A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
Second Law: A robot must obey orders given to it by human beings, except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
Third Law: A robot must protect its own existence, as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law. [1]
Sep 10, 2026 — Half right. So, AI could be used for good by a workers-led society, with socialism at its core? There you have it. More efficient monocropping, more efficient timber farms, more efficient AC, more efficient work, more efficient hell on Earth. How does AI work? What are those data centers all about? Five hundred in China, 3,000 in the USA, and then bleeding out into the hinterland.
What’s the compelling Oppen-Monster-Heimer math problem? What’s the Manhattan Einstein Project problem to solve?
AI could kill every human on Earth by the end of the decade. If it sounds like a sci-fi headline, that’s the point, says Dr. Thejas Wesley, postdoctoral associate at MIT. He joins Rania Khalek and Zoe Alexandra to unpack why Anthropic researchers Evan Hubinger, Samuel Marks, and Jacob Coxon – who resigned this week to go public – are sounding the alarm now, as competition from Chinese open-weight models like Kimi K3 heats up and Anthropic heads into its IPO.
Wesley argues the “rogue AI agents” framing coming out of both Anthropic and OpenAI (last week from CEO Sam Altman himself) is less a scientific warning than a coordinated business strategy, recasting corporate recklessness and unregulated competition as an alien invasion, rather than what it actually is: a series of choices made by executives chasing profits. He points to OpenAI’s Hugging Face incident earlier this summer: rather than nascent digital consciousness breaking free, this was OpenAI shipping software without basic safety guardrails, following the same corporate cost-cutting logic behind disasters like the East Palestine, Ohio train derailment or the BP Deepwater Horizon spill.
As polling shows 71% of Americans oppose new data centers, and 68% support stricter AI regulation, Wesley outlines Bernie Sanders’s proposed sovereign wealth fund plan and ban on AI superintelligence, versus Elon Musk’s counter: letting a small “cabal of technofascists” govern AI development themselves. Wesley says the real fix isn’t billionaires regulating themselves; it’s public, democratic control over a technology with very real life-or-death consequences for humanity.
The U.S. Navy does not have a single, permanent global cap on the number of cetaceans (whales and dolphins) and sea turtles it is permitted to “take”.
What if you were told the US Navy is legally permitted to harass, injure or kill nearly 12 million whales, dolphins, porpoises, sea lions and seals across the North Pacific Ocean over a five-year period?
It is true, and over one-quarter of every tax dollar you pay is helping to fund it.
A multistate, international citizen watchdog group called the West Coast Action Alliance (WCAA), tabulated numbers that came straight from the Navy’s Northwest Training and Testing EIS (environmental impact statement) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) Letters of Authorization for incidental “takes” of marine mammals issued by NOAA’s National Marine Fisheries Service.
“It is outrageous to think that humans have quantified all of the impacts their actions cause to the marine environment.”
A “take” is a form of harm to an animal that ranges from harassment, to injury, and sometimes to death. Many wildlife conservationists see even “takes” that only cause behavior changes as injurious, because chronic harassment of animals that are feeding or breeding can end up harming, or even contributing to their deaths if they are driven out of habitats critical to their survival.
Karen Sullivan, a spokesperson for the WCAA, is a former endangered species biologist and assistant regional director at the US Fish and Wildlife Service; she is now retired.
“The numbers are staggering,” she told Truthout, speaking about the number of marine mammals the Navy is permitted to take. “When you realize the same individual animals can be harassed over and over again as they migrate to different areas, there is no mitigation that can make up for these losses except limiting the use of sonar and explosives where these animals are trying to live.”
October 2015 EIS shows increases in the following activities (this is not a complete list):
– A 778 percent increase in number of torpedoes
– A 400 percent increase in air-to-surface missile exercises (including Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary)
– A 1,150 percent increase in drone aircraft
– A 1,150 percent increase in drone surface vehicles
– A 1,450 percent increase in expendable devices
– A 72 percent increase in electronic warfare operations
– A 50 percent increase in explosive ordnance disposal in Crescent Harbor and Hood Canal
– A 244 percent increase in air combat maneuvers (dogfighting)
– A 400 percent increase in helicopter tracking exercises
– A 3,500 percent increase in number of sonobuoys
– From none to 284 sonar testing events in inland waters
The Growler fighter aircraft used in the Navy’s electromagnetic warfare training are the loudest aircraft ever built. It is worth noting that the noise threshold for hearing damage in humans is 85 decibels. Similar to the Richter scale used for measuring earthquakes, sound measurements are not linear. For every increase of 10 decibels, the intensity of the noise increases tenfold.
“The Navy’s massive levels of testing and training for war are helping to make our oceans barren.”
Your friendly neighborhood JEW:
Oracle posted record revenue during its latest quarter, but that hasn’t stopped the company from chopping more employees.
Reports began appearing on social media early Monday that staff were having trouble accessing corporate systems such as email and Slack, which essentially served as a sign that they had lost their jobs.
According to a number of now-ex Oracle employees posting in a LinkedIn thread, layoff emails weren’t sent to personal email addresses, leaving a good number of people unsure what was happening outside of calls to supervisors, prior heads-up that they were on the chopping block, and the like.
It seems some employees did manage to access their accounts and view the layoff email, as a copy was shared with Business Insider, which published it in its coverage of this latest round of job cuts.
“After careful consideration of Oracle’s current business needs, we have made the decision to eliminate your role as part of a broader organizational change,” the email read. “As a result, today is your last working day.”
US aims to issue deep-sea mining permits within months, Interior Secretary Burgum says
U.S. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum speaks during the ceremonial reopening of Freedom Plaza to mark “the revitalization of one of the nation’s most prominent civic gathering spaces” with new statues, including controversial founding father Caesar Rodney, who was a slave owner, in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 30, 2026. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File Photo
Law of the Sea, the Abyssal Plain, and the Value of Intentional Obsolescence
Rapacious Capitalism
by Paul Haeder / November 18th, 2025
Almost a year ago, when the good old quaint days were still prevailing!??
How will it impact the already diminished populations of phytoplankton which provide up to 70% of the oxygen in the atmosphere? How will it impact the already diminished populations of krill, the foundation of the food pyramid in the sea? How will deep-sea mining influence the climate, the movement of currents, and the migration and viability of sea life? The industry has not answered these questions because there is no answer that they will acknowledge—because such answers will expose them as harbingers of global destruction.
Accused? The evidence has been there since 9148:
Israel accused of trying to ‘eliminate’ living conditions for Palestinians in West Bank
All Jews are suspect; most Jews are criminals, many are murderers.
That fucking PUTIN:
Donald Trump Jr. and his wife, Bettina Trump, acknowledged Monday that a Russian oligarch with ties to President Vladimir Putin paid for their lavish Caribbean island post-wedding celebration in May.
ProPublica reported that Umar Kremlev paid hundreds of thousands of dollars in wedding-related expenses for the newlyweds and dozens of guests for festivities on a private island in the Bahamas that started a day after the ceremony. The festivities included a fireworks show, which ProPublica reported Kremlev also paid for.
The enormous scale of Britain’s centuries-long trafficking of enslaved African people, supported by parliament and the monarchy, has been laid bare by new research.
The Register of British Slave Traders, the product of a three-year project by a team of specialist historians, documents the investors in Britain’s near 250-year transatlantic slave trade from the first traffickers in the 1560s to abolition in 1807.
The register provides biographical detail for as many of 10,500 investors as possible from historical records, building the most comprehensive single picture so far of those who perpetrated the enslavement of African people.
Britain’s trafficking operations, including royal companies led by kings and, later, a rush of entrepreneurs in Bristol, Liverpool and other port cities, violently transported more than 3 million enslaved African men, women and children to colonial plantations in the Americas and Caribbean.
The Guardian is reporting on significant findings of the project, led by Prof William Pettigrew of King’s College London, and the vast human damage it documents: the relentless involvement of the British monarchy, parliament and financial and business elites; the role of the church in legitimising it; and how the investors’ wealth was woven deep into the country’s fabric and used to fund hospitals, schools, welfare organisations, the arts, science and culture.
Key elements include:
A series of British kings and queens were leaders and investors in the trafficking of enslaved African people;
More than 100 MPs were investors in slave-trading companies, including scores in the Tory and Whig parties – the forerunners of today’s Conservatives and Liberal Democrats;
Dozens of directors and original financiers of the Bank of England were investors in the slave trade;
More than 1,000 women invested in slave-trading companies;
Forty-five Church of England clergymen were investors in the slave-trading Royal African Company.
Here’s your Gay Ghoul of the Year: The Treasury Department on Monday identified Russia’s second-largest financial institution, VTB Bank, as a key financial node for Iran’s Islamic Republic and put further sanctions on the bank.
How’s that working out for you egalitarians?
Trump calls Nvidia CEO to talk AI — and gets put on speakerphone during industry summit
“Data centers are great, and they make people wealthy,” the president told CEO Jensen Huang, whose company makes AI chips and hardware.
All Lawyered up? Jewed Up?
Mahmoud Khalil announced on Monday that he’s sued Columbia University, accusing the New York City school he attended of a years-long history of anti-Palestinian discrimination, indifference to harassment, and retaliation.
Khalil, a US green card holder of Palestinian descent, was a graduate student at Columbia’s School of International and Public Affairs (SIPA) when he was arrested at his university apartment by federal immigration agents in March 2025, the first of a number of foreign nationals that the Trump administration has detained and sought to deport over their pro-Palestinian advocacy.
In a 60-page complaint filed in the southern district of New York, Khalil and members of the SIPA’s Palestine Working Group have now accused the university, its board, and the dean of the school, Keren Yarhi-Milo, of “deliberate indifference” and failure to respond to “severe, persistent, and coordinated harassment” directed towards him and other students who had been outspoken about Palestinian rights.
Ahh, schucks, mom, can’t I have those Twinkies?
A new Consumer Reports investigation found potentially harmful contaminants in some popular children’s snacks.
Earlier this summer, Consumer Reports testing found high levels of additives and contaminants in popular processed snack foods.
Now, CR’s food safety scientists have taken a closer look specifically at snacks marketed to or commonly eaten by children.
Consumer Reports tested 21 packaged kids’ snacks and found that 14 had concerning levels of at least one chemical contaminant, including acrylamide or phthalates.
Acrylamide is a chemical that can form naturally in some foods during high-temperature cooking and processing.
Certain health organizations consider it a probable human carcinogen based on animal studies.
Consumer Reports found concerning levels of acrylamide in several types of snacks, including granola bars, chips, pretzels, and even graham crackers.
CR also tested for phthalates, chemicals that can migrate into food from packaging and other materials during manufacturing and processing.
High exposure to certain phthalates has been linked to potential long-term health risks, including interference with the body’s natural hormones, and children’s developing bodies may be especially vulnerable.
Here, the big contamination source: BlackRock Raises EM Equities Back to Overweight on AI, Earnings
OUR JEW!
Major carriers like Liberty Mutual, CSAA (AAA), and others have dropped thousands of policies after reviewing proprietary aerial photography. Across California. Insurance companies—rather than a single “insurance board”—are increasingly using aerial surveillance (via planes, satellites, and drones) to drop homeowners over yard debris, clutter, and even gardens.
Joe, from Merced, California, said his homeowners insurance policy was dropped because of photos from drones, or his wood pile for heating his house, a few trucks that are rusting a bit, and then, get this, for a home garden that might contain Romaine lettuce.
\
Is a home a man’s or woman’s castle, no?
“Salesforce is committed to Israel. We leave politics out of the company”
Meir Amiel, Executive Vice President & Chief Technology Officer of C360 Applications at Salesforce, was called back to the company following the generative AI revolution. He believes Israel can be a technological leader in this field. According to him, the development center in Israel is strategic for Salesforce and will continue to grow.
Growing up in Or Yehuda, Meir Amiel could not have imagined that one day, Salesforce’s founder and CEO, Marc Benioff, would call him to return to the company to prepare it for the AI revolution. Amiel joined Salesforce in 2010, when it was relatively small, with only 2,000-3,000 employees. Since then, the company has grown to nearly 80,000 employees worldwide, including 750 at the development center in Israel, which Amiel helped establish.
A month ago, Salesforce reported an 11% increase in revenue in the first quarter, with a net profit of $1.53 billion, though these results missed analysts’ forecasts.
Tech billionaire Marc Benioff used to give millions to politicians. Then he bought Time magazine.
Benioff is swearing off future political donations, in stark contrast to the rest of Silicon Valley.
InBreds:
British Prime Minister Andy Burnham is considering providing Saudi Arabia with military support against the Houthis, Bloomberg reported on Monday, following recent regional escalation by the terrorist group.
Burnham has agreed to send British military advisors to assist Saudi Arabia, Bloomberg reported, but had not yet committed to sending any additional aid.
RIGHT. Controlling AI and all that Recursive Self-Improvement Asimov and Sagan SHIT:
US acknowledges for the first time that it has deployed weapons in space
The U.S. has confirmed for the first time that it has deployed weapons in space
injection of foreign protein into tissue produces inflammatory injury, and the body responds . . . the Jewish State of Rape, Banking, AI, War, Murder, Maiming, Starvation!
Oh, the pathogens, man, CBS, a la Jews — Ellison and Weiss, what a cocktail and cocksuckers.
Air Force — the Bomber Mercenaries.
CBS’s new 60 Minutes programme attempts to present an Air Force officer’s escape from Iran as if it were some sort of proud American epic — the type of story intended to provoke flag-waving and the “look how brave we are” sort of reaction. However, the entire account is full of selective storytelling, in the manner of pretending that U.S. wars are clean, noble, and heroic. While it focuses on one wounded officer who managed to evade capture, it omits the fact that American bombs killed 168 children on the very first day of the campaign; that is the part which CBS never brings to the forefront because it spoils the myth.
The interview has the feel of a victory lap about it; it is reverent, nearly worshipful — typical of the style used by 60 Minutes, with soft lighting, dramatic music, and questions crafted to make the viewer feel patriotic. It refers to courage, sacrifice, and danger, and speaks of him crawling, hiding, and surviving. It also mentions how proud the Air Force is and states that this is what American service entails.
The thing that is not mentioned is the effect of American bombs.
Exactly one year ago, Mehdi was joined on ‘We’re Not Kidding’ by actor Mark Ruffalo, who plays the Incredible Hulk in Marvel’s ‘Avengers’ movies. So it feels fitting that today’s guest is none other than Emmy award-winning actor Tatiana Maslany, who plays She-Hulk in the Marvel TV series of the same name. Like Mark, Tatiana has been an outspoken advocate for Palestine over the past few years and continues to use her platform to bring attention to Israel’s genocide.
“It was very rare in 2024 to see celebrities speaking out publicly on Palestine. What made you want to do that?” Mehdi asks.
“I’m part of a system. I have to speak on it,” Tatiana says. “How do we watch this happening without feeling the deep grief and rage that we are complicit in it?”
FUCKING HOLLY-Dirt and thespians.
This fellow, man oh man, how many vaxxes has he complied with?
The latest controversy Patel finds himself embroiled in is a microcosm of the misplaced priorities the FBI has operated with due to his leadership. Records revealed by independent national security journalist Seth Hettena as part of the FBI’s review of the investigative holdings related to Jeffrey Epstein show Patel ordering the FBI to go after a popular X poster for trolling him on the social media platform. The X account that drew the FBI director’s ire, Ifindretards, posted a tweet in February during the height of the fallout from the Trump administration’s Epstein Files cover-up, mocking Patel by sardonically quipping that his “retard rating just went to all time highs.”
injection of foreign protein into tissue produces inflammatory injury, and the body responds.
This essay operates in two registers. When examining the peer-reviewed literature of experimental immunology, and when reporting what regulators and researchers have written down, I use their vocabulary: adjuvant, immune response, allergic, autoimmune, sensitization, antibody, IgE. That is how the papers describe what the papers describe. In my own analytical voice, I use the terrain framework: injection of foreign protein into tissue produces inflammatory injury, and the body responds. The establishment’s own words demolish the establishment’s own claims. The terrain voice states what is actually occurring.
The evidentiary spine of this essay is a compilation of five Wistar-rat studies assembled by James Lyons-Weiler at Popular Rationalism in July 2026. Lyons-Weiler and I operate from very different paradigms. He accepts the germ theory framework within which most of his critique is delivered. My rejection of the substance he critiques runs deeper and reaches the framework itself. His compilation nonetheless stands as one of the clearest recent statements of what the peer-reviewed record actually shows, and this essay would be poorer without it.
I do not address the retracted papers of Shaw and Tomljenovic, the contested aluminum-in-brain-tissue findings, the ASIA syndrome as a diagnostic entity, or the systemic clinical claims associated with macrophagic myofasciitis. Those are separate conversations. This essay stays on the peer-reviewed, non-retracted, structurally sound evidence.
In 2012, a group led by Xiao Qi at the Third Xiangya Hospital in China published a paper in the journal Urology. The title reads: “Prostate extract with aluminum hydroxide injection as a novel animal model for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome.”¹
The method is documented in full. The researchers took extract from prostate tissue. They combined it with aluminum hydroxide. They injected the mixture into Wistar rats. The rats developed chronic prostatitis. The response was dose-dependent and injection-number-dependent. The paper reports a reliable protocol for producing the disease in a laboratory.
A 2023 review in Frontiers in Immunology places the Qi protocol in a broader subfield called experimental autoimmune prostatitis, in which “specific antigens trigger autoimmunity” and “immune-boosting adjuvants” are used to increase the model’s success rate.² The review names aluminum hydroxide among those adjuvants.
The same aluminum hydroxide is inside Infanrix, Pediarix, Engerix-B pediatric hepatitis B, PedvaxHIB, Havrix hepatitis A, and dozens of other vaccines. It is injected into infants on the day of birth, at two months, at four months, at six months, at twelve months, at fifteen months, at eighteen months, at four years. It is the same substance, in the same concentration range, delivered by the same route into the same species: mammal.
The essay in front of you asks a simple question. If a peer-reviewed immunology paper describes aluminum hydroxide as the substance that manufactures a disease in a mammal, and a pediatrician injects that same substance into another mammal on a published schedule, what is being done to that second mammal?
In this 40 min video, Debbie Lerman and I are discussing the evolving propaganda narratives. Specifically, MAHA puppets are carrying water for the bio-chemical weapons Pandemic Preparedness cartel. Many of these accounts are desperately trying to convince you of the looming threat of “engineered pathogens” escaping from labs. This requires “mandatory countermeasure…
In this 40 min video Debbie Lerman and I are discussing the evolving propaganda narratives. Specifically, MAHA puppets are carrying water for the bio-chemical weapons Pandemic Preparedness cartel. Many of these accounts are desperately trying to convince you of the looming threat of “engineered pathogens” escaping from labs. This requires “mandatory countermeasures”, including new government agencies, and money! They are begging Bobby to make covid crimes permanent and well funded.
We discussed this MAHA pearl (a year old, but very relevant right now).
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. spoke Thursday about leaving the Democratic Party as he addressed the GOP midterm convention in Dallas.
“During COVID, I watched the Democratic Party turned against every one of its essential values, its principles and all of the policies that defined my party,” he said.
John Trudell (1946–2015) was a poet of the resistance against spirit-denying and culture-destroying industrial imperialism.
Machine money progress Is the cause of our common abuse [1]
His initial focus was on defending the rights and autonomies of Native American peoples who had been so brutally crushed by the invading and occupying empire.
Indians are Jesus Hanging from the cross Hanging from the cross In the name of their savior Forcing on us The trinity of the chain Guilt sin and blame [2]
He wondered: “How did my land become somebody else’s country?” [3] and how other Americans could expect Indians to share in the national grief over 9/11.
Now you want us To cry your tears for you Already we’ve bled for you Already been dead to you Now you want us To cry your tears for you
Chapters of a democracy story Descendants of genocide Twelve score and more years ago We went from being the majority To being the smallest minority Now you want us To cry your tears for you [4]
The modern tyranny demands that we forget who we are and where we came from so that we can be turned into disempowered, malleable and exploitable human resources for its global mega-racket. [5]
But Trudell, like so many of us, felt the soul of his ancestors stirring inside him and guiding his thoughts and actions.
In the 2005 documentary film Trudell, he explains: “I felt as if somebody knocked me unconscious when I entered the world. It’s been a lifetime trying to come to.
“I used to get this idea that I was in the wrong time in the wrong place. I thought that I came here a hundred years too late. The hundred years too late was because I used to see this camp on the plain amongst the trees by a river. It was a tribal camp and I felt I was part of it. It’s like these thoughts were memories. Every part was familiar and I was a part of the whole thing”. [6]
Too confused to care Is no way to live Young ones listen Remember who you are Remember where you are Remember why you are [7]
In 1969, his sense of indigenous roots and connections was galvanized by the Indians of All Tribes occupation of Alcatraz Island.
He was the spokesman for this 19-month long action, which brought the plight of Native Americans into mainstream American consciousness, and he went on to be national chairman of the American Indian Movement (AIM) from 1973 to 1979. [8]
All of this drew the attention of the corporate empire’s enforcement squads and between 1969 and 1979 the FBI amassed a 17,000-page dossier on him, one of the longest in the agency’s history. [9]
An internal FBI memo stated: “He is extremely eloquent… therefore extremely dangerous”. Trudell commented: “All I did was talk and they cracked down hard just for that”. [10]
“The majority of the American citizens agreed with us… The way the government operates, any time any group of people start to get popular support, this becomes a threat to the government. AIM got labelled by this Eastland Subcommittee on Unamerican Affairs as a terrorist organization.
“Between ’73 and ’75, the government with the FBI, they were literally waging a Contra war against now all the AIM people and the traditionalists”. [11]
On February 11, 1979 Trudell burned an American flag during a demonstration in front of the FBI HQ in Washington, DC, explaining: “In the military, they said if the flag has been desecrated, the only way to properly dispose of it is to burn it”. [12]
Some 12 hours later, a fire “of suspicious origin” burned down Trudell’s home on a reservation in Nevada, killing his pregnant wife, Tina, their three children and Tina’s mother.
Unsurprisingly, the FBI declined to investigate, and the blaze was officially ruled an “accident”. But Trudell insisted: “It was murder; they were murdered as an act of war”. [13]
Devastated by the tragedy, Trudell withdrew from the world for a time and found something within him, from beyond him.
“Putting my love into the ground like this, putting my love in boxes, putting them into the ground and covering them up reconnected me to the earth”. [14]
It was during this period of grief and rebirth that he discovered his poetic gift.
Sometimes me and my mind Don’t get along very well and Sometimes I need someone to talk to And someone to cling to A little bit of forever for a little while Doing the rest of the life I can’t hide I fell through some of the wounds And pulled the scars inside [15]
In his poems, later spoken to musical accompaniment as songs, his personal sadness merges with his sadness at the Indian peoples’ condition and indeed a sadness at the endless assault on the living being waged by the global industrial empire.
Industrial slave Capitalist and Communist Imperialist Smiling with false faces Beckoning us With their lies about progress Wanting us to enjoy The rape of earth And our minds
Industrial slave Fork-tongued Legalistic contract chains Turning our visions To technologic nightmares National security warmakers Desecrating the natural world And gods still trying to get over What you done to his boy
Industrial slave Material bound Law and order Religious salvation Industrially alone
Industrial slave [16]
Trudell pointed out: “The governments that are created are created to serve the needs of this industrial ruling class”. [17]
Building to the new world order We’re expected to carry the stone Emperors and the feeding class Human being, being used up fast
Hidden in the beauties of Babylon A civilized behavorial notoriety The more evil the empire The more paranoid the society [18]
He argued: “There is no clear thought being exercised right now in the American public. They are allowing the insanity of the leaders to make decisions that really are not in the best interest of the public, they’re not in the best interest of the children of the public, they’re not in the best interest of the grandchildren of the public. They’re not in the best interest of the earth, they’re not in the best interest of anyone”. [19]
Waking up in industrial society Surrounded by angry days Going through motions of not being Wanting the best but not expecting it [20]
Bitter fruit emerges where bitter seed is sown Economic chains all dressed out as reward [21]
Trudell did not shrink from addressing the depth and scale of the threat posed by industrial imperialists who pillage nature to feed their infernal machineries of greed.
He judged that “they’re industrially insane – no sensitivities to life or what anything is about” [22] as they carried out their grim
Sacrifice ritual for the Prophet technology [23]
He said: “I think we really need to put serious thought into understanding that we’re dealing with a disease. You know, it’s like there’s this predator energy on this planet and this predator energy feeds upon the essence of the spirit, feeds upon the essence of the human being, the spirit…
“They have to mine our minds… The mining of the essence, the mining of the spirit, mining our minds, the pollution from that is all of the neurotic, distorted, insecure behaviour patterns that we develop. That’s pollution.
“Because in order for this predatory system, this disease, to work, we must not be able to use our minds in a clear, coherent manner. Because if we use our minds in a clear coherent manner, we will not accept the unacceptable…
“The great lie is that it is civilization. It’s not civilized. It has been literally the most bloodthirsty, brutalizing, system ever imposed upon this planet. That is not civilization. That’s the great lie… or if it does represent civilization and that’s truly what civilization is, then the great lie is that civilization is good for us”. [24]
The sheer mendacity of the system was a constant theme for Trudell and he stressed how those he termed “corporate terrorists” [25] were always
Lying to enslave with an illusion About freedom [26]
We know the predator We see them feed on us We are aware To starve the beast Is our destiny
The times they were kind They were polite But never honest [27]
Everyone pretending to live Calling exploitation progress Calling submission freedom Calling madness profit Calling earth a plan et Plaguing her with civilization [28]
Damnation or salvation Among the Terrorisms of freedom A civilizing process Where the rule of law Is the law of rule The law is a lie the law is a lie [29]
In the homeland security Pretending corporate corruption Isn’t economic terrorism Money talks while the government listens Compiling files on ones who think different Conditioning an acceptance of debt And not to expect the truth So get used to hearing the lie [30]
The relationship between people and land is central to Trudell’s understanding, as it is to that of the organic radical tradition as a whole.
He told a protest rally in 1979: “We understand that the issue is the land, the issue is the earth. We cannot change the political system, we cannot change the economic system, we cannot change the social system until the people control the land and then we take it out of the hands of that sick minority that chooses to pervert the meaning and intention of humanity”. [31]
And he later remarked: “Lying dormant in us we have a genetic memory and in that genetic memory there’s knowledge, there’s knowledge in that genetic memory, all right, that goes back to the ancient, to the beginning for us… every human being lived within a tribe, every human being recognized this reality that the earth was the mother and the sky was the father”. [32]
It was from this deep and mystical connection to both land and ancestors, the thing I call withness, [33] that Trudell sourced his strength and inspiration.
We are all children of earth The earth is our mother [34]
Crazy Horse We hear what you say One Earth one Mother One does not sell the Earth The people walk upon We are the land How do we sell our Mother How do we sell the stars How do we sell the air [35]
See the woman beauty Lightning streaking dark summer nights Forest of pines mating with new winter snow [36]
Life is a form of the energy of being All forms of the earth have being Our power in being is in spirit energy essence We manifest our power through our human [37]
Join the time of tomorrow and the past Be like us serve the creation we will endure Listen as the trees sing their songs Listen listen [38]
This belonging and connection allow us to mount a life-rooted [39] resistance against the death-cult empire.
