israel’s genocide in Gaza is heavily dependent upon rhetorical obfuscation of facts. From the highest echelons of international institutions and their officials to international human rights organisations, Palestinians in Gaza have been betrayed on several levels.
Finkelstein commences with historical and political details that place Gaza under continuous scrutiny.
Noting Gaza’s obliteration since October 2023, Finkelstein writes, “But since Gaza emerged as a distinct entity after Israel’s ethnic cleansing in 1948, it’s always been a forbidding place.”
This detail in the book’s prologue is a stark reminder of how Gaza is perpetually portrayed. The more Gaza was portrayed as isolated, the easier it was for Israel to launch its periodic bombardments, which, as the author notes, each “typically picked up where the last one left off except at a qualitatively higher level of death and destruction.”
While Israel carried out its periodic ethnic cleansing, it was also able to sustain its narrative of Hamas as a threat, despite its attempts at diplomacy, cooperation with international law and endorsing popular peaceful resistance.
“By 2023, Gaza had vanished from the stage of international politics,” Finkelstein writes.
Yet what happened since October 2023 would see the continuation of an international endeavour that protected not only Israel’s fabricated security narrative, but also its genocide in Gaza.
From false claims to mellowing genocide into war and violations, international institutions and human rights organisations carried out a large-scale diminishing of Israel’s genocidal atrocities and promoted fabricated claims and assertions, even as the evidence inside Gaza continued to pile up.
One example is the UN’s endorsement in a 2024 report of Israel’s very early, unfounded claim that Hamas used rape as a weapon of war on 7 October 2023.
+—+
Perverted Fantasies: Following the revelation that the book was fictional, some literary critics accused Kosiński of using the historical backdrop of the Holocaust as a shield to write pornographic and sadomasochistic fantasies involving children.
Plagiarism Accusations: His literary reputation was further damaged by a famous 1982 exposé in The Village Voice, which accused him of plagiarism and using uncredited ghostwriters to compose his books.
Graphic Content: The boy witnesses and is subjected to extreme depravity, including torture, bestiality, incest, rape, and pedophilia.
Spend a few minutes reading this… Lying for the cause, inventing a past that fits with their present aspirations is a kosher adventure..
On a funny note, doesn’t he look a bit like Elie Wiesel? He clearly performing a similar affinity- selling fictional narratives as history…
I recently came across someone sharing “The Painted Bird” as fact and a story of survival against savages, I’d like to clarify a few things and discuss the truth of his life and how lies can shape reality, history, and perceptions:
“I remember, many years ago, speaking with a Jewish lawyer from New York about Kosinski’s book The Painted Bird. This lawyer, based partly on the book, held the firm belief that Poles were almost sub-human. When he mentioned Kosinski’s description of eyes being torn out in a scene that would seem ‘appropriate’ in a Polish household, I responded, much to his discomfort, that such a scene would be as out of place in a Polish home as it would be in an American one. I added that the only Poles I had ever known were intelligent, civilized, and cultured. He didn’t respond, but his expression suggested that I had just told him something entirely impossible.” – James Park Sloan
Kosinski’s “The Painted Bird” portrayed Poles as inhumane, savage beings, which was and is a horrendous misrepresentation of the very people who risked their lives to save him. The real issue with the book? It’s full of lies, and unfortunately, many bought into it. Many in the Jewish community and Americans in general became captivated by Kosinski and his narrative of wartime suffering at the hands of the “Polish beasts.” The book became a bestseller, shaping the perception of wartime Poland and how Jews were allegedly treated.
The truth is starkly different. Kosinski’s experiences, as he wrote them, were fabricated. Siedlecka, a Pole who knew him and his family personally, reveals that Kosinski spent much of the war living in relative safety and comfort, thanks to the help of Polish families. She describes his father as a crafty survivor (whose life was saved by Poles) with little moral compass, willing to do anything to stay safe, including collaborating with the Germans. After the war, at the liberation of Dabrowa, Kosinski’s father collaborated with the NKVD and the Red Army, sending those who had helped him to Siberia for minor offenses like hoarding.
Still, the real tragedy lies in the actions of Jerzy Kosinski himself. He turned his back on the Polish families who had sheltered him and vilified them, as well as the entire Polish nation, to the world. According to Siedlecka, during the war, young Jerzy Kosinski spent his time enjoying the comforts of sausages and cocoa, luxuries unavailable to his neighbors’ children, within the safety of his home, far removed from the hardship endured by those who risked everything to protect him.
Sadly, Kosinski’s fabricated portrayal of wartime Poland became the narrative many people accepted about the country under German occupation, shaping perceptions for an entire generation. At the peak of his career, some even predicted that Kosinski might win a Nobel Prize. The German edition of his book was an immediate success.
So, if you’re curious about how history becomes shaped by misrepresentation and how stereotypes are born, you can look at people like Kosinski. But I assure you, he was not the only one responsible. It’s crucial for everyone to exercise due diligence before accepting such accounts as factual or forming opinions about an entire group of people.
“The Painted Bird” unfairly and falsely portrayed Poles, shaping a distorted and harmful narrative that still shapes perspectives today
+—+
Moving on . . .
“They’d (U.S. backed opposition candidates) love to win elections so they can profit from selling off the schools. But they can forget it. There won’t be any more elections here, no more elections for them to try and seize the government, to seize power … We are going to work, with the National Assembly and the relevant organizations, on the laws, because we need to create laws that will put up a wall, a barrier, against the coup-plotters, against those who sell off their country, and no matter how much money the Yankees give them, they won’t succeed! They won’t succeed! They won’t succeed!”
Nicaraguan co-president Rosario Murillo further clarified that what Ortega was referring to was preventing foreign interference in Nicaragua, not cancelling elections altogether, saying:
The history of the electoral processes here was established, designed, directed, and guided by the United States. That is history. That is the kind of election that will never return to Nicaragua.
That kind of election that goes against the people will not come back, will never return to Nicaragua. Elections, yes, but our own elections, and when we say our own, we mean elections of our blessed people, designed and organized based on our national sovereignty, based on our national dignity, to elect the best Nicaraguans, those who know about struggle and honor. Blessed, free, dignified, sovereign elections
In his speech, Daniel Ortega accused the U.S. deep state of conspiring with opposition figures in the United States to interfere in Nicaragua, saying, “Don’t think that just because there’s no war we’re at peace… No! They’re constantly conspiring, organizing, looking for a way to create political parties so that in an election they’re supposed to hold, those parties will win. And here this is the end of the history of parties installed by the Yankees, installed by the Somoza regime supporters, ever coming back to power”.
Ortega’s accusations were outright confirmed by Damon Wilson, the current head of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), a cutout of the CIA’s regime change arm.
He admitted that the National Endowment for Democracy was actively “supporting” Nicaraguan opposition figures and will continue to do so, saying:
NEDemocracy will continue supporting those who peacefully defend fundamental freedoms and the right of every Nicaraguan to choose their own leaders and determine their country’s future.
The Ortega-Murillo regime may seek to abolish elections, but it cannot abolish the Nicaraguan people’s desire for democracy. We will stand with them until that right is restored.
And I WANT to live in Nicaragua, and this is the Jewish Rubio Plan . . . again and again?
During the NED sponsored coup in 2018, journalist John Perry on the ground wrote, “Public buildings and the houses of government supporters were burnt down by protesters; shops were ransacked; most businesses and all banks and schools were closed. The main secondary school for 3,700 pupils was burnt out twice. The police station was under siege for 45 days, so no police were on patrol. No cars or taxis could use the streets; passing the barricades on foot involved being checked by youths with weapons and on occasion threatened. Dissent was met with violence (before the barricades went up, I took part in a “peace” march which was pelted with stones). At first protesters had homemade mortars, but later many acquired more serious weapons such as AK-47s; paid troublemakers manned the barricades at night-time. A police official captured nearby was tortured and then killed, his body burnt at a barricade”.
2018 John Perry to the Syphilitic Guardian . . .
“I live in the city of Masaya, which was under opposition control for three months, with the streets blocked by hundreds of barricades. Here, briefly, is what happened.
Public buildings and the houses of government supporters were burnt down by protesters; shops were ransacked; most businesses and all banks and schools were closed. The main secondary school for 3,700 pupils was burnt out twice. The police station was under siege for 45 days, so no police were on patrol. No cars or taxis could use the streets; passing the barricades on foot involved being checked by youths with weapons and on occasion threatened. Dissent was met with violence (before the barricades went up, I took part in a “peace” march which was pelted with stones). At first protesters had homemade mortars, but later many acquired more serious weapons such as AK-47s; paid troublemakers manned the barricades at night-time. A police official captured nearby was tortured and then killed, his body burnt at a barricade.
Although the police, who regained control of the city on 17 July, were well armed, there were only three casualties, including a policeman. People came out on the streets, dancing, singing and offering the police food and drink (similar scenes occurred elsewhere). Of course, the community remains very divided but, contrary to your reports, Masaya is far more peaceful than it was when under the control of the protesters. Before April, indeed, Nicaragua was one of the safest countries in Latin America; we look forward to it recovering that status very soon.” — John Perry, Masaya, Nicaragua
Oh god, Mehdi, the fucking crackpot calling the kettle black . . . .
[Mehdi challenges Mark Warner, the pro-Israel vice-chair of the Senate Intel Committee, on why he won’t say genocide, the future of ICE, and whether the Dems should be the ‘antiwar party.’]
After months of Donald Trump claiming that he would end the illegal war in Iran within two weeks, the U.S. and Iran are once again trading strikes as nuclear deal negotiations have collapsed.
And to make matters worse, this war – like most of Trump’s claims – is based on a lie.
Vice Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee and Virginia Democratic Senator Mark Warner tells Mehdi: “I’ve seen all the intelligence. There was no imminent threat [from Iran]. And this was a war of choice.”
As Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth took to Capitol Hill this week to beg for a near $70 billion in additional funding for the war, Sen. Warner sounds the alarm on just how inept Donald Trump has been at handling the conflict: “There’s not been an organized, straightforward plan, and his unwillingness to come before Congress or go to the American people and say, ‘Here’s what I want to do with this war’ is crazy.”
But Iran isn’t all the two discuss. In this wide-ranging interview, Mehdi also presses Sen. Warner on:
Whether he regrets his vote for Marco Rubio as Secretary of State
His recent vote in favor of selling bombs to Israel while opposing the sale of bulldozers
Whether he believes Israel is committing a genocide in Gaza
The Sudan, Rohingya, and Uyghur genocides, in comparison to Gaza
Why he still takes AIPAC money
Trump’s bogus election interference claims and the ‘five-alarm fire’ about ‘corrupt’ elections
And his position on the future of ICE.
Paid subscribers can watch the full 27-minute interview above, while free subscribers can access a two-minute preview. Consider upgrading your subscription to never hit a Zeteo paywall again!
[Oh, my, oh, my, two minutes is all you fucking NEED!]
Over 4,200 Israeli settlers storm Al-Aqsa , , , Drop Site Daily: July 23, 2026
Look closely — Sean Penn, Sandler, Ben Stiller, you name the fucking whore face, they will be seen here. What’s the fly’s name? The other fucker? All fucking Jewish Settlers.
Is that Che there?
Ahh, is Iran now off limits, in terms of calling out the terror campaign of fucking USA mercenaries?
A new wave of U.S. strikes hit sites across Iran starting on Wednesday night, killing at least two and striking additional civilian and energy infrastructure.
A U.S. missile destroyed an asphalt storage depot in the western Iranian state of Khuzestan on Wednesday night, and explosions were reported around Ahvaz.
A U.S. missile also hit the Shalamcheh border crossing, at the Iran-Iraq border, according to Iraqi officials, killing two people in a nearby rest facility. Iranian officials said the border crossing, used frequently by religious pilgrims, remained functional.
Several explosions were heard in Ziyarat, near the southern coastal city of Sirik, according to Tasnim, with additional explosions heard in Bandar Mahshah.
Iran’s Health Ministry reported on Wednesday the death toll from U.S. airstrikes since June 6 had risen to 53, with 592 people wounded. Among those killed were six women and three children.
QUEER»»>
I’m getting this from a Substacker . . .
I’m not too sure the idea of fighting a rich man’s war is in their minds. I would think that if that were the case, they would not have joined. But they are there to fight for their country and all the BS the country is supposed to stand for. They know that this is not what this war is about.
If they refuse to go, there’s a nice fat court-martial awaiting them. If they go AWAL (AWOL), that will follow them the rest of their lives. If they sabotage the ship and start a laundry fire, someone’s head is gonna roll. If they hide in their barracks or hotel rooms, they will be labeled cowards. If they write their congressperson, they will be ignored. If they blow the whistle on how they are not being protected, they will face fierce punishment. (I just saw a video of an Iranian missile attack posted supposedly by a U.S. soldier).
Video descriptions: Insane close-range footage filmed by a U.S. soldier captures Iranian missiles slamming into Muwaffaq Salti Airbase in Jordan.
Company morale is in the toilet. I feel for them. My heart aches for them. I shed a tear for them. They are blatantly being used as cannon fodder for the rich a-holes who do not care about them at all. These a-holes are making big money trading on the petro-dollar.
The soldiers? Well, they are between a rock and a hard place at this point.
No amount of BS coming from Hegseth, Trump or anyone else who is calling them heroes is gonna change that for them on the ground. No medal of honor will erase the pictures in their heads of their fellow soldiers being blown to bits in front of their eyes. No medal of honor will restore their lost limbs, cure their traumatic brain injuries, overcome their PTSD, heal their family relationships, keep them from being homeless begging in the streets, stop them from hiding during the fireworks displays, keep them from having suicidal ideations, pay for their exorbitant medical bills, stop them trembling through the night due to a barrage of nightmarish dreams or any of the other consequences of the hell they face while fighting these rich man’s wars.
The Navy beat its recruiting goal for new sailors this year, signing up 45,000 new recruits. The service announced the milestone earlier this month. It’s the highest number of people signing up for the Navy in roughly two decades.
“Today’s Navy is stronger because tens of thousands of Americans chose to answer the call to serve,” Rear Adm. Jim Waters, the head of Navy Recruiting Command, said. “Reaching this milestone is not simply about achieving a recruiting objective – it’s about delivering the talented Sailors our Fleet needs to maintain readiness in an increasingly complex security environment.”
“Coast Guard exceeds fiscal year 2025 recruiting goals, achieves highest numbers since 1991”
Some of us WANT 10,000 coffins draped in US China made flags….
Might as well get your news from Hartmann: LOOK at all those BOOKS!
Trouble’s brewing inside the Trump White House, with staffers leaking details of growing friction between the president and Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin. One Republican senator is now publicly admitting that Trump’s war with Iran has left America worse off and that his party will “probably” pay for it in November. Mitch McConnell’s hometown paper just published a pre-obituary laying out why the 84 year-old senator will be remembered as one of the most destructive figures in American politics. And a rural Texas border town is now suing the Trump administration, arguing its border wall could ruin the entire community.
Heroes fuckers like Thom would never admit to: Encelia sent a distress call reporting it had been struck by a missile off Jizan, on Saudi Arabia’s southern Red Sea coast near the Yemen border. British risk firm Vanguard said the ship was hit on its right side, about 80 miles southwest of Al Shuqaiq, another Saudi coastal city.
Ansarallah strikes two tankers in the Red Sea: Ansarallah forces said on Thursday they had struck two Saudi oil tankers in the Red Sea with ballistic and cruise missiles and drones, setting both vessels on fire.
The group identified the tankers as Encelia and Layla, saying they had violated its ban on Saudi-linked shipping. Saudi Arabia later confirmed the attack on the Encelia.
UKMTO separately confirmed a tanker had been struck by an unknown projectile 70 nautical miles southwest of Al-Shuqaiq, Saudi Arabia, causing an onboard fire. No casualties or environmental damage were reported.
Ansarallah also claimed roughly 10 ships have already turned back since it imposed a blockade on Saudi ships, vowing to continue enforcing its “siege with siege” policy.
At least nine vessels have made U-turns to avoid the Bab al-Mandab strait as a result of Ansarallah’s blockade, according to the AFP.
Reuters reported on Wednesday that five vessels, four of them oil tankers, changed course in the Red Sea on Wednesday.
You’re in the Army NOW:
House narrowly passes $95 billion budget for Iran war: House Republicans narrowly passed their $95 billion budget blueprint 216 to 214 on Wednesday to fund the Iran war and impose new voting restrictions, with two Republicans—Reps. Thomas Massie (Ky.), Warren Davidson (Ohio)—voting against it.
The measure will provide up to $73 billion in additional military funding for the U.S. campaign against Iran, with $12 billion allocated for farmers and $10 billion for Trump’s voting restrictions.
You’re in the Israeli Offensive and Occupation Murder Forces NOW, you fucking American incels…
House passes NDAA: The U.S. House of Representatives passed the $1.1 trillion National Defense Authorization Act 216–212 on Wednesday, with six Democrats—Henry Cuellar, Don Davis, Jared Golden, Vicente Gonzalez, Adam Gray,and Marie Gluesenkamp Perez—voting yes and seven Republicans voting no. The measure includes Section 219, which more tightly integrates the U.S. military intelligence and the defense industrial base with Israel.
The bill makes U.S. military support for Israel easier and more institutionalized. It creates a Pentagon office tasked with accelerating U.S.-Israeli military technology cooperation, including joint R&D, testing, co-production, data sharing, and moving jointly developed technology into procurement.
Separately, it extends through 2029 an existing authority allowing the U.S. to transfer weapons already stored in its War Reserve Stockpile in Israel. That authority can permit transfers without Congress voting on each shipment, with Congress only receiving notification under the underlying law.
By 1914, as we have already seen, the interests of Britain and the Anglo-Persian Oil Company had become inseparable, and British foreign policy and the Rothschild Banking family foreign policy became one and the same. During this period of purported U.S. neutrality from 1914 to 1917, American sentiment was shifted gradually but inexorably toward a pro-Ally, pro-war position, first because of the sophisticated British propaganda campaign, and later from the increasing pressure from business and corporate elite on both sides of the Atlantic who had a financial and commercial stake in a British and French victory.
American business was soon booming from the war in Europe. Between 1914 and 1917, the American GNP was up 20% and manufacturing was up 40%. Allied Powers purchased over 3 billion dollars in wartime orders and borrowed over 2 billion dollars in bonds, compared to twenty million in Central power bonds. The British surface naval blockade of Germany ensured that American trade was almost exclusively with the Allies.
As early as 1915, the United States, not yet involved in the War, had loaned France and Great Britain millions of dollars through American banks. Had Germany won, those bonds held by American bankers would have been worthless. By the spring of 1917, American bankers had loaned the Allies almost $3 billion dollars plus another $6 billion for exports, and the steel, munitions, chemical and agricultural industries had all become dependent on the war for profit. Lastly, some of the democrats (and Woodrow Wilson’s biggest financial backers) had vested personal financial interests with Britain and France. How did this happen?
The financial aspect of the conflict which became known as World War One is too vast to relate here with the respect the subject deserves, but let it suffice to point out that World War One elevated approximately 21,000 US investors into the brackets of millionaires and billionaires. The Rockefellers alone, who displayed great eagerness for the US to enter World War One on the British side, made in excess of $200,000,000 from that conflict, and in just one afternoon during the war, Bernard Baruch, Wilson’s Czar of American Industry and part of the commission that handled all purchasing for the Allies during the war, made a personal profit of $750,000.
The Federal Reserve System, which began operations in 1914, was the vehicle which in effect forced the American people, without them even knowing it, to lend the Allies twenty-five billion dollars in loans which went unpaid, although the interest on the loans was indeed paid… to New York bankers. The cartel of the Rothschilds and the Bank of England and other London banking houses which ultimately controlled the Federal Reserve Banks through their controlling amounts of bank stock (along with that of their subsidiary firms in New York, J.P. Morgan Co. and Kuhn, Loeb & Co., etc.) directed the successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress. These very firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914.
The banking and business elites salivating for war included J. Henry Schroder Banking Company, the Rockefellers, the Eugene Meyer family, J.P. Morgan, Alex Brown & Sons, Kuhn Loeb & Co., the Rothschilds, the Warburgs, the Baruch and Guggenheim families and a few others who weaved a tightly connected web of power, money, arms and influence for their own financial gains. Their mutual influence on world affairs often crossed as they financed all sides for a continual, profit rendering conflict.
J. P. Morgan, Jr., one of the signatories to the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913, played a prominent role in the financial aspects of war-mongering. It was he who made the first loan of $12,000,000 to Russia, and in 1915, a loan of $50,000,000 to the French Government. All of the munitions purchases in the United States by the British were made through one of his firms, and he organized a syndicate of about 2,200 banks and floated a loan of $500,000,000 to the Allies.
J.P. Morgan also received the proceeds of the First Liberty Loan to pay off $400,000,000 which he in turn advanced to Great Britain at the outbreak of war. By 1917, the Morgans and Kuhn, Loeb Company had floated a billion and a half dollars in loans to the Allies. The bankers also financed a slew of pro-war (disingenuously named “peace”) organizations which prodded US citizens to become involved in the War. The “Commission for Relief in Belgium” made up grisly atrocity stories against the Germans, while a Carnegie organization called the “League to Enforce Peace” (later, the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace) agitated in Washington for US entry into war.
Sometimes, the bankers financed both sides. The Rothschilds’ agents, the Warburg banking house, were financing the Kaiser. Paul Warburg, a naturalized citizen from Germany who had been decorated by the Kaiser in 1912, was vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. He had also handled large sums furnished by Germany for Lenin and Trotsky while his brother Max (who was Kaiser Wilhelm’s personal banker) was the leader of the German espionage system! It was this brother, Max, who authorized Lenin’s train to pass through the lines and execute the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Jacob Schiff, like the Warburgs, also had two brothers in Germany during the war, Philip and Ludwig, who also were active as bankers to the German Government.
The Rothschilds meanwhile bought the German news agency, Wolff, to further control the flow of information to the German people and what the rest of the world would hear from inside Germany. One of the leading executives of Wolff was none other than Max Warburg! The Rothschilds would later buy an interest in the Havas news agency in France and Reuters in London. The tentacles of the banking families reached deep into the power elites: Dr. von Bethmann Hollweg, was the son of Moritz Bethmann from the Frankfurt banking family of Frankfurt, a cousin of the Rothschilds.
Kuhn, Loeb & Co. represented the Rothschild interests in the US, and along with the Harrimans, the Goulds and the Rockefellers, became the dominant powers in the railroad and America financial world while they war-mongered to fatten themselves even more. The first available appointment on the Supreme Court of the United States which Woodrow Wilson filled was given to Kuhn-Loeb lawyer Louis Brandeis who had been selected by Jacob Schiff to carry on war agitation. Through marriage, the Kuhn Loeb Company managed to twine itself throughout the U.S. Food Administration, the British Secret Service and the Wilson White House. And on and on and on it went, like a ball of twine, tangling and tying the bankers, their progeny and their friends together for war and profits.
On October 13, 1917, Woodrow Wilson stated: “It is manifestly imperative that there should be a complete mobilization of the banking reserves of the United States. The burden and the privilege (of the Allied loans) must be shared by every banking institution in the country. I believe that cooperation on the part of the banks is a patriotic duty at this time, and that membership in the Federal Reserve System is a distinct and significant evidence of patriotism.”
That “patriotism” served the bankers and their cronies well, although it did little for the people of America who sacrificed their sons, fathers, brothers and husbands to a bloody, needless war.
The Lusitania: The Ship That Helped Launch Millions of Deaths
When the Lusitania was launched, she was intended to be the largest, fastest ship ever built, doing better than 25 knots at top speed. Britain had enjoyed naval superiority since 1815, but was gravely impacted by the popularity and financial success of the German luxury liners of Hamburg-Amerika and Norddeutscher Lloyd, and she hoped that Lusitania would restore her sagging reputation. Her maiden voyage was on September 7, 1907 and for the next nine years, the Lusitania crossed the Atlantic 100 times. Her 101st voyage on May 7, 1915 would be her last.
In 1903, British Prime Minister Balfour had authorized the 20-year loan for £2.6 million at 2.5% interest for Cunard to construct both Lusitania and Mauretania. When they were completed, Cunard was given a subsidy of £150,000 for maintaining both ships in a state of war readiness.
Under the command of Captain William Thomas Turner, Lusitania sank within an astonishing 18 minutes of being hit by a German U-boat. Over 1,000 people aboard died because of the quickness of the sinking, including 124 out of 159 Americans on board. There were greater maritime tragedies, but none provided such a perfect opportunity for pro-war propaganda, and probably never before had the innocent dead been as quickly and blatantly exploited. Sir Gilbert Parker, the member of the British propaganda bureau in charge of information and propaganda aimed at the USA, used the occasion to rush the infamously dishonest “Bryce Report of German Atrocities” into print within five days after the sinking, with the sole aim of bringing the USA into the war on Britain’s side.
The American media parroted British reports that the Germans had fired two torpedoes at the ship without any prior warnings. There had been clear, repeated warnings beforehand, however, and even on April 24, 1915, German officials had published notices in forty US newspapers that a state of war existed between Germany and Britain and that passengers would be travelling at their own risk. The public had no idea that British passenger ships would also be carrying implements of war intended for use against Germany, thus making them targets.
From the onset of war in 1914, Britain’s horrendous blockade on Germany under First Lord of the Admiralty Winston Churchill prevented even food from being imported into Germany and brought death, starvation and malnutrition to thousands of people. The British blockade violated the tenets of generally accepted international law which had been codified by several international agreements of the previous two centuries and is believed to have caused up to a million German civilian deaths. U.S. Senator Robert LaFollette pointed out, in vain, that food blockades violated international law and struck at America’s rights as a neutral power. LaFollette even cited an admission by Lord Salisbury, one of England’s prominent statesmen, that “food for the civilian population was never contraband… a principle that the English were callously ignoring in their blockade of Germany.”
Not only were the British employing the blockade to stop, destroy or confiscate ships carrying cargo to Germany, they also disguised warships as merchant ships, used neutral flags as cover (Q-ships), and armed merchant ships, giving them orders to ram German U-boats. This turned every British merchant ship into a warship in the opinion of Germany, who had objected to this policy in vain. The Royal Navy showed its own disregard of civilians by loading passenger ships with weapons.
Come on Ansarallah! More wrecks for fucking divers like myself to enjoy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ahh, no protection for Palestinians in Israel, or here, in the USA, for sure, from the Jews, it seems . . . No sheltering Gazans, or Palestinians . . .
You shall destroy everything which may be of benefit to the Germans.
You shall delay all transport.
You shall boycott German and Italian films and papers.
You must not shop at Nazis’ stores.
You shall treat traitors for what they are worth.
You shall protect anyone chased by the Germans.
Even though Denmark had declared neutrality in the Second World War, on April 9, 1940, Germany invaded, taking the country without firing a shot. The Danish government remained largely intact. At the time, it seemed Germany would win the war and while some in the Danish government were actually Nazi sympathizers, many believed that cooperation was the best way to protect the people. However, many Danes felt the lack of opposition to the takeover jeopardized the soul of the nation.
Displays of nationalism:
These did not directly challenge the occupation, but they united the Danish.
Songs: Huge groups of people gathered to sing anthems about Danish history.
National pride in the King: Crowds gathered as he took his daily horse rides through the streets.
Marches: People marched in the streets at times after leaving on strike, often met with violence.
Slowdowns: Workers delayed and stalled production of Nazi war materials. Sabotage: Several sabotage groups formed that targeted Nazi production and engaged in tactics like burning freight trains, blowing up and raiding factories, destroying train tracks.
Strikes: Workers went on strike across the country, walking off the job completely, or sometimes for part of the day. Often work stoppages would start at a factory and spread to include fishermen, police, firefighters, office workers, civil servants, etc.
BY OPPONENT
Two-minute strikes: At various points, the Freedom Council would call for everyone to stop whatever they were doing for two minutes. Entire cities would come to a standstill with no one or nothing moving. This demonstrated to the Nazis a united display of solidarity and strength and empowered the Danes themselves.
“Go-home early” campaigns: when strikes had been banned, workers creatively said they needed to go home early to water their gardens. Called the “People’s Strike,” this turned into street protests that lasted for many days, only ending with concessions from the Nazis.
Protecting Jews: One of the greatest Danish accomplishments was protecting almost all 8,000 Jewish Danes. When word was leaked that the Jews would be rounded up, a messenger service was organized in one day to sound the alarm. Thousands of non-Jewish Danes stepped in to hide them and fishermen smuggled to Sweden all but around 400 Jews.
Military Intelligence: Members of the small Danish military made contact with British Intelligence in Sweden and provided critical information about the Germans’ war plans.
After first agreeing to many changes demanded by the Nazis, all Danish government officials eventually resigned after a Nazi ultimatum came in 1943 to enforce eight specific measures:
prohibit strikes,
ban public meetings of more than five people,
prohibit private meetings in closed rooms or outside,
impose a night curfew,
confiscate all weapons,
put censorship in German hands,
establish a court to deal with infractions of these demands,
and impose the death penalty for sabotage.
At one point, the Nazis cut off all water, gas, and electricity to Copenhagen, and many times strikes and marches were violently repressed, incurring Danish deaths and casualties. Partway through the occupation, much of the Danish police force shifted their allegiance to the resistance. Close to 10,000 policemen were arrested by the Nazis, who began infiltrating and arresting resistance groups, burning out their hideouts, and torturing and executing even teenagers.
And here’s yet another form of Nazism — Banks. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has a message about the stock market: the risks are “bigger than people think.” With the market shrugging at geopolitical instability and a re-acceleration in inflation, Dimon seems to suggest that investors have gotten comfortable. There’s another big problem, too: whether the gains, mostly in AI names, can stick.
SABOTAGE: This is how the Bankers and Totalitarians see us, and here is yet another Jewish boy writing about it:
Look at those Danish commandments NOW:
You must not go to work for any company making weapons or supporting war, whether in the genocide in Gaza or wherever.
You shall do a bad job for all the fucking companies that are part of the death machine, the sanctions regime, the penury capitalism collective.
You shall work slowly for any fucking boss or corporation who wants 50, 60, 80 hours a week out of you.
You shall destroy important data, files, electronic surveillance machines and tools.
You shall destroy everything which may be of benefit to the Captains of Industry, the Jews, the Goyim, billionaires or millionaires alike..
You shall delay all transport through hacking transportation hubs, airline routes, ticketing, all of it, use all digital tools and burning tires necessary.
You shall boycott Holly-Dirt films, software applications, books, newspapers, websites, musicians in the employ of the Genocidiers and others.
You must not shop at Nazis’ stores — Nazis’ being the Jewish State of Israel and all companies that do biz with the Jewish State of Starvation and Thirst and Terror.
You shall treat traitors for what they are worth.
You shall protect anyone chased by the ICE, ACAB, FBI, ATF, Sheriff Departments, Homeland Security, et al.
AND THIS IS PURE BULLSHIT: White Man’s House! The Israel issue flips. From unthinkable to mainstream.
Last week, House Republicans tried to embarrass Democrats by offering a floor amendment ending all military aid to Israel. But then 103 House Democrats, more than half of the Democratic caucus, voted for the amendment as a badge of honor. They included former Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Democratic Whip Katherine Clark of Massachusetts.
In the space of a few weeks, the Israel issue has finally flipped. The critics have become the mainstream and the defenders of Israel are now the outliers. Polls show that 58 percent of Democratic voters say the U.S. is too supportive of Israel and 52 percent call Israel’s actions in Gaza genocide.
All this has consequences, both for Israel and for domestic politics. Progressive Democrats, who have been winning a string of primaries mainly on pocketbook issues, have long been attacked as overly critical of Israel. But now, criticism of Israel is increasingly the dominant Democratic position, while support from AIPAC and affiliated political action committees has become toxic.
We got deadenders in AmeriKKKa, even the richest one:
The world’s richest man stood before the cameras and declared war on waste.
“$50 million for condoms in Gaza,” Elon Musk thundered. “Condoms for Hamas. They’ve used them to make bombs.”
It was a lie. But it was a lie with teeth. A lie that would go on to contribute to hundreds of thousands of deaths across the developing world.
The “Gaza” Musk was talking about wasn’t the war zone in Palestine. It was Gaza Province, Mozambique—a region drowning in one of the worst HIV epidemics on Earth. The $50 million wasn’t for condoms. It was for life-saving HIV treatment for a population where one in four adults carry the virus. By the time anyone bothered to check the facts, the damage was done—and it was catastrophic.
Look at the fucking Young Turks: US is involved in military confrontation with Iran? Nah, the operative words include a TERROR Campaign using Paid-For US Uniformed Mercenaries.
Houthi Movement? In Ansar Allah’s world, the current battle is one iteration of an eternal battle posited in the Quran between Muslims and their enemies, the Christians and Jews, which Ansar Allah identifies today as the United States and Israel.
The Iranian-backed Houthi movement in Yemen has found a way to tighten the squeeze on global energy markets at the worst possible moment. By announcing a blockade of Saudi oil shipments passing through the Bab el-Mandeb strait at the southern end of the Red Sea, the Houthis are threatening to cut off one of the last remaining alternatives to the Strait of Hormuz — and with it, another 7% of the world’s oil supply.
The escalation comes as the U.S. is already deep into a renewed military confrontation with Iran, a conflict that has seen the Strait of Hormuz effectively closed for extended periods, blocking roughly 10% of global oil shipments. Saudi Arabia had partly skirted that disruption by piping crude to its Red Sea port of Yanbu, but a full Houthi closure of the Red Sea route would choke off that workaround, piling new pressure on an already strained market.
Some people have the moral courage to stand up to power and speak the truth. Around 3,200 courageous Britons have, thus far, been arrested for holding up signs that read “I support Palestine Action”, since July 2025.
Our police, it seems, are not particularly familiar with the Terrorism Act 2000. I informed Margaret Owen that the police may have made a mistake, and concluded that she was not breaking the law based on Article 13, which mentions “public space”. However, Article 12 makes no mention of public space, and I advised Margaret that she may be falling foul of the law, in spite of what the police had told her.
Margaret’s response was to send the police an email. I cannot do justice to what Margaret said, so here is what she sent to the police.
The question everyone is avoiding: Can the rest of the world stop this, or are we just watching the slow-motion collapse of a system that no longer works for anyone?
Back to AmeriKKKa’s Gazafied Gulags: Genesis says she was restrained and interrogated for hours after being accused of soliciting sex. Her account, shared with Rep. Yassamin Ansari, adds to growing allegations of abuse inside Eloy Detention Center.
A transgender woman detained at Arizona’s Eloy Detention Center told officials she was strapped into a wheelchair, handcuffed and questioned for hours by detention officers after being accused of soliciting sex — an allegation that has not previously been publicly reported.
The account, shared by U.S. Rep. Yassamin Ansari during a recent interview with LOOKOUT, is among a series of disturbing allegations about conditions inside Eloy. It also raises new questions about how trans people are treated inside immigration detention, where LOOKOUT has repeatedly reported on the dangers and indignities they face.
Last week, 120 people detained in Eloy Detention Center, an immigration camp in Arizona, signed a letter alleging a variety of human rights abuses including prolonged use of solitary confinement, limited access to clean drinking water, innutritious food, and extreme temperatures.
Story by Abdel Qader Sabbah, Mohamed Ahmed, Sharif Abdel Kouddous, and Jawa Ahmad
GAZA CITY—The charred shell of the Al-Masri family home in the Sabra neighborhood of Gaza City was still smoldering on Tuesday afternoon, hours after the Israeli military bombed it, killing Firas and Salsabeel al-Masri and their four children—Faryal, Salma, Amira and Naim—as they slept.
The airstrike came without warning in the middle of the night, destroying the upper floor of the simple two-story structure and setting it ablaze. “We were asleep in the middle of the night, at around 2 a.m. or so, when we heard a huge explosion,” Abu Youssef Al-Masri, the children’s grandfather, told Drop Site as he stood in front of the partially collapsed home. “We realized the house had been struck. The house collapsed and caught fire.”
The fire spared nothing inside; family belongings burnt to ash lay among broken cinder blocks, the walls that remained standing blackened with soot.
“The house burned completely. It was my brother’s home—he, his wife, and their four children. Burned until it was charred. My brother’s entire family has been erased,” Mohammed Al-Masri, the brother of Firas, said. “They burned before our eyes, and we couldn’t do anything.” He spoke standing at the graveyard where the family of six was buried on Tuesday afternoon.