Our attitudes are climbing We don’t have time for more mind-wasting lies Whatever it is you’re doing we’re not going to buy it It’s time to say something not a time to be quiet [40]
I was listening To the voices of life Chanting in unison Carry on the struggle The generations Surge together In resistance To meet The reality of power
Mother Earth Embraces her children In natural beauty To last beyond Oppressors brutality As the butterfly floats into life We are the spirit of natural life Which is forever
The power of understanding Real connections to spirit Is meaning our resistance Our struggle Is not sacrifice lost It is Natural energy properly used [41]
The generations Remembering the past To rebuild the future For weeping is Another way of laughing And resisting and Outlasting the enemy [42]
Continue to struggle. Resist… The people, the rain, the earth, the wind, struggle together for a common liberty [43]
Brian Merchant, in an essay on Blood in the Machine, wrote:“Only fascist belief systems, rooted in an embrace of human hierarchy and human culling, are capable of rationalizing the level of harm to both people and the natural world that accelerated AI will wreak… Little AI-generated Eichmanns.”
“If we fail in this great experiment, this experiment of apes becoming intelligent enough to take charge of their own destiny, nature will shrug and say it was fun for a while to let the apes run the laboratory, but in the end it was a bad idea,
John Steinbeck: “I wonder why progress looks so much like destruction.” (Travels with Charley) — Reflects on how building highways and modernizing landscapes tear apart the natural world.
Christopher Ruocchio: “Those who wreak destruction and call it progress are ever enemies of eternity . . .” (Kingdoms of Death) — Criticizes the false promise that ruining things is a valid price for moving forward.
Morgan Housel: “Destruction in the face of progress is not only possible, but an efficient way to get rid of excess.” (The Psychology of Money) — Notes how economic or structural progress often clears out old, outdated systems through failure.
Pablo Picasso: “Every act of creation is first of all an act of destruction.” — Explains that making something new often requires breaking down old forms, ideas, or materials.
More mindless muck on TV:
Imagine you’re sitting in a diner when a crazed man (unwashed for years but recently trimmed beard), wrapped in plastic with tubes dangling from his pants, storms in screaming, “I am from the future.” Thumb over a glowing button, ready to obliterate himself and everyone else, he announces that AI is about to rat-fuck the world and he needs a handful of strangers to help fix the future. You wouldn’t go. Right? “Good Luck, Have Fun, Don’t Die” asks what happens when half a dozen people in that LA diner go, “Sure.”
Since it’s Gore Verbinski directing and Sam Rockwell playing the lunatic, of course the man is from the future. What starts as a bleakly funny “Black Mirror” sketch slowly expands into a string of “Black Mirror” episodes, both past and present, explaining why these people join him and just how unhinged their mission becomes. The absurdist comedy is strong, and while the film is technically anti-AI, it’s not in the usual “technology run amok” way. Instead, it holds up a mirror to the ways we’ve voluntarily outsourced societal functions to technology because dealing with real issues would require effort, empathy, and other things we’ve collectively misplaced.
Without spoiling the future-gone-sideways gags, Verbinski’s thesis is blunt: for every problem, there’s a technological solution. But instead of ocean-cleaning robots or cancer-curing models, the solution here is to further normalize school shootings. It comes complete with tiered pricing and the ad-supported version for those who can’t afford dignity. It’s bleak, but it’s also very funny in that “we deserve this future” way.
More than two hours I CAN NEVER GET BACK watching this fucking childish movie.
This is the 3rd-grade reading level we are now at:
We are fucking transmissions getting stuffed with sawdust, man, sawdust for brains:
Deadens Sound: The soft wood particles absorb vibrations and cushion the impact between heavily worn, loose gear teeth, instantly reducing audible whine or grinding.
Improves Friction: In some cases, the wood fibers wedge into the worn grooves of synchronizers or gears, temporarily giving them enough artificial “bite” to shift more smoothly.
The human species, led by white Europeans and Euro-Americans, has been on a 500-year-long planetwide rampage of conquering, plundering, looting, exploiting, and polluting the Earth — as well as killing the indigenous communities that stood in the way. But the game is up. The technical and scientific forces that created a life of unparalleled luxury — as well as unrivaled military and economic power — for the industrial elites are the forces that now doom us. The mania for ceaseless economic expansion and exploitation has become a curse, a death sentence.
“There is a pattern in the past of civilization after civilization wearing out its welcome from nature, overexploiting its environment, overexpanding, overpopulating. They tend to collapse quite soon after they reach their period of greatest magnificence and prosperity. That pattern holds good for a lot of societies, among them the Romans, the ancient Maya and the Sumerians of what is now southern Iraq. There are many other examples, including smaller-scale societies such as Easter Island. The very things that cause societies to prosper in the short run, especially new ways to exploit the environment such as the invention of irrigation, lead to disaster in the long run because of unforeseen complications. This is what I called in ‘A Short History of Progress’ the ‘progress trap.’ We have set in motion an industrial machine of such complexity and such dependence on expansion that we do not know how to make do with less or move to a steady state in terms of our demands on nature. We have failed to control human numbers. They have tripled in my lifetime. And the problem is made much worse by the widening gap between rich and poor, the upward concentration of wealth, which ensures there can never be enough to go around. The number of people in dire poverty today — about 2 billion — is greater than the world’s entire population in the early 1900s. That’s not progress.”
“If we continue to refuse to deal with things in an orderly and rational way, we will head into some sort of major catastrophe, sooner or later,” he said. “If we are lucky it will be big enough to wake us up worldwide but not big enough to wipe us out. That is the best we can hope for. We must transcend our evolutionary history. We’re Ice Age hunters with a shave and a suit. We are not good long-term thinkers. We would much rather gorge ourselves on dead mammoths by driving a herd over a cliff than figure out how to conserve the herd so it can feed us and our children forever. That is the transition our civilization has to make. And we’re not doing that.” — Ronald Wright
In 1970 Lewis Mumford wrote, “The chief premise common to both technology and science is the notion that there are no desirable limits to the increase of knowledge, of material goods, of environmental control; that quantitative productivity is an end in itself, and that every means should be used to further expansion.”
Mumford asked the same question that so many of us ask, which is, Why on earth would a culture do so many crazy, stupid, destructive things? His answer cuts through the typical cornucopian garbage:
“The desired reward of this magic is not just abundance but absolute control.”
Mumford knew — as we all do — that there was no hope in proceeding “on the terms imposed by technocratic society.”
He didn’t think change would be easy, saying that it might take “an all-out fatal shock treatment, close to catastrophe, to break the hold of civilized man’s chronic psychosis.” He was not optimistic:
“Even such a belated awakening would be a miracle.”
Derrick Jensen: Progress is hot showers (which require mining, manufacturing, and energy infrastructures). Progress is computers (which require mining, manufacturing, and energy infrastructures, and are used far more effectively by those in power than by us). Progress is the internet, which allows for instantaneous communication with distant loved ones (and which requires mining, manufacturing, and energy infrastructures, and is used far more effectively by those in power than by us). Progress is supermarkets, which require industrial food production (which in turn requires mining, manufacturing, and agricultural, chemical, and energy infrastructures, and is controlled by ever fewer giant corporations).
Volume 1: The Problem of Civilization
Inherent Violence: Industrial civilization relies on systemic violence, resource extraction, and the exploitation of both humans and the natural world to maintain its power hierarchies.
Illusion of Progress: Most modern technological innovations do not solve fundamental problems; they merely attempt to patch the catastrophic crises created by civilization itself.
The Inevitable End: Civilization will inevitably collapse due to resource depletion. Waiting for it to run its course naturally will result in far more ecological destruction than forcing an early end.
Volume 2: Resistance
A Critique of Pacifism: Jensen rejects strict non-violence, comparing civilization to a pathological abuser that will never stop unless forced. He argues that peaceful activism is insufficient against a system committing planetary ecocide.
Active Sabotage: The book advocates for targeted, militant resistance—such as disabling industrial infrastructure, shutting down oil refineries, and removing river dams—to disrupt the capitalist economy and accelerate the return to localized, agrarian communal living.
The earliest fossils in the Homo sapiens lineage date from 300,000 years ago and are from Morocco. But we didn’t spread out of Africa until about 60,000 years ago, colonizing all parts of the globe. This makes us relative newcomers in most habitats we now inhabit. Over the intervening thousands of years, people living in freezing cold places have adapted biologically to their environment but on a small scale.
One well-known example of this adaptation is that in areas with low sunlight, H. sapiensdeveloped light skin tones, which are better at synthesizing vitamin D. The genomes of living Inuit people from Greenland demonstrate physiological adaptation to a fat-rich marine diet, which is beneficial in the cold.
Lesser bushbabies are one of the few primates that hibernate.
More direct evidence comes from DNA from a single 4,000-year-old permafrost-preserved hair from Greenland. The hair hints at genetic changes that led to stocky body shape that maximized heat production and retention, like the hominin we only have one shin bone from at the Boxgrove site.
Our tropical legacy means we would still be unable to live in cold places without developing ways of coping with the temperatures. Take, for example, the traditional Inuit parka, which provides better insulation than the modern Canadian army winter uniform.
This human ability to adapt behaviorally was crucial to our evolutionary success. Even compared to other primates, humans show less physical climatic adaptation. Behavioral adaptation is quicker and more flexible than biological adaptation. Humans are the ultimate adapters, thriving in nearly every possible ecological niche.
The 78°F problem: According to a study on disrupted seasonal biology published in PMC, removing environmental seasonality creates an internal desynchronization. Without the natural “shock” of temperature transitions, the immune system doesn’t receive the required environmental prompts to cycle through its defensive phases
Biological & Physical Health
Circadian rhythms: Seasonal shifts in light and temperature regulate our internal clocks. This variation helps control sleep cycles, hormone production, and energy levels throughout the year.
Metabolic health: Cold temperatures activate “brown fat.” This type of fat burns calories to generate body heat and improves insulin sensitivity.
Immune system training: Exposure to changing environments acts like a workout for your immune system. A static environment can make the body less adaptable to fighting off illnesses.
🧠 Mental & Cognitive Benefits
Cognitive performance: Studies show that human brain activity changes with the seasons. Some cognitive functions, like sustained attention, actually peak during the changing seasons rather than in constant warmth.
Psychological contrast: Seasonal changes provide a natural passage of time. Constant 78°F weather can cause “monotony fatigue,” leading to lethargy and a lack of motivation.
🌾 Agriculture & Ecosystem Survival
Food production: Many major crops—like wheat, apples, and potatoes—require a period of cold dormancy (vernalization) to grow and produce food. Without seasons, global agriculture would collapse.
Pest control: Cold winters naturally suppress insect populations. Constant warm temperatures would cause agricultural pests and disease-carrying insects (like mosquitoes) to multiply without limit.
Always “future” drug developments, man.
Four years of molecular data from more than 100 participants indicate that the human body does experience predictable patterns of change, but they don’t track with any of Mother Nature’s traditional signals. Overall, Snyder and his team saw more than 1,000 molecules ebb and flow on an annual basis, with two pivotal time periods: late spring-early summer and late fall-early winter. These are key transition periods when change is afoot – both in the air and in the body, said Snyder, who is the Stanford W. Ascherman, MD, FACS, Professor in Genetics.
“You might say, ‘Well, sure, there are really only two seasons in California anyway: cold and hot,” Snyder said. “That’s true, but even so, our data doesn’t exactly map to the weather transitions either. It’s more complicated than that.”
Snyder hopes that observations from this study – of higher levels of inflammatory markers in the late spring, or of increased markers of hypertension in early winter, for example – can provide a better foundation for precision health and even help guide the design of future clinical drug trials.
One caveat, Snyder said, is that the team conducted the research with participants in Northern and Southern California, and it’s likely that the molecular patterns of individuals in other parts of the country would differ, depending on atmospheric and environmental variations.
Well well, just Covid? Just Long Covid? Not the mRNA kill shots?
Last week, The Telegraph published an article titled, “How having a disability became cool,” with the subhead, “Young women, nicknamed ‘sickfluencers’, are turning chronic illness into a lifestyle trend and entrenching a culture of economic inactivity.”
This article serves a political purpose.
It shores up the government narrative that rising rates of disability are being driven, not by the ongoing and unchecked spread of COVID, but by people just deciding they want to “identify as disabled”.
This claim is absurd on its face.
Let’s dive in.
The Gauntlet is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
People do not drop out of work in order to pursue the lucrative field of professional disability-check-collecting. Governments have a tried-and-true method of avoiding exactly this sort of thing: they force disabled people to live in abject poverty, which does the trick quite nicely.
Disabled people, quite simply, are not treated well. They aren’t treated well by governments. It’s not easy to get disability payouts, and even if one does, those payouts are paltry. They aren’t treated well by employers; disabled people are usually both micromanaged and underpromoted. They aren’t treated well by peers, who mix condescension with distaste with prejudice with presumption. In romantic relationships, disabled people are more prone to abuse.
There are quite simply no reasons to “fake” a disability, but there are many, many reasons, to “fake” being well, or better than one is.
Poppy Coburn disagrees, and she’s oh-so-unhappy about it:
POTS. ME. CF. ADHD. MDD. GAD. PMDD. EDS. FND. For a steadily growing group of British young women, these acronyms – and the conditions they represent – are fundamental to their lives. The country is sicker than it’s ever been before, and it’s not afraid of shouting about it. Disability is changing.
There’s almost- almost- nothing wrong with this paragraph other than the sneering tone of the author. “The country is sicker than it’s ever been before” – now why would that be? Six years after COVID hit, four years after the virus has been allowed to run totally rampant without mitigation, the country is sicker than it’s ever been before, but we can’t come up with any reason why that would be other than “women be faking?”
Disability activists warned for years that this would be the outcome of allowing COVID to spread unmitigated. Now that it’s time to pay the piper, the state and its media allies are working desperately to sever the connection between COVID and its consequences.
Jesus, not just the fucking bioweapon, manufactured COVID-SARS Co2
But the plans were on display . . .” “On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.” “That’s the display department.” “With a torch.” “Ah, well the lights had probably gone.” “So had the stairs.” “But look, you found the notice, didn’t you?” “Yes,” said Arthur, “yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying Beware of the Leopard.”
Douglas Adams, “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”.
There has been a massive relentless campaign to get the needle into every arm over the past 3 years. The group hunted with conspicuous vigilance by the criminal cartel from the start were pregnant women, followed by children and babies. An avalanche of direct to consumer ads screaming about “tremendously safe in pregnancy” Poison-19 shots started appearing on social media and other major platforms before these shots were even authorized for emergency use (December 2020). EUA does not permit advertising any drug as safe and effective. But the government is exempt from following the law, remember?
Due Diligence and Art is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Given the avalanche of “tremendously safe in pregnancy” messages out there, including from the top FDA and CDC officials, one may be surprised that as of today, these shots are officially NOT RECOMMENDED in pregnancy according to the product labels, that state there is no data to make these recommendations. Furthermore, maternal toxicity, skeletal abnormalities and accumulation of the potentially toxic injection substances in the ovaries have been documented by non-clinical studies for these products. Of course, to find this information, you need to descent into a dark cellar and find a locked file cabinet – i.e. know how to find the drug labels in the bowels of the FDA website, read sections buried deep in those labels, and in addition, sue the HHS for freedom of information, and wait months for the lawsuit to hopefully turn out in your favor. See, this is easy, you just have to follow the proper procedure!
I have written extensively about Pfizer’s and Moderna’s nonclinical studies that revealed clear harm for pregnancy and neonatal development. The studies were in FDA’s possession at the time the shots were authorized, yet the FDA chose to ignore the safety signals, and in case of Moderna’s product, they went even further and wrote an outright lie in the product’s summary label, stating that there was no vaccine related skeletal malformations in baby rats, while Moderna’s own documents admit that these were observed at a statistically significantly increased rate in vaccinated rats’ offspring.
Judicial Watch announced on December 13, 2022 that it received 699 pages of records from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regarding data Moderna submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on its mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. The documents also reveal Moderna elected not to conduct a number of standard pharmacological studies on the laboratory test animals. The records include a “Nonclinical Overview” prepared by Moderna and submitted to the FDA for approval of its vaccine revealing that a number of rats were born with skeletal deformations, known as “wavy ribs” and “rib nodules,” to mothers injected with the mRNA vaccine. The study dismissed the anomalies as “not considered adverse”, without any additional data demonstrating exclusion of this risk. The FDA published a direct lie in the regulatory summary statement on Spikevax.
PROGRESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THAT FUCKING PROGRESS: NO SMOKING GUNS HERE!
Resisting the Roadless Rule Rollback
Devastating Trump Proposal Would Doom Millions of Acres of Forests
Beloved keystone species like grizzly bears can’t recover without national forest habitat free of roads and development. Now the Trump administration wants to open these crucial wild places to destruction — with cataclysmic consequences.
President Donald Trump’s U.S. Department of Agriculture is moving to undo the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Rule, a landmark conservation policy that has protected wild forests for a quarter of a century. Repealing it would be the single largest evisceration of public land protections in American history, opening nearly 45 million acres of wild national forests to road construction, logging, and other development across 37 states.
The move ties directly to Trump’s executive order directing the immediate expansion of American timber production — a blatant giveaway to the timber industry at the expense of some of America’s last wild places.
Threats to Wildlife
This move would affect more than 7 million acres of critical habitat for endangered species and pose a catastrophic threat to 88 federally protected animals and plants across the country, including grizzly bears, Canada lynx, wolverines, spotted owls, and native fish. It would also harm more than 300 other protected species that live in roadless areas but don’t have designated safeguards for their habitat.
The damage would reach far beyond roadless boundaries. Sediment from road construction and logging would foul waterways downstream, smothering spawning beds and threatening Chinook salmon, bull trout, candy darters, Gila trout, freshwater mussels, and frogs.
Roadless forests are the beating heart of American biodiversity — precious places where the wild is still wild. Forest areas free of roads, logging, pollution, and other industrial activities provide crucial connected habitat for species, protecting them deep into the secluded backcountry.
Habitat destruction is a leading driver of the world’s extinction crisis. Repealing the Roadless Rule will put at risk some of the last undisturbed and most important places for animals and plants in the United States.
Grizzlies: A Poster Species for Retaining the Rule
For grizzly bears — protected under the Endangered Species Act — the wild, intact forests of the Rocky Mountains are a lifeline. National forest roadless areas make up a large portion of the designated recovery zones for these bears, including population strongholds in the Northern Continental Divide — the vast wild country around Glacier National Park — and the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem in Wyoming and Montana.
The future of grizzly recovery depends on intact, roadless habitat so these populations can connect. National Forest roadless areas are the backbone of this network, both within recovery zones and across the corridors that connect them.
Our Report
Read the Center for Biological Diversity’s 2026 report, Deadly Incursions — the first examination of where the Trump administration’s proposed dismantling of Roadless Rule protections overlaps with critical wildlife habitat and the ranges of threatened and endangered animals and plants.
The climate: Many roadless areas contain mature and old-growth forests that absorb and store vast amounts of carbon. Logging and processing these trees would release much of that carbon back into the atmosphere, worsening the climate crisis.
Drinking water: National forests are the largest source of drinking water in the United States, serving more than 60 million people in 33 states. Because road construction and logging are major drivers of sediment pollution in rivers and streams, opening protected areas in headwaters to these activities could contaminate drinking-water supplies for millions of people downstream. The Roadless Rule was specifically designed to prevent this threat and protect these waterways.
Wildfire risk: Roads increase human-caused wildfires. A 2022 U.S. Forest Service study found that half of all human-caused wildfires originated within 1.5 miles of a road. A sweeping new analysis of three decades of national forest fire data found that wildfires were four times more likely to start near roads than in roadless forest tracts, ignited by unattended campfires, sparks from vehicles, and other human causes.
Taxpayers’ money: The Forest Service already manages nearly 370,000 miles of roads — two times the nation’s highway system — and faces a multibillion-dollar maintenance backlog. Taxpayers have subsidized this overdeveloped road system and, if the Roadless Rule is repealed, would be stuck footing the bill for any new roads built in backcountry forests.
That fucking PROGRESS:
The Trump Environmental Protection Agency presented pesticide giant Bayer with multiple options on how to proceed with a dicamba approval months before the agency proposed to allow the dangerous, drift-prone pesticide to be sprayed on genetically engineered cotton and soybeans, according to government documents made public today by two conservation groups.
The company’s input was solicited on the level of restrictions needed to effectively mitigate dicamba volatility and runoff, ranging from more protective to less protective, according to records released in response to a lawsuit filed by the Center for Biological Diversity and the Center for Food Safety. The mitigation options the company chose in May 2025 were similar to the options the EPA proposed in July 2025 and closely resembled the final restrictions that were finalized in February of this year.
“The EPA is allowing Bayer to choose its preferred measures to limit dicamba’s damage as if it was ordering up a late-night dinner à la carte from Chili’s,” said Nathan Donley, environmental health science director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “But guess who doesn’t even get a seat at the table? The many hundreds of thousands of Americans who will be left to watch their crops, gardens, and trees wither up and die from toxic dicamba gas wafting over their property lines.”
Despite repeated assurances from the EPA that it has put effective protections in place, dicamba drift has damaged millions of acres of farmland and caused damage to orchards, vegetable farms, home gardens, native plants, trees, and wildlife refuges across the country since its first approval in 2016. Experts have found dicamba drift damage to be the worst of any herbicide in the history of U.S. agriculture. Yet the current approval provides even fewer protections from dicamba drift and damage than past approvals.
Dicamba’s reapproval in 2026 came despite federal court decisions in 2020 and again in 2024 striking down the agency’s previous approvals of the weedkiller as unlawful. The 2020 decision cited the agency’s “refus[al] to estimate the amount of dicamba damage” despite abundant damage, while the 2024 decision called out the EPA’s failure to solicit and address input from the victims of dicamba drift.
“That EPA would pay any heed to dicamba manufacturers and their junk science, much less let them decide on dicamba use restrictions, is a travesty and evidence of how thoroughly the agency has been captured by pesticide interests,” said Bill Freese, science director at Center for Food Safety. “And make no mistake: EPA’s industry-driven dicamba drift “mitigations” have been essentially worthless. Observers in the Midwest say dicamba has drifted rampantly this year, causing as much or more damage than ever before.
This research took about seven months to complete and edit; it also required constant defense and analyzing the most horrifying content. I truly hope you will take the time to read, share, learn, and spread the stories of the brave Palestinian women who continue to endure these horrors. Your support in my mission to write and do this work is appreciated more than words can describe.
On February 9th, 2025, an Israeli soldier gunned down an 8-month pregnant Palestinian woman named Sundus Jamal Shalabi.[1] She is one of the many murdered[2] since the assault on Gaza that began October 7th, 2023, which has revealed a devastating pattern: the systematic targeting of Palestinian women as a calculated strategy of, what this Note characterizes as, genocide under prolonged occupation.[3] The pattern, here, refers to the systematic and repeated conduct in targeting specific victims, evidenced later in the Note through direct statements, statistics, and disproportionate impact on women. For example, on September 22nd, 2025, Australian doctors working in Gaza described doing a “C-Section on a beheaded lady,” in 2024, a doctor at Kuwaiti Hospital in Rafah described a similar situation in delivering a baby from their dying mother; these are but two examples of the impact of femicide on Palestinian women, families and society.[4] Femicide is defined as an intentional killing with gender-related motivation, as the most extreme manifestation of violence against women.[5] Femicide and genocide are conceptually linked through their shared logic of group destruction, but they are not synonymous. Femicide centers gender as the axis of annihilation, whereas genocide targets a protected group defined by nationality, ethnicity, race, or religion. Palestinian women are killed both because they are women and because they are Palestinian, untying social capacity for continuity.[6] Despite decades of jurisprudence recognizing gender-based violence (rape, sexual assault, and other gender-based sex crimes) as a component of genocide, femicide itself remains undefined within international criminal law and has never been codified or prosecuted as a distinct method of group destruction. This conceptual and doctrinal absence leaves a legal void: without explicit recognition, systematic killings of women that function as instruments of genocide, such as those witnessed in Gaza, fall through the cracks of existing accountability mechanisms. Recognizing femicide in its own right, and as a distinct method used to carry out genocide, is therefore essential, for it reveals how gendered killing functions as both a manifestation and a mechanism of genocidal intent.
At least 28,000 Palestinian women have been killed to date, with thirty-seven mothers killed daily. These statistics reflect not merely casualties of “war” but also evidence of deliberate gender-based destruction.[7] The Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT), including East Jerusalem, stated in a 2025 report that “Israel has targeted civilian women and girls directly,”.[8] While Israel’s bombardment, siege, and starvation campaigns in Gaza have prompted widespread allegations of genocide, this Note highlights a critical yet underexamined dimension: the systematic targeting of Palestinian women’s reproductive capacity as a tool of group destruction.[9] Through killings, the dismantling of maternal healthcare, and other forms of gender-specific violence, Israel’s conduct satisfies multiple acts prohibited under the Genocide Convention, particularly Article II(d)’s ban on “measures intended to prevent births within the group”.[10]An Obstetrician in Gaza, stated that “This is a war against women. Thousands of women have been killed and hundreds of thousands are living in extremely precarious conditions. The number of women and girls who have died from complications related to pregnancy and childbirth remains unknown.”[11]
The scale and pattern of harm directed toward women in Gaza has manifested in multiple forms. These include the destruction of Gaza’s primary fertility clinic, which reportedly contained approximately 4,000 embryos; repeated strikes on maternity wards; attacks on residential structures where women and children were sheltering; and the creation of conditions in which an estimated 50,000 pregnant women lack access to essential medical care.[12] According to a United Nations press briefing, between March 18 and April 9, 2025, during the period following the breakdown of a “ceasefire”, thirty-six airstrikes reportedly targeted areas occupied exclusively by women and children.[13] The United Nations Population Fund, World Health Organization, Doctors Without Borders, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), and Human Rights Watch have further documented the purposeful breakdown of maternal healthcare and infant mortality.[14] In one instance, Human Rights Watch notes that due to insufficient medical infrastructure, as many as four to five newborns were placed in a single incubator, with most not surviving.[15]
The impact on women in Gaza extends beyond direct violence. According to the United Nations, approximately 155,000 women were either pregnant or breastfeeding, with an estimated 5,500 expected to give birth each month — many while facing severe food insecurity, as 95% of the population was reported to be experiencing starvation-level conditions.[16] Access to maternal healthcare has been critically impaired. Reports indicate that women have been prevented from reaching hospitals, including by sniper fire, forcing deliveries in unsafe and unsanitary conditions.[17] The widespread destruction of medical infrastructure has contributed to a marked increase in preventable infant deaths and, according to some accounts, a 300% rise in miscarriages.[18] These conditions, arising within the framework of a prolonged occupation, have been characterized by many legal scholars, such as Raz Segal, Ugur Umit Ungor, and William Schabas, as constituting acts of genocide under Article II of the Genocide Convention.[19]
The consequences of the conflict have reverberated throughout Palestinian society. Over 3,000 women have reportedly been widowed, more than 17,000 children orphaned, and over 50,000 children killed or injured, most commonly those between the ages of six to ten.[20] This large-scale disruption, which this Note argues constitutes acts of genocide, has placed unprecedented burdens on surviving women, who are left to sustain family and community life amid the widespread destruction of infrastructure and social support systems.[21] The mass displacement of 2.1 million Palestinians, of whom 1.7 million are reportedly experiencing conditions of forced starvation, has had particularly severe implications for women and mothers seeking to protect and care for their families.[22]
I argue that the systematic targeting of Palestinian women in Gaza constitutes femi-genocide, the use of femicide as an operational tool of genocide. The conduct of the Israeli leadership and officials, especially the killing of women and girls, fulfills the actus reus and evidences the specific intent (dolus specialis) required under the Genocide Convention. Femicide here operates as an instrument to destroy a group: by erasing the bodies through which life continues, it extinguishes both present and future generations. Through this lens, I reconceptualize gender-based persecution as a structural means of annihilation, situating Gaza within a broader jurisprudential trajectory of reproductive and demographic destruction. I conclude by addressing the dual layers of accountability, individual criminal liability under international criminal law and state responsibility under customary international law, and propose a reframing of femicide within international legal doctrine as an operational mechanism of genocide rather than a parallel phenomenon.