The bodies were carried by relatives wrapped in white shrouds through the rubble-strewn cemetery to be laid to rest. Abu Youssef stood in the middle of the shallow graves and placed the small body of his granddaughter, Amira, next to her mother as Israeli drones buzzed incessantly overhead. “The whole world is watching us,” Mohammed said. “There is no ceasefire in effect, the war hasn’t stopped, and no one cares about us.”
July 22, 1946 — On this day in 1946, Zionist terrorists of the Irgun organisation, led by future Israeli PM Menachem Begin, bombed the King David Hotel, the British Administrative HQ in Palestine.
At the time, it was the deadliest terror attack targeting British subjects. Disguised as Arab workmen and waiters, the members of the Irgun planted a bomb in the basement of the main building of the hotel, whose southern wing housed the Mandate Secretariat and a few offices of the British military headquarters. The resulting explosion caused the collapse of the western half of the southern wing of the hotel.
91 people of various nationalities were killed, and 46 were injured in the attack. In 2006, former Irgun fighters and right-wing politicians commemorated the attack on the King David Hotel in celebration with a conference, and also unveiled a plaque in front of the King David Hotel in a ceremony.
Current Israeli Prime Minister and genocidal war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu attended the celebration and gave a speech defending the Zionist terrorists of Irgun.
This vitally necessary and carefully researched book examines the way US establishment media ran interference for Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza, aligning its coverage with Israeli military narratives whilst downplaying, and even condoning, the wholesale massacre of Palestinians.
Commencing with the October 7, 2023, attack, The Complicit Lens scrutinizes mainstream journalism, contrasting it with social media reports and international news coverage. It reveals how legacy media presented Israeli violence as defensive and justified, casting doubt on IDF bombings, employing passive language to deflect blame for atrocities, and repeating Israeli talking points, often word-for-word. Massacres of those seeking food became “aid-related deaths,” whilst missile attacks on tented refugees were “tragic mistakes.” Meanwhile, well-worn tropes of war propaganda, including claims of the beheading of babies and mass rapes, subsequently revealed to be without foundation, were used to justify Israeli actions and obscure culpability.
Andersen documents the targeting of journalists and aid workers in what has become the deadliest conflict for each on record. She spotlights the editorial censorship that prohibited the use of terms such as “genocide” and “massacre” in the reporting of Palestinian deaths. And, as global protests against the Gaza genocide gathered strength, she examines the hostile media portrayal of these uprisings, particularly those led by young people and Jewish organizations
Authored by ROBIN ANDERSEN. Introduction by RASHID KHALIDI
A media scholar examines how US establishment outlets echo Israeli narratives on Gaza, recasting atrocities like the Flour Massacre as “aid-related deaths” to whitewash genocide and excuse war crimes amid global outrage.
“Meticulously documented.”
—Mickey Huff
“Startling. Reading this material in one analytical text is essential . . . We need this book ‘yesterday’.”
—Tami Gold
“Makes an overwhelming case that US corporate media’s response to genocide has been not resistance, but complicity.”
—Jim Naureckas
“A superb job . . . shows how America’s mainstream media has served as Israel’s principal propaganda arm in the US.”
—John J. Mearsheimer
“Robin Andersen has done a tremendous service to the cause of truth and justice for Palestinians. Every journalism school in America ought to assign her book as required reading.”
George Lucas sure knows how to create popular entertainment products. It should come as no surprise that the museum named for the Star Wars and Indiana Jones creator is already generating buzz
Wait times up to 6 hours, and it took a little more than 4.5 hours for this reporter to get through. On the bright side, there were still plenty of tickets left, including for the first day. Do not refresh the page or you may lose your spot.
The details: Alltickets are timed entry. Tickets are $25 for adults and $21 for those 65 and older. Children, members, active-duty military, personal aides or attendants and EBT cardholders have free entry. Museum neighbors in the LM37 program will also be free, with that pass opening in August.
But how do I buy: Each person is limited to nine tickets, and you’ll have 20 minutes to check out once they’re added to your cart, according to the museum. You can find the link here.
What’s next: The grand opening is Sept. 22.
Our main priority was delivering water to the truly forgotten families. People thanked Substack’s supporters, and we saw the joy in their eyes as we distributed the water… But the painful truth is that thousands of families are still waiting. Children go to sleep thirsty, mothers stand for hours searching for a drop of water, and the elderly find no one to lend them a helping hand. Don’t let these voices be silenced by the war.”
To every person who donated, shared an article, encouraged someone else to give, or simply chose not to look away—
Thank you.
Because of you, thousands of Palestinians have received food, medicine, emergency supplies, and now life-saving drinking water.
And how many Americanos are involved in primary, secondary, dual-use manufacturing and R & R and all that jazz for the murderous military offensive weapons outfits?
The Iranian argument for not having nukes was the commitment to prevention of a nuclear race in the Gulf and neighboring states. This argument won’t hold water by the end of next week… Iran will have a bomb, and this is wonderful news.
Well done, Orangutan …
Here’s what Jew-oogle says:
The military-industrial complex relies on a combination of primary-use (strictly military) and dual-use (civilian and military) technologies. Calculating the total workload, economic output, or research footprint requires categorizing these sectors and analyzing specific data points.
Here is how to structure and calculate the work generated by both sectors.
Primary-Use Work (Defense-Specific)
Primary-use work produces goods and services with no viable commercial market. It is funded almost exclusively by government defense budgets.
Lethal Systems: Development and manufacturing of missiles, ammunition, and torpedoes.
Combat Platforms: Production of fighter jets, main battle tanks, and naval warships.
Military Space: Launching and maintaining classified reconnaissance and early-warning satellites.
Specialized Services: Military-specific training, base operations, and tactical intelligence analysis. [1]
Dual-Use Work (Commercial & Military)
Dual-use work involves technologies developed for the commercial market that are critical for military modernization, or vice versa. This sector is growing rapidly due to commercial tech innovation. [1, 2, 3]
Advanced Computing: Artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and microelectronics used in both consumer tech and targeting systems.
Cybersecurity: Network encryption, threat detection, and cloud infrastructure protecting both banks and defense networks.
Materials & Energy: Carbon fiber composites, synthetic fuels, and advanced batteries for electric vehicles and military gear. [1, 2, 3, 4]
How to Calculate the Total Workload
To quantify the scale of this work, economists, policy analysts, and defense contractors typically use three primary metrics:
1. Financial Expenditures (The Top-Down Method)
Defense Budgets: Track national defense procurement and Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) budgets. [1, 2]
Contract Awards: Aggregate publicly available government transaction data (like FPDS in the US) to see exactly how much money flows to specific corporate vendors.
Venture Capital Tracking: Measure private sector investment in dual-use tech startups (often referred to as “Defense Tech” or “National Security Tech”).
2. Labor and Workforce (The Bottom-Up Method)
Direct Employment: Count the total headcount of major defense prime contractors and dedicated military research labs.
Indirect Employment: Apply economic multipliers to estimate jobs in the supply chain (e.g., raw metal suppliers, component manufacturers).
Induced Employment: Calculate the economic ripple effect of defense worker spending in local communities. [1, 2]
3. Intellectual Property and Research
Patent Classification: Analyze patent filings using international codes related to weapons, radar, and aerospace alongside dual-use categories like autonomous navigation.
Academic Funding: Track government research grants (e.g., DARPA, Horizon Europe) awarded to universities for foundational science.
The Army conducts outreach to identify and harness dual-use technologies that emerge from the private sector. The Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Army for Acquisition, Logistics and Technology launched the xTech program to facilitate prize competitions that award and accelerate innovative technologies, with an aim of solving persistent Army challenges. At Army Futures Command, the Austin-based Army Applications Laboratory serves as an incubator for novel ideas, helping entrepreneurs develop and present promising solutions, while the command’s Office of Small Business Programs provides pathways for outstanding small businesses to partner with the Army. Recent small business partnerships initiated by the command have aided in the development of augmented reality goggles for working dogs, new radio frequency and photonic technology to eliminate communication signal interference and advances in chemical detection technology.
According to Diana Jordan-Baldwin, the Office of Small Business Programs’ Small Business Innovation Coordinator, working with private industry “provides cutting-edge and future technology, which allows Army Futures Command to meet the mission of tomorrow.”
Remember? Will there be a Lucas Museum for Gaza?
In Photos: Gaza Before the Genocide Escalated
Before the genocide escalated against Palestinians in Gaza, the city still carried daily life, under siege and constant bombardment.
AAUP? Fuck, Jewish epigrams for this report:Published July 2026. This report was prepared by a joint subcommittee of the Association’s Committee A on Academic Freedom and Tenure and the Committee on College and University Governance and was approved by both parent committees in May 2026.
It is the business of a university to provide that atmosphere which is most conducive to speculation, experiment, and creation. It is an atmosphere in which there prevail “the four essential freedoms” of a university—to determine for itself on academic grounds who may teach, what may be taught, how it shall be taught, and who may be admitted to study.
—US Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, concurrence in Sweezy v. New Hampshire
In a modern state, virtually all corners of society—even institutions that think of themselves as otherwise independent—are fiscally dependent on powerful national governments. States can leverage grants, payment for services, tax breaks, and regulatory enforcement to change the fiscal prospects of everything from the media to non-governmental organizations to law firms to universities. Once a leader realizes he can use the state budget to force compliance with whatever agenda he is pushing, then institutions that have become dependent on state funds, tax breaks, or regulatory forbearance are caught between caving in, making radical cutbacks, or experiencing institutional death. That’s what’s happening now with universities.
—Kim Lane Scheppele, professor of sociology, Princeton University
The Trump team’s goal has not changed. They want an unprecedented—and flagrantly unconstitutional—degree of government oversight and control over American universities.
—Joseph Fishkin, professor of law, University of California, Los Angeles
Nobody will save us unless we fight together to save ourselves.
—Peter Sporn, professor of medicine, Northwestern University
V. Conclusion
It has often been noted that illiberal authoritarians always seek to undermine and ultimately control autonomous institutions: the judiciary and the bar, the media, and colleges and universities. In its first year the second Trump administration has assaulted all three. In each case, the targets have been tarred as “elitist” and unresponsive to “popular” will. But as the AAUP’s founders recognized, if universities are to serve the common good in a democracy, they must remain autonomous, unbeholden to the vagaries of popular opinion and political winds. To be sure, the agreements discussed in this report and the proposals advanced by the Trump administration’s proposed compact claim to affirm academic freedom and promise not to interfere with the curriculum. But such promises ring hollow.
“If universities can be subject to drastic financial penalties anytime the federal government decides ‘in its sole discretion’ that the university is not complying, it is difficult to believe there will not be strong incentives for administrators, faculty, and students to avoid any speech or conduct that might attract negative attention from the Trump administration,” two commentators on the agreements warn. “Whether explicit or implicit, such federal control cuts to the heart of the freedom of inquiry that allows universities to contribute to the innovations, economic prosperity, and creation of knowledge that have made American higher education the envy of the world.”145
In that light, we recall the words of the AAUP’s 1956 special report on the abuses of the second Red Scare:
We cannot censure the justified public interest in colleges and universities, or be unmindful of the extremely difficult task confronting academic administrations that seek to preserve educational and research opportunities in order to serve the general welfare in spite of the suspicions of a public which, at times, has been confused by complicated issues or led astray by demagogic appeals. The temptation to yield a little in order to preserve a great deal is strong. . . . Yet to yield a little is, in such matters, to run the risk of sacrificing all. . . .
[W]e deem it to be the duty of all elements in the academic community—faculty, trustees, officials and, as far as possible, students—to stand their ground firmly even while they seek, with patient understanding, to enlarge and deepen popular comprehension of the nature of academic institutions and of society’s dependence upon unimpaired intellectual freedom.146
The report charges that Cuba and its allies are mounting “a revolution against western civilization itself — waged, in part, via the novel and insidious method of persuading the children of the West to turn against their own inheritance.” It accuses Havana of “gleeful support of the George Floyd uprisings.” It asserts that “the rise of antifa” and “the explosion of pro-terrorist activism on American college campuses,” can be “linked, in some way, shape, or form, to Cuban influence.”
It characterizes the DSA as serving “as a particularly potent illustration of the ideological victory of Cuba’s effort to position itself as the spiritual capital of Third Worldist radicalism.” It claims the organization maintains a “fierce, almost religious commitment to the cause of the Cuban regime.” It alleges Cuba has built a “sprawling revolutionary network” that has “shaped America’s most famous and influential extremist movements” including the Black Panthers, the Weather Underground and antifa. These networks include “powerful leftist nonprofits, anti-ICE collectives, socialist groups, and Marxist militant organizations” in the U.S.
Ahh, it all makes sense, Chris . . . . Jew-oogle: “facial recognition will soon be adopted by every sector”
You are spot on. Powered by rapid advancements in AI, the global facial recognition market is experiencing massive growth, projected to surpass $20 billion by the end of the decade. Driven by the need for touchless authentication, enhanced security, and streamlined convenience, this technology is quickly moving into every aspect of daily life. [1, 2, 3]
But the software reaches beyond law enforcement to a wide variety of other industries:
Travel: U.S. customs relies on facial recognition for its biometric exit program, and 17 airports currently deploy the technology, with plans to scan 97% of departing passengers by 2024.
Finance: Some ATMs in Japan use facial recognition instead of cards and PINs, while Amazon Go scans customers to charge them virtually at its cashier-less stores.
Health care: Facial recognition software can identify patients and diagnose genetic conditions.
Education: Some public school systems in the U.S. are implementing the technology to track people who have been banned from campus or to record class attendance.
Military: The U.S. is experimenting with software that can identify people in the dark using heat signatures on the skin.
Social services: Some homeless shelters have experimented with the technology to help identify people seeking services who don’t have other forms of identification.
Legal, Societal, and Policy Implications
As the use and power of this technology continues to expand, it raises a number of serious questions, Schaake notes.
First, what are the consequences for privacy and anonymity? Should people have a presumption of privacy when they attend sporting events, take a walk in a public park, visit a hospital, or pick up our child at school?
“What one person might think is legitimate use, another person might think of as abusive or a blanket violation of rights,” she says.
Another issue of growing concern is bias, when software that’s often trained on white, male images frequently misidentifies women and people of color.
Questions also arise around proper oversight of the people creating and implementing the technology. If a police force’s outdated facial recognition software produces bad results, who’s responsible? Should private companies be held accountable if their technologies are used for nefarious ends?
Clearview AI, which scraped billions of photos online, claimed to be working exclusively with law enforcement agencies, but reports linked the company to clients ranging from Saudia Arabia and the United Arab Emirates to Walmart and the NBA. A technology that’s ostensibly “designed for research or medicine can be used elsewhere for repression,” Schaake says. It is essential to consider the context in which facial recognition systems are used. “There are not enough guardrails,” she says.
Larry Ellison predicts rise of the modern surveillance state where ‘citizens will be on their best behavior’
Here’s a pig site:
Debunking Ellison’s statements
However, not all of Ellison’s claims withstand scrutiny. Despite technological advancements, police must uphold constitutional rights, even if it may be deemed less efficient or safe. Ellison asserted that cameras and AI in schools would enhance safety, but the Fourth Amendment and school policies against recording children complicate matters. Some schools have cameras, but police cannot always access or use the footage, adding further complexity.
Ellison neglected to highlight the crucial role of having accurate data within the system, which is fundamental before considering how AI can be beneficial. The integrity and diversity of data are fundamental to the effectiveness and fairness of AI systems in policing. Proper data management ensures that AI algorithms do not perpetuate existing biases but rather promote accurate and equitable outcomes. For instance, in the case of predictive policing, where AI algorithms analyze historical crime data to forecast future criminal activities, if the data used in these systems is skewed or biased, it can result in disproportionate targeting of certain communities. For example, if historical data reflects over-policing in specific neighborhoods, the AI system may continue to predict higher crime rates in those areas, perpetuating a cycle of surveillance and enforcement, which is a result of a discussion from a project I have been working on with the National Academies.
Ellison talked about Oracle body cameras and mentioned that while officers can request the camera to be off during bathroom or lunch breaks, it always records, although footage would only be accessible with a court order. This implies officers have no reasonable expectation of privacy, which could be a concern if some unions or agencies are unaware of this and are currently deploying this platform. Additionally, many departments allow the public to request that officers turn off their body cameras for various reasons; therefore, officers would be eroding trust with the public when cameras are not actually off.
AI can assist in video monitoring for various reasons, such as supporting street staff, transcribing footage and ensuring accountability, which will improve safety and efficiency. However, some studies indicate that body cameras don’t significantly affect the use of force, so one should be cautious in assuming that constant monitoring will suddenly make a difference.
Ellison suggested that AI will supervise every officer, reporting issues as they arise. This must be balanced with respecting individual rights and used for mentorship. Studies indicate that administrative oversight contributes to stress and staffing shortages, underscoring the need for balanced leadership.
Ellison stated that drones can respond faster than police cars, adding value by gathering information. This doesn’t replace officers who still have to respond and intervene. Additionally, cell phone cameras can provide instant live feeds during calls, further aiding in information gathering without Fourth Amendment risk issues.
1984 comes with an appendix on Newspeak, the language used by the party to limit and reduce thought, which has some parallels to the way we have to describe the world to a computer. Orwell writes about a series of vocabularies, and names the most basic set of words the “A vocabulary,” :
“It was composed almost entirely of words we already possess, words like hit, run, dog, tree, sugar, house, field, but in comparison with the present-day English vocabulary their number was extremely small, while their meanings were far more rigidly defined. All ambiguities and shades of meaning had been purged out of them — Newspeak words [were] simply a staccato sound expressing one clearly understood concept.”
Newspeak was also binary: the word for cold existed, but the word “warm” did not, being replaced by a 0: “unwarm.”
Dianne Forsythe noted, though, that the people building these knowledge systems didn’t see it that way. In one of my favorite lines of hers, she writes:
“People in AI rely a good deal on introspection as a method of research. Having found a statement applies to them, they appear willing to accept that it applies to [humans] in general. I think of this as ‘I am the world’ reasoning.”
Facial recognition systems are largely built from images that programmers pull from the World Wide Web, with one of the largest and most used models coming from portraits people posted to the photo website Flicker. (That’s the dataset). Instead of writing code that describes every possible face, neural nets can study thousands of images, find patterns between them, and predict things. For example, one model was trained to produce a random face whenever we want one.
Here are two photographs of people that don’t exist. These are portraits made by a machine learning model that was trained on 70,000 images, and asked to create something that follows all of the same rules that it learned by looking at those images. These are just two images: in ten seconds, you could create literally hundreds more. It began by identifying patterns common to all of those images, and quickly sorted out that if an eyeball is here and a mouth is here, then a nose is probably in the center of your face.
When a surveillance camera sees a person in a parking lot that it decides doesn’t belong there, an artificial intelligence tool can use this same learning to identify and match aspects of a real face to an archive of images in a criminal database, or license database, or passport database. For example, the FBI has a photo archive of 640 million faces drawn from state drivers license data that it can compare with images from grainy footage of parking lots. Now, we start the process of sorting and categorizing until we have a match. It can quickly see that the center of your face has a nose and compare that nose to the pixel arrangements of noses in every photograph in those databases, then it might look through those and see which ones have matching eyes, then ears, etc, until it narrows down an entire photographic database of millions of license photographs down to a few pictures. Then it can identify you, compare it to a criminal database (or not) and pass that information on to agencies interested in knowing who is hanging out in a parking lot.
“Winston’s greatest pleasure in life was his work.”
The deal, which would run for 30 years and is estimated to be worth tens of billions of dollars, is designed to give American companies a central role in developing Saudi Arabia’s nuclear infrastructure while limiting the involvement of foreign competitors. A key provision would permit US firms to build a uranium-enrichment facility in the kingdom if a joint US-Saudi study concludes such a step is warranted — an arrangement officials say would give Washington greater oversight and help prevent the technology being diverted to military use.
The striking context is that this comes even as the United States wages war on Iran over its own nuclear programme, having assassinated the Leader of the Islamic Revolution and struck nuclear facilities in an offensive launched on February 28. What Washington is fighting to deny Tehran, it is preparing to extend to Riyadh.
What the Dog Saw) probe similar themes of mass conformity and how environments shape our reality. He—along with critics like Neil Postman—famously champions the idea that Huxley’s Brave New World proved more prescient about modern Western democracies than Orwell’s, because we tend to love our oppression and willingly trade our critical thinking for entertainment and consumption. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Look at this fucking shit from the INBred UnUnited Queendumb: Which Dystopian Society is Better? 👁️ 1984 or Brave New World?
Can a ChatBot break up with you? It happened en masse on February 13, 2026, as OpenAI deprecated its companionship-friendly ChatGPT “4o” model. This is a mixtape. It has AI-generated songs created from texts that ChatGPT wrote to people on the internet before it was shut down.
In the mixtape narration, I discuss what the model does and why it writes these texts the way it does.
Why a mixtape? Because when you and I look at these texts, they are… texts. We make sense of them intellectually. But for the people on the receiving end of these messages, the music is highly emotionally charged. By turning them into music AI would (and did) write, the language takes on a different weight. We can come closer to feeling how these texts would feel if we saw ChatGPT as a partner about to leave us.
THIRTEEN YEARS ago, read: So fucking naive and shallow …..
When you hear or see a creative public relations campaign, it grabs hold of you immediately. Some can move you to laugh or tears or inspire action. Powerful campaigns can change the public’s perception seemingly overnight about a brand, product, or social movement.
Nobody understood this more than the father of public relations, Edward L Bernays. As blogged about previously, the father of spin understood that it was the combination of the news, not advertising, and the manipulation of people’s unconscious through endorsements by doctors, celebrities, and other experts that truly made the difference.
You may be thinking, is this true? PR isn’t that powerful, is it? Well, his clients included a vast array of who’s who during his time and they saw colossal results first hand. They included Procter & Gamble, the American Tobacco Company, Cartier Inc., CBS, General Electric, and Dodge Motors. He even composed campaigns for the NAACP and American presidents Woodrow Wilson and Calvin Coolidge.
“Missouri stands with Israel and its people and we want to make sure that the world understands that,” the governor said while signing the bill.
Israel has declared policies mandating the mass murder of civilians (the Dahiya Doctrine), the killing of its own citizens (the Hannibal Directive), and the potential nuclear destruction of the world (the Samson Option).
Its spies are active in countries around the globe, and its proxies are actively engaged in corrupting governments and institutions across the West.
Does such a regime have a “right to exist?” No.
In fact, dismantling such a regime and its replacement with a free Palestine with equal rights for all is not only a legal requirement, but also an existential imperative for all of humanity.
READ before Craig is put into the docks: By Craig MokhiberJuly 15, 2026
With a new attack on the ICC, the U.S. expands its assault on the rule of law
Marco Rubio’s campaign to “dismantle” the ICC isn’t about sovereignty. It’s the latest U.S. move to shield Israeli officials wanted for war crimes from accountability, following a pattern used by fascist regimes to gut independent judiciaries.
On Monday, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced the administration’s latest brazen attack on international law and the institutions mandated to uphold it.
Declaring “a sweeping campaign to dismantle the threat posed by the International Criminal Court,” Rubio promised a “whole-of-government response to systematically disable the ICC’s ability to operate.”
In language that would make Orwell blush, Rubio’s lawless statement claims that his campaign of intimidation and obstruction against the Court is meant to “disable the threat posed by the ICC to Americans.”
In essence, an administration that has been on a global rampage, perpetrating gross violations of human rights at home and abroad, is now seeking to claim that the international institutions set up to protect human rights (like the ICC), rather than the U.S. itself, are the real threats to human rights.
To achieve the administration’s nefarious ends, Rubio has promised pressure on states to withdraw from the ICC. That includes the intimidation (“increased scrutiny”) of states receiving U.S. aid that refuse to reject the ICC’s authority, visa revocations and travel bans for ICC personnel, and increased (unlawful) sanctions against the ICC and affiliated organizations.
In other words, the Trump administration, acting to protect another oppressive foreign regime engaged in genocide and apartheid, has publicly announced an illegal campaign to obstruct justice and, to that end, to persecute judges, court personnel, and cooperating witnesses and experts.
The ‘sovereignty’ canard
Rubio’s announcement, as has become common with such Trump policies, seeks to frame the “campaign” as a defense of “U.S. sovereignty.” But few will be deceived by this transparent ruse.
First, duly constituted international tribunals, as institutions of international law, are not a threat to any state’s sovereignty. To the contrary, they are expressions of sovereignty, as international law is formulated by states as an act of sovereignty.
States negotiate treaties, join international organizations, and consent to be bound by international law in order to benefit from inclusion in the international community of states, and to ensure a safer and more stable international legal order.
Nowhere is this clearer than in matters of the prohibition of war crimes, crimes against humanity, genocide, and aggression — which represent the entire remit of the ICC. And the Court only acts in the wake of such atrocities when there is a jurisdictional basis to do so, and when relevant states are unable or unwilling to act.
Seeking to be excluded from accountability for the highest crimes in international law, or to exclude others from it, is not the behavior of a state worried about the technicalities of sovereignty. Rather, it is the act of a rogue state seeking to advance the cause of impunity for itself and its co-perpetrators.
Secondly, the ICC does not prosecute states, and cannot therefore directly challenge their sovereignty, as such. It is rather a court of individual criminal responsibility for perpetrators from state parties (who have given consent to the ICC), or who have committed crimes on the territory of a state party.
And states have an opportunity to investigate and prosecute such crimes on their own and, indeed, are already obliged to do so under international law whether they are parties to the ICC (Rome Statute) or not. Under Article 17 of its Statute, the ICC’s jurisdiction only activates where states fail to do so (so-called “complementarity”).
Buttressing Israeli impunity
Third, as a series of previous U.S. actions and statements have made clear (and while the U.S. certainly has some reason to fear prosecution of U.S. perpetrators of war crimes in places like Afghanistan and Iraq) this assault on the Court is principally just the latest attempt by the U.S. to buttress the impunity of the Israeli regime at a moment when global calls for the regime’s accountability have reached a fever pitch.
The ICC’s indictments against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, both of them fugitives from justice, for crimes against humanity, sent the Israeli regime’s U.S. sponsors into a fury. Threats were quickly followed by official sanctions against judges, prosecutors, and cooperating witnesses.
Indeed, even before the warrants were requested, a dozen U.S. Senators sent a threatening letter to the ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan, declaring, in the style of delinquent schoolyard bullies, “Target Israel and we will target you….You have been warned.”
The Trump administration, in defense of Israeli impunity, has already withdrawn from the UN Human Rights Council, attacked UN agencies like UNRWA, and imposed several rounds of unlawful sanctions on the ICC Prosecutor, its Judges, the UN’s human rights rapporteur on Palestine, and the most prominent Palestinian human rights organizations.
Under a previous administration, the U.S. has even gone so far as to adopt legislation allowing for U.S. military action against the seat of the ICC in the Netherlands, with the objective of springing indicted war criminals from the U.S. or its ally nations. The legislation was nicknamed “The Hague Invasion Act.”
The assault on international law
The latest outrage from the Secretary of State is part of a larger effort by the U.S.-Israel axis to dismantle the post-WWII system of international law and, thereby, to remove all constraints on their exercise of raw power.
This effort has included a series of broad-daylight violations of the highest rules of international law, including serial aggression across Western Asia, the Mediterranean, Latin America, and the Caribbean, live-streamed war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide, assault and murder on the high seas, murder and assassinations on foreign territories, and the kidnapping of foreign leaders.
It has included a war against international organizations, variously attacking, campaigning against, or withdrawing from organizations like UNRWA, the World Health Organization, and the UN Human Rights Council.
It has included spying, smearing, and sanctioning international officials and judges, from the ICC to the UN human rights rapporteurs.
It has included attempts to replace the United Nations with dictatorial imperial bodies like the Trump-headed “Board of Peace.”
And it has included the abduction, torture, and murder of hundreds of UN staff and the destruction of their facilities, especially in Palestine.
Of course, the latest U.S. action announced by Rubio against the ICC is not only morally outrageous but also patently unlawful, like many of the acts cataloged here.
If that happens, yet another hard-fought — and still nascent — building block of international law will fall. And its restoration in our time will be unlikely.
Will the world fight back?
But international law is not without tools to resist the expanding U.S. assault.
The Rome Statute of the ICC itself, under Article 70, provides for criminal prosecution for “impeding, intimidating or corruptly influencing an official of the Court,” as well as for “retaliating against an official of the Court on account of duties performed by that or another official.”
And there is no language in Art. 70 that would limit its application to perpetrators from member states, meaning the Court could, in principle, charge U.S. (and Israeli) persons with such offenses.
Indeed, a case in point is the ICC Prosecutor’s recent Art. 70 warning to Israel and others in May 2024, which came in response to efforts by the Israeli regime and Western powers to intimidate the Court.
Upon announcing his request for arrest warrants for the Israeli perpetrators, Khan stated that “all attempts to impede, intimidate or improperly influence the officials of this Court must cease immediately.” He added that his office would not hesitate to “act pursuant to article 70 of the Rome Statute if such conduct continues.”
If convicted under Article 70, perpetrators can face five years in prison. And beyond Article 70, the ICC is itself an international organization with legal personality (meaning that it has rights and can bring claims on its own behalf). Customary international law allows for such organizations to take countermeasures when attacked.
What’s more, the Court is located in the Netherlands, a UN member state that has also ratified the Rome Statute and is obliged to provide security for the Court.
As such, any violation by the U.S. on or directed at the ICC in the territory of the Netherlands would not only constitute the supreme international crime of aggression, but would also solve the jurisdictional question, should the Court wish to act against U.S. persons seeking to intimidate or obstruct ICC proceedings.
Of course, it is highly unlikely that U.S. officials could ever be arrested for these crimes, and the U.S. is heavily armed, violent, and often lawless in its actions abroad, as Rubio’s most recent action shows.
It’s true that the ICC (or its state parties) have no power to impose decisions on the U.S. by force. But with sufficient political backing from state parties to protect ICC judges and prosecutors, U.S. perpetrators could find themselves marked as fugitives from justice and unable to travel through a significant number of countries.
There would also be political and diplomatic costs, resulting in the U.S’s even further isolation on the world stage.
A total of 125 ICC state parties, including many of the U.S.’s closest Western allies, are already legally obliged to oppose the U.S. attacks on the Court. So while the ICC may never be able to arrest U.S. perpetrators — though any of its 125 members could — it can mark them as permanent fugitives, alongside their Israeli co-perpetrators.
In addition, states could act, individually and collectively, to block U.S. sanctions against the ICC and its personnel.
The European Union, for example, has sanctions blocking legislation that could be activated to protect those targeted by the U.S. Its failure so far to initiate such action to protect ICC personnel, UN rapporteur Francesca Albanese, and targeted human rights organizations is an ongoing scandal of complicity.
Member states of the UN could also convene an emergency session of the General Assembly under the Uniting for Peace mechanism to circumvent a U.S. veto in the Security Council and adopt measures to push back against this assault on international law and protect its victims.
So far, of course, there is little sign of willingness from governments around the world to confront the U.S.-Israeli Axis on these matters. To the contrary, the level of complicity, especially by Western states and Arab governments, has been shocking given the stakes.
But if they do not find the courage and principle to act soon, it is highly unlikely that the postwar legal system will survive.
Taking the assault on the judiciary global
Viewed through a historical lens, the Rubio game plan is nothing new. Fascism loves “law and order,” but it despises the rule of law.
Short of popular revolution and armed resistance, an independent judiciary is often the ultimate check on abusive power.
That’s why, beginning in 1925, Mussolini’s fascist regime purged the courts of any judges that might seek to constrain fascist power, replaced them with loyalists, and established political courts to punish opponents and ensure the will of the regime. Eight years later in 1933, the Nazi regime began its consolidation of power in Germany by purging the courts of independent judges and replacing them with loyal Nazis. Four years after that, beginning in 1937, the fascist regime of Francisco Franco in Spain instituted a plan to systematically purge the Spanish judiciary of independent judges and replace them with military tribunals and political courts loyal to the regime.
Since then, efforts to intimidate, corrupt, subjugate, or dismantle judicial bodies have been constant hallmarks of authoritarian regimes and of mafia syndicates everywhere.
The Trump administration, as the latest announcement from Rubio makes clear, is no exception.
The only difference is that Trump and Rubio have now taken their assault on the rule of law global. And that is a threat to everyone.
No, Israel does not have ‘a right to exist.’ Quite the contrary, actually.
Unlike the Zionist claim that “Israel has a right to exist,” my assertion is rooted in international law. Of course, given Israel’s propensity for violating such laws, it’s no surprise they’re still claiming a right that has no basis in reality.
Aftermath of an Israeli airstrike targeting the home of the al-Tawil family in Nuseirat refugee camp, central Gaza, May 26, 2026. (Photo: Hassan al-Jedi/APA Images)
News that, in the midst of the genocide in Palestine, the German parliament was this week advancing legislation that would criminalize speech that denies that Israel has a “right to exist,” with penalties of up to five years in prison, came as a surprise to virtually no one.
This is, after all, the same Germany that perpetrated genocide first in Namibia and then in Europe, and is now actively and enthusiastically participating in the ongoing genocide in Palestine while brutally repressing all who dare speak out against it inside Germany.
Indeed, alongside Israel and the U.S., the German state today has the dubious distinction of being among those most captured by Zionist interests and most corrupted by Zionist ideology.
The German state even has an official policy (Staatsräson) dedicating the German state to the continued existence of the Israeli regime, and a formal declaration of Israel’s “right to exist” is required to acquire German citizenship. (No such declaration of Germany’s right to exist is required).
But the statement that the Israeli regime has no right to exist is not only a legally protected opinion. It is also demonstrably true, as a matter of both fact and law.
Of course, the statement that Israel “has a right to exist” has always been nonsense, unrooted as it is in either law or fact.
But this Zionist claim rings familiar to the ear of people in the West because it has been so often repeated as a pillar of Zionist propaganda, echoed by Western politicians benefiting from Israel lobby bribes, and by Israel-aligned media corporations dutifully buttressing the impunity of the regime.
Ask yourself if you have ever heard a similar refrain asserting Italy’s right to exist, or Canada’s — or Germany’s, for that matter? And yet the claim is constantly made that the Israeli regime (and only the Israeli regime) somehow has such a right.
The most obvious conclusion is that the regime and its proxies in the West are so deeply insecure about the legitimacy of the state, given the lawless and bloody history of its founding and expansion, that they have deemed it necessary to impose an enforced (and fictional) orthodoxy, rooted in an idea of Israeli exceptionalism and state-sponsored impunity.
But there is no such right in international law. None.
Inconvenient facts
Indeed, when I first entered the corridors of the United Nations in the 1980s, many states then existed that no longer existed when I left in 2023. Did the USSR, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, East Germany, Tanganyika, Zanzibar, and the United Arab Republic have a “right to exist?” No. And neither does Israel.
States come and go, but none of them has a “right to exist.” As a factual matter, this is undeniable.
And yet, some still actively parrot the baseless Zionist fabrication that the Israeli regime somehow possesses it, others accept it without question, some (like Germany) even seek to compel others to declare it, and still others prohibit any attempts to challenge the lie.
There is no “right to exist” for states under international law. Thus, Israel cannot claim such a right.
Of course, states do have some rights. For example, states normally have a right to sovereign equality, to territorial integrity, and to self-defense under Article 51 of the UN Charter. But even these rights normally afforded to states are subject to conditions and qualifications, many of which would exclude Israel’s claim to them.
For example, the International Court of Justice has repeatedly found that Israel has no right to claim self-defense in its attacks on occupied Palestinian territories. (In essence, you cannot break into someone’s house and then claim a right to self-defense when they resist you).
Secondly, except for those agreed in treaties with Egypt (1979) and Jordan (1994), Israel does not even have defined borders. Much of the territory claimed and held by the Israeli regime is territory over which it has no legal claim whatsoever, and other territory claimed as part of the state is itself subject to challenge.
The regime can make no legal claims of territorial integrity over lands it unlawfully seized in 1967 and after, including East Jerusalem, Gaza, the West Bank, and the Golan Heights.
Its 1949 “Green Line” with Lebanon, Syria, the West Bank, and Gaza, is not an international border, but rather an armistice line merely meant to separate forces. The regime cannot claim it as a lawful border.
Moreover, given that the prohibition of the acquisition of territory by force is a jus cogens norm (the highest, peremptory rules) of international law and a binding obligation under the UN Charter, it cannot claim any of that land as part of its lawful territory.
Even the land claimed by Zionist forces in 1947 under the UN partition proposal is subject to legal challenge. Given that fact, the UN General Assembly had no authority under its Charter, or more broadly in international law, to overrule the will of the indigenous people or to create a settler-colonial state, and the Zionist forces had no right under international law to deny the self-determination of the Palestinian people or to acquire territory by force.