By situating these acts at the intersection of international criminal law and human rights law, this analysis contributes to both genocide studies and international criminal law scholarship. As Palestinian women continue to face heightened risks amid ongoing occupation and armed conflict, recognizing the gendered dimensions of mass violence is essential to advancing legal accountability and informing effective prevention strategies.
This Note does not seek to re-establish that the campaign in Gaza constitutes genocide in the broader sense. That claim has already been advanced by South Africa in proceedings before the International Court of Justice and supported by extensive documentation from organizations such as Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International.[23] These analyses have emphasized how Israel’s blockade, bombardment, and starvation policies may satisfy the legal threshold for genocide and reveal an overarching intent to destroy the Palestinian people. Yet they have largely not addressed the gendered dimensions of that intent— how the systematic targeting of women as the bearers of the group’s reproductive and social continuity functions as a means of achieving the group’s destruction. Addressing this dimension does not propose a distinct form of intent apart from the dolus specialis required for Genocide. Rather, it demonstrates how femicide can operate as evidence of genocidal intent, revealing the perpetrator’s understanding that destroying the reproductive capacity of a group is integral to destroying the group itself.
On September 16, 2025, the United Nations Human Rights Council published their legal analysis of Israel’s violence, coming to the conclusion that Israel’s Genocide has deliberately deprived civilians of food, water, and shelter in what it describes as “collective punishment,” yet the differential impact of such deprivation on women remains underexamined.[24] Legal scholars have recognized that “Gender permeates all aspects of the crime of genocide,” but this insight has been largely absent from public legal discourse on Gaza .[25]
This Note fills that gap by examining how attacks on Palestinian women’s survival, reproductive health, and in sustaining family life may function both as evidence and as instruments of group destruction…
In Prosecutor v. Akayesu, the court stated that genocide “embodies a special intent . . . which demands that the perpetrator clearly seeks to product the act as charged.” This intent can be inferred from systematic patterns of violence and explicit statements.
In the case of Gaza, multiple converging factors support an inference of genocidal intent. The shift in the demographics of those killed is stark: whereas less than 14% of Palestinians killed in prior bombardments between 2008 and 2023 were women and girls, from October 2023 to January 2024, 70% of deaths in Gaza were women and children, 1,000,000 women and girls have been displaced, and there exists no safe spaces for women survivors of gender-based violence. This dramatic change reflects a transformation in the nature and aims of the military campaign. Intent can also be inferred from words.
Public statements from senior Israeli officials, reflect a rhetorical framework that dehumanizes Palestinians and normalizes large-scale violence. Israeli President Isaac Herzog: “It’s an entire nation out there that is responsible . . . This rhetoric about civilians not being aware, not involved, it’s absolutely not true”; Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu suggesting nuclear weapons could be “one of the possibilities” for Gaza”; Agriculture Minister Avi Dichter: “We are now rolling out the Gaza Nakba”; National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir stated that “my right for life comes before their right to movement,” “their” being Palestinians in Gaza; and IDF spokesperson Daniel Hagari: “The emphasis is on damage and not on accuracy”.
One frequently cited example is Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s invocation of “Amalek” in late 2023, a biblical reference historically associated with the total destruction of an enemy population. This statement, among others, has been interpreted by some legal scholars and international observers as evidence of genocidal rhetoric, potentially indicative of intent under Article II of the Genocide Convention…
[2] The term “murder” is used here consistent with its definition under international criminal law. Under ICL, murder as a crime against humanity is defined as “unlawfully and intentionally causing the death of a human being,” requiring that the perpetrator either intends to kill or intends to inflict grievous bodily harm likely to cause death while being reckless as to whether death ensues. The mens rea includes both direct and indirect forms of intention. While domestic legal systems may vary in their precise definitions of murder (including degrees of murder, distinctions between murder and manslaughter, and specific mental state requirements), the ICL definition largely converges with common domestic law understandings of intentional unlawful killing. Notably, under ICL, it is not required to recover the body to prove beyond reasonable doubt that a person was murdered; the fact of a victim’s death can be inferred circumstantially from other evidence. International Criminal Law & Practice Training Materials: Crimes Against Humanity, Module 7, § 7.2.2.2.2, at 18 (ICLS 2024), https://iici.global/wpd/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/icls-training-materials-sec-7-cah1.pdf (Citing, Prosecutor v. Akayesu, Case No. ICTR-96-4-T, Judgment, ¶ 589 (Sept. 2, 1998); Prosecutor v. Delalićet al. (”Čelebići”), Case No. IT-96-21-T, Judgment, ¶ 439 (Nov. 16, 1998); Prosecutor v. Strugar, Case No. IT-01-42-A, Appeal Judgment, ¶ 270 (July 17, 2008).
[3] ‘Genocide’ will be used as a term of rhetoric to set the context in which indignities take place. Since the ICJ has not ruled on South Africa’s submitted 800-page indictment, this Note characterizes the violence that has taken place as Genocide; Seealso Amnesty Int’l, ‘You Feel Like You Are Subhuman’: Israel’s Genocide Against Palestinians in Gaza, (2024), https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/mde15/8668/2024/en/; Occupation refers to the effective control of territory by foreign armed forces. The definition coming from the 1907 Hague Regulation, a “territory is considered occupied when it is actually placed under the authority of the hostile army,” Hague Regulations (1907) on the Laws and Customs of War on Land, annex, art. 42. See generally Ilan Pappé, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (2006).
[5] Five Essential Facts to Know About Femicide, UN Women (Nov. 25, 2024), https://www.unwomen.org/en/articles/explainer/five-essential-facts-to-know-about-femicide (“Femicide (or feminicide, as it is referred to in some contexts) is defined as an intentional killing with a gender-related motivation. It is different from homicide, where the motivation may not be gender-related.,” UN Women); For purposes of this analysis, the term “gender-related motivation” follows the definition of “gender” in Article 7(3) of the Rome Statute, referring to the two sexes, male and female, as understood within the society concerned. This Article adopts that binary framing not to exclude other gender identities but because the conduct examined here, the systematic killing of women in Gaza, targets women specifically as women, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court art. 7(3), July 17, 1998, 2187 U.N.T.S. 90. See, e.g., Lisa Davis, Dusting Off the Law Books: Recognizing Gender Persecution in Conflicts and Atrocities, 20 Nw. J. Hum. Rts. 1 (2021) (arguing for greater recognition of gender-based persecution as a distinct international crime); Alessia Nicastro, Addressing Femicide Through International Criminal Law: The Need for a Binding Legal Framework, Yale J. Int’l L. (Jan. 26, 2025) (arguing for femicide to be recognized as a core gendered method of group destruction).
[6] Report of the Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women and Girls, Its Causes and Consequences, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/59/47 (May 2025).
[9] Médecins Sans Frontières (Doctors Without Borders), U.S.-Backed Aid Distribution Points in Gaza Are Sites of Orchestrated Killing (Aug. 7, 2025), https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/latest/us-backed-aid-distribution-points-gaza-are-sites-orchestrated-killing, (reporting that Israeli and U.S. authorities have turned aid distribution sites in Gaza into “sites of orchestrated killing,” using starvation as a weapon of war and enforcing a siege that prevents the entry of life-saving supplies. The siege, imposed since March 2025, has effectively deprived civilians of food, water, and medicine); U.N. Press Release, Security Council, As Israel’s Aerial Bombardments Intensify, “There Is No Safe Place in Gaza,” Humanitarian Affairs Chief Warns Security Council, U.N. Press Release SC/15564 (Jan. 12, 2024), https://press.un.org/en/2024/sc15564.doc.htm.
[10] Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide art. II(d), Dec. 9, 1948, 78 U.N.T.S. 277; Declaration on the Elimination of Violence against Women, art. 1 (“”violence against women” means any act of gender-based violence that results in, or is likely to result in, physical, sexual or psychological harm or suffering to women, including threats of such acts, coercion or arbitrary deprivation of liberty, whether occurring in public or in private life.”); Independent Commission, supra note 130.
[21] Press Release, Israeli Attacks on Educational, Religious and Cultural Sites in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Amount to War Crimes and the Crime Against Humanity of Extermination, UN Commission Says, OHCHR (June 10, 2025), https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/06/israeli-attacks-educational-religious-and-cultural-sites-occupied (reporting the UN Commission’s finding that Israeli attacks on civilian infrastructure in the OPT amount to war crimes and crimes against humanity, including extermination).
[23]Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (S. Afr. v. Isr.), Application Instituting Proceedings and Request for the Indication of Provisional Measures, ICJ Pleadings (Dec. 29, 2023); Amnesty Int’l, supra note 3.
[24] Human Rights Council, Legal Analysis of the Conduct of Israel in Gaza Pursuant to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/60/CRP.3 (Sept. 16, 2025).
1948, 1491, 13,000 BCE . . . Pick your Starting Date as that Nuclear Clock is how many seconds before midnight? Israelis and their Jewish Handlers, Cease and Desist and DIE!
In 1938, a small team of German scientists managed to split a uranium atom. This split, known as fission, sees an atom’s nucleus splitting into two or more nuclei, which releases an incredible, explosive amount of energy. Worried that the Germans would be using this finding to build a colossal bomb, Einstein signed a letter (written by physicist Leo Szilard) to the U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1939. The letter warned the President of Germany’s potential nuclear efforts and urged him to start a nuclear program in the US. Three years later, in 1942, the Manhattan Project officially launched.
Announcement Date: January 27, 2026, by the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.
Previous Time: Set at 89 seconds to midnight in 2025.
Historical Context: First created in 1947 during the Cold War, when it was initially set at 17 minutes to midnight
Thailand has spent decades building its image as a welcoming, easygoing place — “Land of Smiles.” In 2025–2026 that smile is getting tighter. In Phuket, Koh Samui, Koh Phangan, Pattaya and even smaller northern towns like Pai Thai communities are openly venting their frustration, anger and exhaustion at some Israeli tourists and semi‑permanent Israeli groups who have settled into local neighborhoods. This isn’t just fringe sentiment anymore. It is national policy, diplomatic conversation and street protests too.
A PATTERN THAT FINALLY CAME TO A BREAKING POINT
Local Thai papers and regional outlets have been documenting a steady rise in confrontations with Israeli visitors — not just scuffles, but patterns: disrespect for local customs; loud disputes with business owners; threats and intimidation; attempts to sidestep Thai land‑ownership laws; nominee business structures; unpermitted construction; political provocation; and a general sense of entitlement that locals say goes too far. Thai officials have said openly that hospitality doesn’t mean tourists can do whatever they want.
Israel, err, dollars, err, shekels, err, Jews First, man, not for, with, of, because of the people. For, with, by, because of the, well, Jews:
Soulless eyes:
What did the NEOCONS and JEWS in America DO because of their HANDS on the flight patterns and basement bombs on Sept. 11?
And those ARABS?
George H.W. Bush, 94, Presided Over ‘Age of Miracles and Wonders’
In Israel, Irving Moskowitz was among the major US billionaires funding Jewish settlements in the occupied territories, Messianic religious schools and universities, Jewish far-right groups, and paramilitary activities.
Moskowitz was not only Netanyahu’s donor and one of the many on his “millionaire list.” He was also an associate of the right-wing Ariel Center for Policy Research, a hardline advocacy group espousing the Likud line on Israeli security. In the United States, he was among the funders of major neoconservative think tanks promoting the War on Terror and hardline Israel-centric Middle East policies, including the Hudson Institute, the neoconservative American Enterprise Institute (AEI), and the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA).
Along with other pivotal financiers, Moskowitz contributed to the rise of neoconservatism in America, and the movement’s many Jewish leaders who shared the ideas of revisionist Zionism, including Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Robert Kagan, William Kristol, and so on.
Led by Kristol and Kagan, neoconservatives founded their think tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC) with a view to sustaining America’s unipolar moment for decades to come. Whatever was in the interest of Israel, according to Netanyahu’s Likud, was in the national interest of America.
Other donors followed, including the casino tycoon Sheldon Adelson. For some, two decades until his death in 2021, when Forbes estimated his net worth at $35 billion, Adelson was a major sponsor of Netanyahu and kingmaker among the Republicans who helped fund Trump’s drive to the White House.
A mushrooming media controversy pitting neoconservatives against a prominent Jewish-American political commentator could mark a new stage in the growing battle over who speaks for the US Jewish community on foreign policy issues, particularly regarding the Middle East.
TIME columnist Joe Klein’s accusations that Jewish neoconservatives, who played a particularly visible role in the drive to war in Iraq and have since pushed for military confrontation in Iran, sacrificed “US lives and money … to make the world safe for Israel” have spurred angry charges of anti-Semitism and personal attacks from critics at such neoconservative strongholds as The Weekly Standard, National Review, and Commentary.
But the fierceness of the controversy surrounding Klein, generally considered a political centrist, highlights the growing antagonism between neoconservative hardliners and prominent US Jews whose more moderate views are aligned more closely with those of the foreign policy establishment.
The controversy began 24 June, when Klein argued in a TIME blog post that the “fact that a great many Jewish neoconservatives — people like [independent Democrat Sen.] Joe Lieberman and the crowd at Commentary — plumped for this war [in Iraq], and now for an even more foolish assault on Iran, raised the question of divided loyalties.”
Within a day, Abraham Foxman, head of the Anti-Defamation League, accused Klein of espousing “age-old anti-Semitic canards about a Jewish conspiracy to control and manipulate government.”
The reaction from the right-wing press was even harsher. Commentary editor John Podhoretz reiterated the accusation of “anti-Semitic canards” and called Klein “manifestly intellectually unstable.”
Writing in National Review, former George W. Bush speechwriter Peter Wehner called Klein “a man who cannot control his anger and even hatred.”
But Klein has refused to back down, accusing his attackers of using charges of anti-Semitism to silence criticism of neoconservative policies.
“When [Commentary writer] Jennifer Rubin or Abe Foxman calls me anti-Semitic, they’re wrong,” he said in an interview. “I am anti-neoconservative.”
Oh, yeah, those years: 1 August 2008. More crime scenes:
Goes way back:
And here we are — Jew Censorship a la AGI/AI:
Cleveland Magazine:I really enjoyedThe Dissidents; it was a history I did not know anything about. It felt like a really great introduction to this world.
Derf Backderf: Yeah, it’s pretty much the only one out there. It’s completely forgotten history at this point, which I like. That’s fun to do.
CM:Absolutely. WithThe Massesbeing the big centerpiece series throughout the whole book, could you talk about, in your life, how you first discovered that magazine? What made you pick it up for the first time?
DB: That happened at Ohio State when I went to school, and that’s where the Billy Island Cartoon Museum is, which was just starting back then. But the head curator was one of my profs, and so I was doing political cartoons — bad political cartoons — for the student paper, The Lantern. That’s where I started my cartooning career, and I was really struggling. I was looking for inspiration, and it was the head curator, Lucy Caswell, who said, “You might want to take a look at these cartoonists in The Masses,” and I was just blown away. And so that began this lifelong love affair with not only the magazine, but with the contributors. I just expanded from there. Everything was out of print. There were no books written about it, no collections, no nothing. So I just had to pursue it on my own over the course of many years, and here we are.
Students are drilled into remembering failed attempts to colonise what was then known as Siam by France and Great Britain, and the costly price Thailand paid for having to cede territory under its control during the Rama V era in the late 19th century. Thais have been taught to be protective of their country and safeguard its sovereignty from potential foreign powers….
And I am running into the breeders, the HR freaks, almost all women, fucking up city departments, companies, hospitals. Hiring managers here and there, the breeders, the fucking nanny blade runners and certainly Good Germans.
Don’t you get it yet? No? Western Culture, that Anglo-Saxon-Franco-Iberian-Nordic-Slavic culture, is dead in the water. Peter Principled to the high heavens. The managerial class, the professional screening-out fuckers, and boy do these breeders like their AI, their apps that can screen for them any fucker like me who might have some minor journalistic or Substack and WWW presence, where the word “Jew” is counted and then put through their AI (now) sieve to, well, eliminate me from employment.
This is them, the raped breeders, at the Trump Rapist and Pedophile Convention, loving his fucking 80-year-old feces-filled Made in Israel Depends. Right in their fucking Mary Kay made-up faces.
The nanny HR state loves this: Recent investigative reports have highlighted a significant trend involving former Israeli intelligence operatives holding prominent roles within major global technology firms. While this is often discussed in the context of corporate connections rather than traditional, covert espionage “infiltration” by Mossad, the scale of former intelligence personnel moving into Big Tech has raised substantial national security and privacy concerns. [1, 2]
Job postings and interviews with senior security officials at Anthropic show that the frontier AI lab is building out an extensive monitoring system to keep tabs on activists who oppose the rapid development of artificial intelligence.
In addition to monitoring activists in the vicinity of Anthropic executives and keeping tabs on protests near physical Anthropic assets, the firm is also implementing a “pre-crime” approach, attempting to predict incidents before they happen. In some cases, that also means reporting suspects to police before a crime occurs. Anthropic did not respond to the Prospect’s request for comment.
Anthropic’s plans to surveil dissent are at odds with the firm’s efforts to cast itself as the responsible alternative to OpenAI. At the beginning of the year, the Department of Defense and Anthropic engaged in a high-profile dustup over Anthropic’s refusal to allow the military to use its tools for mass domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons. That tension seems to have eased as Anthropic hires for “national security sales” positions, seeking to restart military contracts. The increase in threat monitoring of domestic opponents fits with a renewed focus on national security.
A piece of Anthropic’s surveillance architecture was revealed in a podcast interview from last year between Anthropic Global Security Operations Center Manager Keon Ellison, Security Operations Manager Zach Melvin, and James Neufeld, CEO of Samdesk, a company Anthropic contracts with for risk detection.
In a wide-ranging conversation about threat monitoring and analysis, the interview also touches on monitoring activists. “Last year we had an executive travel into a major city when we received some intelligence through Samdesk about a planned protest,” Ellison said. The originally scheduled protest was moved up due to permitting issues. “Samdesk gave us about 60 minutes of advance notice that the protest organizers had moved the timeline,” Ellison explained. “That extra hour was critical. Without it our executives would have departed their meetings; they would have run right into the heart of the disruption.”
Ellison said that Anthropic used this data to devise an alternate route for the executive and funnel them to a service entrance at the hotel. “What could have been a high-stress situation,” he said, “was really mitigated through early detection through Samdesk and giving us that information.”
Anthropic has begun making routine reports to police departments across the country for threats, and toldThe Wall Street Journal in July, “We track concerning behavior over time through a person-of-interest process, allowing us to catch escalation patterns early.” According to the Journal, “several individuals involved in incidents reported to police were already being tracked by Anthropic security.”
Last month, The San Francisco Standard reported that Anthropic had reported a man to San Francisco police for telling Claude that he had bought an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle and had CEO Dario Amodei “in his sights.” When The Standard contacted the man in question, he told the newspaper he was “just fucking around.”
In late July, the U.S. cybersecurity giant Palo Alto Networks (PANW) announced that it had acquired the Israeli identity management and information security firm CyberArk, paying a staggering $25 billion dollars worth of cash and stock to purchase the firm. In addition to potentially injecting billions of dollars into the Israeli economy, Palo Alto Networks’ acquisition of CyberArk further strengthens the relationship between Silicon Valley and Israel’s security-intelligence apparatus.
Palo Alto is one of the world’s largest cybersecurity firms, and provides infrastructure protection, firewalls, and cloud security services to tens of thousands of companies internationally. Udi Mokady, CyberArk’s founder and executive chairman, is an alum of Unit 8200, the Israeli Military Intelligence Directorate’s elite signals intelligence division. So are the four co-founders of Wiz: the Israeli cloud computing firm recently bought by Google for $32 billion. So, too, is Palo Alto’s Founder and Chief Technology Officer Nir Zuk.
Palo Alto has expanded through a spree of high-profile acquisitions over the past decade, paying sometimes up to billions of dollars for startups aimed at expanding its cybersecurity offerings. Nearly half of these have involved companies with origins in Israeli intelligence, raising concerns about access to the vast amounts of data around the world that the company is charged with protecting. Palo Alto Networks did not respond to Drop Site’s request for comment.
So, I was minding my own business yesterday, and lo and behold, I got a call while I was painting the house. From some behavioral health care director. For a job I applied for months ago.
A residential treatment facility for substance use disorder
Who this serves
Adults 18+ with substance use disorder from across Oregon, with priority to residents of Lincoln County. We expect to serve 200 residential patients and 600 outpatients each year. As a nonprofit health care provider, Samaritan Pacific Health Services doesn’t turn anyone away for inability to pay or insurance type.
What
Establish a 16‑bed Samaritan Treatment & Recovery Services facility in Lincoln County to provide residential treatment and intensive outpatient programs, including group and individual therapy, medication-assisted treatment and peer-delivered services. The Pacific Communities Health District purchased a facility and funds are being raised to build an addition for a commercial kitchen, meeting spaces and offices as well as to remodel the existing living space. Nonprofit Samaritan Pacific Health Services is committed to operating the facility.
Where
In Newport, within a short driving distance of Samaritan Pacific Communities Hospital.
When
Completion of the facility is expected in the spring of 2025 based on available funding for construction. Residential services will be offered 24 hours a day, seven days per week. Outpatient services are offered Monday through Friday, including evening sessions.
Why
Residents in need: Data gathered by our Regional Mental Health/Substance Use Coalition shows that between March and August 2021, 12,225 Lincoln County residents were screened for substance use disorder, with 1,297 individuals screening positive for drugs, including alcohol, and 886 people were diagnosed with substance use disorder.
No residential treatment in Lincoln County: According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Oregon ranks second in the country for substance use disorder, with 18.2% of the population addicted to drugs or alcohol. Yet, Oregon ranks 50th in the nation for access to treatment programs. Inpatient treatment is a critical first step in the recovery process for many individuals, but there are currently no inpatient services in Lincoln County, and limited outpatient services.
Death and overdoses rising: The state’s Chief Medical Examiner, Dr. Sean Hurst, recently testified to the Oregon Legislature that between, 2019 and 2020 alcohol-related deaths in Oregon increased 73% and drug overdoses were up 39%.
Economic imperative: According to surgeongeneral.gov, addressing “substance misuse and substance use disorders effectively for all Americans aligns with a strong economic imperative. Substance misuse is estimated to cost society $442 billion each year in health care costs, lost productivity, and criminal justice costs.”
So, the fellow liked my interview over the phone, liked my experience with adults and giving out medications and my own overnight stay experience with an adult home in Portland for folks with developmental disabilities. Imagine that: taking care of the needs of five men overnight, and then hitting the books in the day, working as a part-time fucking faculty member in the Portland-Vancouver area.
He asked if a face-to-face meeting was cool with the recovery team at the facility. I told him to schedule it.
Months ago I applied for the position. Hmm, $27 to $40 an hour, four days a week, yes, at night.
And then, thirty minutes later, I check my fucking black mirror phone, and I get this shit.
Dear Paul,
We appreciate the time and effort you have dedicated to our application process. We have thoroughly reviewed a significant number of applications for the Recovery Support Specialist I position (see below). After careful consideration, we have determined that you will not be advancing to the next stage of the hiring process, as we are pursuing a candidate who more closely meets our needs.
Position: Recovery Support Specialist I
Department: PCH Treatment&Reco-Residential
Requisition: 77001
Schedule: 1.0 (80 hrs/pp)
Shift: Night
We hope you will consider applying for future opportunities with us. As a best practice, we recommend reviewing and updating your application and resume to include your most recent work history. For additional resources, please visit our Career page to login to your individual profile, find answers to frequently asked questions, and view Tips for Success.
Again, thank you for expressing interest in Samaritan Health Services.
Sincerely, Samaritan Talent Acquisition
Do you get it YET? Fucking breeders, fucking nanny state, fucking mostly women determining outcomes, and alas, they are raped, their fucking minds, dudes. And I tried tracking down this fellow, with no luck, as I talked to someone at the facility and basically told her that this is a mental rape, calling me, telling me I am in the running, setting up a face-to-face, and then the AI or HR breeders sent me that above. You know, addiction which is an area I have been trained in, with the huge caveat of TRAUMA-informed care and harm reduction, but alas, the cunts of capitalism put me through a 1.5-hour ringer.
“Where thinking is isolated without free exchange with other minds and can no longer expand, delusion may follow. Whenever ideas are compartmentalized, behind and between curtains, the process of continual alert confrontation of facts and reality is hampered. The system freezes, becomes rigid, and dies of delusion.” ― Joost A.M. Meerloo, The Rape of the Mind: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing
“There is another important weapon the totalitarians use in their campaign to frighten the world into submission. This is the weapon of psychological shock. Hitler kept his enemies in a state of constant confusion and diplomatic upheaval. They never knew what this unpredictable madman was going to do next. Hitler was never logical, because he knew that that was what he was expected to be. Logic can be met with logic, while illogic cannot—it confuses those who think straight. The Big Lie and monotonously repeated nonsense have more emotional appeal in a cold war than logic and reason. While the enemy is still searching for a reasonable counter-argument to the first lie, the totalitarians can assault him with another.” ― Joost A.M. Meerloo, The Rape of the Mind: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing
“Radio and television tend to take away active affectionate relationships between men and to destroy the capacity for personal thought, evaluation, and reflection. They catch the mind directly, giving people no time for calm, dialectical conversation with their own minds, with their friends, or with their books.” ― Joost A.M. Meerloo, The Rape of the Mind: The Psychology of Thought Control, Menticide, and Brainwashing
Americans felt afraid after 9/11 because the attacks suddenly destroyed the long-held belief that the U.S. mainland was completely safe from major foreign disasters.
Loss of Invulnerability
Felt safe: Before 2001, most people in the U.S. thought major wars and violent attacks only happened in other parts of the world.
Sudden shock: Hijacked planes hitting iconic U.S. buildings proved that everyday places could become front lines.
Deep anxiety: Citizens lost their sense of personal and national security, as The Guardian notes about how the event unraveled the nation’s collective comfort.
Constant Reminders and Changes
New rules: Airports added strict security checks, and the government passed laws like the Patriot Act to increase domestic surveillance.
Media updates: Continuous news coverage kept the threat of future violence fresh in people’s minds.
Daily caution: Many citizens grew more suspicious, careful, and distrustful of public spaces and strangers.
Shift in Modern Fears
Changing threats: Over the years, general anxiety shifted from foreign terrorists to a mix of random violence and domestic extremism, according to a Reuters poll.
Lasting impact: The psychological shift turned a secure nation into one that remains permanently alert to unseen dangers.
I was watching the fucked up bad acting (all Holly-Dirt is bad acting) Nuremberg. Just fucked up dude: Russell Gladiator Crowe, and then the tall fuck playing the prosecutor, and then the Queen movie guy playing the major, a psychiatrist.
On New Year’s Day 1958, 45-year-old Douglas Kelley burned himself while cooking for a Rose Bowl party, stormed into the bathroom, and grabbed a potassium cyanide capsule. He swallowed the poison in front of his wife and three children, and he didn’t even leave a note behind to tell them why. Kelley’s family believes that he was haunted by his past: He’d served as the chief psychiatrist at Nuremberg Prison in 1945, where he’d interviewed nearly two dozen Nazi leaders about their crimes during the Holocaust. Kelley had formed a particularly close relationship with Hermann Göring, which is documented in the 2025 film “Nuremberg.” However, the movie doesn’t even begin to cover some of the more extraordinary parts of Kelley’s story — such as Göring asking Kelley to adopt his daughter. Göring died behind bars in 1946 after poisoning himself with potassium cyanide, just like Kelley did 12 years later.
Key Findings at Nuremberg
Dr. Douglas Kelley evaluated 22 top Nazi prisoners, including Hermann Göring, during the 1945 trials.