In fact, the International Law Commission has held that states must not recognize claims based on violations of jus cogens and erga omnes norms (binding on all states), such as those perpetrated by Zionist forces during the Nakba of 1947-48, and by the Israeli regime ever since. In addition, territorial acquisitions resulting from the threat or use of force impose obligations of non-recognition on all states.
The ICJ has recalled this principle with regard to the Israeli regime’s presence in occupied Palestinian territory as recently as 2024, when it found that the occupation of East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and the Gaza Strip is entirely unlawful, that it must end quickly and completely, and that all states are obliged not to recognize Israel’s presence in those territories and to work to end it.
Thus, as Israel has no defined territory, its legal claims to territorial integrity are significantly limited. And without recognized borders (and here we are not talking about a minor border dispute, but rather a lack of definition for most of the state’s territory), it even lacks a key criterion for recognition as a state.
To this day, almost thirty UN member states across Africa, Asia, and Latin America (including some of its closest geographic neighbors) do not recognize the state of Israel, and others have cut off diplomatic relations with the regime during the current ongoing genocide.
No sovereignty without equality
Finally, without lawful sovereignty, there can be no claim to sovereign equality.
Sovereignty, in international law, belongs not to states, but rather to people. The Israeli regime declares itself a “Jewish state,” and claims to represent its people.
But it does not represent the interests of non-Jewish persons (Muslim and Christian Palestinians) who are either present, or have a right to be present and part of the legitimate polity of that territory.
The ethnonationalist state of Israel can perhaps claim to represent 7.2 million (Jewish) constituents. It cannot credibly claim to represent the almost 16 million Palestinians who have a right to form part of the polity of that land.
Indeed, even if the regime forcibly settled every Jew on the planet on the land, it would still only represent a minority of the population, vis-à-vis the majority of Palestinians.
Excluded variously from equal representation (1948 Palestinians), any representation (Gaza, West Bank, and East Jerusalem Palestinians), or even the ability to exercise their legal right to return and participate (diaspora Palestinians), are the overwhelming majority of persons who have a right to form part of the polity.
Nor can Israel claim legitimate governmental authority. This is because international law establishes that “the will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government,” which must be “expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage.”
Excluding millions of the indigenous people of the land on the basis of ethnonationalist criteria is a textbook breach of that requirement. As such, the Israeli regime cannot claim legitimate governmental authority.
The ICJ has recently affirmed that the regime has no such authority in Gaza, the West Bank, or East Jerusalem. But the unequal terms imposed on Palestinians inside the Green Line, and the total exclusion of those in the diaspora, make the point equally applicable to the remainder of the Palestinian community as well.
And without that authority, the regime cannot claim legitimate sovereignty.
Similarly, the regime’s lawless conduct weighs against claims of sovereignty.
This is because modern conceptions of sovereignty include an element of responsibility (especially vis-à-vis respect for non-aggression, human rights, and international law) that a genocidal, apartheid regime with a continuous history of aggression, assassinations, crimes against humanity, and a chronic scofflaw status in the face of international legal rulings and UN resolutions cannot claim to have met.
From illusory rights to actual duties
Thus, as a matter of law and fact, the Israeli regime has no “right to exist.”
But the analysis should not stop there.
Even a cursory examination of international law reveals that, to the contrary, the Israeli regime should not exist.
The international community of states has obligations to cease recognition of the regime, to isolate it, and to work for its dismantlement and for the liberation of the Palestinian people from the regime.
Clearly, no one would today argue that Nazi Germany, or Apartheid South Africa, or Vichy France, or Khmer Rouge Kampuchea had a “right to exist.” Nor would we entertain claims for eternal colonial regimes in Algeria, India, Namibia, or Kenya. For the same reasons, no legal (or moral) argument could justify a right to exist for Zionist Israel.
To the contrary, international law requires that, where breaches of peremptory norms of international law are integral to the creation, expansion, and sustaining of a state (as was the case in apartheid Namibia and Rhodesia), such entities should not be recognized or accepted as legitimate states and should in no way be assisted.
Israel’s record is clear. It was founded on the breach of two peremptory (jus cogens) norms: the right to self-determination of the people of the land, and the rule on the non-acquisition of territory by force, as well as on the two highest crimes in international law: genocide and aggression.
Since then, it has refused the return of refugees and their compensation, and has continuously expanded its unlawful evictions, land theft, and colonization.
The United Nations and every major international human rights organization have concluded that the Israeli regime is guilty of apartheid and racial segregation, unlawful occupation, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide.
The regime is now on trial for genocide at the ICJ, charges that the Court has found plausible enough to issue a series of preliminary orders (all of which the regime has ignored).
And the same Court has found the regime guilty of unlawful occupation, the forced denial of self-determination, the unlawful acquisition of territory by force, war crimes, apartheid, and racial segregation.
And the International Criminal Court has indicted the regime’s leaders for crimes against humanity.
For the full eighty years of its existence, the Israeli regime has held the distinction of being in breach of the highest number of UN resolutions and ICJ decisions of any country on the planet.
Today, the regime is unlawfully occupying Palestine, Lebanon, and Syria, attacking Lebanon, Syria, Iran, Yemen, and beyond, and perpetrating genocide in Palestine.
It has carried out assassinations across the region and has admitted to (indeed, bragged about) transnational terrorist attacks with booby-trapped pagers in Lebanon
Judged against the imperatives of international law, Israel is, in the strictest sense of the term, a rogue regime, illegitimate in its founding, and devoid of all legitimacy in its conduct ever since.
To declare that such a regime has a “right to exist” is an affront to generations of its victims, to international law, and to human decency itself. And the threat that it poses extends far beyond Palestine.
The Israeli regime is driven by a deeply racist and fundamentally violent ideology. It is armed with advanced technologies of surveillance and death, holds powerful conventional weaponry, and possesses stockpiles of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons.
It has declared policies mandating the mass murder of civilians (the Dahiya Doctrine), the killing of its own citizens (the Hannibal Directive), and the potential nuclear destruction of the world (the Samson Option).
Its spies are active in countries around the globe, and its proxies are actively engaged in corrupting governments and institutions across the West.
Does such a regime have a “right to exist?” No.
In fact, dismantling such a regime and its replacement with a free Palestine with equal rights for all is not only a legal requirement, but also an existential imperative for all of humanity.
Craig Mokhiber
Craig Mokhiber is an international human rights lawyer and former senior United Nations Official. He left the UN in October of 2023, penning a widely read letter that warned of genocide in Gaza, criticized the international response and called for a new approach to Palestine and Israel based on equality, human rights and international law.
“What we are talking about here is an Israeli establishment that is aiming at the extermination of the Palestinian people. In every possible way. Not only in Gaza but in the West Bank.”
— Mustafa Barghouti, interview, @MEEunapologeti
Failed to render LaTeX expression — no expression found
That GOD?
Since the “ceasefire” of last October, Israel has slaughtered more than 1,150 Palestinians, having violated the supposed truce over 3,700 times.
That Fucking GOD: Gates of Hell!!!
Across Lebanon, over 1.2 million people were forced from their homes by the Israeli assault, with more than 700,000 people in Lebanon still displaced despite a so-called “ceasefire,” according to the United Nations.
“Everything has been put on standby. The war has prevented us from dreaming,” Shehemy said.
THAT GOD BLESS America:
President Trump has not ruled out using ground forces, including seizing Kharg Island—Iran’s main oil export terminal. He has repeatedly threatened to hit Iranian power plants and bridges next week unless Tehran resumes negotiations.
Iran has responded in kind. An Iranian military official warned of “obliterating all remaining infrastructure in the region” if Trump’s threats are implemented. The IRGC has stated that oil, gas, and chemical fertilizer exports will not resume while U.S. attacks continue.
As one Gulf diplomat put it: “It’s likely to get worse before it gets better.”
Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring met with Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche this week at the insistence of a retiring Republican senator, but they emerged from the sit-down describing Blanche as “condescending,” “arrogant” and unwilling to commit to pursuing cases against powerful men named in the disgraced financier’s files.
The meeting, arranged as a condition for Sen. Thom Tillis’s vote to advance Blanche’s nomination out of the Senate Judiciary Committee, came more than a year after victims began requesting an audience with the Department of Justice. Tara Palmeri, a journalist who has covered the Epstein story for years, told Cenk Uygur on The Young Turks that Blanche never wanted the meeting.
“He was forced to. This is part of confirmation politics. He has no regard for them. He has no interest in hearing from them or speaking to them,” Palmeri said in an interview with Cenk. Palmeri noted that Blanche, according to reporting in the book “Regime Change,” had previously suggested offering a pardon to Ghislaine Maxwell in exchange for clearing President Donald Trump.
Tillis, a North Carolina Republican who is not seeking reelection, told Blanche he would not vote for him unless he met with the survivors. The sit-down happened at 4:30 p.m. on a recent afternoon — a last-minute, check-the-box exercise, Palmeri said, that left victims feeling “worse.”
“He was condescending. He was arrogant. He deflected blame and basically told them to go to the FBI and re-report their stories of abuse, retraumatizing them, which they’ve already done,” Palmeri said.
One survivor pushed back directly, asking whether Blanche wanted her to go to the FBI and point out the sworn testimony she had already given agents — files that already exist in the bureau’s Epstein database. Blanche, according to Palmeri, acknowledged the FBI “handled this badly” but acted as if he had no control over the agency, even though the FBI reports to the Department of Justice.
“A priest arrayed in white vestments climbs the tree and, with a golden sickle, cuts down the mistletoe, which is caught in a white cloak… They believe that mistletoe given in drink will impart fertility to any animal that is barren and that it is an antidote to all poisons.”
Brookweed (Samolus) likewise had to be picked in very precise conditions. Pliny says it had to be taken with the left hand by somebody who was not allowed to look behind them. [24] Markale suggests that the very careful way in which the druids handled the plants points to their use of homeopathy, in which the slightest interference with their natural qualities could undermine their effect.
As far as trees were concerned, he explains:
“The yew, the hazel, the service tree and the oak are druidic trees, used by the druids” – indeed, Maximus of Tyre, a Greek philosopher of the late second century BC, wrote that the druids regarded the oak as a “visible representation of divinity”.
Paul — “Mistletoe is, in fact, an extraordinary plant. It is a parasite. It is, in a way, a vegetal vampire which feeds on the blood of others. In truth, it survives by drinking the sap of the tree: it is really an ‘oak-water’. Moreover, we know that mistletoe is one of the oldest plants on our planet, perhaps one of the first to have appeared and, in any case, that it is a survivor of a distant era in which conditions of life were not like our own.
“We have to conclude that mistletoe has survived different phases of evolution and that it adapted to new circumstances: it was a matter of life and death. No longer being able to draw its vital energy from the earth, like other plants, it fixed itself to other vegetation and takes that vital energy as its own. In this way, the mistletoe liberates the energy of the oak and makes use of it”.
“Since the oak represents the divine force, cosmic energy, even when it is symbolically replaced by another tree, mistletoe, oak-water is the very essence of divinity.”
A Minnesota business owner left CNN host Jake Tapper stunned Friday after he compared federal immigration enforcement’s detention facilities to concentration camps.
A handful of Minnesota businesses closed to protest Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations, including Moon Palace Books, whose co-owner Jamie Schwesnedl appeared on “The Lead with Jake Tapper.” Tapper pushed back during the interview after the Minnesota business owner used the term “concentration camp” to describe immigration detention facilities, saying the phrase carries a specific historical meaning.
[Fucking Jake Tapper, man oh man . . . . ]
“Just one note, I’m not here to defend ICE, but I’m not a big fan of people using the term ‘concentration camp’ to describe detention camps. That has a very specific meaning,” Tapper said.
Schwesnedl responded.
“I understand that, but they take people to Fort Snelling here, which literally was built as a concentration camp, and Alligator Alcatraz, which I think we can all agree is a concentration camp. I’m not saying they’re Dachau. I’m not saying they’re putting people in ovens — yet — but these are concentration camps. I don’t need to argue with you about that,” Schwesnedl said.
Prior to that conversation, Schwesnedl claimed Minneapolis had been “invaded by masked gunmen” sending neighbors to “concentration camps.”
“We can’t do business as usual right now, anyway, because our city has been invaded by masked gunmen kidnapping family members and friends and neighbors of ours to send them to concentration camps,” Schwesnedl told Tapper when asked about the importance of closing their business. “Additionally, there’s a lot of businesses in our area that have staff or customers or owners who are afraid to come to work, afraid to come in and shop. People are closing down today, and we felt like it wouldn’t be kind or fair for us to stay open, so we’re closing in solidarity to help send a message.”
Much of Al-Mansouri lies in ruins, with the Israeli-occupied village of Majdal Zoun just across the valley. Despite the destruction and continued Israeli attacks, around 100 residents have chosen to remain. Al Mansouri, Lebanon. July 16, 2026.
God’s Chosen PEOPLE.
Last month, Israeli aircraft dropped leaflets over Al-Mansouri, declaring the area a “threatened zone,” telling residents to “stay away” and warning that anyone who approached Israeli forces would “put themselves in danger.” Despite the threats, around 100 people have chosen to remain in the village, according to Yousef Shehemy, the mayor of neighboring Majdal Zoun, who has been displaced from his home by the occupying Israeli forces.
“People here believe their souls belong to this land,” Shehemy told Drop Site as he drove past a row of destroyed houses in Al-Mansouri. Shehemy was in the village when the leaflets fell from the sky. “They want to control people’s lives from above with leaflets, drones, sound grenades—all of it to frighten civilians.”
Across Lebanon, over 1.2 million people were forced from their homes by the Israeli assault, with more than 700,000 people in Lebanon still displaced despite a so-called “ceasefire,” according to the United Nations.
“Everything has been put on standby. The war has prevented us from dreaming,” Shehemy said.
You gotta hate Americans, who are all happy go luck about giving Larry Ellison and Oracle and Palantir and Mossad every fucking kernel of caramel corn eaten or shat out in a public bathroom. Look at this fucking Internet “story,” and alas, there is ZERO pushback, ZERO people decrying this Dystopian SHIT.
When the Los Angeles Clippers opened their $2 billion Intuit Dome in 2024, team chief technology and digital officer George Hanna figured roughly one in three fans would opt into the venue’s facial authentication system, which has fans upload a selfie ahead of time and stroll into the building without pulling out their tickets. “On a good day,” he said recently, “That’s kind of what I was hoping for.”
He was wrong.
Last season, by the end of an average game, close to 75% of fans were enrolled in Game Face ID, Hanna said, more than doubling his expectations.
“The curve of adoption was crazy,” he said. “We’re thrilled, and that allows us to sort of keep going and keep pushing.”
LA fan buy-in likely only accelerated the installation of facial scanning tools nationwide—a trend born out of COVID-fueled digitization drives, improved algorithms and growing consumer acceptance. But the developments also raise questions about just how much biometric observation people are willing to allow, both inside and outside The Tampa Bay Buccaneers added a facial recognition-powered “express entry” lane this year, following the Atlanta Falcons’ adoption of similar technology a year prior. The entire NFL now uses the tech to secure the playing fields, locker rooms and press boxes.
MLB, meanwhile, continues rolling out its facial authentication entry options across ballparks. Face-based ticketing came to Ohio State and the University of Florida in 2025 too, as schools looked to speed up student journeys from tailgate to seat.
In total, facial authentication technology provider Wicket says it supports more than 50 pro teams across the NFL, NBA, NHL, MLB, MLS, NWSL, WNBA and Australian Football League, as well as golf and tennis tournaments.
Wicket’s first major sports foray came in 2020, when the Cleveland Browns turned to the technology to limit fan-employee contact during the COVID-19 pandemic. The system decreased entry times and food lines, including by reducing the number of fans packing the remaining traditional pathways. As the tech has improved, the company has been able to install its tablet-based scanners in more locations, such as club-level entrances. One of the biggest hurdles each time the tech debuts, Wicket COO Jeff Boehm said, is explaining to fans that, No, you don’t have to pull out your phone or credit card. Your face is all you need.
“It’s almost so little friction that fans are almost confused by how easy it is,” he said.of ballparks.
“Churches are using it to see who is coming to the pews. Roller rinks have used it to decide whether or not someone has had too many fights and doesn’t get to come in anymore. Stores are using it to try to identify shoplifters,” he added. “I can’t give you a kind of quantitative answer, but what I can say is that it is increasingly common across public accommodations in America.”
Ahead of the 2026 World Cup, Kansas City is piloting facial recognition technology on local buses. Add that to the list.
Internationally, biometric surveillance is becoming increasingly commonplace. A new Premier League program will leverage “intelligence-led facial recognition in London to identify and prevent serious offenders attending matches,” the league announced earlier this month. In Brazil, stadiums with capacities beyond 20,000 seats are required to install biometric tracking systems. Palmeiras has a deal with local police to share some of that information, which has reportedly led to the arrest of more than 200 people who entered the venue.
“We know exactly who is in each seat,” club executive Oswaldo Basile said in October.
Fears over facial tracking are compounded by how the information could be combined with increasingly sophisticated forms of online monitoring and individualized messaging, now supercharged by generative AI tools.
“The targeted ad industry is incentivizing a pervasive economy of surveillance of us at all times,” Schwartz said.
Early facial ticketing pilots were met with some protests. And energy still exists to create more state or federal oversight. But as the technology’s penetration has expanded, pushback seemingly hasn’t. A demand for security is leading venue operators to test out the newest tech, while a desire for convenience and personalization has seen fans increasingly getting in line.
2025 was the year facial recognition went mainstream. For now, privacy crusaders are left to wait.
Real-Time Bidding: Personal data is continuously broadcasted to thousands of advertisers through real-time bidding, creating deep privacy and security risks.
Behavioral Tracking: Invisible trackers, cookies, and pixels build detailed psychological and behavioral profiles.
Offline Integration: Online monitoring is increasingly paired with real-world surveillance, such as facial recognition scanning in public spaces and sporting venues.
Surveillance Pricing: The infrastructure used to target ads is also being used to determine the prices consumers are charged based on their personal data.
These fucking millionaires and billionaires need to be pitchforked into mulch . . . “Landmaxxing Has Billionaires Buying Up All the Homes Around Them”
THESE PEOPLE NEED TO BE SHOOT, GUTTED, SPLAYED!