Normal Minds: He discovered that the defendants were not clinically insane or a special biological breed of evil.
Common Traits: Most prisoners possessed average or high intelligence, deep narcissism, and intense ambition.
Moral Void: They simply lacked empathy and a moral compass, functioning like ruthless opportunists rather than madmen.
The Warning for America
Fascism Can Spread: Kelley realized that under the right conditions, ordinary people anywhere are capable of committing terrible acts.
Political Danger: He cautioned that American politicians could exploit public fears, target minority groups, and divide citizens for power.
Need for Vigilance: He urged the public to protect democracy by thinking critically and rejecting leaders who weaponize hate.
Direct evidence of genocidal intent
Empty heading
Many of the unlawful acts documented by Amnesty International were preceded by officials urging their implementation. The organization reviewed 102 statements issued by the Israeli government, military officials and others between October 7, 2023, and June 30, 2024. Many dehumanized Palestinians and called for or justified genocidal acts or other crimes against them.
Of these, Amnesty International identified 22 statements made by senior officials in charge of managing the offensive that appeared to call for or justify genocidal acts, providing direct evidence of genocidal intent. This language was frequently replicated, including by Israeli soldiers on the ground, as evidenced by audiovisual content verified by Amnesty International. This evidence shows soldiers making calls to “erase” Gaza or to make it uninhabitable and celebrating the destruction of Palestinian homes, mosques, schools and universities.
Kelly sort of missed the memo on the Jews murdering British and Palestinian civilians in Palestine way before the Nakba.
At the heart of Kelley’s warning is the banality of authoritarianism. Nazism did not begin with gas chambers; it began with grievance, fear, economic instability and the promise of national renewal. It was normalised step by step, through propaganda, scapegoating and the steady erosion of democratic norms. Kelley observed how easily people rationalised cruelty when it was framed as duty, patriotism or obedience to authority.
Crucially, Kelley rejected the comforting myth that “it couldn’t happen here”. He argued that this belief is itself a form of denial that leaves societies dangerously unprepared. When people assume that fascism belongs only to another time or another nation, they fail to recognise its early warning signs in their own political culture: the dehumanisation of minorities, contempt for the rule of law, attacks on the press, and the glorification of strongman leadership.
AND THAT EVIL in small doses is the NANNY state, and their AI fucking orgasms, finding every fucking shred of evidence that I have ever written stating that Jews and Israel are a continuing crime scene.
Judaism, Zionism and Conflation-grasping the Kosher Trinity…
Jewish Anti Zionists (AKA AZZ) are occasionally irritated by the ‘conflation’ of ‘Zionism and Judaism’ but the terms are inherently related.
Conflation is usually understood as the merging of two or more distinct sets of information, texts, ideas, etc. into one. Does this concept apply to Zionism and Judaism? Are Zionism and Judaism distinct terms? Are Jews and Zionism categorically different from each other?
For example, can Americanism and exceptionalism be conflated? Can round and circular be conflated? The distinction between terms that are related can be confusing. But the relationship between Jews and Zionism is clear. This is also true of the relationship among Zionism, Jews and Judaism. These terms are intrinsically related politically, culturally, religiously and at times they form a metaphysical continuum.
Apartheid is a racist system of exploitation. The Jewish state doesn’t want to exploit the Palestinians; it wants them gone. It was born as an ethnic cleanser and it quickly transitioned into a genocidal monster echoing some of its most insanely brutal Biblical verses.
Nanny Blue States
Fascist Christian Red States.
And a rape culture:
Phone records provide ‘irrefutable proof’ of sexual assault allegations against Trump, lawyer says
completely controlled, programmed, and manipulated by another person. In Yiddish slang, calling someone a golem implies they are a brainless tool, an idiot, or a puppet doing someone else’s bidding
Philan-Tam-Duy Le is a 35-year-old tattoo artist from Julian, California, who gained international attention after being arrested near the U.S. Capitol with a 10-foot-tall, fully functioning homemade guillotine. On August 25, 2026, U.S. Capitol Police discovered Le’s black Toyota Tacoma illegally parked along East Capitol Street near the Supreme Court and the Library of Congress. The upright wooden frame and heavy, angled metal blade were fully assembled and plainly visible sticking out of his truck bed.
Chronology & Context
The Journey: Le constructed the device himself and drove it more than 2,500 miles from San Diego County directly to Washington, D.C..
Pre-Arrest Activity: Prior to his trek, Le posted an Instagram video on August 12 showing off the guillotine while wearing an executioner’s hood. The post included captions expressing deep frustration with lawmakers and defense contractors regarding foreign conflicts.
The Arrest: U.S. Capitol Police officers spotted the vehicle around 3:00 p.m. and quickly took him into custody without incident.
Legal Proceedings & Motive
Le was formally charged with a misdemeanor for attempted possession of a prohibited weapon. During his arraignment in the District of Columbia Superior Court, he pleaded not guilty. A judge denied the prosecution’s request to hold him in jail, noting that Le had no prior criminal record, made no specific threats toward individuals.
Two Jews you can ALWAYS count on to get it wrong . . .
Katie and Aaron, the ebony and ivory of the fucking alt/ulterior signs of life media.
Useful Idiots, two Jews in a Pod…. Meet Hillary Clinton: tin-foil hatter!
During a crazy episode of Morning Joe (which had so much ridiculous content that it takes up the majority of this extended Friday Free-for-All), Hillary Clinton made the astonishing claim that Netanyahu (much like 9/11 theorists believe about George W. Bush) KNEW about the October 7 attacks BEFORE they happened and still let them occur.
I just love those bar and bat mitzvah cunts calling anything against their dirty religion tin foil hat folk:
Oh, the separation of the sexes!
Have you ever noticed how in all the political commentary and debates since 2001, the truth about what happened on September 11, 2001, is never seriously discussed? It is just assumed that the government’s version of events is true, with minor, limited hangouts, such as the Saudi’s financing of some of the alleged hijackers.
It is a third rail of American politics; question it and your goose is cooked.
By September 2001, George Bush Jr. was in major political trouble in his first year in office. “9/11” saved his skin and made him into a national hero with a bullhorn in the wreckage of the Twin Towers. It allowed him to pursue his endless war on terror and win a second term even while destroying Iraq. Obama, picking up Bush’s baton while offering the usual phony critiques of his policies, quickly bailed out Wall Street and the banks and proceeded to attack seven Muslim countries.
In 2026, Donald Trump is in major political trouble as the mid-term elections approach in his second term. He is caught in a quagmire with his losing war with Iran. His patron and blackmailer Israel, has him up against the wall. Russia and China, ruled by far smarter leaders, are confounding him. His popularity has plummeted. All indications are that he is a man at the end of his tether, crazed, fascistic, and desperate. People like him do insane things. Nuclear weapons are at his disposal.
As the daily news makes clear, mentally unstable, desperate people do evil things. They take knives, guns, clubs, and walk out on an ordinary day and slaughter innocent people on a street, in a school, on a subway, everywhere and anywhere. Nuclear weapons can kill a few more, and we are ruled by madmen.
Judaism, Zionism and Conflation-grasping the Kosher Trinity…
Jewish Anti Zionists (AKA AZZ) are occasionally irritated by the ‘conflation’ of ‘Zionism and Judaism’ but the terms are inherently related.
Conflation is usually understood as the merging of two or more distinct sets of information, texts, ideas, etc. into one. Does this concept apply to Zionism and Judaism? Are Zionism and Judaism distinct terms? Are Jews and Zionism categorically different from each other?
For example, can Americanism and exceptionalism be conflated? Can round and circular be conflated? The distinction between terms that are related can be confusing. But the relationship between Jews and Zionism is clear. This is also true of the relationship among Zionism, Jews and Judaism. These terms are intrinsically related politically, culturally, religiously, and at times they form a metaphysical continuum.
[Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate Defend Tucker Carlson]
While pre-emancipated Jews were at ease with their ethno-religious identity, the French Revolution, emancipation, and secularisation introduced complexity to identity issues for European Jews. Since then, secular Jews have found it difficult or even impossible to consolidate their tribal identity within the emerging universal discourse around them. They find it impossible to fuse their cultural racial orientation with their anti racist progressive political rants. Zionism offered a solution. It promised to take the Jews away, to remove the problem. But Zionism only managed to move the problem to a new place.
Diaspora Jews have developed different tactics to deal with their identity crises. Contemporary Jewish identity is shaped like a tri-polar magnetic field in which one pole is religion, another is race, and the third is politics.
When Jewish politics is subject to criticism (Israel, Zionism, the Lobby, etc.) some Jews claim to be ‘racially offended’ in spite of the fact that race, biology, blood or ethnicity was never mentioned. When Jewish racism is subject to criticism (chosenness, Israel race laws, etc.) some Jews are affronted by a perceived attack on their religion. When the religion or some obscene Jewish religious teaching is disparaged, many Jews are quick to assert that they are hardly religious anymore (which is true, by the way). We are confronting a quantum leap–an evasive identity that is morphing constantly. It moves rapidly within its kosher trinity field; it is everywhere and nowhere. The reason for this is that the Kosher Trinity makes it very difficult, or even impossible, to criticise Jewish politics, ideology and religion. The Kosher Trinity allows Jews to boast about their cultural symptoms and great achievements while claiming offense when any of these symptoms are discussed by others. This quantum model is set to suppress any possible dissent and avoid Jewish self-reflection. As much as you may find it hard to grasp what Jews are, Jews share the struggle to address who they are and what they are up to. —- Judaism, Zionism and Conflation, October 09, 2017 by Gilad Atzmon
These links will bring readers to a vast interconnected and diverse series of articles, books, and videos about September 11, 2001 (and much more). ratical.org, run by David Ratcliffe, is an extraordinary encyclopedia of online sources unmatched anywhere.
+—+
Moving on to the dirty patriarchal Judeo-Christian pedophile rings of the Crypto Christian and Jewish “faiths”
I watched this last night. Sure, it’s not a new thing out there, but oh how relevant to the issues of our time:
dirty weak men
pedophiles as Christians
families wrapped up in secrecy
that Generation, the old fucks, who never question
hundreds of kiddoes fucking probed and raped by a chiropractor
victim blaming
How Amanda Mustard Confronted More Than Her Pedophile Grandfather in ‘Great Photo, Lovely Life’
“I made this thing to be this Rorschach test for people,” Mustard told Jezebel of her HBO documentary, which is a rare revelation of family trauma.
“I made this thing to be this Rorschach test for people,” the 33-year-old first-time filmmaker told Jezebel of Great Photo, Lovely Life, which was filmed over eight years and co-directed by Rachel Beth Anderson. “I very intentionally do not try and tell you how to feel but to reckon with whatever’s coming up in all of its complexity. To me, it’s like taking the temperature of where we’re at as a society.”
Production began in 2014 when Mustard sat down with Flickinger for an interview. That conversation, she said, was her first attempt to get answers for herself and her family, and accountability for the scores of his victims–including, as it’s later revealed, her mother, Debi, and older sister, Angie. Flickinger responded with revolting frankness. Less than five minutes into the film, he describes one instance as “quite an engagement.” Of another, he says he “more or less experimented” with a prepubescent girl. What emerged is a film that manages to be grim, not glib; incisive instead of incendiary; and a conclusion that offers both answers and salient questions about intergenerational trauma, women’s complicity in men’s wrongdoing, and the ways forgiveness can harm rather than heal.
“In the evangelical faith that my family adheres to, not forgiving is equal to the sin that was committed against you, which is insane. But it’s also a milder form of victim-blaming.”
Mustard is well aware that Great Photo, Lovely Life could’ve been the kind of true crime retelling you’d find on Investigation Discovery or Netflix. “My pedophile grandpa…” Mustard says, imagining an alternative, Abducted in Plain Sight-esque take on her family’s story. But with a rich archive of photographs and home movies, Great Photo Lovely Life surpasses any ripped-from-the-headlines salaciousness and becomes a searing rumination not of a “monster” but a truly reprehensible human whose actions had a ruinous effect on innumerable lives.
“We so rarely hear the perspective of a perpetrator,” Mustard said of the importance of confronting her grandfather onscreen. “As a survivor myself, it is weirdly healing to see somebody own it. There’s value in that. The whole question that led me to that interview in the first place was, ‘How did we get here?’”
Yeah? The older generation? Take a look at these fucking crazy faces of younger women with their Pedophile and Rapist in Chief:
Mustard recalled asking her grandfather, while interviewing him in the Florida retirement facility where he was living, if there was anybody that he ever felt like he could talk to about it.
“Did you ever open up?” Mustard said.
“I wished I could have,” he responded, Mustard recalled. “I wanted to talk to somebody, but I didn’t know who I could really talk to.”
“What if there had been somebody he could talk to? Imagine how different things could have been for my family,” Mustard told the Times. “In the U.S., we spend $5.4 billion a year on locking child abusers up and only $3 million on child sexual abuse prevention research.”
Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes were partly crimes against children. However, that is not how the country talked about them. The coverage went to the celebrity angle, the money angle, and the political angle, and the one conversation the case never started was a national conversation about child sexual abuse.
Elizabeth J. Letourneau, PhD, a professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health who leads the Moore Center for the Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse, does not mince words about it. “I am outraged,” she told Newsweek’s Parting Shot podcast while discussing her new book, One in Five: Why Child Sexual Abuse Is Our Biggest Public Health Crisis and What We Can Do to Stop It, co-authored by journalist Luke Malone. “There is almost nothing about [it in] the coverage of this case, and not just the coverage but the law enforcement aspect of it, that treats it as child sexual abuse.”
Letourneau and Malone spent years working on a book to highlight the thing that the Epstein case could have potentially started a conversation about: child sexual abuse.
The title comes from a sobering statistic: One in five kids will experience sexual abuse before they turn 18. Numbers like that are why the authors treat this as a public health crisis rather than a crime story, and why Malone keeps returning to how ordinary it is. “It affects one in five kids,” he said. “It is so prevalent.”
In 2024, as public conversations about abuse, grooming, and accountability unfolded again and again, Amanda found herself watching familiar patterns repeat. These patterns felt uncomfortably close to the high-control religious world she thought she had left behind. For Amanda, this was not just cultural commentary. It was personal.
In this episode, Amanda and Kyle step away from sensationalism to offer something different: structure.
Using the cases of Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gothard, Amanda explains the architecture of abuse. She examines how power is built, protected, and normalized, how grooming operates long before it becomes criminal, and why systems so often defend themselves at the expense of survivors.
Rather than focusing on graphic details or individual pathology, this conversation examines the conditions that allow abuse to flourish. It explores why the stories in the news feel eerily familiar, why true accountability and justice rarely occur, and why simply removing bad actors never fixes the underlying problem.
By the end of this episode, you will have a clearer framework for recognizing grooming and power dynamics.
This episode is for anyone who has felt disoriented watching recent narratives unfold, and for those who want language, clarity, and a steadier way of understanding what is really happening beneath the headlines.
MONEY from the pedophile and rapist, and of course a Chabad Jew. Donald Trump has offered a $5,000 payout to every adult American if Republicans secure both chambers of Congress in the midterms. It is a $1.3 trillion promise, supposedly funded by magical thinking and tariff revenues.
The question is whether this is legal. The answer depends entirely on which side of the Atlantic you stand, and how much you still believe in the myth of American institutional integrity.
Under US law, federal statutes explicitly prohibit payments intended to influence voting. Yet Trump’s legal team will inevitably camouflage this as a promised “tax cut” or shield it behind the First Amendment. In a system where billionaires buy political petitions and the highest court treats corporate lobbying as free speech, a blunt bribe to the electorate is just another Tuesday. Legality is a technicality. Enforcement is a joke.
[Notice the witch’s finger. Too many Benjamins counted late at night. Paper cut. Why OpenAI Hired Chuck Schumer’s Daughter Away From Amazon — The AI industry has a greater need for government influence than anyone else.]
Schumer is a veteran of Democratic politics who has worked in the Obama White House and on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. But she’s not just any government relations professional with public-sector experience; if the name didn’t tip you off, Schumer is also the daughter of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). She brings to OpenAI knowledge of how Democrats might approach the AI industry’s growing power, both from her firsthand revolver experience and from more tacit understandings culled from the types of personal relationships the child of a Senate leader is able to develop.
The Schumer family’s deep ties and support to both Wall Street and Silicon Valley are wellestablished by now, and played a central role in legislative fights around antitrust legislation policy in the Biden years. That this allegiance to industry complicates efforts to hold powerful bad actors to account has become almost droll.
Yeah,, the fucker needs rehabilitation! At least 28 women have publicly accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct since the 1970s, with allegations ranging from unwanted groping and forcible kissing to sexual abuse and rape.
“The suspect, 35-year-old Philan-Tam-Duy Le of Julian, CA, was arrested for Carrying a Dangerous Weapon for being in possession of the guillotine,” USCP said.
BUT HE STILL fails to put the fucking DIRTY Jews and DIRTY Occupation fake cuntry, Israel, in his fucking piece: A tidbit I found on this scum woman…
Shayna Steinger is Jewish and comes from a prominent Jewish family.
Public records and family announcements confirm her heritage through multiple personal and institutional connections:
Family Connections: Her late sister, Jessica C. Steinger, had funeral services held at the Tifereth Israel Synagogue and was buried at the Jewish Glendale Cemetery, with the family requesting memorial contributions to the Jewish Federation of Greater Des Moines.
Extended Family: Her uncle, Lawrence L. Ladin, was actively involved with Des Moines’ Temple B’nai Jeshurun.
Professional Background: Beyond her personal heritage, Shayna Steinger is a former Foreign Service Officer for the U.S. Department of State, where she served from 1999 to 2016, including a role as the Chief of the Political and Economic Section at the U.S. Embassy in Yemen.
Kit: Adding to the mystery, 12 of the 14 visas were approved by a single consular official, named Shayna Steinger. Almost immediately after being appointed to the Jeddah consulate in July 2000 fresh out of Columbia University, she began rubberstamping applications of future 9/11 hijackers. At the time, the consulate’s approach to issuing visas was strict, specifically due to local “terrorism” concerns. Internal guidelines stated applicants – particularly young male Saudis – should always be interviewed in person, and have clear grounds for travel.
However, Steinger personally took it upon herself to reverse this policy. Moreover, she issued visas to future 9/11 hijackers despite their applications frequently being incomplete or error-strewn, based on forged documents, and their contents giving ample grounds for suspicion. Steinger nonetheless interviewed Hani Hanjour, who purportedly piloted Flight 77, which struck the Pentagon. Afterwards, she rejected his application for a three-year US visa, due to apparent doubts over his stated purposes in the country. Nonetheless, Steinger approved Hanjour’s renewed application two weeks later.
In ensuing official investigations, she offered wildly contradictory accounts of why the hijackers’ visas were granted. In Hanjour’s case, Steinger initially claimed he provided requested supporting documentation. She subsequently admitted he actually hadn’t, but Hanjour’s “middle class” background purportedly led her to conclude he was trustworthy. Thanks to the court filing, we know in reality future 9/11 hijackers were granted entry to the US so they could be recruited by the CIA upon arrival, suggesting Steinger was acting on Agency orders.
and who the fuck cares about some white woman, with a multimillion-dollar lawsuit against the psychiatrist who was “assisting her” with thoughts of infanticide
Although mental state defenses frequently are raised in cases of infanticide, legal criteria for these defenses vary across jurisdictions. We reviewed outcomes of such cases in states using M’Naghten or Model Penal Code (MPC) standards for insanity, and the factors considered by the courts in reaching these decisions. LexisNexis and Westlaw searches were conducted of case law, legal precedent, and law review articles related to infanticide. Google and other Internet search engines were used to identify unpublished cases. Despite the differing legal standards for insanity among states, the outcomes of infanticide cases do not appear to be dependent solely on which standard is used. The presence of psychosis was important in the successful mental state defenses. This case series suggests that states that use the stricter M’Naghten standard have not been less likely than states with an MPC standard to adjudicate women who have committed infanticide as not guilty by reason of insanity.
Infanticide, defined as the killing of children less than one year of age, has evoked questions and controversy in both psychiatry and the law. Infanticide is etiologically distinct from neonaticide, the killing of an infant in the first 24 hours of life.1
Over the years, when a woman with postpartum mental illness has killed her child, the courts have responded in vastly different ways. In some courts, such women have been found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) and ordered to undergo psychiatric treatment, while in others, they have been found guilty and sentenced to prison, sometimes for life. Some scholars have argued that differing state insanity standards result in disparate sentencing.2 In this article, we explore this hypothesis and examine cases tried in jurisdictions with either the M’Naughten or model penal code (MPC) standard. We conclude by summarizing relevant data for forensic mental health professionals serving as experts in such cases.
Authorities say the two school-aged siblings of a toddler found hanging in their basement walked into their house as the horror was unfolding.
The deceased child, 2-year-old Barrett Walsh, was found hanging from a rafter in the basement of their Frankfort, Ill. home on Sept. 1, according to court documents reviewed by PEOPLE.
Their mother Corie Walsh, 40, was found trying to self-harm and has since been arrested on murder charges, according to the Frankfort Police Department.
Ed Curtain: Yet I was chagrined and amazed by so many people’s insouciant lack of interest in questioning and researching the most important world event since the assassination of President Kennedy. I understood the various psychological dimensions of this denial, the fear, the cognitive dissonance, etc., but I sensed something else as well. For so many people, their minds were like beds already “made up.” I found that many young people were the exceptions, while most of their elders dared not question the official narrative. These included many prominent leftist critics of American foreign policy, such as Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, Alexander Cockburn, and others, whose defenses of the official government and media explanations (when they even made such defenses; often they just trashed skeptics as “9/11 conspiracy nuts,” to quote Cockburn) totally lacked any scientific or logical rigor or even knowledge of the facts. Now that years have elapsed, this seems truer than ever. There is a long list of leftists who refuse to examine matter to this very day. And most interestingly, they also do the same with the assassination of JFK, the other key seminal event of recent American history.
I kept thinking of the ongoing language and logic used to describe what had happened that terrible day in 2001 and in the weeks to follow, with the nonsense proffered about the anthrax attacks that originated from a U.S. bioweapons lab. It all seemed so clichéd and surreal, as if set phrases had been extracted from some secret manual, phrases that rang with an historical resonance that cast a spell on the public, as if mass hypnosis were involved. People seemed mesmerized as they spoke of the events in the official language that had been presented to them.
So with the promptings of people like Graeme MacQueen, Lance de Haven-Smith, T.H. Meyer, et al., and much study and research, I have concluded that my initial intuitive skepticism was correct and that a process of linguistic mind-control was in place before, during, and after the attacks. As with all good propaganda, the language had to be insinuated over time and introduced through intermediaries. It had to seem “natural” and to flow out of events, not to precede them. And it had to be repeated over and over again.
In summary form, I will list the language I believe “made up the minds” of those who have refused to examine the government’s claims about the September 11 attacks and the subsequent anthrax attacks.
Pearl Harbor. As pointed out by David Ray Griffin and others, this term was used in September 2000 in The Project for the New American Century’s (PNAC) report, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” (p.51). Its neo-con authors argued that the U.S. wouldn’t be able to attack Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, etc. “absent some catastrophic event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” Then on January 11, 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld’s “Space Commission” warned that the U.S. could face a “space Pearl Harbor” if it weren’t careful and didn’t increase space security. Rumsfeld urged support for the proposed U.S. national missile defense system opposed by Russia and China and massive funding for the increased weaponization of space. At the same time he went around handing out and recommending Pearl Harbor: Warning and Decision(1962) by Roberta Wohlstetter, who had spent almost two decades working for The Rand Corporation and who claimed that Pearl Harbor was a surprise attack that shocked U.S. leaders. Pearl Harbor, Pearl Harbor, Pearl Harbor – those words and images dominated public consciousness for many months before 11 September 2001, and of course after. The film Pearl Harbor, made with Pentagon assistance and a massive budget, was released on May 25, 2001 and was a box office hit. It was in the theatres throughout the summer. The thought of the attack on Pearl Harbor (not a surprise to the U.S. government, but presented as such) was in the news all summer despite the fact that the 60th anniversary of that attack was not until December 7, 2001, a more likely release date. So why was it released so early? Once the September 11 attacks occurred, the Pearl Harbor analogy was “plucked out” of the social atmosphere and used constantly, beginning immediately. Another “Day of Infamy,” another surprise attack blared the media and government officials. A New Pearl Harbor! George W. Bush was widely reported to have had the time that night, after a busy day of flying hither and yon to avoid the terrorists who for some reason had forgotten he was in a classroom in Florida, to allegedly use it in his diary, writing that “the Pearl Harbor of the twenty-first century took place today. We think it is Osama bin Laden.” Shortly after the 50th anniversary of Pearl Harbor on December 7, Bush then formerly announced, referencing the attacks of September 11, that the U. S. would withdraw from the ABM Treaty. The examples of this Pearl Harbor/ September 11 analogy are manifold, but I am summarizing, so I will skip giving them. Any casual researcher can confirm this.
Homeland. This strange un-American term, another WW II word associated with another enemy – Nazi Germany – was also used many times by the neo-con authors of “Rebuilding America’s Defenses.” I doubt any average American referred to this country by that term before. Of course it became the moniker for The Department of Homeland Security, marrying home with security to form a comforting name that simultaneously and unconsciously suggests a defense against Hitler-like evil coming from the outside. Not coincidentally, Hitler introduced it into the Nazi propaganda vernacular at the 1934 Nuremberg rally. Both usages conjured up images of a home besieged by alien forces intent on its destruction; thus preemptive action was in order. Now the Department of Homeland Security with its massive budget is lodged permanently in popular consciousness and in fact.
Ground Zero. This is a third WWII (“the Good War”) term first used at 11:55 A.M. on September 11 by Mark Walsh (aka “the Harley Guy” because he was wearing a Harley-Davidson tee shirt) in an interview on the street by a Fox News reporter, Rick Leventhal. Identified as a Fox free-lancer, Walsh also explained the Twin Towers’ collapse in a precise, well-rehearsed manner that would be the same illogical and anti-scientific explanation later given by the government: “mostly due to structural failure because the fire was too intense.” Ground zero – a nuclear bomb term first used by U.S. scientists to refer to the spot where they exploded the first nuclear bomb in New Mexico in 1945 – became another meme adopted by the media that suggested a nuclear attack had occurred or might in the future if the U.S. didn’t act. The nuclear scare was raised again and again by George W. Bush and U.S. officials in the days and months following the attacks, although nuclear weapons were beside the point in terms of the 11 September attacks, but surely not as a scare tactic and as part of the plan to withdraw from the ABM treaty that would be announced in December. But the conjoining of “nuclear” with “ground zero” served to raise the fear factor dramatically. Ironically, the project to develop the nuclear bomb was called the Manhattan Project and was headquartered at 270 Broadway, NYC, a few short blocks north of the World Trade Center.