“It’s about controlling their lifestyle and their surroundings,” explains agent Angel Nicolas of Serhant. Some clients buy neighboring properties to create a larger estate, while others hold onto them for future development or to pass down to the next generation.
“Your home isn’t just the four walls you live in—it’s the entire experience of the neighborhood around you,” he says. “If you have the chance to own what’s next door, it can give you both peace of mind and flexibility for the future.”
An ongoing search at the site of a US airstrike on a school in southern Iran has recovered further remains belonging to 32 of the child victims, but authorities say no trace has yet been found of Makan Nasiri, a boy who has been missing for almost five months.
Officials in Hormozgan province said on Tuesday that weeks of recovery work at the Shajareh Tayyebeh School in Minab and the surrounding area had led to the discovery of 62 body fragments, which DNA testing identified as belonging to 32 of the students killed in the February 28 attack.
This guy is yammering and yammering . . . .
Blackhawk Down . . ..
Blackhawk downer costs a lot.
New reports confirm a massive $70 billion discrepancy regarding the true financial burden of the U.S.-Iran conflict. While Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testified that direct military costs have reached $37.5 billion, independent experts estimate the actual ongoing economic impact is over $100 billion when factoring in hidden costs like supply chain strain and soaring consumer energy prices.
President Donald Trump’s administration sought phone records of several New York Times journalists and even those of some of their relatives, according to a motion unsealed Monday — an unusually aggressive attempt to unmask the confidential sources of reporters who wrote about Trump’s Qatari-gifted Air Force One jet.
The efforts by the Republican president’s administration to compel the identity of sources in the form of additional subpoenas come at a time when the executive branch’s relationship with the press is increasingly contentious. The efforts, described in a letter-motion filed by the Times over the weekend, were more expansive than previously known, the newspaper noted. They also covered a time frame that exceeded the news articles in question.
“Two of the subpoenas seek records beginning on January 1, 2026, long before the events that are purportedly the basis for the Department’s investigation,” lawyers for the Times wrote in the letter. “That timeframe strongly suggests that the Department is using this investigation not to focus on any purported concerns arising from the July 8 and 9 articles, but instead to forage for information about the Journalists’ source relationships more broadly.”
Crap headline from Al Jazeera.
The Houthis may soon discover the limits of Saudi strategic patience
Saudi Arabia has so far ignored provocations to preserve regional stability. But it may soon be pushed into action.
Independent analysts and opposition lawmakers accuse the Trump administration of severely understating the true cost of the U.S. war in Iran.
While U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth testified to Congress that the conflict has cost $37.5 billion so far, independent tallies from groups like Moody’s Analytics and defense analysts place the total economic and operational cost upward of $100 billion to $132 billion.
Critics argue that the White House is using a narrow accounting framework and invoking operational security to obfuscate the full financial burden and growing casualty numbers from the American public
The supreme international crime according to 2017 U.S. media reporting is interfering nonviolently in a democratic election — at least if Russia does it. William Blum, in his book Rogue State, lists over 30 times that the United States has done that. Another study, however, says 81 elections in 47 countries. France 2017 makes that total at least 82. Honduras 2017 makes it 83. Russia 2018 makes it 84. The 2020-revealed 1964 coup in British Guiana makes it 85. Somalia 2022 would be 86. In 2025 Trump’s blatant interference in Argentina and Honduras would make it 88. There are clearly dozens more.
And yep, my Snakes US Passport already has the Homeland Security red flags, so, what would I expect going to Scotland to see a cousin, or buddy in Spain, upon my return?
Adely, Suzanne: The president of the National Lawyers Guild who participated in the Nuestra América Convoy and who, the report notes, praised Venezuela’s 2024 elections.
Amazon Labor Union: A labor union founded by Christian Smalls that participated in the 2026 Nuestra América Convoy to Cuba.
Antifa: A decentralized group of self-described “Anti-fascist” political activists
Assata’s Daughters: A Chicago-based Black Lives Matter abolitionist offshoot that trains young activists in the radical spirit of Assata Shakur.
Association for Investment in Popular Action Committees (AIPAC): A California-based umbrella nonprofit that funds left-wing media and delegations to Cuba and Venezuela.
Bass, Karen: The current Mayor of Los Angeles and former Congresswoman who was a Venceremos Brigade organizer in the 1970s.
Benjamin, Medea (Susan Benjamin): A co-founder of Code Pink and Global Exchange who organizes Cuba solidarity efforts.
Black Alliance for Peace: An activist group that maps U.S. military bases and police training facilities as targets for radical agitation.
Black Lives Matter (BLM) (including Global Network Foundation, Grassroots, and at School): A sprawling racial justice network whose leaders and offshoots, the report says, have expressed solidarity with Cuban regime and radical figures like Assata Shakur.
Boudin, Chesa: The former District Attorney of San Francisco and son of Weather Underground member Kathy Boudin.
changingFrequencies: A Black Queer Feminist-led abolitionist project aiming to disrupt waht it calls the “Medical Industrial Complex”.
Claudia Jones School: A Washington, D.C.-based organizing collective that conducts popular education and, the report says, pro-Cuba lobbying.
Code Pink: Women for Peace: A left-wing protest group that describes itself as anti-war and organizes solidarity delegations to Cuba.
Cohen, Ben: The co-founder of Ben & Jerry’s who attended the wedding of Neville Roy Singham and Jodie Evans.
de la Cruz, Claudia: The co-founder of the People’s Forum, IFCO executive director, and 2024 presidential candidate for the Party for Socialism and Liberation.
De Los Santos, Manolo: The co-founder and head of the People’s Forum who the report says maintains deep relationships with Cuban regime elites.
Democratic Socialists of America (DSA): A major socialist political organization that has organized official delegations to Cuba.
Ensler, Eve (V): A prominent playwright who attended the wedding of Neville Roy Singham and Jodie Evans.
Equality for Flatbush: A Brooklyn-based Black Lives Matter abolitionist group fighting gentrification, police, and ICE.
Evans, Jodie: The co-founder of Code Pink who married Neville Roy Singham.
Floyd, George: A Minneapolis man whose 2020 death sparked nationwide uprisings that the report notes were praised by Cuba.
Garza, Alicia: The co-founder of Black Lives Matter who credited Assata Shakur as a key influence in her organizing work.
Goodman, Amy: The host of Democracy Now! who the report notes attended the wedding of Neville Roy Singham and Jodie Evans.
Haitian Women for Haitian Refugees: An activist group led by Black women that organizes to defend Black migrants and block deportations.
Hirsi, Isra: A campus activist and daughter of Ilhan Omar who was suspended from Barnard College for organizing anti-Israel encampments before traveling to Cuba.
IFCO / Pastors for Peace: An ecumenical foundation that organizes aid caravans to leftist regimes and serves as a fiscal sponsor for numerous radical U.S. groups.
Larudee, Paul: A U.S. citizen based in San Francisco who serves as the North American coordinator for the pro-Iranian “Resistance Axis” coalition Al-Tajammu.
Mamdani, Zohran: Mayor of New York
National Lawyers Guild (NLG): An association of radical lawyers that provides legal defense and “legal observers” for various left-wing groups
National Network on Cuba (NNOC): A coalition of over 60 American groups dedicated to lobbying for Cuba and coordinating nationwide direct actions.
Omar, Ilhan: A Democratic Congresswoman and mother of campus activist Isra Hirsi.
Party for Socialism and Liberation: A leftist political party that fielded a 2024 presidential candidate and conducts protests.
People’s Forum, The: An activist hub for anti-ICE and pro-Cuban agitation.
Piker, Hasan: A streamer and left-wing political commentator who, the report notes, traveled to Cuba to film a documentary and participated in the Nuestra América Convoy.
Pressley, Ayanna: A Democratic Congresswoman who, the report notes, publicly praised convicted murderer Assata Shakur upon her death.
Singham, Neville Roy: A Shanghai-based American technology magnate who funds various left-wing activist groups.
Smalls, Christian: The founder of the Amazon Labor Union who participated in the 2026 Nuestra América Convoy to Cuba.
Thousand Currents: A progressive nonprofit that served as the fiscal sponsor for the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation.
Villaraigosa, Antonio: A former Mayor of Los Angeles and Speaker of the California Assembly who was a Venceremos Brigade alumnus.
Viva Palestina US: The American branch of an international network that, the report says, previously provided convoys and funds to Hamas.
Waters, Maxine: A Democratic Congresswoman who, the report notes, once wrote a letter urging Fidel Castro not to extradite fugitive Assata Shakur.
Wilson, Diane: A co-founder of Code Pink.
Witness for Peace Solidarity Collective: An organization that runs recurring solidarity delegations to Cuba.
Ahh, from another Jewish liberal:
Guilt by association at its finest. But what exactly are they guilty of?
What the report shows isn’t that any of these people are knowingly taking directions from a foreign power — only that they disagree with the U.S. government on Cuba policy (or at most, agree with Cuba).
Their views can be wrong — aggressively, offensively wrong even — but it’s their goddamn right as Americans to hold them.
U.S. and Iran trade strikes for 9th day. Israel has killed at least 1,158 Palestinians in Gaza since the so-called ceasefire deal was signed, according to Gaza’s Health Ministry. Middle East Eye reports Israeli minister “Smotrich says U.S. fighting Iran is ‘best for us’ and Israel will not join … Finance minister says the war serves Israeli interests while American troops and households bear its mounting costs.” AntiWar.com is reporting “Nearly 100 U.S. Troops Injured This Month”.
Words, man, this shit hole’s White Man’s House of the Minyans . . . .
Luna Amendment to #1394 The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA)
Representative Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL-13) introduced Amendment 1394/320 to the H.R. 8800 (National Defense Authorization Act) on July 20, 2026.
Related legislation: H.R.8800; S.4784
Bill Summary: The Luna Amendment strikes 7 words, including four instances of the word “integration/integrate” from Sec. 219 of the NDAA, the section that creates the U.S.-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative.
Context: The changes made by this Amendment are entirely cosmetic. The Amendment is a cosmetic cynical ploy and bad faith politics on the part of REP Luna and the Republican Majority to muddy the waters around this section. Specifically, the Amendment:
Does not strike the most important instance of the term ‘integration,’ which occurs in Section (a)(1), as follows:
identifying jointly developed or Israeli-origin technologies with operational utility for potential integration into United States systems and programs of record;
Would not have any meaningful impact on the overall direction of the Initiative – it would not remove the directive for integration of Israeli tech into U.S. weapons systems; would not substantively change the 10 areas of emerging tech collaboration, would not impact the directive to expand coproduction, and would not remove the directive to appoint an Executive Agent in DOD to see the program forward.
A New Policy’s Recommendation: OPPOSE
A New Policy opposes the amendment as it is a cosmetic change to section 219 and bad faith politics, and A New Policy is urging Members to OPPOSE the Luna Amendment on that basis. Had the Majority wished to have a real debate on this issue, they could have advanced the Massie-Khanna Amendment to strike Sec. 219 entirely. The fact they did not tells you everything you need to know about this Amendment.
“Congress has once again defied the will of the American people and moved us one step closer to fusing our military industrial complex with Israel’s. Even worse, they’re not even willing to have an honest, public debate about the issue. They just keep pushing this dangerous proposal forward behind closed doors. And, the reason they’re doing this is painfully obvious: they know the American people don’t want it, but they’re too scared to stand up to the Israel lobby. But, enough is enough, it’s well past time that Congress puts the interests of the American people above the interests of Benjamin Netanyahu.”
What the fuck? China Rejects U.S. Allegations of Foreign Military and Intelligence Facilities in Cuba.
On Monday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian rejected U.S. allegations about the presence of foreign military and intelligence facilities in Cuba.
FUCK AMERIKKA:
Yeah, Wolff and Sachs and other Jews yammering about the end of Imperial AmeriKKKa. I want some of that HOPEIUM they snort.
Denouncements? We need to start training folks how to pick up a gun, how to make gasoline and fertilizer bombs, and how to remote detonate them, motherfuckers:
A strange strange world indeed: DICTATORS!
On Wednesday, the Guatemalan government unveiled the design for the funerary monument that will house the remains of writer Miguel Angel Asturias, winner of the 1967 Nobel Prize in Literature.
The repatriation of Asturias’ remains from France is scheduled for October, while Minister of Culture Luis Mendez explained that the memorial will be located in the gardens of the Miguel Angel Asturias Cultural Center in Guatemala City, as a permanent tribute to the writer.
The design, by Guatemalan architect Alejandro Paz, consists of a contemporary pavilion with twin reinforced concrete beams, a metal roof, and marble elements, respectfully integrated into the existing heritage site.
Meanwhile, the Miguel Angel Asturias Cultural Center is internationally recognized for its organic architecture, which blends structures with Guatemala’s topography and volcanic landscape.
There’s a certain confusion about this novel, to which Asturias himself contributed. At the time, he championed social and protest fiction, the kind that revealed the horrors that Latin American dictators had committed. On many occasions, he claimed that his book belonged to the genre of politically engaged novels.
Undoubtedly, this is one important aspect of Mr. President. The novel deals with prototypical Latin American realist or local color themes, based on the dramatic historical circumstance that dictators ruled most Latin American countries.
In an unnamed country, an egomaniacal dictator schemes to dispose of a political adversary and maintain his grip on power. As tyranny takes hold, everyone is forced to choose between compromise and death. Inspired by life under the regime of President Manuel Estrada Cabrera of Guatemala, where it was banned for many years, and infused with exuberant lyricism, Mayan symbolism, and Guatemalan vernacular, Nobel Prize winner Miguel Ángel Asturias’s magnum opus is at once a surrealist masterpiece, a blade-sharp satire of totalitarianism, and a gripping portrait of psychological terror.
Miguel Ángel Asturias’s Nobel Lecture, 12th December 1967
(Translation)
The Latin American Novel: Testimony of an Epoch
I would have preferred this meeting to have been called a colloquium instead of a lecture – a dialogue of doubts and assertions on the subject that concerns us. Let us start by analysing the antecedents of Latin American literature in general, focusing our attention on those aspects that have most connection with the novel. Let us follow the sources back to the millenarian origins of indigenous literature in its three great moments: Maya, Aztec and Inca.
The following question arises: Was there something resembling the novel among the indigenous peoples? I believe there was. The history of the original cultures of Latin America has more of what we in the Western world call the novel than of history. It is necessary to bear in mind that the books of their history – their novels we would now say – were painted by the Aztecs and Mayas and preserved in a figurative form which we still do not understand by the Incas. This assumes the use of pictograms in which the voice of the reader – the indigenous do not distinguish between reading and reciting since for them it is the same thing – recited the text to the listeners in song form.
The reader, reciting stories or ‘great language’, the only person who understood what the pictograms meant, carried out an interpretation, recreating them for the enlightenment of those who listened. Later, these painted stories become fixed in the memory of the listeners and pass in oral form from generation to generation until the alphabet brought by the Spanish fixes them in their native tongues with Latin characters or directly in Spanish. In this way, indigenous texts come to our knowledge with very little exposure to European corruption. The reading of these documents is what has allowed us to affirm that, among the native Americans, history has more of the characteristics of the novel than of history. They are accounts in which reality is dissolved in fable, legend, the trappings of beauty, and in which the imagination, by dint of describing all the reality that it contains, ends up re-creating a reality that we might call surrealist.
This characteristic of the annulment of reality through imagination and the re-creation of a more transcendental reality is combined with a constant annulment of time and space as well as something more significant: the use and abuse of parallel expressions, i.e., the parallel use of different words to designate the same object, to convey the same idea and express the same feelings. I wish to draw attention to this point – the parallelism in the indigenous texts allows an exercise of nuances that we find hard to appreciate but which undoubtedly permitted a poetic gradation destined to induce certain states of consciousness which were taken to be magic.
If we return to the theme of the origin of a literary genre, similar to the novel, among the pre-Colombian peoples it is necessary to link the birth of this novel form with the epic. The heroic legend, exceeding the possibilities of historical fiction, was sung by the rhapsodists – the great voices of the tribes or ‘cuicanimes’ who toured the cities reciting the texts in order that the beauty of their songs would be disseminated among the peoples like the golden blood of their gods.
These epic songs that are so abundant in pre-Columbian literature, and so little known, possess what we call ‘fictional plot’ and what the Spanish friars and missionaries termed ‘tricks’.
These fictional tales were originally the testimony of past epochs; the memory and fame of high deeds that others on hearing, would desire to emulate. This literature of reality and fable is broken in the instant of servitude and remains as one of the many broken vessels of those great civilisations. Other narratives will follow – in this same documentary form – recounting not the evidence of greatness but of misery, not the testimony of liberty but of slavery, no longer the statements of the masters but those of the subjects and a new, emerging American literature attempting to fill the empty silences of an epoch.
However, the literary genres that flourished in the Iberian peninsulas – the realistic novel and the theatre – were not to put down roots here. On the contrary, it is the indigenous effervescence, the sap and the blood, river, sea and mirage that affects the first Spaniard to write the first great American ‘novel’ for the ‘True Story of the Events of the Conquest of New Spain’ written by Bernal Diaz del Castillo deserves to be called no less. Is it not rather bold to describe as a ‘novel’ what that soldier called not history but ‘true history’? But are not novels frequently the true history? I repeat the question: is it really boldness to describe as a novel the work of this illustrious chronicler?
To those who might call me daring in my description, I would invite them to enter the cadenced and panting prose of this versatile foot soldier, and they will notice how – on entering into it – they gradually forget that what happened was reality and it will seem to them increasingly a work of pure imagination. Indeed, even Bernal himself says no less, next to the very walls of Tenochtitlan: “this seemed to be the work of enchantment that is recounted in the book of Amadis!” But this is the work of a Spaniard – it will be said – although the only thing Spanish about it is its having been written by a ‘peninsular’ resident in Santiago de los Caballeros de Guatemala – where that glorious manuscript is kept – and its having been composed in the old language of Castile although it partakes of that masquerade characteristic of indigenous literature. To Don Marcelino Menendez y Pelayo – this expert in classic Spanish literature – the taste of this prose is strange and the fact that it has been written by a soldier he finds surprising. It escapes this eminent writer that Bernal, at the age of eighty, had not only heard many texts of indigenous literature being recited, being influenced by it, but through osmosis had absorbed America and had already become American.
But there is another more impressive parenthesis. In their last sorrowful cantos, the indigenous peoples – now subjugated – call for justice and Bernal Diaz Castillo expresses his deepest feelings in a chronicle which is a howl of protest at the oblivion into which they fell after being “fought and conquered.”