The Unthinkable. This is another nuclear term whose usage as linguistic mind control and propaganda is brilliantly analyzed by Graeme MacQueen in the penultimate chapter of his very important book, The 2001Anthrax Deception. He notes the patterned use of this term before and after September 11, while saying “the pattern may not signify a grand plan …. It deserves investigation and contemplation.” He then presents a convincing case that the use of this term couldn’t be accidental. He notes how George W. Bush, in a major foreign policy speech on May 1, 2001, “gave informal public notice that the United States intended to withdraw unilaterally from the ABM Treaty”; Bush said the U.S. must be willing to “rethink the unthinkable.” This was necessary because of terrorism and rogue states with “weapons of mass destruction.” PNAC also argued that the U.S. should withdraw from the treaty. A signatory to the treaty could only withdraw after giving six months’ notice and because of “extraordinary events” that “jeopardized its supreme interests.” Once the September 11 attacks occurred, Bush rethought the unthinkable and officially gave formal notice on December 13 to withdraw the U.S. from the ABM Treaty, as previously noted. MacQueen specifies the many times different media used the term “unthinkable” in October 2001 in reference to the anthrax attacks. He explicates its usage in one of the anthrax letters – “The Unthinkable” [sic]. He explains how the media that used the term so often were at the time unaware of its usage in the anthrax letter since that letter’s content had not yet been revealed, and how the letter writer had mailed the letter before the media started using the word. He makes a rock-solid case showing the U.S. government’s complicity in the anthrax attacks and therefore in the Sept 11 attacks. While calling the use of the term “unthinkable” in all its iterations “problematic,” he writes, “The truth is that the employment of ‘the unthinkable’ in this letter, when weight is given both to the meaning of this term in U.S. strategic circles and to the other relevant uses of the term in 2001, points us in the direction of the U.S. military and intelligence communities.” I am reminded of Orwell’s point in 1984: “a heretical thought – that is, a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc – should be literally unthinkable, at least as far as thought is dependent on words.” Thus the government and media’s use of “unthinkable” becomes a classic case of “doublethink.” The unthinkable is unthinkable.
9/11. This is the key usage that has reverberated down the years around which the others revolve. It is an anomalous numerical designation applied to an historical event, and obviously also the emergency telephone number. Try to think of another numerical appellation for an important event in American history. It’s impossible. But if you have a good historical sense, you will remember that the cornerstone for the Pentagon was laid on September 11, 1941, three months before the attack on Pearl Harbor, and that the CIA engineered a coup against the Allende government in Chile on Sept 11, 1973. Just strange coincidences? The future editor of th New York Times and Iraq war promoter, Bill Keller, introduced the emergency phone connection on the morning of September 12 in a NY Times op-ed piece, “America’s Emergency Line: 911.” The linkage of the attacks to a permanent national emergency was thus subliminally introduced, as Keller mentioned Israel nine times and seven times compared the U.S. situation to that of Israel as a target for terrorists. His first sentence reads: “An Israeli response to America’s aptly dated wake-up call might well be, ‘Now you know.’” By referring to September 11 as 9/11, an endless national emergency fear became wedded to an endless war on terror aimed at preventing Hitler-like terrorists from obliterating us with nuclear weapons that could create another ground zero or holocaust. Mentioning Israel (“America is proud to be Israel’s closest ally and best friend in the world,” George W. Bush would tell the Israeli Knesset) so many times, Keller was not very subtly performing an act of legerdemain with multiple meanings. By comparing the victims of the 11 September attacks to Israeli “victims,” he was implying, among other things, that the Israelis are innocent victims who are not involved in terrorism, but are terrorized by Palestinians, as Americans are terrorized by fanatical Muslims. Palestinians = Al Qaeda. Israel = U.S. Explicit and implicit parallels of the guilty and the innocent. Keller tells us who the real killers are. His use of the term 9/11 is a term that pushes all the right buttons, evoking unending social fear and anxiety. It is language as sorcery. It is propaganda at its best. Even well-respected critics of the U.S. government’s explanation use the term that has become a fixture of public consciousness through endless repetition. As George W. Bush would later put it as he connected Saddam Hussein to “9/11” and pushed for the Iraq war, “We don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.” All the ingredients for a linguistic mind-control smoothie had been blended.
Karp has often spoken about his Jewish identity shaping his worldview, according to Weinberger, and framed Israel’s war with Palestine as a struggle of good versus evil. “From my perspective, it’s not just about Israel,” he said in a 2024 interview with CNBC. “It’s like, ‘Do you believe in the West? Do you believe the West has a superior way of living?’” The young radical who once stood up against racism, it seems, now has a cultural superiority complex.
Palantir did not immediately reply to Gizmodo’s request for comment. Weinberger’s Valley of Death will be available in bookstores later this month.
More Jews telling the world about their Jews: Valley of Death, a forthcoming book from journalist Sharon Weinberger about the relationship between Silicon Valley and the U.S. military, suggests his political views have changed over time.
[Jim Doherty, a rancher and former Morrow County Commissioner, center right, listens to a House Interim Committee on Climate, Energy, and Environment informational meeting on data centers at the Oregon State Capitol in Salem, Ore., on Sept. 8, 2026.]
Your typical fucking redneck:
As the debate over data centers heats up in Salem, the industry is poised to grow 200 miles away in Eastern Oregon, where more than 50 facilities are already online with another in the works.
Morrow and Umatilla counties were among the first places in Oregon to welcome data centers, as Amazon Web Services began building the facilities in the area 15 years ago. Amazon has since turned the region into one of the biggest hubs in the state.
As the industry rises to the forefront of Oregon politics in an election year, its corporate leaders are defending infrastructure they say has become “critical to the way we live and work,” while politicians respond to public outcry over data center tax breaks, power costs and environmental trade-offs.
Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek announced Tuesday that she supported a statewide moratorium on the construction of new data centers, hardening her stance as she campaigns for reelection. She also issued an executive order pausing any new developments on state-owned land. Kotek delivered the news to a cheering crowd at an anti-data center protest on the steps of the state capitol, calling on state lawmakers to take action.
Kotek’s announcements are unlikely to slow projects already planned near Boardman in Morrow County, local officials said. David Sykes, the chair of the Morrow County Board of Commissioners, said the state can do what it wants with its land, but decisions over data centers on private property are up to local government.
“This should be left to the counties to decide what to do,” he said.
Doherty, the former Morrow County commissioner, wasn’t persuaded by Amazon’s pitch.
He said in an interview that he was worried the company’s water use would worsen the region’s longstanding nitrate crisis by concentrating nitrate-contaminated groundwater, and that it was running its generators far more than 12 hours per year.
He also dismissed Amazon’s efforts at community investment in light of the tax breaks it receives through the state’s enterprise zone program. Kotek signed a bill this year that pauses state tax breaks for data centers.
“When they’re paying you 10 cents on the dollar and giving you another 10 cents, that’s not philanthropy,” he said.
He was also skeptical that the governor’s executive order would have any effect on his home in Morrow County.
Morrow County Planner Tamra Mabbott said she didn’t think any of the data centers in the pipeline involved state land. Sykes, the current Morrow County commissioner, declined to say whether he supported or opposed more data center developments in the county, but later added that they could continue as long as they went through the proper channels.
Says it all about this War Dog Economy — WILDFIRES?
General Atomics unveils ‘Wildfire’ drone to replace Reaper
Pitched for the Massed Modular Aircraft program run by the Air Force and Defense Innovation Unit, General Atomics says its new drone design can exceed requirements set by the Pentagon to succeed the MQ-9A Reaper.
Ahh, that fucking AmeriKKKa:
Trump said Thursday that the federal government would issue $500 Obamacare refunds to about 1 million people starting in October.
Health policy experts said the money isn’t enough to make up for soaring Affordable Care Act insurance premiums, following the expiry of enhanced premium subsidies.
The refunds would come just a month before midterm elections, in which affordability has become a central theme.
Trump’s announcement came one day after he said he wanted to send a $5,000 election “dividend” to every American.
Another fucking roveling Jew in the News!
Lies, more lies, and Jewish-inspired lies: ‘Surge in construction’ at suspected Iranian nuclear site, analysts say, as US considers ways to strike deep underground.
Iceland’s government will submit a bill in February to ban whaling, a move that would leave Norway and Japan as the only two countries in the world to continue commercial whaling.
Whaling in Iceland has sparked years of protests from animal welfare campaigners and Hollywood celebrities.
The bill will include “a permanent ban on whaling,” the government, which has a majority in parliament, said on its website late on Wednesday.
In this year’s hunting season, which runs from June to around the end of September, 80 fin whales had been caught as of Wednesday, according to Humane World for Animals, an animal welfare group that tracks the catches. The quota allows 150 fin whales to be killed this year.
“There is considerable political and public support for this bill to ban commercial whaling, and compelling ethical, veterinary, legal and conservation reasons to hope it succeeds,” said Wendy Higgins, a Humane World for Animals spokeswoman.
Guts.
Gutless — The Genocide Quintet. Main opposition factions ink surplus-vote deals in bid to maximize Knesset representation
Dirty Nose Job JEW, LGBTQA: OpenAI pulls out of Caltech math hackathon after mathematicians issue open letter criticizing AI math ‘slop’
A researcher at OpenAI said on Thursday that the ChatGPT maker is no longer sponsoring Caltech’s “math hackathon,” an event where participants use large language models to solve research problems.
OpenAI’s exit follows an open letter released on Wednesday from current and former Caltech mathematicians, who said the event, which is sponsored by AI companies, “is likely to have destructive impacts for the mathematical community.”
John Judge – 9/11, Afghanistan, and Iraq: Unanswered Questions of September 11, Part 1 Roxy Theater, Allentown, 10 October 2002
September 11, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Some of the History of 20th Century Wars
at 7:10 I’ve been following 9/11 since its inception. It was close enough to me in DC that it shook my windows when the plane hit. And I was quite amazed at what did and didn’t happen that day. The two things that I have focused on primarily, beyond the background information, because I think these are the two areas that the administration and the national security system are most vulnerable in, are the events of that day, especially in Washington, DC, or what I would call a military stand-down on 9/11 in Washington, DC, and somewhat nationally. And I’ll go into that. The other is the history of the Anthrax investigation.
I was not enamored of the idea of asking, as some were, what did Bush know and when did he know it? I mean, I think the proper formation of that question would be, When was Bush told, and how soon did he forget it? We know that Colin Powell, for instance, was informing India, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and many of the surrounding countries in June of 2001 that the United States would militarily intervene against the Taliban in Afghanistan in mid-October to take them out. This is in June. And we were also told on Tom Brokaw’s ABC News that the war plans for Afghanistan were on Bush’s desk on September 9th. Well, what that says to me is—some people were shocked; Bush knew about the plan even before 9/11—what it says to me, though, is that Bush is out of the loop. Bush is the last to know, the last to be told.
Our choice now seems to be between a “new war” and a new world. As always, the forces of reaction and wealth are telling us we have no choice but war, and no right or power to decide. They are calling for a secret investigation, a secret conviction, a secret method of execution, and a totally secret war abroad. The American people as a whole are the only ones in the world who have the right to decide on a national response to this tragedy, and it must be one that takes into account the rights of all the other peoples and nations of the world.
The empty-headed Westerner, man oh man, getting a gig with Snoop Dog for $10 k a month to travel the world for the best fucking Ice Cream while his fucking boys bomb babies
If I won the lottery, boy oh boy, this is what I would do….
If I just hit the jackpot at the casino, then I could buy a Dodge Viper . . .
If some benefactor offered me a million bucks, man, I would be set…
If I married a rich sheik, I’d be in heaven . . .
If I could get on The Price Is Right, I’d show them how to win a cruise and a cute little Soul car . . .
If Oprah would have me on, I’d plead with her for a new house… .
If your dream job involves traveling the world, eating ice cream and telling Snoop Dogg which flavors are actually worth trying, you might want to clear your schedule.
Snoop Dogg’s Dr. Bombay ice cream brand is looking for an International Ice Cream Taster, and the three-month gig pays $30,000.
The position, posted by Dr. Bombay/Bosslady Foods, is open to applicants around the world. The person hired will be paid $10,000 per month as an independent contractor, with hiring and payments handled through Deel.
And the job description is basically a love letter to ice cream.
“Your mission? Taste. Travel. Discover. Report back to Snoop.”
I heard this on the local radio station, while working with a client, and of course, clients with DD/ID/PD might have some grand illusions or delusions, for sure, but this was an FM radio station so, the ad is going out to thousands of stations.
[DD is developmental disabilities; ID is intellectual disabilities; PD is psychiatric disabilities, FYI]
For three months, the lucky hire will travel the world in search of the best and most interesting frozen desserts.
Their assignment includes:
Discovering unique ice cream and dessert trends
Tasting desserts in different cities and cultures
Finding emerging flavors before they become mainstream
Sharing discoveries with the Dr. Bombay team
Creating social-media content from their adventures
Helping develop new flavors, campaigns and experiences
So, yes, you’ll be eating a lot of ice cream.
But you’ll also need to know what you’re talking about.
The company says it isn’t looking for a traditional, stuffy food critic. Instead, it wants someone who is curious about food, plugged into culture, comfortable on social media and capable of turning a scoop of ice cream into a story.
Creators, foodies, marketers, students, entrepreneurs, journalists, chefs and applicants with unconventional backgrounds are all encouraged to apply.
[TEVYE] “Dear God, you made many, many poor people. I realize, of course, that it’s no shame to be poor. But it’s no great honor either! So, what would have been so terrible if I had a small fortune?”
If I were a rich man, Ya ha deedle deedle, bubba bubba deedle deedle dum. All day long I’d biddy biddy bum. If I were a wealthy man. I wouldn’t have to work hard. Ya ha deedle deedle, bubba bubba deedle deedle dum. If I were a biddy biddy rich, Yidle-diddle-didle-didle man.
I’d build a big tall house with rooms by the dozen, Right in the middle of the town. A fine tin roof with real wooden floors below. There would be one long staircase just going up, And one even longer coming down, And one more leading nowhere, just for show.
I’d fill my yard with chicks and turkeys and geese and ducks For the town to see and hear. And each loud “cheep” and “swaqwk” and “honk” and “quack” Would land like a trumpet on the ear, As if to say “Here lives a wealthy man.”
If I were a rich man, Ya ha deedle deedle, bubba bubba deedle deedle dum. All day long I’d biddy biddy bum. If I were a wealthy man. I wouldn’t have to work hard. Ya ha deedle deedle, bubba bubba deedle deedle dum. If I were a biddy biddy rich, Yidle-diddle-didle-didle man.
I see my wife, my Golde, looking like a rich man’s wife With a proper double-chin. Supervising meals to her heart’s delight. I see her putting on airs and strutting like a peacock. Oy, what a happy mood she’s in. Screaming at the servants, day and night.
The most important men in town would come to fawn on me! They would ask me to advise them, Like a Solomon the Wise. “If you please, Reb Tevye…” “Pardon me, Reb Tevye…” Posing problems that would cross a rabbi’s eyes! And it won’t make one bit of difference if i answer right or wrong. When you’re rich, they think you really know!
If I were rich, I’d have the time that I lack To sit in the synagogue and pray. And maybe have a seat by the Eastern wall. And I’d discuss the holy books with the learned men, several hours every day. That would be the sweetest thing of all.
If I were a rich man, Ya ha deedle deedle, bubba bubba deedle deedle dum. All day long I’d biddy biddy bum. If I were a wealthy man. I wouldn’t have to work hard. Ya ha deedle deedle, bubba bubba deedle deedle dum. Lord who made the lion and the lamb, You decreed I should be what I am. Would it spoil some vast eternal plan? If I were a wealthy man…
[The musical ran on Broadway in 1970, earning nine Tony Award nominations, and was revived successfully Off-Broadway in 1990. A 2015 reworking of the show was praised for clarifying the show and was recorded on JAY records]
Ahh, the JEWS:
“If I Were a Rich Man” from the 1964 Broadway musical Fiddler on the Roof. While the English lyrics written by Sheldon Harnick use the phrase “If I were a rich man,” the song was directly inspired by a 1902 Yiddish monologue by author Sholem Aleichem titled Ven ikh bin Rothschild (”If I Were a Rothschild”), referencing the famously wealthy Rothschild banking family
When the musical was later translated back into Yiddish, the translator restored this original reference, changing the famous chorus line to
“Ven ikh bin a Rotshild”.
People believe they will win the lottery because of cognitive biases, emotional coping mechanisms, and an inability for the human brain to truly process massive odds.
Cognitive Biases
Availability Bias: Media coverage highlights vivid stories of rare winners, making success feel common while ignoring millions of losers.
Difficulty Processing Numbers: Human brains struggle to intuitively grasp extreme numbers, like odds of 1 in 292 million.
Illusion of Control: Some players believe personal rituals, lucky numbers, or “secret formulas” can influence a random draw.
Emotional and Social Drivers
Escapism and Hope: For many, buying a ticket offers emotional relief, a momentary fantasy, and tangible hope for a dramatically better life.
Perceived Necessity: Studies on Self.inc show that half of players view the lottery as the only feasible way to significantly change their financial situation.
Minimizing Regret: People continue playing regular numbers out of a fear of regret if those numbers happen to hit after they stop.
Then, I got sucked into the Egalitarian’s bullshit:
Oh, shit, now you are into the bloody bullshit national pastime — crime shows, celebrity trials, the whole fucking joke of an American pastime of being junior CSI and Hawaii Five O wannabes.
Yoiu know, I am a writer, journalist, teacher, and fucking worker with a weekly radio show, and imagine that, I knew nothing of this case, until, hmmm, the great egalitarian brought it up. Believe you me, it is easy for an egalitarian to turn off the smut that is NOT news.
So, the murders of the kiddos, infanticide, is EVIL? Oh my, oh my. What about the USA and NED and what is happening in Nepal? The Jewish State of Hell, Occupied Palestine, spreading its true evil from each corner of the globe? Too much to yammer on about THEM?
And, alas, how many are screwed by the criminal injustice systems, locked up for crimes they did not do, for years, in CMUs and solitary is that evil? The jailers, are they evil? The manure pile called Congress and the Senate- do you see evil there?
And you always go after3,428 billionaires; what’s up with that? There are evil ones in the other category of fucking fascist capitalists = 58 million millionaires.
Imagine, the cocktail of dirty drugs prescribed to this woman. IMAGINE. And, alas, it is a country like Nicaragua we should be seeking as a model, or Cuba. Clinics and lay nurses and always people around people and families helping those with all manner of disease or mental hardship. But in your world of citing The Guardian — that piece of shit unreliable Capitalist fucking rag — you are attempting to define EVIL? Based on the most evil of systems — the criminal injustice system with the robed perverts and rotten systems called jury instructions and no power for jury nullification of the crime scene called jurisprudence.
So, thanks for cluttering my head with another fucking pop culture shit show on Court TV, something I have been able to skip over easily.
The specific medications prescribed to Lindsay Clancy included:
Benzodiazepines & Sedatives (For Anxiety and Insomnia)
• Ativan / Lorazepam
• Klonopin / Clonazepam
• Valium / Diazepam
• Ambien / Zolpidem
• Benadryl (Used as a sedative for sleep)
•
Antidepressants (SSRIs, SARIs, & Tricyclics)
• Zoloft (Sertraline)
• Prozac (Fluoxetine)
• Wellbutrin (Bupropion)
• Remeron (Mirtazapine)
• Trazodone
• Amitriptyline
• Antipsychotics, Mood Stabilizers, & Other Anti-Anxiety Meds
• Seroquel / Quetiapine (An antipsychotic also prescribed in low doses for insomnia)
• Lamictal / Lamotrigine (A mood stabilizer/anticonvulsant)
• Hydroxyzine (An antihistamine used for psychiatric purposes/anxiety)]
(Note: THe fucking witch doctor — Jennifer Tufts — also considered Zulresso, a continuous 60-hour IV infusion treatment for postpartum depression that costs $34,000, but Clancy never actually received or took it.)
What Was Actually Found in Her System?
According to forensic toxicologist testimony from NMS Laboratories during the trial, only four primary psychiatric medications were actively detected in her blood following her suicide attempt:
Quetiapine (Seroquel) – Detected at the highest relative concentration, though still well below toxic levels.
1. Mirtazapine (Remeron)
2. Lamotrigine (Lamictal)
3. Trazodone – Detected at levels too low to have an active effect.
4.
Prosecutors used pill counts and these low toxicology results to argue that Clancy had missed or stopped taking many of her pills (such as only taking seven Zoloft and six Ativan pills). Conversely, medical expert reviews and her defense emphasized that rapidly cycling through 13 heavy psychiatric drugs in such a short window can trigger severe mental destabilization, mania, and psychosis, particularly if underlying bipolar disorder is misdiagnosed.
How Lindsay Clancy’s criminal case could help her leverage a ‘million-dollar’ settlement in lawsuit against docs.
When a Jew Lawyer speaks, all parties SHIVER, man:
Clancy could use to bolster negotiations in the civil case, legal observers say.
“It’s like a leverage play when you’re negotiating or mediating,” said Seth Zuckerman, a New York lawyer who handles both criminal and civil cases.
Key Themes and Insights
Brainwashing and Terror: Meerloo notes that to condition individuals, totalitarian regimes systematically eliminate alert consciousness through fear, terror, and hopelessness. Psychological shock is utilized to frighten populations into submission, creating a state of “menticidal hypnosis” where victims act in a trance-like state repeating external commands.
Conformity and Thought Control: The book highlights how inquisitive and doubting minds are actively suppressed under totalitarianism. Implanted delusions remain difficult to correct, and repetition of the “big lie” often overpowers logic during ideological conflicts. Meerloo also observes that conformity is frequently conditioned early in life, affecting even intelligent individuals.
Vulnerability and Addiction: The text addresses how dependencies, such as alcoholism and drug use, impair voluntary mental control and pave the way for totalitarian submission.
SHOP, man, Homo Sapiens Consumpticius:
General Belief: Roughly 70% of American adults believe in angels overall.
Personal Protection: A major study by Baylor University found that 55% of Americans specifically believe they have been personally protected from harm by a guardian angel.
Non-Religious Believers: Interestingly, the belief is experiential and crosses secular lines; about 1 in 5 Americans who identify as non-religious still believe they have been watched over by a protector angel.
Or,
Or,
“When there was a crisis facing the Jewish people, we can look back to the golem myth from late 16th-century Prague. The Jews were threatened by pogroms, so the rabbi conjured a man out of earth and gave life from nothingness to save the ghetto and protect the Jewish people,” Schumer said.
American superheroes of the 1930s, like Batman, were a response to the rise of fascism and Nazism. Other superheroes, like Captain America, were created to help raise American consciousness about the war and to change isolationist attitudes, he added.
Schumer, as an artist and writer himself, created the comic book character Captain Israel, based on Captain America, to bolster public support for the State of Israel as it was threatened by terrorism during the Second Intifada.
“Jewish ideas of truth, justice and the American way are basically the Jewish democratic ideal,” Schumer said. “The Jewish people, as the original storytellers, as the Bible writers, conjure heroes out of nothingness to inspire people.”
Jews, the INSIDERS, the system of KILLING.
Cognition vs. Identification in the Judaic State
Gilad Atzmon, quoting:
Yesterday, I watched a short clip from the 1970s featuring an Orthodox Jew whom I regard as the most important Jewish thinker of his generation and beyond.
Yeshayahu Leibowitz was asked about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the Jewish historic right to the land.
Leibowitz insisted that a historic right doesn’t exist—there is no such thing, he said.
What we see in Palestine, he contended, isn’t a legal, historical, or political clash. It is a clash of cognitions.
In Leibowitz’s view, being French or English is not grounded in any legal or historical right but in the cognition of being English or French. One is French not because one carries a French ID card, but because one recognises in oneself the cognition of being French. It is the bond with the language, the soil, the sky, the streets, the blossom in the spring, the history, the culture, the poetry, the chanson, the heritage.
It is worth mentioning that cognition is something one finds in oneself, as opposed to identification, which implies an identification with something external. This distinction is illuminated in the difference between ‘being English’, for instance, and acting ‘as a’ Brit. I believe that being English would be perceived by Leibowitz as a cognition, while acting ‘as a’ Brit is displaying an amalgam of identifications (as a Brit, I believe-in or identify-with X, Y, Z).
According to Leibowitz, the fight over Palestine is a battle between two peoples locked in two separate cognitions: Israeli and Palestinian. Such a battle, according to Leibowitz, could only lead to two possible scenarios:
One scenario is dividing the land between the two peoples (this option was later named the ‘two-state solution’).
The other is a catastrophic, bitter war in which, according to Leibowitz, the whole world will join with the Arabs.
This was Leibowitz in the 1970s. If there was a window at any point for a two-state solution, that window closed long ago. We are now witnessing the evolution of the second scenario, as accurately predicted by Leibowitz: a colossal war in which the whole of humanity is taking the Palestinian side, turning against the Jewish genocidal state and its caretakers around the world.
But the story doesn’t end here.
It is also worth mentioning that what Leibowitz viewed as an ‘Israeli cognition’ back in the 1970s has evaporated completely. It has been replaced by Jewish/Judaic cognition.
Jewish (Cognition) vs. Israelines (Identity)
Arthur Finkelstein was the American political strategist behind Benjamin Netanyahu’s stunning 1996 election victory. Finkelstein was a pioneer in using data to drive political strategy. He polled voters on whether they identified first as Jews or Israelis and used the results to design campaigns, leading to concepts like “Bibi is good for the Jews.”
Finkelstein’s polling in 1996 revealed a fundamental divide in the Israeli electorate. Voters were asked: “Do you consider yourself more Jewish or more Israeli?” You may note that the ‘Z’ word was not mentioned. Zionism was already a dead notion in Israeli politics by 1996.
A majority of respondents answered, “Jewish.”
Those identifying as “Jews” tended to vote for Netanyahu, while those identifying as “Israelis” tended to vote for Shimon Peres.
Finkelstein correctly believed this distinction explained everything in Israeli politics. It led to the campaign’s core message—”Peres will divide Jerusalem”—based on the finding that “Jewish”-identifying voters would reject any deal requiring the capital’s division. This insight was crucial to engineering Netanyahu’s victory.
In an interview following his defeat, Peres was asked about the election results. He said: “We lost.”
“Who is ‘we’?” The interviewer wondered.
“The Israelis,” Peres answered.
“And who won?”
“The Jews!” Peres replied.
The last Israelis
Nearly five decades later, the last so-called ‘Israelis’ are leaving the country. They have grasped that Israel’s transition into a Jewish ghetto/ Judaic State is nearly accomplished and there is nothing they can do about it.
The Israeli ‘cognition’ couldn’t last. Because it wasn’t really a cognition. It was a ‘cognition wannabe’—an invention born out of an aspiration of ‘becoming’ as opposed to a celebration of ‘being.’
Israeliness was just another Jewish ‘revolutionary’ dream. It was an a phantasy born out of European Jewish self-loathing, an expression of the Jewish desire to be ‘normal,’ a people ‘like all other peoples.’ Israeliness was an identitarian dream for auto-metamorphosis, a fantasy of a secular, Hebraic, self-sufficient society. Israeliness provided a short-lived, fake, delusional sense of authenticity. As such, more than a real cognition, it was a delusional momentary identitarian adventure.
The cracks in the Israeli so-called ‘cognition’ fully unveiled themselves in the early 1970s, especially following the 1973 war.
Slowly but surely, more and more Israelis started to lose faith in the fake Israeli ethos. They started to search for a path towards authenticity and true meaning that might justify dying in an Israeli war or committing a genocide while pretending to be a ‘peace lover.’
Israeliness couldn’t provide the good. The Israelis were singing about shalom, yet doing everything within their power to make shalom impossible. Israeliness could never rid itself of its original sin, the 1948 Nakba. Judaism, was consistent and coherent; it rationalised supremacy, expansionism, and even genocide.
Judaism was destined to prevail. It had 2,500 years of experience in suppressing Jewish revolutionaries and dissenters. The victory of Judaism over Israeliness is the moment in time when the West Bank settlement movement matured into a noticeable political force. By the end of the 1970s (1977), Labour Zionism had lost its power, pretty much forever. The Jewish State launched its transition into a Judaic state.
If you wonder how it is possible that Israeliness was so easily defeated by Jewishness, cognition vs. identification is the answer. The Judaic state is consistent with the Jewish cognition. While Israeliness offered a revolutionary, albeit short-lived, identitarian outlook—a fantasy of being ‘authentic’—Jewishness offered the Israelis the prospect of simply being themselves. It is that particular ‘being themselves’ and being for themselves that brought along the worst documented genocide in human history.
What They Told You Was True
The prescription is written on the basis of a mechanism, a diagnosis, and a trial. Each has failed on its own terms.
1. The chemical imbalance was never demonstrated
The theory that depression results from a deficiency of serotonin was never established in the scientific literature. Joanna Moncrieff and colleagues published a comprehensive umbrella review of the serotonin theory in 2022 and found no consistent evidence for its central claims.⁵ The theory was abandoned by serious researchers decades earlier. It continued to appear in direct-to-consumer advertising and patient education materials because it served a function. It explained why the pill was necessary and why the patient would need to keep taking it.
Steven Hyman, director of NIMH from 1996 to 2001, later observed that “the gold standard was the DSM criteria. It struck me as a fool’s errand to try to develop a biomarker for a fictive category.”⁶ The chemical imbalance was the mechanism proposed for a disease no one could measure, in a category no one could validate.
After four decades and hundreds of millions of dollars in federal research, not one disorder in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders has a confirmed biological test. Not depression. Not schizophrenia. Not bipolar disorder. Not ADHD. Not anxiety. Not any of the more than three hundred conditions the manual lists.
Robins and Guze proposed a five-step validation process in 1970: clinical description, laboratory studies, exclusion criteria, follow-up studies, family studies.⁷ The five steps were meant to establish, over time, which alleged disorders were real diseases and which were figments. Four decades later, Darrel Regier, who chaired the DSM-5 task force, told Psychiatric News that “validity tests have not lived up to the expectations of Robins and Guze.”⁸ Kenneth Kendler, the field’s leading nosologist, wrote that the diagnostic categories in use had been “heavily influenced by expert opinion” and were “fuzzy constructs that shift when viewed in different ways.”⁹
Thomas Insel, director of NIMH from 2002 to 2015, put it most directly in a 2005 address to the American Psychiatric Association: “The DSM-IV has 100 percent reliability and zero percent validity.”¹⁰ Reliability means clinicians using the same manual will arrive at the same diagnosis. Validity means the diagnosis corresponds to a real thing. Insel was telling the assembled profession that its manual sorted patients consistently into categories that did not exist.
The APA response was to convene committees to plan the DSM-5. The committees did not find biological markers. They could not have. The categories were not built to have biological markers. They were built from clinical description alone. The manual reifies its own criteria.
The consequence for the patient is direct. When the doctor says “you have major depressive disorder,” the patient hears a diagnosis in the sense that a diabetes diagnosis is a diagnosis: a measurable biological state with a known mechanism. What the patient has actually received is a checklist tally. Five of nine symptoms present for two weeks. That is the whole test. There is no blood work, no scan, no biomarker. The diagnostic bible of American psychiatry sits on the shelf as an artifact of expert agreement, not a description of nature.
The opening figures bear structural repetition: 3 percent versus 67 percent, admitted by the lead investigator, still not retracted, still cited. Ed Pigott’s reanalysis was published in BMJ Open in 2023.¹¹ The investigators, when confronted, doubled down on the fraud in the American Journal of Psychiatry rather than correct it.¹² The owner of the journal, the American Psychiatric Association, did nothing.
Peter Gøtzsche has documented the specific manipulations. The “remission” threshold was set so low that a patient scoring 7 on the Hamilton depression scale, including endorsement of “feels like life is not worth living,” was counted as symptom-free.¹³ Patients who exited the study were assumed to have remitted at the same rate as those who stayed, a statistical fiction that inflated the numbers by an order of magnitude. Eleven prespecified outcomes were never reported. Suicidal ideation was reported at 0.7 percent in one paper and ten times that in others by the same authors.
The trial that was supposed to establish the effectiveness of antidepressants in real-world practice established the opposite. The profession’s response was to continue citing the announced figure.
The prescription arrives with the phrase “you may notice some side effects.” The phrase does the work of concealment. Three effects, in particular, are not warned about with the seriousness they warrant.
4. Akathisia carries documented suicide risk
Akathisia is a state of extreme inner restlessness produced by antidepressants, antipsychotics, and antiemetics. The Greek term means inability to sit still. The patient may pace, fidget, wring hands, or endlessly walk. The condition may also present without visible motor symptoms, as unbearable internal agitation the observer cannot see.¹⁴
In 1990, Martin Teicher and colleagues at Harvard published five cases of patients who developed intense suicidal preoccupations on fluoxetine, all associated with akathisia, all resolving when the drug was stopped and returning when it was restarted.¹⁵ Rothschild and Locke published the rechallenge study in 1991: three patients who had made serious suicide attempts on fluoxetine, all rechallenged under controlled conditions, all developing akathisia and becoming suicidal again. One patient said in retrospect: “I tried to kill myself because of these anxiety symptoms. It was not so much the depression.”¹⁶
A study of psychiatric inpatients found that 79 percent of those who had attempted suicide were experiencing akathisia at the time.¹⁷ Another found that half of all fights on a psychiatric ward were akathisia-related. Haloperidol at moderate to high doses made half the patients markedly more aggressive, sometimes to the point of wanting to kill their psychiatrists.
The FDA’s 2004 black-box warning on antidepressants describes what Breggin has called the stimulant syndrome: anxiety, agitation, panic attacks, insomnia, irritability, hostility, aggressiveness, impulsivity, akathisia, hypomania, mania.¹⁸ The label warns that these can occur in nonpsychiatric patients, meaning the drug produces the syndrome by itself, not by unmasking a preexisting condition.
Gøtzsche’s team examined manufacturer trial data and found akathisia miscoded as “hyperkinesia” in Zoloft trials. In paroxetine trials they found not a single case of akathisia recorded, which is statistically impossible given the drug class.¹⁹ The miscoding was systematic.
The FDA-approved label for Zyprexa describes akathisia as “extreme inner anxiety and restlessness.” At least one psychiatric textbook labeled it “agitated depression,” folding the drug’s most dangerous effect back into the diagnosis it was prescribed to treat. The patient who reports the akathisia is told the underlying illness has worsened. The dose is increased.
5. Benzodiazepine dependence begins at prescribed doses
The FDA-approved label for Xanax states that withdrawal symptoms, including seizures, have been reported after only brief therapy at doses within the recommended range for treating anxiety.²⁰ In the eight-week trials used for FDA approval, patients were worse off at eight weeks than before starting the drug. Between 7 and 29 percent of patients could not withdraw after only six to eight weeks of exposure.²¹
If you are currently taking a benzodiazepine, do not stop it abruptly. Abrupt cessation can produce seizures. Item 12 addresses what safe withdrawal actually requires.
Heather Ashton, the British psychiatrist who ran a benzodiazepine withdrawal clinic at the University of Newcastle for decades, documented that long-term users often required a year or more to taper.²² Some experience withdrawal symptoms lasting years after cessation. Cognitive impairment, depression, and anxiety worse than the original condition are common outcomes of long-term use.²³ Gøtzsche, who has decades of clinical pharmacology experience, has noted that patients report benzodiazepine withdrawal as often worse than heroin. Heroin abstinence symptoms resolve within days. Benzo withdrawal can persist for years.
6. ADHD stimulants produce the symptoms they treat on withdrawal
The DSM has a category for stimulant withdrawal, which lists depression, anxiety, irritability, sleep problems, fatigue, and agitation as the withdrawal syndrome after “several days or longer” of use. Rebound hyperactivity, talkativeness, and inattention are documented after a single dose in a placebo-controlled NIMH study of normal children ages 6 to 12.²⁴ Ten of fourteen children in that study showed marked behavioral rebound; three developed euphoria.
If a child is currently taking a stimulant, do not stop it abruptly. Rebound and withdrawal effects are commonly mistaken for a worsening of the original condition. Item 12 addresses safe withdrawal.
The teacher observes the child on Monday morning after a weekend off the drug, notices the child is more scattered and irritable than usual, and concludes the child needs the medication. The child is in withdrawal. The dose is increased. Peter Breggin’s observation from the early 1990s stands unchanged three decades later: if the child continues on Ritalin because they continue to have problems focusing, the disorder may be the drug’s effect.²⁵ Drug-induced inattention becomes the reason to continue and increase the drug.
The Multimodal Treatment Study of ADHD, the largest NIMH-funded stimulant trial, tracked children through eight years of follow-up. By three years, the medicated children showed no advantage over the non-medicated on any measure. They were, however, 2 cm shorter and 2.7 kg lighter than their unmedicated peers, a growth suppression the FDA eventually required on the label.²⁶
The drugs act on the brain and the brain responds. What the brain does under sustained chemical assault is documented in the profession’s own imaging studies.
7. Antipsychotics shrink brain tissue on MRI
Nancy Andreasen, editor-in-chief of the American Journal of Psychiatry from 1993 to 2005, began a longitudinal MRI study of over 500 first-episode schizophrenia patients in 1989. In 2003, she reported that frontal lobe white matter volume decreased progressively over the years of treatment.²⁷ In 2011, her team published in Archives of General Psychiatry the finding that antipsychotic exposure was directly associated with volume loss.²⁸ In a 2008 interview with the New York Times, Andreasen stated it plainly: “The more drugs you’ve been given, the more brain tissue you lose.”²⁹
Fusar-Poli and colleagues confirmed the pattern in a 2013 meta-analysis of longitudinal MRI studies.³⁰ The 2009 Navari and Dazzan review reported that both older and newer antipsychotics produce gross changes in brain volume in selected regions.³¹ In monkey studies, haloperidol and olanzapine produced substantial reductions in both grey and white matter, and reduced glial cell numbers.³²
Andreasen’s original interpretation was that the shrinkage reflected the disease. The follow-up data forced her to concede the drug was the cause.
Tardive dyskinesia is a drug-induced movement disorder produced by antipsychotics. It can affect any voluntary muscle: face, tongue, neck, torso, extremities, diaphragm, vocal cords. The condition presents as involuntary jerky movements, slower writhing movements, painful spasms, or restlessness the patient cannot control. The mechanism is understood. Antipsychotics block dopamine receptors in a brain region called the basal ganglia. Over time the brain compensates by growing more of those receptors. When the drug dose is reduced, or when the extra receptors eventually outnumber the block, the excess drives the involuntary movements.
The prevalence is not marginal. DSM-IV-TR sets the annual incidence at 3 to 5 percent per year in young adults and 25 to 30 percent per year in older patients.³³ These are cumulative rates. A young adult after three years of exposure has a 9 to 15 percent risk. An older patient after three years has a 75 to 90 percent risk. Prevalence in outpatient clinics runs above 40 percent. In long-term facilities, above 50 percent.³⁴ There is no established treatment. Most cases are permanent.
The condition often extends beyond motor symptoms. Gualtieri and Barnhill observed that “in virtually every clinical survey that has addressed the question, it is found that TD patients, compared to non-TD patients, have more in the way of dementia.”³⁵ Breggin has called this tardive dementia. Tardive akathisia and tardive psychosis have also been documented, representing further permanent damage to the higher brain function of patients whose brains were supposed to be helped.
The condition is frequently masked by the drug that caused it. Increasing the dose suppresses the visible movements while the underlying damage progresses. Reducing the dose brings the movements out, which the prescriber may interpret as evidence that the patient still needs the medication. The patient’s brain, already damaged, is offered more of what damaged it.
The neurological literature has documented tardive dyskinesia for over five decades. It is required disclosure on antipsychotic labels. It is not routinely disclosed at the point of prescription.
Electroconvulsive therapy applies electrical current to the head sufficient to produce a grand mal seizure. In modern practice, the patient is anesthetized and given a muscle relaxant to prevent the visible convulsion. The electrical dose is often increased to compensate for the seizure threshold raised by the anesthesia. Multiple treatments are given, typically 8 to 16 per course, sometimes more.
Autopsy studies dating to the 1940s documented brain necrosis in patients who died following ECT.³⁶ Animal studies documented brain damage. The brain’s response to ECT is an acute organic brain syndrome, medically indistinguishable from severe head injury. In neurological terms, multiple continuous seizures without full recovery of consciousness constitute status epilepticus, a medical emergency defined by its risk of permanent brain damage.
The memory loss is documented in every serious study that has looked for it. Larry Squire and Pamela Slater reported an average of 27 months of retrograde amnesia surrounding treatment.³⁷ Freeman and Kendell, using face-to-face interviews conducted by the treating doctors themselves (a design that biased strongly against reporting), found that 74 percent of patients reported memory impairment and 30 percent said their memory function was permanently affected.³⁸ Squire and Slater’s own longer follow-up found that 55 percent of patients felt they had not regained normal memory function over the years.
Gøtzsche summarizes the current literature: with strict definitions of memory loss, 29 to 55 percent of patients are affected. With looser criteria, 51 to 79 percent.³⁹ Death rates from ECT, according to a systematic review by John Read and colleagues, run at approximately 1 per 1,000 treatment courses, ten times higher than the American Psychiatric Association’s stated figure.⁴⁰
The efficacy evidence is thinner than the harms evidence. The 1985 NIMH Consensus Conference on ECT accepted the finding that no controlled study showed benefit beyond four weeks. The four-week window corresponds to the acute organic brain syndrome, during which severe brain dysfunction produces the euphoria or apathy interpreted as improvement.⁴¹ Once the brain begins to recover, the depression returns. If the patient is given more ECT, the brain damage accumulates. If the patient is not given more ECT, the profession points to the returning depression as evidence the disease was chronic.
The APA’s 1990 task force report on ECT omitted essentially the entire literature documenting memory loss and brain damage.⁴² The literature it omitted included the work of Squire, Slater, Janis, Friedberg, Breggin, and even the APA’s own previous 1978 report, which contained more information on memory loss than the 1990 update. In psychiatry, science sometimes runs backward.
At some point the patient decides they no longer want to be on the drug. The system was not built to help them leave.
10. SSRI discontinuation can last years
The FDA-approved labels describe “discontinuation syndrome.” Patients and doctors alike were told the symptoms would last a few weeks and resolve. The systematic review by Davies and Read, published in 2019, established that this was false. Withdrawal symptoms are more common than reported, more severe than reported, and last far longer than reported. In one survey of 580 patients, 16 percent reported withdrawal symptoms lasting over three years.⁴³
If you are currently taking an SSRI or SNRI, do not stop it abruptly. Withdrawal reactions can include severe agitation, akathisia, suicidal ideation, and violence. Item 12 addresses the resources for safe tapering.
The Dutch tapering-strip program run by Peter Groot and Jim van Os has documented the shape of the problem. Of 895 patients on antidepressants, 62 percent had previously tried to withdraw without success. Using hyperbolic dose-reduction strips, 71 percent were able to withdraw within a median of 56 days.⁴⁴ Venlafaxine required 90 percent of patients to start at the lowest available dose and taper over three months. Some patients required more than six months. Dutch insurers refused to reimburse extended tapering because “there is no evidence in the literature” for its necessity, a circular defense against the very treatment the literature was documenting.
The withdrawal is routinely misinterpreted as return of the underlying illness. The patient is told they were unwise to stop and needs to remain on the drug indefinitely. Breggin’s term for this pattern is medication spellbinding. The drug produces effects the patient attributes to the disease.
11. Long-term outcomes are worse with the drugs than without them
The 1997 British study of a large inner-city primary care facility followed 95 never-medicated depressed patients and 53 drug-treated ones. Symptom reduction at six months: 62 percent for the never-medicated, 33 percent for the drug-treated.⁴⁵ A World Health Organization study of 640 depressed patients found that medicated patients had worse general health and were more likely to still be mentally ill at one year.⁴⁶ A Canadian five-year study of 9,508 depressed patients: 19 weeks of depression per year for the medicated, 11 for the unmedicated.⁴⁷ An NIMH study of 547 patients: medicated patients were three times more likely to lose their principal social role and nearly seven times more likely to become incapacitated at six years.⁴⁸
Rif El-Mallakh reported that 40 percent of patients on antidepressants end up in a chronically depressed “treatment resistant” state.⁴⁹ Giovanni Fava documented that drug changes induced by antidepressants “may propel the illness to a more malignant and treatment unresponsive course.”⁵⁰
The pattern extends to antipsychotics. Martin Harrow’s 15-year follow-up of first-episode psychosis patients found that those not on antipsychotics had significantly better outcomes and were far more likely to be in recovery.⁵¹ Lex Wunderink’s 7-year Dutch trial randomized first-episode psychosis patients to maintenance antipsychotics or dose reduction and discontinuation. The reduction group had double the recovery rate.⁵² Bockoven had documented in 1975 that rehospitalization rates rose after the introduction of antipsychotics and that medicated patients were more socially dependent than those treated in the pre-drug era.⁵³
The pattern is consistent across drug classes and across decades. Longer exposure produces worse outcomes. The drugs sensitize the brain and convert episodic distress into chronic dysfunction. The profession’s response has been to rewrite the natural history of the conditions to match the drug-damaged outcomes. The 1999 American Psychiatric Publishing Textbook of Psychiatry declared that older studies showing depression was self-limiting had been “disproved.” Depression became “a highly recurrent and pernicious disorder.”⁵⁴ The drugs had made it so.
12. Tapering protocols do not exist in most medical schools
The prescriber who put the patient on the drug is typically not trained in how to help them come off it. Withdrawal is not covered in the standard psychiatric curriculum. The tapering approach with the strongest evidence base is hyperbolic dose reduction, developed by Mark Horowitz and Joanna Moncrieff and published in Lancet Psychiatry in 2019.⁵⁵ The approach requires micro-dose reductions of a few percent at a time, made possible by liquid formulations or compounded tapering strips. Standard tablets do not come in the small doses required.
Peter Gøtzsche’s team spent two years trying to publish a Cochrane review protocol on antidepressant withdrawal support. The Cochrane depression group, chaired by Rachel Churchill, raised objections through 12,044 words of feedback across 86 numbered points, then rejected the protocol.⁵⁶ Cochrane refused to publish a review on how to help patients safely withdraw from a class of drugs prescribed to hundreds of millions of people worldwide. Gøtzsche’s PhD student Anders Sørensen mentored 30 consecutive patients through withdrawal in his unpaid spare time and documented the results, because it was the only way to do the work.
The insurance system compounds the problem. Dutch national health insurance refuses to reimburse extended tapering on the grounds of insufficient evidence, though the evidence exists and the insurers know it does. American insurers do not cover compounded formulations. The tapering strips developed at the Amsterdam pharmacy (taperingstrip.org) are available to prescribers in any country, but the patient must find a prescriber willing to order them, which many will not.
The knowledge exists. The Ashton Manual for benzodiazepine withdrawal has been public since 2002.⁵⁷ The Horowitz-Moncrieff hyperbolic tapering literature is in peer-reviewed journals. Mad in America hosts a withdrawal community with thousands of patients’ documented experiences. Breggin’s Psychiatric Drug Withdrawal was published in 2013.
None of it is on the psychiatric residency reading list. The doctor who wrote the prescription is, in most cases, not the doctor who can help the patient stop taking it. The patient is on their own.
The most common defense of the current prescribing paradigm is that the drugs help some patients, and that essays like this one endanger those patients by encouraging them to stop.
Some patients do report subjective benefit on these drugs. That is not disputed. What is not established is that this benefit exceeds placebo by a clinically meaningful margin, or that it survives the long-term outcomes documented in Item 11.
The safety caveats throughout this essay, and the resources listed below, exist precisely because abrupt cessation is dangerous. Nothing here recommends abrupt cessation. What is recommended is informed choice, which requires the twelve findings to be visible before the prescription is written or renewed. A patient who wishes to continue after seeing the twelve findings has made a different decision from a patient who was never shown them.
JEWS:
When the DSM-5 was published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) in May 2013, it faced widespread criticism for over-medicalizing normal human behaviors. In response, a group of writers and mental health professionals published a celebrated parody called The Diagnostic Manual of Mishegas. [1]
The Concept: Created under the fictitious persona of “Dr. Sol Farblondget,” the manual humorously categorizes archetypal Jewish behaviors and anxieties into clinical “disorders”.
Cultural Context: Rather than mocking mental illness, the book highlights the historically deep ties between Jews and the American psychoanalytic tradition, turning cultural quirks (like excessive worrying, overeating, or parental guilt) into tongue-in-cheek diagnostic criteria.
The satirical Diagnostic Manual of Mishegas–created by the fictitious Dr. Sol Farblondget–sends up the DSM with its listing of Jewish disorders.
CATEGORIES OF MISHEGAS
1.0 NERVOUS CONDITIONS OF EVERYDAY LIFE
Nervous conditions are part of the human condition, and thus are as different in their variations as human beings are different from one another. Still, it is helpful to understand what form of nervousness you are experiencing, or what type of tsuris-addict is torturing you with tales of woe, and to thereby figure out how to tell the feeling, or the person, to gei avek (get lost!), gei shluffen (go to sleep), or—our number one suggestion, especially when the meter is running out on your patience for listening to yet another mournful Oy Vey-drenched soliloquy—to tell the tsuris-addict to fardrai zich deyn kopf (literally: ‘Go turn your own head around’—i.e., to leave me alone and make yourself nuts!) Also: a good hot pastrami sandwich, don’t skimp on the mustard, with a nice, fat sour pickle on the side, can’t hurt.
Here follows a list of common nervous conditions that, though different in kind, one from the other, have many qualities in common and, depending on a particular day’s Dow Jones Industrial Average or the state of your kishkas (intestines), can sometimes be used interchangeably.
1.01 Tsuris Reactions and Sequelae
Although Jews like to claim a monopoly on tsuris, the truth is that this condition (troubles, aggravation, worries, suffering) befalls everyone, and most of what passes for mishegas is a natural reaction to life’s vagaries and pitfalls. Thus, when a 54-year-old woman becomes depressed because her accountant husband, also 54, has taken up with an 18-year-old hotsie-totsie, she is not mishugah and in need of psychotropic medications. What she needs, we believe, is to shack up with an 18-year-old lifeguard or tennis pro, and to leave her husband a note, informing him that, as an accountant he should realize that 18 can go into 54 many more times than 54 can go into 18.
The point is not to moan, groan and carry on about the tsuris that has befallen you, but to do something about it. Remember: when the Children of Israel fled from Egypt and came to the Red Sea with the Egyptians in hot pursuit, and they complained to God that he had delivered them from slavery into something worse than slavery, and Moses, who did not even ask for a retainer, went to God on their behalf and transmitted his tribe’s complaints, God laughed. “Wherefore criest thou unto me?” God said. “Go forth!” And it was only when the Children of Israel stopped kvetching, and plunged forward into the Red Sea, that the waters parted.
1.02 Tsuris-addiction
Tsuris addiction is a widespread condition which, by cutting people off from their innate capacity for pleasure and encouraging kvetching (complaining), enables them to spread gevalt-laden gloom and doom everywhere. In an iconic example, four elderly Jewish women are wading ankle-deep in the waters at Brighton Beach. “Oy,” says Ethel. “Oy vey,” says Molly. “Oy vey iz mir,” says Lillie. “Please, ladies,” says Annie. “We promised not to talk about our children.”
People who have life-long love affairs with, and attachments to, misery wind up living in what we think of as The Village of Oy Vey Iz Mir at whose center is the Shtiebel of Gornish Helfin. Tsuris addicts spend their lives holding on to every morsel of real or imagined bad news they ever had—kvetching, for example, about how unfair it is that they had to grow up near people with bigger houses, better time-shares, more cashmere sweaters and fancier cabanas than theirs. In Oy Vey Iz Mir, any and every event is cause for weeping and wailing.
That tsuris addiction is a regrettable and oft-considered natural part of life is not even mentioned in the D.S.M. (Nor is tsuris attachment, which is pretty much the same thing, except that you can send it to someone in an e-mail.) While some studies show that tsuris addicts may take what they consider genuine (if perverse) pleasure from being miserable, the price of their pleasure is often to plunge many of us into a desire to rip out their vocal cords.
1.02A: The Wisdom of Gornish Helfin
Although the D.S.M. makes a big deal out of attachment theory, we are advocates of detachment theory, since experience convinces us that what proves most helpful both to those addicted to tsuris, and those who must suffer from relationships with tsuris addicts, is the concept of Gornish Helfin (meaning, literally, “Nothing will help”), which can be explained by the following archetypal example.
When the great Yiddish actor Mendel Kupietzky fell down in the middle of a Yiddish-language performance of King Lear, and a doctor rushed to the stage and began examining him, a man in the balcony started yelling, “Give him an enema. . . . ! Give him an enema. . . . !” And when, a moment later, the doctor threw out his hands in a gesture of helplessness, and announced that Mendel Kupietzky was dead—still the man from the balcony kept yelling “Give him an enema . . . ! Give him an enema. . . . !” and would not stop despite pleas from other actors and members of the audience. Only when the theater manager appeared alongside the doctor and looked up at the man in the balcony and said, “He’s dead, sir. An enema can’t help. Gornish Helfin . . . Gornish Helfin . . . ”
—only then did the man in the balcony change his tune. “Give him an enema!” he cried one last time. “It can’t hurt . . . . ”
Once we understand that no matter what we do to and for some people, they will not change—that GornishHelfin, and therefore the best thing is to leave them be—we free ourselves from the quintessential American illusion, pragmatic to its core, that there is no problem for which there is not a happy solution. What we believe is that for many situations and conditions, including most forms of mishegas—tsuris addiction at the top of the list—there is nothing to be done. Thus, any engagement with the tsuris addict—especially telling the addict that kvetching about tsuris is not such a hot idea—merely brings on ever-rising levels of tsuris-addiction.
For tsuris addicts, insatiability is the name of the game. Nothing will ever please them, and it is a waste of time—truly mishugah!—to point out that they have no real reasons for being miserable, or to urge them to find ways to be happy.
Therefore, when engaged in relationships with tsuris-addicts, and you sense an impulse to enter into dialogue with them, the suggestion here is to cock your head to the side, furrow your brow in feigned sympathy, and stare through or past the addict while silently repeating, “Gornish helfin . . . Gornish helfin . . . Gornish helfin . . . ” This way, if by some miracle these people ever do change, you have not destroyed whatever good will may exist between you, and they remain ready to embrace you.
Here’s your chance:
How to apply
Before you start packing your suitcase, there are a few requirements.
Applicants must:
Speak English
Have a valid passport
Be available for the next three months
Additional languages are a plus.
The position is a three-month independent contractor engagement paying $10,000 per month, for a total of $30,000.
You can apply from anywhere in the world. The job will be hired and paid through Deel, which handles the engagement and payments.
If you’re wondering whether you’ll have to make a TikTok of yourself eating ice cream in order to get the job, the listing does encourage applicants to submit videos, social links, and other application materials.
So, if you have a passport, a serious appreciation for ice cream, and an opinion about what flavor the world needs next, this could be your chance.
Russian Jewish Gulags, before the King David Hotel, Honey Pots, Contra rebels, USS Liberty, and, gulp, well well Controlled Demolition and the Hannibal Murders
It was announced by the BBC 20 minutes before it Happened. (Foreknowledge?)
Oh, the chain of Jewish Crimes CUSTODY:
No, Gideon… this is a genocide, a systematic annihilation of the great indigenous people of Palestine and their beautiful civilization.
It is inspired by Old Testament and Talmudic misanthropy…
Sergey Brin is cooking up Google’s AI destiny
The Alphabet cofounder has gained more influence over Gemini, working from a microkitchen in Mountain View
On the second floor of Gradient Canopy, a tent-like structure that rises east of Google’s Mountain View headquarters, is a microkitchen filled with many of the typical fixings: coffee beans, grinders, an espresso machine, a fridge. Less typical is the U-shaped formation of desks, used by Google cofounder Sergey Brin and a handful of mission-critical leaders who are steering Google through an AI race it can’t afford to lose.
US Rep. Chris Pappas swiftly defeated progressive opponent Karishma Manzur in a Democratic Senate primary in New Hampshire on Tuesday, capping off one of several races in which criticism of Israel and AIPAC became prominent talking points.