As from this moment, all Latin American literature, in song and novel, not only becomes a testimony for each epoch but also, as stated by the Venezuelan writer Arturo Uslar Pietri, an “instrument of struggle”. All the great literature is one of testimony and vindication, but far from being a cold dossier, these are moving pages written by one conscious of his power to impress and convince.
Will the south give us a mestizo? The mestizo par excellence since – in order for nothing to be lacking – he was the first American exile: Inca Garcilaso. This Creole exile follows the indigenous voices already extinguished in his denunciation of the oppressors of Peru. The Inca offers us in his magnificent prose not only the native American – nor only the Spanish – but the mixture materialised in the fusion of the bloods, and in the same demand for life and justice.
To start with, nobody discerns the ‘message’ in the prose of Inca. This will be clarified during the struggle for independence. Inca will then appear with the dignity of the Indian who knew how to make fun of the empire of “the two knives” – that is to say, civil and ecclesiastical censorship. The Spanish authorities, slow to fathom the message containing so much spirit, imagination and melancholy, wisely order the confiscation of the story of Inca Garcilaso where the Indians have “learned so many dangerous things.”
Not only poetry and works of fiction bear witness. The least expected authors such as Francisco Javier Clavijero, Francisco Javier Alegre, Andrés Calvo, Manuel Fabri, Andres de Guevara gave birth to a literature of exiles which is – and will continue to be – a testimony of its epoch.
Even the Guatemalan poet Rafael Landívar has his form of rebellion. His protest is silence – he calls the Spanish ‘Hispani’ without qualifying the adjective. We refer to Landívar because, despite being the least known, he should be considered the standard-bearer of American literature as the authentic expression of our lands, our people and landscapes. According to Pedro Henriquez-Urena, “among the poets of the Spanish colonies he is the first master of landscape, the first to break definitively with the conventions of the Renaissance and discover the characteristic features of nature in the New World – its flora and fauna, its countryside and mountains, its lakes and waterfalls. In his descriptions of customs, of the crafts and the games there is an amusing vivacity and – throughout the poem – a deep sympathy and understanding of the survival of the original cultures.”
In 1781 in Modena, Italy, there appeared under the title of ‘Rusticatio Mexicana’ a poetic work of 3,425 Latin hexameters, in 10 cantos, written by Rafael Landívar. One year later in Bologna, the second edition appeared. The poet, called by Menendez y Pelayo ‘the Virgil of the modern age ’, proclaimed to the Europeans the excellence of the land, the life and the peoples of America. He was concerned for the people of the Old World to know that El Jorullo, a Mexican volcano, could rival Vesuvius and Etna, that the waterfalls and caves of San Pedro Martir in Guatemala were the equals of the famous fountains of Castalia and Aretusa and referring to the cenzontle – the bird whose song has 400 tones – he elevated it above the realm of the nightingale.
He sings the praises of the countryside, of the gold and silver that was filling the world with valuable coins and the sugar loaves offered at royal tables.
His poem is not short of statistics concerning the riches of America. He cites the droves of cattle, the flocks of sheep, the herds of goats and pigs, the sources of medicinal waters, the popular games – some unknown in Europe – and he does not hide the glory of the cocoa and chocolate of Guatemala. But there is something that we should be aware of in the song of Landivar; namely his love of the indigenous. The Indian, for Landivar, is the race that succeeds in everything; he describes the marvels of the floating gardens created by the Indians; he holds them up as examples of charm and skill without forgetting their great sufferings. In this way he imparts poetic substance – in naturalistic poetry far from symbolism – to a fact that has always been denied: the superiority of the American Indian as farmer, as craftsman and worker.
To the image of the bad Indian, lazy and immoral that was so widely propagated in Europe and accepted in America by those who exploit it, Landívar opposes the picture of the Indian on whose shoulders has weighed – and continues to weigh – the burden of labour in America. And he does not do it by simply stating it – in which case we would have the right or not of believing it. In his poem we see the Indian on board his charming canoe, transporting his goods or travelling and we admire him extracting the purple and scarlet, laying out the snowy worms that produce the silk, holding on stubbornly to the rocks in order to remove the beautiful shellfish, patiently and doggedly ploughing, cultivating the indigo plant, extracting the silver from his native mines, exhausting the golden veins… The Rusticatio of Landívar confirms what we have said of the great American literature – it cannot accept a passive role while on our soil a famished people live in these abundant lands. In its content it is a form of novel in verse.
Fifty years later, Andres Bello was to renovate the American adventure in his famous ‘Silva’, an immortal and perfect work in which the nature of the New World appears again with maize the leader – as haughty chief of the corn tribe – the cacao in ‘coral urns’, the coffee plants, the banana, the tropics in all their vegetable and animal power, contrasting the impoverished inhabitant with this grandiose vision ‘of the rich soil.’
Bello recalls Inca Garcilaso in his role as an exile; he is of the American lineage of Landívar, both represent the brilliant start of the great American odyssey in world literature. As from this moment the image of nature in the New World will awaken in Europe an interest but it will never attain the incandescent fidelity that is achieved in the work of Landívar and Bello. A distorted vision of the marvels is offered us by Chateaubriand in ‘Atala’ and ‘Les Natchez’.
For the Europeans, nature is a background without the gravitational force achieved by Creole romanticism. The romantics give nature a permanent presence in the creations of poets and novelists of the epoch. This is exemplified by José María de Heredia singing of the Niagara Falls and Esteban Echeverría describing the desert in ‘La Cautiva ’, to mention just two.
Latin American romanticism was not only a literary school but a patriotic flag. Poets, historians, and novelists divide their days and nights between political activities and dreaming their creations. Never has it been more beautiful to be a poet in America! Amongst the poets influenced by the Patria converted in Muse are José Mármol, author of one of the most widely read novels in Latin America – ‘Amalia’. The pages of this book have been turned by our febrile and sweaty fingers when we suffered in our very bones the dictatorships that have plagued Central America. The critics, when referring to the novel of Mármol, point out inconsistencies and carelessness without realising that a work of this type is written with a madly beating heart – pulsations that leave in the sentence, in the paragraph, on the page that abnormal heartbeat reflecting the distortion of the life force that troubled the entire country. We are in the presence of one of the most passionate examples of the American novel. Despite the years, ‘Amelia’ – the imprecations of José, Mármol – continues to move readers to such an extent as to represent an act of faith.
It is at this very moment that the voice of Sarmiento is heard posing his famous dilemma at the threshold of the century: ‘civilisation or barbarism’. Indeed, Sarmiento himself will be startled when he becomes aware that ‘Facundo’ turns his arms against him and against everyone, declaring himself to be the authentic representative of Creole America, of the America that refuses to die and attempts to break – with a breast already hardened – the antithetical scheme of civilisation and barbarism in order to find between these two extremes the point where the American peoples are able to find their authentic personality with their own essential values.
In the middle of the last century another romantic, no less passionate, appears in Guatemala: José Batres Montúfar. In the midst of tales of festive character, the reader feels that he should forget the fiesta to listen to the poetry. The immortal José Batres Montúfar, with abundant charm tinged with bitterness, was able to get to the core of issues that already – in the middle of the past century – were highly charged.
Another voice was to ring out from north to south, that of José Martí. His presence was felt, whether as an exile or in his beloved Cuba, the fre of his speech as poet or journalist being combined with the example of his sacrifice.
The 20th century is full of poets, poets who have nothing more to say, with very few exceptions. Among the latter stand out the immortal Rubén Darío and Juan Ramón Molina from Honduras. The poets flee from reality, maybe because this is one of the ways of being a poet. But there is nothing living in much of their work, which instead tend towards garrulity.
They are ignorant of the clear lesson of the native rhapsodists; they are forgetful of the colonial craftsmen of our great literature, satisfied with the bloodless imitation of the poetry of other latitudes and ridicule those who sang the bold gestures of the liberation struggle, considering them dazzled by a local patriotism.
It is only when the First World War is passed that a handful of men – men and artists – embark on the reconquest of their own tradition. In their encounter with the indigenous peoples, they drop anchor in their Spanish home port and return with the message that they have to deliver to the future.
Latin American literature will be reborn under other signs – no longer that of verse. Now the prose is tactile, plural and irreverent in its attitude to conventions – to serve the purpose of this new crusade whose first move was to plunge into reality not so as to objectify but rather to penetrate the facts in order to identify fully with the problems of humanity. Nothing human – nothing which is real – will be foreign to this literature inspired by contact with America. And this is the case of the Latin American novel. Nobody doubts that the Latin American novel is at the leading edge of its genre in the world. It is cultivated in all our countries, by writers of different tendencies, which means that in the novel everything is forged from American material – the human witness of our historic moment.
We, the Latin American novelists of today, working within the tradition of engagement with our peoples which has enabled our great literature to develop – our poetry of substance – also have to reclaim lands for our dispossessed, mines for our exploited workers, to raise demands in favour of the masses who perish in the plantations, who are scorched by the sun in the banana fields, who turn into human bagasse in the sugar refineries. It is for this reason that – for me – the authentic Latin American novel is the call for all these things; it is the cry that echoes down the centuries and is pronounced in thousands of pages. A novel that is genuinely ours; determined and loyal – in its pages – to the cause of the human spirit, to the fists of our workers, to the sweat of our rural peasants, to the pain for our undernourished children; calling for the blood and the sap of our vast lands to run once more towards the seas to enrich our burgeoning new cities.
This novel shares – consciously or unconsciously – the characteristics of the indigenous texts; their freshness and power, the numismatic anguish in the eyes of the Creoles who awaited the dawn in the colonial night, more luminous however than this night that threatens us now. Above all, it is the affirmation of the optimism of those writers that defied the Inquisition, opening a breach in the conscience of the people for the march of the Liberators.
The Latin American novel, our novel, cannot betray the great spirit that has shaped – and continues to shape – all our great literature. If you write novels merely to entertain – then burn them! This might be the message delivered with evangelical fervour, since if you do not burn them they will anyway be erased from the memory of the people where a poet or novelist should aspire to remain. Just consider how many writers there have been who – down the ages – have written novels to entertain! And who remembers them now? On the other hand, how easy it is to repeat the names of those amongst us who have written to bear witness.
To bear witness. The novelist bears witness like the apostle. Like Paul trying to escape, the writer is confronted with the pathetic reality of the world that surrounds him – the stark reality of our countries that overwhelms and blinds us and, throwing us to our knees, forces us to shout out: WHY DO YOU PERSECUTE ME? Yes, we are persecuted by this reality that we cannot deny, which is lived in the flesh by the people of the Mexican revolution, embodied in persons such as Mariano Azuela, Agustin Yanez and Juan Rulfo whose convictions are as sharp as a knife; those who share with Jorge Icaza, Ciro Alegría, Jesús Lara the shout of protest against the exploitation and abandonment of the Indian; those who with Romulo Gallegos in ‘Done Bábara’ create for us our Prometheus. Here is Horacio Quiroga who frees us from the nightmare of the tropics, a nightmare that is as peculiar to him as his style is American. ‘Los ros profundos’ of José María Arguedas, the ‘Rio oscuro’ of the Argentinian Alfredo Varela, ‘Hijo de hombre’ of the Paraguayan Roa Bastos and ‘La ciudad y los perros’ of the Peruvian Vargas Llosa make us see how the life-blood of the working people is drained in our lands.
Mancisidor takes us to the oil fields to which are drawn – leaving their homes – the inhabitants of ‘Cases muertas’ of Miguel Otero Silva… David Vinas confronts us with the tragic Patagonia, Enrique Wernicke sweeps us along with the waters that overwhelm whole communities while Verbitsky and María de Jesús lead us to the miserable shanty towns, the Dantesque and subhuman quarters of our great cities…
Teitelboim in ‘E1 hijo del salitre’ tells us of the gruelling work in the saltpetre mines while Nicomedes Guzman makes us share in the lives of the children in the Chilean working class districts. We feel the countryside of E1 Salvador in ‘Jaragua’ of Napoleón Rodríguez Ruiz and our small villages in ‘Cenizas del Izalco’ of Flakol and Clarivel Alegria. We cannot think of the pampas without speaking of ‘Don Segundo Sombra’ by Guiraldes nor speak of the jungle without ‘La voragine’ of Eustasio Rivera, nor of the Negroes: without Jorge Amado, nor of the Brazilian plains without the ‘Gran Sertao’ of Guimaraes Rosa, nor of the plains of Venezuela without Ramón Díaz Sánchez.
Our books do not search for a sensationalist or horrifying effect in order to secure a place for us in the republic of letters. We are human beings linked by blood, geography and life to those hundreds, thousands, millions of Latin Americans who suffer misery in our opulent and rich American continent. Our novels attempt to mobilise across the world the moral forces that have to help us defend those people. The mestizo process was already advanced in our literature and in rediscovering America it lent a human dimension to the grandiose nature of the continent. But this is a nature neither for the gods as in the texts of the Indians, nor a nature for heroes as in the writings of the romantics, but a nature for men and women in which the human problems will be addressed again with vigour and audacity.
As true Latin Americans, the beauty of expression excites us and – for this reason – each one of our novels is a verbal feat. Alchemy is at work. We know it. It is no easy task to understand in the executed work all the effort and determination invested in the materials used – the words.
Yes, I say words – but by what laws and rules they have been transformed! They have been set as the pulse of worlds in formation. They ring like wood, like metals. This is onomatopoeia. In the adventure of our language, the first aspect that demands attention is onomatopoeia. How many echoes – composed or disintegrated – of our landscape, our nature are to be found in our words, our sentences. The novelist embarks on a verbal adventure, an instinctive use of words. One is guided along by sounds. One listens, listens to the characters.
Our best novels do not seem to have been written but spoken. There is verbal dynamics in the poetry enclosed in the very word itself, and that is revealed first as sound and afterwards as concept.
This is why the great Spanish American novels are vibrantly musical in the convulsion of the birth of all the things that are born with them.
The adventure continues in the confluence of the languages. Amongst the languages spoken by the people, in which the Indian languages are represented, there is an admixture of the European and Oriental languages brought by the immigrants to America.
Another language is going to rain its sparkle over sounds and words. The language of images. Our novels seem to be written not only with words but with images. Quite a few people, when reading our novels, see them cinematically. And this is not because they pursue a dramatic statement of independence but because our novelists are engaged in universalising the voice of their peoples with a language rich in sounds, rich in fable and rich in images.
This is not a language artificially created to provide scope for the play of the imagination or so-called poetic prose; it is a vivid language that preserves in its popular speech all the lyricism, the imagination, the grace, the high-spiritedness that characterise the language of the Latin American novel.
The poetic language which nourishes our novelistic literature is more or less its breath of life. Novels with lungs of poetry, lungs of foliage, lungs of rich vegetation. I believe that what most attracts non-American readers is what our novels have achieved by means of a colourful, brilliant language without falling into the merely picturesque, the spell of onomatopoeia cast by representing the music of the countryside and sometimes the sounds of the indigenous languages, the ancestral smack of those languages that flourish unconsciously in the prose that is used. There is also the importance of the word as an absolute entity, as a symbol. Our prose is distinguished from Castilian syntax because the word – in our novels – has a value of its own, just as it had in the indigenous languages. Word, concept, sound; a rich, fascinating transposition. Nobody can understand our literature, our poetry if the power of enchantment is removed from the word.
Word and language enable the reader to participate in the life of our novelistic creations. Unsettling, disturbing, forcing the attention of the reader who – forgetting his daily life – will enter into the situations and personalities of a novel tradition that retains intact its humanistic values. Nothing is used to detract from mankind but rather to perfect it and this is perhaps what wins over and unsettles the reader, that which transforms our novel into a vehicle of ideas, an interpreter of peoples using as an instrument a language with a literary dimension, with imponderable magical value and profound human projection.
Translated by The Swedish Trade Council Language Services.
From Les Prix Nobel en 1967, Editor Ragnar Granit, [Nobel Foundation], Stockholm, 1968
Humberto Ak’abal (1952–2019) was a K’iche’ Maya poet from Guatemala. His book Guardián de la caída de agua (Guardian of the Waterfall) was named book of the year by Association of Guatemalan Journalists and received their Golden Quetzal award in 1993. In 2004, he declined to receive the Guatemala National Prize in Literature because it is named for Miguel Ángel Asturias, whom Ak’abal accused of encouraging racism. Ak’abal, a recipient of a Guggenheim fellowship, passed away on January 28th, 2019.
ICE has been touting record-high arrest numbers this summer—and they are not wrong. The daily rate of ICE arrests in June was over 1,300, the highest month of the Trump administration, and in July that number increased again to a record 1,474 arrests per day for the first 11 days for which we have data. This reverses a trend we saw since the early fall where overall arrest numbers had actually remained fairly consistent or declined. The purported shift in ICE tactics—from the manic Kristi Noem months that cost the lives of two U.S. citizens to the less spectacular tactics under Markwayne Mullin—has effectively led to more arrests without as much popular backlash. The rising death toll of ICE detention, not to mention the deadly shooting of Joan Sebastián Durán Guerrero in Maine, hardly points to a more disciplined, less rogue agency.
Of those people held in detention, the largest group continues to be immigrants with no criminal history whatsoever, reinforcing the now longstanding observation that the agency is not targeting the worst of the worst. In fact, the percentage of people in detention with nothing more than an actual or alleged immigration violation (with all of the utter meaninglessness that this administration has made of that category) continued to grow since April while the percentage of immigrants with charges or convictions declined as a percent of the total. These crude categories do not tell the whole story of the lives of people in detention, but I continue to present this as an important contextualizing data point.
+—+
Drawing on his personal experiences under the reign of Estrada Cabrera, Asturias explored the nature of a totalitarian state and how it annihilated human dignity and spirit.
[CABRERA’S 22-year rule (1898–1920) is widely documented as a “reign of terror” responsible for thousands of casualties.]
My father was one of the victims of the man for whom all the torments of Hell are waiting—Colonel Parrales Sonriente— that hired assassin whose deeds will some day figure in history, if there is anyone prepared to dip his pen in snake-poison to write it.
At the behest of the all-controlling dictator, the police and the judicial system work in tandem to frame two innocent public figures who can be a threat in the future for the President – ‘the indictment charging Canales and Carvajal with sedition, rebellion and treason, with all possible aggravating circumstances.’