The Associated Press called the race just an hour after polls closed, at 6 p.m., when 22% of the votes had been counted. As the night wore on, with 88% of the votes tallied, Pappas had accrued 65% of the votes to Manzur’s 32.8%.
“If you look at October 7 as the starting point, then you might say Israel is defending itself,” Manzur said. “But you should actually look at the 100 years of war between the two people.”
Centrist beats progressive foe in NH Democratic Senate primary marked by Israel criticism
Chains of Custody!
Ahh, Jew Fall on Streaming Propaganda, a la JEWS: Goyim will have even more of that 2 percent of a functioning brain lobotomized by the Mossad.
Writer and Director Guy Moshe served in the Israeli special forces, followed by a stint working protective details be fore becoming a filmmaker. In his early years, he distanced himself from his military service, but he always knew he wanted to explore his niche service experience. When an idea from former CIA Intelligence Special Operations Group Officer Bazzel Baz (“The Blacklist”) came across his desk, Moshe saw an opportunity.
Along with co-writer Mark Bacci (“Real Detective”), Moshe wrote the screenplay for “The Fix,” a special forces thriller starring Liam Neeson (“Taken”), Zachary Levi (“Shazam!”), Quincy Isaiah (“Nemesis”), Elnaaz Norouzi (“Tehran”), and Titus Welliver (“Lost,” “Bosch”).
Miliband rejects chief rabbi’s claim British Jews in greater danger after sanctions move
That fucking crime scene: Jews make up approximately 0.4% to 0.5% of the total population of the United Kingdom
Which fucking Jew is in on this one? As Social Security fund runs dry, some Republicans say it’s time to raise taxes
Raising the payroll tax cap is gaining traction as a fix — even in the anti-tax GOP — to fend off deep cuts in retirement benefits.
September 7, 2026 at 5:00 p.m. EDT
Economist Alan Nasser argued in his article “The Paradigmatic Liberal as Fiscal Conservative: How Franklin D. Roosevelt Botched Social Security” that FDR’s choice to fund Social Security through regressive payroll taxes rather than general government revenues was a profound political and economic mistake.
Regressive Funding: Nasser and other critics note that financing Social Security via employee and employer payroll contributions (FICA) operates like a flat tax or sales tax, placing a heavier relative burden on lower-income workers who can least afford it.
Subordinating Public Good to Capital: Nasser argued that FDR structured the New Deal to fit comfortably within capitalist market parameters, prioritizing business profit stability and sound fiscal conservatism over true redistributive justice.
FDR’s Political Rationale
The Insurance Illusion: Roosevelt famously insisted on contributory payroll taxes not for sound economic reasons, but for deliberate political self-defense.
Creating Entitlement Protection: FDR told aides—such as Luther Gulick—that paying into the system gave workers an unquestionable “legal, moral, and political right” to collect benefits, making it politically impossible for future conservative politicians to scrap the program.
The Trade-off: By tying benefits explicitly to individual payroll contributions modeled on private insurance, FDR insulated the program from political repeal, but permanently anchored public welfare to a regressive funding mechanism.
From Cambridge University in 1932-1933, John Maynard Keynes observed a promising new U.S. president presiding over what he saw as half-baked and confused policies, while labor insurgency was mounting. Roosevelt’s measures were, Keynes conceded, without precedent, but novelty was not enough. Long-term commitment to direct federal employment was required. For Keynes, this was the bottom line. (For a detailed analysis of Keynes’s prescriptions for eliminating unemployment, see Alan Nasser, “What Keynes Really Prescribed,”CounterPunch subscription edition, volume 19, number 19, 2012)
Existing programs were not only too small, but they were also either temporary (Civilian Conservation Corps and Civil W orks Administration) or irrationally tied to the severely weakened states’ ability to raise substantial revenues on their own (Federal Emergency Relief Act and Public Works Administration). CWA had come closest to the kind of commitment Keynes thought indispensable, but it suffered two fatal defects: it was temporary, designed only to help workers get through the harsh winter of 1933, and of all these programs it was the object of Roosevelt’s greatest suspicion. Roosevelt feared that CWA would raise workers’ expectations of what they could permanently expect from government.
The Dawn of the New Deal and Keynes’s 1933 Letter
The president’s instincts were solidly anti-federalist; there must be no permanent direct government provision of what it is the proper function of the private sector to provide. (1) Roosevelt wanted relatively small, temporary federal efforts on behalf of workers, with the states primarily responsible for the provision of social benefits in the long run. Keynes urged large, permanent programs supplying employment during both economic contractions and expansions, provided directly by the federal government. He communicated his concern to Roosevelt in an open letter published in The New York Times on December 31, 1933. (2)
In the letter he expressed his extreme distress at Roosevelt’s timid policy. “At the moment your sympathizers in England are nervous and sometimes despondent. We wonder whether the order of different urgencies is rightly understood, whether there is a confusion of aim, and whether some of the advice you get is not crack-brained and queer.” He then outlined his alternative analysis.
The basic issue, Keynes insisted, is “Recovery,” whose object is “to increase the national output and put more men to work.” An increase in output depends on “the amount of purchasing power… which is expected to come on the market.” Recovery depends upon increasing purchasing power. There are, Keynes pointed out, three factors operating to raise purchasing power and output. The first is increased consumer spending out of current income, the second is increased investment by capitalists, and the third is that “public authority must be called in aid to create additional current incomes through the expenditure of borrowed or printed money.”
Since the vast majority of consumers are workers, increased consumption expenditure is impossible on the required scale during a period of high unemployment and low wages. Business investment will eventually materialize, but only “after the tide has been turned by the expenditures of public authority.” Government investment in employment-generating public works must come first. Only after large-scale government investment can private investment be expected to kick in.
A compelling logic is implicit in that observation. According to the orthodoxy Keynes is criticizing, a revival of aggregate investment by the class of capitalists is necessary and sufficient to constitute recovery. But investment by an individual capitalist in a severe downturn would be irrational. So each capitalist will defer investment until there is evidence of recovery, i.e. evidence that the other capitalists have undertaken productive outlays. Uh-oh: a structural contradiction is in place. If each investor refrains from investment until all the others invest, no capitalist will invest. Each will die waiting for the others to come across. In the absence of an external impetus to the private investment system, the depression will be endless. Recovery is possible, then, only if a force external to the private market gets the ball rolling. Enter government to the rescue. “[T]he tide has been turned.”
Hence Keynes’s conviction that only government expenditures on a grand scale can breathe life back into a depressed economy. Keynes suggested as an example of what he had in mind “the rehabilitation of the physical condition of the railroads.” He would later, in a 1938 letter, recommend a national program of public housing as a project on the required scale.
The crisis was not merely economic. Keynes had witnessed the rise of revolutionary movements in response to the protracted inability of capitalism to meet the needs of working people. He had written about both the Bolshevik revolution and the tendency of austerity to spawn revolt from the Right. Keynes was antipathetic to both fascist and worker rule, and feared revolutionary consequences should the New Deal fail. “If you fail,” he wrote Roosevelt, “rational change will be gravely prejudiced throughout the world, leaving orthodoxy and revolution to fight it out.” The politicalstakes were high, as they must be under conditions of protracted capitalist austerity.
The stakes are no less high now. The current contraction emerged from a political-economic settlement, the post-Golden-Age period from 1974 to the present, resembling in relevant respects the Depression-prone economy of the 1920s.
I want to review both those features of the 1920s which generated the economic debacle Keynes addressed, and the corresponding precipitating causes of today’s crisis. The similarity of the origins of both contractions is striking. If Keynes was right to argue -and we shall see that he was- that large-scale public employment is the only remedy for a severe and extended economic contraction, it will be clear that the same prescription applies to the present depression. We will then be in a position better to grasp the urgency of public employment as a policy without which the United States faces a future of long-term stagnation and intolerable unemployment.
The 1920s as Exemplar of Mature Capitalism: the Stage-Setting for the Great Depression
The 1920s was the benchmark decade for mature pre-Keynesian capitalism. The major capital-intensive industries were in place and oligopolized (or rapidly becoming so), technological development raced ahead and production and profit levels were high. By 1919 union power had been dealt a crippling blow; labor was almost entirely unorganized during the 1920s.
The remarkable increases, between 1919 and 1929, in GDP (40 percent), production (64 percent in manufacturing), productivity (43 percent in industry as a whole, 98 percent in automobiles) and profits (200 percent) were not matched by a comparable increase in wages. Productivity advances did not lead to higher wages; wages were no higher in 1929 than they were in 1922. Nor did they bring about falling prices; industrial concentration made for “downwardly sticky” prices. The result was inexorable: national income was distributed upward so that by 1928 the nation exhibited the greatest inequality of the century to that point.
In his landmark study of the economy of the1920s (3), George Soule spelled out the consequences of that settlement:
“…toward the end of [the decade] large amounts of cash remained in the hands of of the big manufacturing and public-utility corporations that they did not distribute either in dividends or by means of new investment… the large corporations accumulated even more cash than they needed for their own uses… This money eventually spilled over into stock speculation. …[T]he surplus funds of large business corporations were now being lent directly to speculators…A curious commentary on the state of the American economy at the time is the fact thatbusiness could make less money by using its surplus funds in production than it could by lending the money to purchasers of stocks, the value of which was supposed to be determined by the profit on that production.”
The lessons of the 1920s are clear, and they bear directly on the build-up to the present crisis. Developed capitalism without social democracy and strong labor unions leads to productivity increases far outpacing wage growth, extreme inequality, insufficient working-class purchasing power, an unprecedented buildup of household debt and nowhere for profits to go but into capitalist consumption and financial speculation. With financial growth not reflecting comparable health in the productive economy, a bubble formed in stock market speculation and household debt grew faster than household income. By their nature, bubbles break. The popping of the speculative bubble brought about the stock market crash of 1929.
The crash and ensuing Depression afflicted what we have seen was a highly vulnerable economy. Because the economy had by the 1920s become industrially mature, growth no longer depended upon the breakneck expansion of the capital goods sector, but was now, and for the first time, fuelled by the production and consumption of consumer durable goods like refrigerators, radios, vacuum cleaners and, most importantly, automobiles. Consumption replaced investment as the driver of economic growth. (4) Robust growth would now require high wages.
With wages stagnant, working-class households’ ability to sustain the consumer durables boom became dependent, as it would again from the mid-1970s onward, on unsustainable household debt levels. Supplementing income-based purchasing power with credit had been a fact of life since the late nineteenth century, but the debt increments increased especially rapidly during the 1920s. The proportion of total retail sales financed by credit increased from 10 percent in 1910 to 15 percent in 1927 to 50 percent in 1929.When working-class purchasing power and household debt approached their limit by 1926-1927, the rate of growth of consumer purchases began to decline. Key growth markets like autos and construction became saturated and excess productive capacity became conspicuous. Production fell and profits were directed to financial speculation and bubble creation. The stock market and the economy responded accordingly. The Great Depression was at the door.
A comparable dynamic was in effect during the period preceding September 2008. From the mid-1970s to the year before the housing bubble began to leak, 2005, the gap between productivity growth and flat wages grew wider and wider. As in the 1920s, national income shifted steadily and increasingly to the top. Inequality approximating that of the 1920s grew. 1928 and 2007 were the highest inequality years since 1900. (Each year, not coincidentally, was followed by a major meltdown.) Workers once again resorted to debt to maintain living standards. The ratio of outstanding consumer debt to disposable income had more than doubled, from 62 percent in 1975 to 127.2 percent in 2005. Since 1995 the debt burden, measured by the percentage of household income pledged to debt service, had become increasingly concentrated in the lower three income quintiles. Financial speculation, which had accelerated since the mid-1970s, took off with a vengeance after 1999. Echoes of the 1920s were loud and clear.
When 2008 ushered in today’s depression, the political-economic legacy of the New Deal had long given way to the neoliberal religion of market-only solutions harkening back to the pre-Keynesian 1920s. The Great Depression’s lesson that only public employment on a grand scale could remedy persistent joblessness was cast aside as incompatible with born-again free market fundamentalism. Obama’s remarks at the December 3, 2009 “jobs summit” express the current elite consensus that any politically acceptable remedy for intractable joblessness must be market-based: “[While] government has a critical role in creating the conditions for economic growth, ultimately true economic recovery is only going to come from the private sector.” That’s a recipe for endless depression.
We shall see below that Big Guns from Larry Summers to Paul Krugman have finally drawn the appropriate conclusion: America faces a future of long-term, perhaps permanent, stagnation and high unemployment. This is indeed the price working people will pay for the total exclusion of public employment from current policy discussions. We can see this more clearly after we first have a look at the course of the Great Depression and the alternative Keynes urged upon Roosevelt when the New Deal recovery fizzled in 1937.
The Big Contraction, the Aborted Recovery and Keynes’s Response
From 1929 to 1933 the economy plummeted, leaving 24.9 percent of workers unemployed and many more underemployed. By 1932 more than 32,000 businesses would go bankrupt. National output fell by 50 percent. Investment plunged.20 percent of U.S. banks, at least 5,000, failed. This is what created the grist for Keynes’s mill.
The Depression reversed the euphoria of the 1920s and initiated a profound sense of desperation frequently referred to by president Roosevelt as a national “emergency.” Motivated by advisors more radical than he and mounting worker impatience, Roosevelt initiated experimental stimulus measures.
The WPA and other modest public employment measures provided sufficient momentum to the economy that a sharp upturn began in late 1933 and lasted until 1937. This was one of the two longest cyclical expansions in the nation’s history, and the steepest ever. The upturn is typically but misleadingly thought to be a direct result of the New Deal’s enormous increase in deficit spending. The lesson “Keynesians” have drawn is that mature capitalism is capable only of brief periods of stability left to its own private devices, so that government intervention during economic downturns is a recurrent necessity built into the system. Private investment, then, is necessary but insufficient to drive the accumulation process; deficit-financed government investment is also required if economic growth is to be accompanied by full employment.
This can be seriously misleading. Government investment is not merely necessary; it is the only form of investment, Keynes claimed, capable of bringing about full employment. Keynes was emphatic that reducing taxes and interest rates, and providing temporary unemployment benefits, were no substitute for direct government job creation. The lesson that matters is that the elimination of unemployment is not the direct result of government deficit spending as such. Public works projects, for example, put people to work, and this provides workers with a wage, the household spending power Keynes underscored as the key to recovery. Without restoring the purchasing power of the working majority, there would be no recovery.
Wages turned into effective demand, then, is the direct cause of a revival of production and employment. But niggardly wages will not do. The nation’s human and non-human resources are vast, and marshalling them for production at full employment calls for aggregate household spending power sufficient to that task. The 1920s and the period from 1974 to the present display those features of mature industrial capitalism which generate the kind of crisis which only high wages can reverse.
The End of the Recovery and the Triumph of Sound Finance
The recovery of 1933-1937 exhibited the fastest growth rates of the twentieth century. At the peak of the expansion industrial output and national income had returned to 1929 levels and purchases of new autos surpassed 1929 sales. (5) New auto sales were fuelled by consumer spending. The consumer demand that drove this exceptional recovery was created by public, not private, investment. It is not investment as such that capitalist development renders otiose, but private investment.
New Deal government investment was a precondition of the 1933-1937 expansion, during which banks had stopped lending and net private investment had evaporated. But the New Deal took no steps to ensure the permanence of adequate consumer demand or household income. Roosevelt took his policies to be temporary urgencies to be terminated once their “jump-start” aims had been accomplished. He anticipated the time when he could reduce deficit spending and return to the principles of sound finance.
The president’s wishes seemed to be coming true in 1937. From FY 1936 to FY 1937 total government expenditures dropped from $8,476,000,000 to $8,001,000,000 and the deficit fell from $4,361,000,000 to $2,708,000,000. Federal tax receipts increased from $4,116,000,000 to $5,294,000,000. (6)As early as January of 1937Rooseveltwas planning retrenchment. (7)
In his January 1938 budget message the president announced with relief that the increase in government income meant that New Deal deficits -meaning New Deal programs- must be reduced to 0.1 percent of GDP and taxes would be increased to fund the Social Security program. So eager was the president to bring the budget closer to balance that he could overlook the sharp declines in employment that had begun in September 1937. The president had felt forced by circumstance to accept policy to which he was otherwise opposed, direct federal employment. The improved fiscal picture provided the fiscally conservative Roosevelt with the opportunity to cut WPA jobs and other income-generating programs.
Keynes promptly wrote, less than one month after the budget message, in a private letter to Roosevelt that it was an “error of optimism” to act as if recovery were assured when it had only just begun. (Read the entire letter here: https://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/aboutfdr/pdfs/smFDR-Keynes_1938.pdf)
The president should invest, Keynes urged, more heavily in public works lest another disaster ensue.
Roosevelt paid no heed. New Deal spending fell and unemployment rose. The economy plunged into another, somewhat shorter and shallower, depression. The new contraction was doubly discouraging, causing public confidence in the New Deal to diminish and business to feel threatened by the radical claim that it had been shown to be unable to deliver on its promise to bring about economic renewal once government had withdrawn.
Fed chairman Marinner Eccles urged renewed government spending and Roosevelt responded by increasing WPA and AAA spending, but not by very much. His eggs were in another basket, new military expenditures. Roosevelt’s choice was not merely cynical. He saw the growing aggression of Italy, Germany and Japan in Africa, Europe and East Asia as calling for a re-evaluation of American neutrality.
Public opinion polls in 1938 and 1939 found the public disapproving of the military spending as excessive in the light of intensified economic hardship at home. The 1937 cyclical peak did not after all end the Depression. In that year workers were still pressing for what they deserved but had not yet gained. 1937 saw a massive sit-down strike at the General Motors Flint, Michigan plant. It is a measure of the public’s awareness that the recovery did not mean that the Depression was over that the strike enjoyed broad support. The Governer even called out the National Guard to protect the strikers from possible violent resistance by General Motors.
In his 1938 letter to Roosevelt Keynesurged the presidentto redouble the efforts that had produced the 1937-1938 upswing:
‘…the present recession is partly due to an “error of optimism” which led to an over-estimation of future demand… But I am quite sure that this is not all. There is a much more troublesome underlying influence. The recovery was mainly due to the following factors: –
(i) the solution of the credit and insolvency problems, and the establishment of easy short-term money;
(ii) the creation of an adequate system of relief for the unemployed;
(iii) public works and other investments aided by Government funds or guarantees;
(iv) investment in the instrumental goods required to supply the increased demand for consumption goods;
(v) the momentum of the recovery [was] thus initiated.’
Keynes intends here to rule out the position common among the administration’s apologists, that current policy is unobjectionable and not at the root of the renewed contraction. The problem, it was argued, was that the president had made an overoptimistic projection of future buying power. The remedy was to resume government spending as before. Keynes objected that the problem rested with current policy, which not only must not be retrenched, as Roosevelt had done, but should be expanded. More of the same was not enough. The key movers of the expansion had been (iii) and (iv), but they were not large enough:
“Now of these (i) was a prior condition of recovery, since it is no use creating a demand for credit, if there is no supply. But an increased supply will not by itself generate an adequate demand. The influence of (ii) evaporates as employment improves, so that there is a dead point beyond which this factor cannot carry the economic system. Recourse to (iii) has been greatly curtailed in the past year. (iv) and (v) are functions of the forward movement and cease – indeed (v) is reversed – as soon as the position fails to improve further. The benefit from the momentum of the recovery as such is at the same time the most important and the most dangerous factor in the upward movement. It requires for its continuance, not merely the maintenance of recovery, but always further recovery. Thus it always flatters the early stages and steps from under just when support is most needed. It was largely, I think, a failure to allow for this which caused the “error of optimism” last year.” (Emphasis Keynes’s)
Keynes makes it clear that increased spending on public works is the linchpin of sustained recovery. If spending is not increased, much less actually decreased, as Roosevelt had done, the economy’s “forward movement” will reverse itself. Thus, forward movement must also be “upward movement,” creating a higher level of demand, not merely restoring the pre-downturn 1937 level. Output and income must increase over time. This means that public investment too must increase.
Failure to grasp that consumption demand and investment demand must perpetually increase in tandem will lead one erroneously to “over-optimism,” to infer from the achievement of a higher level of demand that one need only do more of the same, with respect to government investment, in order to maintain demand. But the nature of capitalism is that demand requires not merely to be maintained, but to be increased, and that requires increased investment. The upshot is that government must be permanently involved in support of effective demand, and since the precondition of demand is the availability of jobs, the government must become a permanent provider of employment.
In the letter Keynes recommends “increased investment in durable goods such as housing, public utilities and transport… in the United States at the present time the opportunities, indeed the necessity, for such developments were unexampled.” Keynes had understood from earlier discussions with Roosevelt and his advisors that the administration was commited to the need for hitherto untried alternatives, and that housing was an obvious priority.
But in this case it was Keynes who had been over-optimistic. “Take housing. When I was with you three and a half years ago the necessity for effective new measures was evident. I remember vividly my conversations with Riefler at that time. But what happened? Next to nothing.”
Keynes went on to make the case for investment in public housing as an ideal for a more buoyant and sustained recovery:
“Housing is by far the best aid to recovery because of the large and continuing scale of potential demand; because of the wide geographical distribution of this demand; and because the sources of its finance are largely independent of the Stock Exchanges. I should advise putting most of your eggs in this basket, caring about this more than about anything, and making absolutely sure that they are being hatched without delay.” (Emphasis Keynes’s)
Roosevelt apparently did not “care” enough to launch such a program. To this day the U.S. has one of the poorest records on public housing of all the developed capitalist countries.
Keynes was familiar with the American bias toward the individual states, rather than the federal government, as providers economic aid. If the states must be intermediaries of federal funding, so be it, he concedes – but get the job done! “In this country we partly depended for many years on direct subsidies. There are few more proper objects for such than working class houses. If a direct subsidy is required to get a move on (we gave our subsidies through the local authorities), it should be given without delay or hesitation.” (Emphasis Keynes’s)
Keynes implored Roosevelt to nationalize the utilities. “Personally I think there is a great deal to be said for the ownership of all the utilities by publicly owned boards… If I was in your place, I should buy out the utilities at fair prices in every district where the situation was ripe for doing so, and announce that the ultimate ideal was to make this policy nation-wide… a policy of competing plants with losses all round is a ramshackle notion.” As for the railroads, “Nationalize them if the time is ripe.” And the imperative to socialize was not limited to railroads and utilities. “I accept the view that durable investment must come increasingly under state direction… I regard the growth of collective bargaining as essential. I approve minimum wage and hours regulation.”
Note Keynes’s institutional socialism: “durable investment must come increasingly under state direction.” The socialization of investment was no mere “emergency” measure.
Summing up his policy recommendations, Keynes declares that “A convincing policy, whatever its details may be, for promoting large-scale [government] investment under the above heads is an urgent necessity… Far too much precious time has passed.” There will be resistance, Keynes acknowledges, to these measures. Capital will greet all these recommendations with great alarm. Keynes’s instructions to Roosevelt on the proper handling of businessmen is wonderfully clever, close to Oscar Wilde at his best:
“Business men have a different set of delusions from politicians; and need, therefore, different handling… You could do anything you liked with them, if you would treat them (even the big ones), not as wolves and tigers, but as domestic animals by nature, even though they have been badly brought up and not trained as you would wish. It is a mistake to think that they are more immoral than politicians. If you work them into the surly, obstinate, terrified mood, of which domestic animals, wrongly handled, are so capable, the nation’s burdens will not get carried to market…”
This was the way to break down resistance and enlist capital into the recovery effort.
The notion that capital can be cajoled to acquiesce in the socialization of some of the nation’s biggest private investments strikes us as naïve. In Keynes’s day capital had nothing resembling the virtually complete hegemony over public policy that finance capital enjoys today. But about this Keynes was right: capitalists are not more immoral than politicians. The need to enlarge profits under conditions of international competition does not permit moral restraint, any more than those sitting around a Monopoly board are morally bound to throw the game out of empathy with the losers. The rules and objects of the game are such that moral considerations have no application.
Not so with politicians, who are supposed to legislate in the interests of the democratic aspirations of the citizenry. Protecting the less advantaged from the vagaries of the market is a moral and political imperative. This is why picketing the banks, as some did after the September 2008 debacle, betrays a failure to grasp the source of economic power. In themselves, the banks are powerless. Such powers as they have are legislated, all of them. What banks do they do, Capital (sic) Hill willing and enabling. Political economy is first political; the economics is derivative.
Roosevelt could not have been expected to embrace Keynes’s counsel. The resumed spending, niggardly as it was, brought about a minor rebound, but the overall contraction was not ended until the U.S. mobilized for entry into the Second World War.
The Consequences of Rejecting Government Job Creation: Long-Term Stagnation, Chronic Joblessness, Persistent Austerity
Since last November, perhaps the most widely discussed item of economic news has been Larry Summers’s Nov. 8 speech at the IMF’s Annual Research Conference. Summers argued that it is likely that the US faces a future of chronic “secular stagnation,” with slow growth, high un- and underemployment and low wages. The force of ‘secular’ is that this is not a temporary state; stagnation looks to be the “new normal.”
After the postwar boom began the term ‘secular stagnation’ fell out of use as the 1920s fantasy of endless growth and prosperity once again took hold. But two post-Golden-Age factors have made it increasingly difficult for mainstream economists to sustain optimism. The slow growth rates since 1974, and especially the ineffectiveness of the Fed’s recent unparalleled monetary stimulus, defies orthodox comprehension. More importantly, we are seeing both the mass destruction of full-time jobs, many of which will never return, and record levels of long-term unemployment (unemployed for 15 weeks or longer).
Most revealing is that long-term unemployment has been rising since the late 1960s, well before the triumph of neoliberalism. The short-term unemployed have been a shrinking percentage of all unemployed throughout the entire postwar period. Looking at the business cycle over the last forty years, an ominous trend emerges: in each business-cyclical expansion, the long-term unemployment rate remains either at or above the level of the previous expansion. In a word, for the last forty years the short-term unemployed have been a declining, and the long-term unemployed an increasing, percentage of all unemployed. By Keynes’s own standards, pretend-Keynesian fiscal policy has been a seventy-year bust. Summers’s forecast shows that this has not been entirely lost on the economics establishment.
Summers’s invocation of secular stagnation takes off from the fact that while the dot.com bubble of the late 1990s did (for three years only) raise employment and wages, the much larger housing bubble of the 2000s had no such effect. It neither produced high employment nor drove up wages nor spurred the economy to full capacity. He adds the equally important observation that neither of these bubbles, representing a huge boost to demand, brought about real-economy inflation, a typical concomitant of robust, employment-creating growth. Krugman adds (New York Times, blog, November 16, 2012) that even earlier expansions, such as characterized the later Reagan years, were driven not by economic “fundamentals” like rising employment and wages, but by “runaway thrift institutions and a large bubble in commercial real estate.” As Summers put it, “Even a great bubble wasn’t enough to produce any excess of aggregate demand… Even with artificial stimulus to demand, coming from all this financial imprudence, you [didn’t] see any excess… I wonder if a set of older ideas, that went under the phrase ‘secular stagnation’… may not be without relevance to America’s experience.”
The conclusion drawn by both Summers and Krugman is that bubbles appear to be required to sustain not merely the listless growth of the post-Golden-Age era, but even the exceptionally sluggish growth rates of the new millenium. So powerful is the tendency to stagnation that even zero interest rates are insufficient to create jobs -much less full employment- or to get the economy running at full capacity. In sum, full-throttle monetary stimulus functioning to sustain bubbles is necessary to keep the economy from falling below stagnation levels of output and rates on unemployment. Bluntly put, if you don’t want a full-fledged Depression, you’ve got to keep the bubble going. Slow growth, high un- and underemployment and low wages are the best we can do.