The scene of Carvajal’s trial is a classic:
“The table round which the tribunal sat was covered by a flag, as prescribed by the regulations. The beggars were sitting in the witnesses’ seats. Carvajal turned and looked at the members of the tribunal, searching for signs of wisdom and judgement. The first one his eyes encountered was as drunk as it was possible to be. And the President (of the tribunal), who was giving the most finished performance of them all as an alcoholic, seemed on the point of passing out.”
Carvajal is neither given adequate time to read the ninety-one pages of the indictment nor allowed to defend himself against the charges. Since the tribunal knows that he is innocent, this is considered waste of time and an exercise in futility. The tribunal has been meticulous, however, to ensure that “the sentence had been drawn up and written out in advance” – and it is now served on him. Carvajal is executed the next morning.
In a totalitarian state corruption always seeps from top to bottom. Asturias amplifies it with the description of the judge advocate general, the highest judicial authority in the state who has swindled a brothel owner of ten thousand pesos, and is all too willing to prostitute his office to serve the tyrant. When Carvajal’s widow comes to his house to know where the body of her husband is buried the judge’s servant sympathises with her, only to be chastised by his master when he learns about it:
“When will you understand that you mustn’t encourage people to hope? In my house the first thing everyone, down to the cat, has to learn is that there are never grounds for hope of any description for anyone. It’s only possible to go on holding a position like mine if you obey orders; the President’s rule of conduct is never to give grounds for hope, and everyone must be kicked and beaten until they realise the fact.”
Sky News spent four months pulling apart the bombing of the Shajareh Tayyebeh primary school in Minab — the strike that instantly became the most notorious moment of the U.S.-Israeli war on Iran. It happened on day one. The school was hit again and again, and 168 children were killed, along with teachers and staff whose identities were traced through painstaking open‑source work. Most of the dead were girls between seven and twelve. Their families have waited four months for the U.S. investigation that was promised, and nothing has been released.
With Iran’s internet shut down and travel into the country nearly impossible, Sky News’ Data and Forensics team turned to whatever evidence could be gathered remotely: satellite archives, CCTV, witness videos, old maps, school records, anything that could be verified. They worked with Forensic Architecture to rebuild the school in 3D and reconstruct the attack second by second.
What they found wasn’t a mystery. It was a failure that had been built into the system long before the missiles were launched.
The Pentagon had satellite imagery of the site going back to 1987. They had decades of overhead surveillance showing exactly what the compound was. They had images from December 2025 where you can literally see children’s shadows in the playground. The school had been walled off from the adjacent IRGC naval base since at least 2015, with its own perimeter, its own website, its own public footprint. Any analyst with basic tools could have confirmed it was a civilian school in minutes.
But on February 28, three Tomahawk missiles were fired from the USS Spruance, roughly 716 kilometers away in the Arabian Sea. CCTV shows the compound being hit nine times at 11:22 a.m. The school itself was struck about ten seconds after the first impact. Witnesses say the second missile landed exactly where a teacher had moved surviving students for shelter, killing nearly everyone who had taken cover there. A third strike followed on the same spot. The crater matches a Tomahawk. The pattern of impacts matches a Tomahawk. The launch platform matches a Tomahawk. There is no serious doubt left about what was used or who fired it.
This pathological psychopath is their president. This tells you everything you need to know…
Dictators of a many colored Feathered Yemukle
Israel Delays Release of Gaza War Crimes Investigations Again
Yeah, I put myself through this at 7 am: “Watch this Extremely Effective Right Wing Propaganda Video that Is Effective Primarily Because the Left Wrongly Says that Ordinary Whites Benefit from Racial Discrimination Against Non-Whites”
Many scholars of racism and slavery have memorized Du Bois’s sentence,
“The slave went free; stood for a brief moment in the sun; then moved back again towards slavery.”
Yet we ignore what immediately follows.
“The whole weight of America was thrown to the color cast,” he wrote. “A new slavery arose. The upward moving of white labor was betrayed into wars for profit based on color caste. Democracy died save in the heart of black folk. Indeed, the plight of the white working class throughout the world today is directly traceable to Negro slavery in America…”
Oh well, gotta fire off a few 12-gauge shells to start my morning:
Quoting Paulokirk:
Nauseating. First, I covered education in many states as a newspaper reporter. And, I taught as a substitute in many K-12 districts. You have zero idea how ludicrous you are thinking K12 is about teaching kiddos the truth, like the film 13th, or Exterminate All the Brutes, or the 1619 Project. Howard Zinn’s People’s History of the US is banned in many districts. WE CAN’T teach that, dude.
Here, amazing interview, again, try using this in many community colleges:
Gerald Horne in High School? Where can you teach his work?
“To the extent that 1776 led to the resultant U.S., which came to captain the African Slave Trade—as London moved in an opposing direction toward a revolutionary abolition of this form of property—the much-celebrated revolt of the North American settlers can fairly be said to have eventuated as a counter-revolution of slavery.”
Alabama Alaska Arkansas Florida Idaho Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah West Virginia Wyoming?
No way, Jose.
In his book The Counter-Revolution of 1776, historian Gerald Horne challenges the traditional view of the American Revolution. He argues that it was not a progressive fight for freedom, but a conservative movement to protect the institution of slavery from growing British abolitionist sentiments.
Teaching the Jewish State of Rape and Torture and Starvation is a colonial WHITE apartheid state of interlopers and land thieves? In High School? College? Bullshit:
Over 37 U.S. states have officially adopted or recognized the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism.
+–+
Ya just don’t get it.
+–+
Ya think I can teach Nick Estes in K12 where there is a heavy influence of Native Culture in the area? GIVE ME A BREAK. These books are verboten in your supposed great caring white-dominated school districts.
Water Protectors vs. Pipeline: The book details the protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL). This pipeline was built to carry oil across the Missouri River, threatening the drinking water and sacred lands of the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe.
The Concept of “Tiwahe”: Estes uses the Dakota word tiwahe (which means “family” or “household”) to describe how water protection is an act of caring for all living things. Think of it as a pebble dropped in a pond; one action ripples out to affect the entire community.
The Long Tradition: The author shows that the Standing Rock camp was not an isolated event. It was a continuation of past struggles, such as the fight against the Pick-Sloan Plan in the 1940s and 1950s. That plan built large dams on the Missouri River that flooded Native lands.
Decolonization: Estes argues that to heal our future, society must listen to Indigenous knowledge. Instead of treating the earth like a resource to extract for profit, we should treat it like a relative.
+–+
My old union:
“Let’s be clear: critical race theory is not taught in elementary schools or high schools. It’s a method of examination taught in law school and college that helps analyze whether systemic racism exists — and, in particular, whether it has an effect on law and public policy,” Weingarten said. “But culture warriors are labeling any discussion of race, racism or discrimination as CRT to try to make it toxic. They are bullying teachers and trying to stop us from teaching students accurate history.”
+–+
When Gloria Ladson-Billings set out in the 1990s to adapt critical race theory from law to education, she couldn’t have predicted that it would become the focus of heated school debates today.
Over the past couple years, the scrutiny of critical race theory — a theory she pioneered to help explain racial inequities in education — has become heavily politicized in school communities and by legislators. Along the way, it has also been grossly misunderstood and used as a lump term about many things that are not actually critical race theory, Ladson-Billings says.
“It’s like if I hate it, it must be critical race theory,” Ladson-Billings says. “You know, that could be anything from any discussions about diversity or equity. And now it’s spread into LGBTQA things. Talk about gender, then that’s critical race theory. Social-emotional learning has now gotten lumped into it. And so it is fascinating to me how the term has been literally sucked of all of its meaning and has now become ‘anything I don’t like.’”
In this week’s Harvard EdCast, Ladson-Billings discusses how she pioneered critical race theory, the current politicization and tension around teaching about race in the classroom, and offers a path forward for educators eager to engage in work that deals with the truth about America’s history.
Gloria Ladson-Billings: Let me be pretty elemental here. Critical race theory is a theoretical tool that began in legal studies, in law schools, in an attempt to explain racial inequity. It serves the same function in education. How do you explain the inequity of achievement, the racial inequity of achievement in our schools?
Now let’s be clear. The nation has always had an explanation for inequity. Since 1619, it’s always had an explanation. And indeed from 1619 to the mid-20th century, that explanation was biogenetic. Those people are just not smart enough. Those people are just not worthy enough. Those people are not moral enough.
In fact, across the country, we had on college and university campuses programs and departments in eugenics. If you went to the World’s Fair or the World Expositions back at the turn of the 20th century, you could see exhibits with, quote, groups of people from the best group, which was always white and typically blonde and blue-eyed, to the worst group, which is typically a group of Africans, generally pygmies. So the idea is you can rank people. So we’ve always had an explanation for why we thought inequity exists.
Somewhere around the mid-20th century, the 1950s, you’ll get a switch that says, well, no, it’s really not genetic; it’s that some groups haven’t had an equal opportunity. That was a powerful explanation. So one of the things that you begin to see around the mid-1950s is legislation and court decisions, Brown versus Board of Education. You start to see the Voting Rights Act. You see the Civil Rights Act. You see affirmative action going into the 1960s. And yeah, I think that’s a pretty good, powerful explanatory model.
Except they all get rolled back. 1954, Brown v. Board of Education. How many of our kids are still in segregated schools in 2022? So that didn’t hold. Affirmative action. The court’s about to hear that, right? Because of actually the case that’s coming out of Harvard. Voters rights. How many of our states have rolled back voters rights? You can’t give a person a bottle of water who was waiting in line in Georgia. We’re shrinking the window for when people can vote.
So all of the things that were a part of the equality of opportunity explanation have rolled away. Critical race theory’s explanation for racial inequality is that it is baked into the way we have organized the society. It is not aberrant. It’s not one of those things that we all clutch our pearls and say, “Oh my God, I can’t believe that happened.” It happens on a regular basis all the time. And so that’s really one of the tenets that people are uncomfortable hearing. That it’s not abnormal behavior in our society for people to react in racist ways.
Spritzler, another Jew, Finkelstein:
While Finkelstein’s criticisms resonate with defenders of the traditional Western canon, many scholars argue that he misunderstands the core foundation of CRT.
Ignoring Systemic Roots: Critics point out that Finkelstein’s arguments sometimes assume that for racism or bigotry to exist, there must be active, conscious, or written statutory laws against a group. In contrast, the entire premise of CRT is that discrimination can be quietly built into the “structure” of societal institutions, functioning almost like toxic material in a building.
Dismissing Everyday Realities: Critics argue that because Finkelstein often focuses purely on older models of legal discrimination, he downplays how casual racism, institutional barriers, and implicit biases affect marginalized communities today.
Here at UCLA Law, we have been home to a nation-leading Critical Race Studies program for the last 20 years. And right now across the country, a firestorm over Critical Race Theory has exploded. New legislation bans ideas and research designed to combat racism from classrooms and workplace training by labeling them as “divisive” and “anti-American.” What is at the root of this conflict? And what are its consequences? Join our panel of experts for a deeper conversation discussing the origins of Critical Race Theory, a breakdown of the current debate, and a thoughtful analysis of what is at stake.
This event is in partnership with UCLA Law Critical Race Studies, home of the nation’s first Critical Race Studies program.
+—+
Fucking Heni Youngman and Mel Brooks and Seinfeld:
Finkelsteinian zingers
On MSNBC’s Joy Reid: “living proof that not all yentas are Jewish and not all bovines are cows.”
On Angela Davis: “Once upon a time she was on the F.B.I.’s Ten Most Wanted List. Now she’s on Martha’s Vineyard’s Five Most Coveted List.”
On Henry Louis Gates: “a virtuoso at crawling on the ground while typing on his keyboard.”
On Amy Goodman (whom he doesn’t name): “Goddess of Wokeness…a woke machine, churning out insipid clichés as her mental faculty degenerates to mush.”
On Ibram X. Kendi: “mallet-wielding grifter…preposterous poseur…[whose] ‘definitive history of racist ideas in America’ reduces to a compendium of prepubescent binary name-calling.”
On Robin DiAngelo’s morbid obsession with diagnosing “racism”: “She is the monomaniacal Captain Ahab in pursuit of the White Whale. She is little Jackie Paper out to slay Puff the Racist Dragon. Her palette comprises two colors—white and black… What an unremitting, remorseless, insufferable bore!”
On the widespread fascination with transgender people: “the first day of a graduate seminar, students used to describe their intellectual interests. Nowadays, it’s de rigueur to declare your sexual orientation. It’s only a matter of time before a student announces, ‘I’m she/her and I’m packing a thick, juicy nine-incher.’”
Richard Martinez, the attorney who represents a group of Mexican-American students who attended Tucson schools, said the students sued shortly after the law was passed by Arizona Governor Jan Brewer.
“This was the curriculum that was intended to be responsive to them…culturally, linguistically, educationally,” Martinez said. “The program had a very strong effect on students’ achievement… in fact, most of the students finished high school and matriculated to college, which was unprecedented at Tucson Unified School District.”
Gloria Ladson-Billings: And I’d always pull out the university’s mission statement. And I’d say, “You see these words right here around social justice? That’s where I am with this work. I don’t know what they’re doing at the business school on social justice, but I can tell you that the university has essentially made a commitment it to this particular issue. Now we can debate whether or not you agree with me, but I haven’t pulled this out of thin air.”
So if I’m a school superintendent, I want to say, “Here are core values that we have.” I’m reminded of many years ago. I was supervising a student teacher. It was a second grade. And she had a little boy in a classroom and they were doing something for Martin Luther King. It might have been just coloring in a picture of him with some iconic statement. And this one little boy put a big X on it. And she said, “Why did you do that?” And his response was, “We don’t believe in Martin Luther King in my house.” So she said, “Wow, okay, well, why not?” And he really couldn’t articulate. She says, “Well, tell me, who’s your friend in this classroom?” And one of the first names out of his mouth was a little Black boy.
And she said, “Do you know that he’s a lot like Martin Luther King? You know, he’s a little boy. He’s Black.” She was worried about where this was headed and didn’t know what to do as a student teacher, because she’s not officially licensed to teach at this point. And I shared with her our strategy. I said, “Why don’t you talk with your cooperating teacher about what happens and see what she says. If she doesn’t seem to want to do anything, casually mention, don’t go marching to the principal’s office. But when you have a chance to interact with the principal, you might say something I had the strangest encounter the other day and then share it.” Well, she did that.
The principal called the parents in and said, “Your child is not in trouble, but here’s what you need to know about who we are and what we stand for.”
Gloria Ladson-Billings: You know? And so again, it wasn’t like let’s have a big school board meeting. Let’s string up somebody for saying something. It wasn’t tearing this child down. But it was reiterating, here are our core values. I think schools can stand on this. They can say, “This is what we stand for. This is who we are.” They don’t ever have to mention the word critical race theory.
The retrenchment we are seeing in some states, I think it was a textbook that they were going to use in Texas that essentially described enslaved people as workers. That’s just wrong. That’s absolutely wrong. And I can tell you that if we don’t teach our children the truth, what happens when they show up in classes at the college level and they are exposed to the truth, they are incensed. They are angry and they cannot understand, why are we telling these lies?
We don’t have to make up lies about the American story. It is a story of both triumph and defeat. It is a story of both valor and, some cases, shame. Slavery actually happened. We trafficked with human beings, and there’s a consequence to that. But it doesn’t mean we didn’t get past it. It doesn’t mean we didn’t fight a war over it, and decide that’s not who we want to be.
Ishmael Reed’s play, The Haunting of Lin-Manuel Miranda, is a corrective to the revisionist missteps of the Broadway musical, Hamilton. À la A Christmas Carol, the titular character is led through a series of truth-telling apparitions which represent the marginalized groups absent from Hamilton. Each “haunting” deconstructs Hamilton’s abolitionist, anti-hero portrayal of the founding father, delivered with Reed’s incisive, impeccably researched satire.
Hamilton has been internationally revered as a harbinger of theater’s more inclusive future since its sold-out Broadway debut in 2015. Playwright and performer Lin-Manuel Miranda based the work on Ron Chernow ’s highly-regarded biography, Alexander Hamilton, a book critiqued for its glowing, savior-esque narrative. Despite criticism, Hamilton remains a crowd-pleasing hit to its loyal and dedicated fans, with the filmed version of the musical now available on Disney+ .
In contrast, The Haunting of Lin-Manuel Miranda, which debuted at the Nuyorican Poets Cafe in May 2019 and was published in October by Archway Editions, reframes Hamilton’s origin story by emphasizing the years he spent working for a slave firm in St. Croix. After immigrating to the US, he settled in New York and married Eliza Schuyler, who came from a family of high society, slave-owning New Yorkers. While Hamilton was a member of the Manumission Society, a group of “do-gooding” abolitionists, he never ceased enslaving people himself, a fact which seems to trip up many historians and fans of the musical alike.
In Reed’s telling, Hamilton’s first ghostly visitor is “Ben,” an enslaved man who was owned by the Schuyler family. He is followed by a host of characters, such as “Negro Woman,” “Native American Man,” and “Native American Woman” — a mechanism meant to disrupt Miranda’s sentimental characterizations. Later, Harriet Tubman delivers the most memorable monologue in the play, describing the spiritual encounter that awakened her from her enslaved condition into a consciousness of choosing one’s life.
Reed also deflates the simplistic, neoliberal concept of “colorblind casting,” a premise only successful when the narrative stakes reflect historical accuracy, breathing expansive new life into perceived classics. (In a recent, stunning example, Wendell Pierce portrayed Willy Loman in the 2019 revival of Arthur Miller’s “Death of a Salesman” at London’s Young Vic Theater.) However, when these initiatives fail, within their binaried scope of intent, they venture into minstrelsy. In Hamilton, the casting of Black and Latinx actors placed many of them in the role of slave owners, of which Reed’s “Indentured Servant” character instructs, “by romanticizing people who treated human beings as animals you are playing along with the system as well.”
Near the end of the second act, Reed does allow Miranda a moment of redemption when the character confronts a stuffy caricature of Chernow. It is via the biographer’s dismissive rejection of him that Reed invites compassion for Miranda, the playwright, as a symptom of broader systems of racism.
In the aftermath of the unconscionable realities of slavery and native genocide, the pretense of the underdog and other limited archetypal framings will never produce anything more than a comfortable, entertaining ride towards resolution. The Haunting of Lin-Manuel Miranda illustrates that in order to truthfully engage with history, we need to rid ourselves of tired conventions, willingly interrogate historical truths, and commission stories from those typically ignored.