Expect no relief, says Summers: “The underlying problem may be there forever.” Krugman puts it in the form of a rhetorical question: “[W]hat if the world we’ve been living in for the past five years is the new normal? What if depression-like conditions are on track to persist, not for another year or two, but for decades?” (“A Permanent Slump?”, New York Times, November 17, 2013) To his credit, Krugman saw the handwriting on the wall well before the Summers speech. In his June 27, 2010 column, he wrote: “We are now, I fear, in the early stages of a third depression…[T]he cost – to the world economy and, above all, to the milliions of lives blighted by the absence of jobs – will… be immense.”
In none of this discussion is there mention of the Keynesian solution, government as a permanent and increasingly essential provider of productive employment. Ironically, Summers and Krugman have unwittingly made the case that orthodox, acceptable demand boosters are inadequate to the task of providing working people with material security. Large-scale public employment is, as Keynes argued, the only alternative to mass immiseration.
The Summers-Krugman point confirms Keynes’s central claim that, contrary to the neoclassical theory that the free economy naturally tends toward full-employment equilibrium, the economy can reach equilibrium (the quantity of goods supplied is equal to the quantity of goods demanded) at any level of employment. Let there be 30 percent unemployment. Firms will then produce no more and no less than the lucky 70 percent are willing to pay for. Excess capacity will be wrung out of the system by the liquidation or destruction of redundant plant and equipment. But what about excess labor capacity?
Secular stagnation leaves the nation with a large number of permanently un- and unemployed persons devoid of hope for themselves or their children. But it is just this hope that constitutes the “American dream.” With the dream become a nightmare, we are on the path to social dislocation on a potentially terrifying scale: higher rates of crime, suicide, domestic violence, psychological depression and other forms of social disorder characteristic of periods of intense material insecurity. These are forms of unorganized resistance, and cannot be “wrung out” of the system like idle plants. They will be repressed. The powers that be have been putting in place for some years now, surely in anticipation of widespread social turbulence, the infrastructure of a police state. This comes as no surprise. Historically, capitalism in deep and protracted crisis and without an organized and active Left generates the makings of fascism. If the Left remains dormant, we are in for big trouble.
Alan Nasseris professor emeritus of Political Economy and Philosophy at The Evergreen State College. His website is:
. His book, The New Normal: Persistent Austerity, Declining Democracy and the Privatization of the State will be published by Pluto Press later this year. If you would like to be notified when the book is released, please send a request to nassera@evergreen.edu
During the intervening 12 years, the pair stood at the center of cataclysmic events, with the very outcome of Western civilization at stake. No two men could have been more diametrically opposite in their personal, political, moral, or ethical dimensions, and in no sphere were these traits more striking than in their worldview and their treatment of the Jews.
While Hitler’s unspeakable record in this regard has been amply documented and denounced, Roosevelt’s is still being tallied, a subject of fitting and extended debate among scholars, ideologues, and the extended Jewish community. Middle ground is a rare commodity here, but American University professors Richard Breitman and Allan J. Lichtman attempt to stake out just such territory in “FDR and the Jews,” published last year by Belknap/Harvard University Press.
The two historians meticulously analyze and explicate FDR’s personal feelings and appraisal of the Jews as a people; his political calculus and penchant for secrecy in the way he dealt with them as he did with all of his constituencies; and the persistent allegations about what he knew of the Final Solution, when he knew it, and whether he did enough to combat it.
Dr. Breitman and Dr. Lichtman also dissect two of the most contentious accusations against Roosevelt: that he callously prevented the docking in the United States of the SS St. Louis after the German vessel transporting more than 900 Jewish refugees was turned away by Cuba in 1939, and that he failed to order the bombing of gas chambers or the railroads leading to them in 1944, when it seemed feasible to do so.
Their profile of the enigmatic Hudson Valley patrician and master of the Machiavellian arts who forever refashioned the presidency is thoughtful, crisp, and unapologetic. If there are any judgments to render on arguably one of the top three chief executives in U.S. history (Lincoln and Washington are the others; readers are free to rank them), Dr. Breitman and Dr. Lichtman do so with balance and dispassion, showing a sure feel for the fraught, unprecedented situations of the 1930s and ’40s.
FDR clearly exceeded all of his predecessors in support from Jews. He reciprocated by appointing them to key positions during his governorship of New York and the presidency. Fully 15 percent of his choices were Jewish, an astounding number for the time. He also nominated a second Jewish justice to the Supreme Court (Felix Frankfurter joined Louis Brandeis after Benjamin Cardozo’s death) and was so openly groundbreaking that his programs were derisively dubbed the “Jew Deal.”
Perhaps this was due to Roosevelt being shielded to some extent from the anti-Semitism of his privileged class by parents who instilled tolerant attitudes for the times in their doted-upon only child. Roosevelt’s formidable mother, Sarah Delano, even addressed a Hadassah group just before her death.
Despite this, FDR most assuredly indulged in stereotyped banter about Jews as an undergrad at Harvard (where he later voted as an overseer against raising their admissions quota above 6 percent), with his cronies in Albany and Washington, and with Stalin at Yalta. Yet these utterances seem more generic than genuine, flippant reminders of a politically incorrect age and country-club condescension.
By contrast, Eleanor Roosevelt clung to crude anti-Semitic attitudes through her early years, especially during FDR’s Washington service as assistant secretary of the Navy during World War I. She is quoted by Professors Breitman and Lichtman in one particularly vicious reference: “The Jew party [for Bernard Baruch] was appalling. I never wish to hear money, jewels, or sables mentioned again,” and in another, characterizing Felix Frankfurter as “an interesting little man but very Jew.”
However, as her marriage to Roosevelt faltered, her larger world blossomed, and her metamorphosis into a human rights icon gained traction over the decades. She ultimately would surpass her husband in both the depth and understanding of oppressed people everywhere and in her support for Israel. (See the excellent analysis by Warren Boroson in the July 26, 2013 issue of the Jewish Standard.)
Fucking Nazis.
Oh, that superior race has got the fucking Africans snookered.
In a blatant manifestation of neo-colonial ambition, the Zionist entity is aggressively expanding its footprint across the African continent. Far from mere diplomatic outreach, this systematic infiltration aims to construct a contiguous “Israeli Belt”—a geographic and military continuum stretching from the Horn of Africa to the Gulf of Guinea. Backed by the United States and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), this imperialist project is designed to encircle the Arab and Islamic worlds, secure regional puppet regimes, and further the Zionist agenda against the Axis of Resistance.
Mercenaries for Gaza: Uganda and Burundi’s Treacherous Complicity
The moral bankruptcy of several African regimes has been laid bare by their willingness to act as subcontractors for Zionist atrocities. Recent intelligence indicates that Uganda and Burundi are actively preparing to deploy troops to the Gaza Strip as part of a so-called “International Stabilisation Force.” This move, operating under the auspices of a US-Zionist “Peace Council,” represents a grave betrayal of the Palestinian cause and the broader Global South.
Ugandan dictator Yoweri Museveni has committed 1,200 soldiers to this force, while Burundi is expected to send up to 2,000 troops. For these regimes, participating in the subjugation of Gaza is a transactional bid to secure military and financial concessions from Tel Aviv. Museveni, in particular, views his subservience to the Zionist entity as a lifeline for his dynastic succession. This complicity was grotesquely underscored when his son and heir-apparent, General Muhoozi Kainerugaba, attended the unveiling of a statue honouring Yonatan Netanyahu—the notorious Zionist commander killed during the 1976 Entebbe raid.
According to reporting compiled by More Perfect Union, in 2022 big investors bought more than one in every four single-family homes sold nationwide. Read that again slowly, because the number is doing more work than a single clause can hold. One in four. Not one in four in some overheated Sun Belt boomtown, though those markets got hit hardest, but as a national figure, a blended average across a country that still, officially, tells its children that buying a house is the reward for working hard and saving money. It turns out there was a fourth bidder at the table the whole time, and it was never planning to live there.
Crime scene after Jewish Crime Scene — Chain of Custody of the Evidence: 9/11 + 25 = New World Next Week
This week on New World Next Week: the KSM trial date is set; Trump lifts sanctions on Al Qaeda; and the generated outrage occurs just in time for the 911 anniversary.
1)Lazar Kaganovich: Stalin’s political figurehead of the Central Committee. In 1928, Kaganovich led the implementation in the Ukraine of Stalin’s first Five-Year Plan.
~ The aim of Stalin’s first Five-Year Plan in Ukraine was to destroy family farms through starvation, making the peasants “landless” and thereby introducing “collectivization,” by which the Ukrainian peasants were forced to become employees of the state. This forced famine reached its crisis point in 1932.
2)Genrikh Yagoda: Founder of the NKVD (Soviet Secret Police). Assisted in the first Five-Year Plan of starving Ukrainian peasants.
3)Nikolai Yezhov: Appointed by Yagoda as Head of the NKVD. Assisted in the first Five-Year Plan of starving Ukrainian peasants. Yezhov took on a “Russian” name like most Judeo-Bolsheviks. His wife was an active Jew.
These Judeo-Bolsheviks seized livestock, crops, grain, and farm instruments from the Ukrainian peasants. Any Ukrainian citizen who resisted them was shot. Desperate Ukrainian clergy and peasants ate anything to survive: bugs, grass, and leather shoes.
Thousands of prisoners were slaughtered by the NKVD, headed by Genrikh Yagoda and Nikolai Yezhov. The NKVD was thesecret police who carried out mass torture, starvation, and executions.
Judeo-Bolsheviks were the chief architects of the Ukrainian forced famine, which eliminated Ukrainian clergy and 6 million Ukrainian Orthodox Christians.
Anybody who claims the Holodomor was not perpetrated by Jews is ~15% correct and about ~85% wrong.
The Butterfly Effect? A Cornell University study showed that monarch larvae fed milkweed leaves heavily dusted with pollen from Bt corn suffered higher mortality, ate less, and grew slower.
Bt-modified corn produces pollen containing crystalline endotoxin from the bacterium genes. When this corn pollen is dispersed by the wind, it lands on other plants, including milkweed, the exclusive food of monarch caterpillars and commonly found around cornfields.
Says John E. Losey, Cornell assistant professor of entomology and the primary investigator on the study: “We need to look at the big picture here. Pollen from Bt-corn could represent a serious risk to populations of monarchs and other butterflies, but we can’t predict how serious the risk is until we have a lot more data. And we can’t forget that Bt-corn and other transgenic crops have a huge potential for reducing pesticide use and increasing yields. This study is just the first step, we need to do more research and then objectively weigh the risks versus the benefits of this new technology.”
Everywhere I go in America, I hear this:
“Oh, I can’t eat that; I have Crohn’s disease, or Cushing’s, or Hashimoto’s, or IBS or leaky gut syndrome or diabetes or celiac’s or allergies to soy, corn, eggs, fish, nuts, milk, melons, blueberries, vegetables of all kinds, and cold air.”
The butterflies overwinter in Mexico and by the spring begin migrating north. The first generation of the year crosses into Texas, other Gulf Coast states and Florida, seeking milkweed on which to lay their eggs and feed. By late May or early June, the second generation of adults has emerged and heads north to areas including the Midwest Corn Belt. Monarch caterpillars are feeding on milkweed during the period when corn is shedding pollen, Losey says. Thus “they may be in the right place at the right time to be exposed to Bt-corn pollen.”
Chronic disease touches nearly every American household — across every age, community, and corner of the country.
The numbers are striking:
▪️ 76% of U.S. adults have one or more chronic diseases ▪️ 51% have two or more chronic diseases ▪️ 194 million Americans are living with at least one chronic condition
Poison by any other name is still POISON.
Despite headwinds like the war in Europe, high inflation, and the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the US chemical industry made it out of 2022 in relatively good shape. That is one interpretation of the results of C&EN’s new survey of the top 50 US chemical producers, which is based on these firms’ financial results for 2022.
These 50 chemical makers posted combined sales of $376.7 billion, an 11.4% increase from a year ago and a new record for the annual survey. Only six firms posted a sales decline.
But for the 43 firms that disclose profit figures, combined chemical operating profits fell 4.8%, to $55.2 billion. Sixteen firms posted an earnings decline. One company, Trinseo, posted a loss.
Many of those that reported reduced profits—Dow, ExxonMobil, LyondellBasell Industries, and Westlake—are large petrochemical makers. The petrochemical industry built a lot of capacity in recent years, and the sector is in a cyclical downturn. In addition, energy prices rose sharply in 2022 because of the war in Ukraine. Oil prices spiked by 33% in the first half before settling down.
In contrast, fertilizer makers had a tremendous year. Sales at Mosaic, which makes phosphate fertilizers, rose 54.8%, lifting the firm to number 4 in the US top 50. Sales at the nitrogen fertilizer maker CF Industries skyrocketed 71.1%, propelling it to number 8.
But even those gains are modest compared with the jump at Albemarle, a major supplier of lithium for electric car batteries. Its sales more than doubled, launching it from 24 in last year’s ranking to 15 this year.
Spending on the future was mixed at chemical firms. The 42 companies that disclose capital spending figures reported a combined rise of 22.2%, to $20.1 billion. Some 26 firms report R&D spending. Their combined total was $3.2 billion, a 1.0% decline.
Many firms departed this year’s US top 50. Kraton was acquired in March 2022 by South Korea’s DL Chemical for $2.5 billion. The polymer and pine chemical firm was number 34 in last year’s survey. The electronic materials maker CMC Materials, number 42 last year, was acquired in July 2022 by Entegris—ranked 41 this year—for $5.7 billion.
In April 2022, the industrial conglomerate Prince International, backed by the private equity firm American Securities, bought Ferro, number 43 in last year’s ranking, for $2.1 billion. Prince and Ferro then merged with Chromaflo Technologies to form Vibrantz Technologies. As a private company, Vibrantz does not publicly report financial results.
Minerals Technologies and Goodyear Tire & Rubber, last year’s numbers 49 and 50, respectively, didn’t have enough revenues to make the cut this year.
Debuting in the ranking at a hefty number 26 is Ascend Performance Materials. The nylon 6,6 business, once part of Solutia, is owned by the private equity firm SK Capital and is now disclosing its annual sales.
Other newcomers are firms riding a wave of high commodity prices. LSB Industries and CVR Partners, numbers 45 and 46, respectively, are both nitrogen fertilizer producers. Livent, the lithium business that spun out of FMC in 2019, nearly doubled sales in a single year and comes in at number 48. Sisecam Resources, wrapping up the list at number 50, makes soda ash.
The C&EN ranking includes only companies that publicly report sales from chemicals. Some large companies would likely make the list if they disclosed these figures. For example, Invista, a polymer and fiber business owned by the privately held Koch Industries, would easily be on the list, possibly near the top. SI Group and TPC Group, two other private firms, would also probably make the survey. In addition, some diversified public firms don’t break out chemical sales—for example, Procter & Gamble with its oleochemical business.
By highlighting some of the worst offenders on the market, EWG’s Dirty Dozen Guide to Food Chemicals shows you which chemicals in food to avoid:
Potassium bromate
Potassium bromate is a possible human carcinogen added to flour used in packaged baked goods.
Propylparaben
Propylparaben is a preservative used in pastries and some tortillas. It causes developmental and reproductive harm.
BHA
Butylated hydroxyanisole, better known as BHA, is a preservative used in cured meats and other foods. Multiple sources have identified it as a possible human carcinogen.
BHT
Butylated hydroxytoluene, also called BHT, is a preservative found in cereals and other foods. It’s a chemical cousin of BHA and is a possible human carcinogen.
Titanium dioxide
Titanium dioxide is a color additive used mostly in candy. It may damage DNA.
Seven artificial dyes
Synthetic food dye can be found in many types of food and beverages. It can affect development and cause behavioral difficulties in children. There are seven dyes that are especially concerning: Red 3, Red 40, Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1, Blue 2 and Green 3.
Aspartame
Aspartame is an artificial sweetener that can affect the hormones that regulate metabolism and have a negative effect on weight control. It has also been linked to heart disease and increased risk of cancer.
ADA
Azodicarbonamide, or ADA, is used as a dough conditioner and strengthener, as well as a bleaching agent in breads and pastries. ADA has been linked to an increased risk of cancer. It may also cause liver and kidney injury and affect the blood and the nervous and respiratory systems.
Propyl gallate
Propyl gallate is a preservative used in vegetable oil, meat products and chewing gum, among other products. It may cause hormone disruption and has been linked to an increased risk of asthma, hyperactivity and even cancer.
Sodium benzoate
Sodium benzoate is a preservative used mostly in carbonated drinks, fruit juice, salad dressing and fermented foods. When combined with ascorbic acid, citric acid and vitamin C, it has been linked to an increased risk of cancer. The reaction between sodium benzoate and any of these three compounds forms benzene, a chemical associated with blood cancer.
Methylene chloride, trichloroethylene and ethylene dichloride
Methylene chloride, trichloroethylene and ethylene dichloride are solvents used in the production of decaffeinated coffee and tea and certain spices. These three chemicals are linked with an increased risk of cancer.
Sodium nitrite
Sodium nitrite is an additive used to preserve meat. When added to processed foods, nitrites are associated with an increased risk of cancer.
Tip of the fucking iceberg, but this Jew, man, Satan on Crack:
Yeah, butterflies:
Nine-year-old Wafaa Akila was killed with her father in Gaza City after leaving school to buy supplies for the new year.
Key Developments
Wafaa Yousef Akila, nine, had just begun the new school year in Gaza after prolonged disruption caused by Israel’s genocidal war.
After classes, she went with her father, Yousef, to buy notebooks, pens and other school supplies when an Israeli strike hit their car.
Wafaa and her father were killed in the Al-Nasr neighborhood of Gaza City, while others were wounded in the attack.
A First Day of School
Wafaa Yousef Akila was nine years old when she began what should have been a new chapter in her childhood.
Like thousands of children across Gaza, she was returning to school after a prolonged interruption caused by Israel’s genocidal war on the Strip.
Her expectations were those of any child beginning a new academic year: notebooks, pens, a school bag and the chance to see classmates again.
On Sunday, Wafaa attended her first day of school. After classes, she left with her father, Yousef, to buy the school supplies she still needed for the days ahead. It was supposed to be an ordinary family errand marking the beginning of a school year.
Instead, it became their last journey together.
This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Killed While Buying School Supplies
According to Palestinian sources cited by Al-Jazeera, an Israeli missile struck the car carrying Wafaa and her father in the Al-Nasr neighborhood of Gaza City.
Both were killed in the attack, while others were wounded. The strike turned the objects associated with Wafaa’s return to school, notebooks, pens and supplies, into part of the scene of destruction.
Gaza Health Ministry Director General Munir al-Barsh drew attention to the circumstances of her killing, asking what threat a school bag, notebook or pen could represent.
Wafaa never returned for her second day of school.
A Story beyond One Child
Wafaa’s killing resonated widely because it reflected a much larger reality confronting Gaza’s children.
The new school year has begun amid widespread destruction, displacement and the deaths of thousands of children and family members throughout the Israeli war.
For many students, returning to classrooms has meant returning without parents, siblings or classmates who were killed during the genocide.
Since October 7, 2023, Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza has killed more than 73,000 Palestinians and wounded over 174,000.
Thousands of children are among those killed, while much of Gaza’s educational infrastructure has been destroyed or damaged, leaving an entire generation of Palestinian children to pursue their education amid death, displacement and destruction.
(PC, AJA, Palestinian media)
Two Jews in a pod:
The Rape of the Mind is a 1956 book by Dutch-American psychoanalyst Joost Meerloo that examines how totalitarian regimes use brainwashing, coercion, and psychological torture to control human thought. Edward Bernays was an American pioneer in public relations and mass propaganda who applied psychology to shape public opinion and consumer behavior.
While Meerloo focused on the defensive analysis of authoritarian “menticide” (the killing of the spirit), both figures explored how mass psychology can be deployed to manipulate the human mind.
Shared Territory: Both Meerloo and Bernays recognized that the conscious mind is vulnerable to hidden psychological triggers and mass suggestion.
Opposing Lenses:
Bernays treated psychological manipulation as a practical craft to be utilized for commerce and political steering.
Meerloo viewed those very same techniques as a dangerous pathology—a form of spiritual violation that strips away human dignity and democratic freedom.
He has trouble completing a thought’: bizarre public appearances again cast doubt on Trump’s mental acuity
Viewers who elect to watch certain innocuous classic films on Disney’s streaming service, Disney Plus, will find themselves confronted by the following statement:
This program includes negative depictions and/or mistreatment of people or cultures. These stereotypes were wrong then and are wrong now. Rather than remove this content, we want to acknowledge its harmful impact, learn from it and spark conversation to create a more inclusive future together.
It’s a relief to know that the Disney corporation has such a powerful sense of moral responsibility. Absent this forewarning, defenseless children might find themselves exposed to subtle messages of oppression and hatred in films like Dumbo or Aladdin or Peter Pan. Or, at least, they might if Disney had not taken the additional precaution of removing these titles from children’s accounts altogether. Apparently, it is fine for minors to be exposed to quite frightening recent films like Raya the Last Dragon (2021), but a film like the original Aladdin (1992) is an altogether riskier proposition.
What makes these classic films so dangerous is sometimes difficult for even the alert and socially conscious adult to discern. Aladdin, online commentators have explained, features a villain whose nose is larger than that of the protagonist. In The Jungle Book (1967), the orangutan King Louie sings jazz and risks being perceived as a racist caricature (even though he was voiced by the Italian American musician, Louis Prima). Other films do include more obvious transgressions: the Native Americans in Peter Pan (1953) are a stock collection of prominent stereotypes, and the friendly crows in Dumbo (1941), one of whom is called Jim Crow, feature in scenes reminiscent of minstrel shows.
FAQ
Why do narcissists infantilize others?
Narcissists infantilize others to assert their dominance and maintain a sense of control, even if this control is imagined. Because narcissists are motivated to make themselves feel a sense of importance over others, infantilizing someone is an easy way to accomplish this.
Are Millennials infantilized?
Yes, any adult can be infantilized. Millennials represent roughly people born between 1981-1996, so they are old enough to be infantilized. Infantilizing young people often functions to devalue or undermine their knowledge and experience based on presumptions relating to age.
What does infantilization mean in sociology?
In sociology, infantilization refers to the practice of treating an adult like a child as it relates to the social structures between the actors. In other words, the sociological understanding of infantilization examines the existing power structures, sociocultural categories (e.g. race, age, status, etc.), and social norms of the system in which the infantilizing occurs.
It seems that throughout the stages of our lives, our perceived maturity level is a parabola.
At birth and infancy, we are at our lowest level of perceived maturity, slowly rising as we grow into adolescence and adulthood, and peaking when we reach what is deemed “middle-aged.” However, the curious part is where the dip occurs. Despite the steady rise seen for the first part of our lives, the fall seems to be abrupt and unexpected as we reach geriatric ages. As infants, we are, naturally, taken care of and spoken to in a tone and cadence that to any other age group would come across as patronizing. However, even though it seems like society would naturally view elderly people as the most mature group, it is often the opposite that happens: infantilization.
It seems that as an elderly person, you fall into one of two groups or typical tropes: infantilization or vilification. It has been repeatedly seen and reinforced in the media that almost all of these characters fall into one of the two. They are either deemed “cute” and in many ways treated similarly to how we treat babies, or they are seen as grouchy, rude, and made to be vilified by their age.
The diaperfication of the fucking Crocodile Tears All for the Red White and Blue Camo Mercenaries..
You know about the missing trillions, right? You know, the $2.3 trillion missing from the Pentagon’s coffers that was announced to the public on September 10, 2001, and then never mentioned again? …Of course, if that IS your understanding of the missing trillions story, then you don’t know the missing trillions story. Join James for today’s Corbett Report deep dive into the real story of the Pentagon’s missing trillions and how many trillions are missing today.
MAGA madness . . . Trump promised to Save Your Job. John Deere Moved It to Mexico Anyway.
More Perfect Union’s investigation, “Trump Says He Will Save American Jobs. John Deere Is Calling His Bluff,” has the full reporting: John Deere has announced more than 1500 layoffs in the last year. Deere and Case New Holland used to employ generations of union workers across the Midwest. Now they’re slashing American jobs and moving to Mexico. We investigated what’s behind it — and how to bring those jobs back.
How much information can the 3rd-grade reading level Trump take, or the 7th-grade reading level of most Americans absorb?
What does insect collapse mean?
It’s hard to grasp the extent of insects’ impact on our daily lives, but loss of these species would be catastrophic for our planet.
They’re the most diverse form of life on Earth, making up 75% of all species and outnumbering humans 200 million to one. While there are only 5,416 mammal species, there are about 1 million insect species we know exist – and experts believe there are millions more yet to be discovered by humans.
Insects not only pollinate many of the plants we eat, but they help decompose matter, control weeds, and provide food for other forms of life. Without insects, entire ecosystems would collapse. How would that affect us? Well, it would drastically alter our current food systems, for a start.
Is insect collapse really happening?
The findings of the research are shocking, and The Guardian has proclaimed that insects could “vanish within a century”.
However, others express skepticism that this simply isn’t possible because of insects’ sheer numbers and their diversity, which makes them more resilient to disasters that could wipe humans off the planet. In addition, much of the data from the study was drawn from North America and Europe, with limited data from insect populations around the rest of the world.
But experts such as Michelle Trautwein from the California Academy of Sciences say that while the data isn’t spotless, the warning is legitimate, and we should take this information as an opportunity to figure out how serious the threat of insect collapse really is.
Butterflies, like many of the insects on this list, are indicators of environmental health. If we lost them, we may lose a key marker of the state of our environment.
Urbanisation seems to be playing a big role in their decline, as scientists found that butterfly species in cities and towns were declining at a much higher rate than their countryside counterparts (at 69% to 45%) – air pollution, loss of green spaces, paving of gardens, neglecting of parks and loss of brownfield sites were all cited factors.
The Monarch butterfly in the US is particularly under threat – scientists believe this could be due to the herbicide Roundup, which kills Milkweed – the Monarch caterpillar’s only food source.
What can you do to help the butterflies?
Be aware that most pesticides (even organic ones like insecticidal soap or neem oil) will still kill or harm butterflies – avoid using pesticides in your garden; if you must, be sure to shield flowers from the sprays (further reading: How to Garden Organically.)
Plant a butterfly garden, using wildflowers and grasses that supply nectar from April to October, and leaving areas of tall grass in your garden; as the RSPB reminds, don’t forget about feeding caterpillars, too!
Moths are important because they provide food for other insects, spiders, frogs, toads, lizards, shrews, hedgehogs, bats and birds – especially baby birds. Britain’s Blue Tit chicks are estimated to eat 35 billion of them a year.
If we lost moths, we’d lose pollinators for important plants and, like butterflies, essential clues to the state of our own environment. Moths also seem to be in danger from urbanisation and pesticides – they’re also particularly affected by artificial lighting, which can alter their reproductive and pollinating behavior. Climate change seems to be a more cited factor for the decline of moths than of butterflies
Some numbers show that the moth population has declined by nearly 50% in Scotland. In England, two-thirds of 340 moth species declined from 1968-2003.
What can you do to help the moths?
Plant amoth garden, with plenty of wild spaces, weeds and plant debris. The RSPB recommends piling up any dead wood you have lying around to make a little moth heaven.
Reduce your carbon footprint – think minimising traveling and using less energy (that artificial lighting!) (This action can help every insect in this list).
Become a volunteer moth (or butterfly) recorder – anyone can take part, from complete beginners to veteran lepidopterists!
Of all the species on this list, you’ve probably heard most about the worrying decline of bees.
Bees pollinate an estimated one-third of the food we consume; without bees, many plants would die, triggering further extinctions of dependent organisms. For us, it wouldn’t mean all-out famine; but it would radically alter existing food systems, with many fruits and vegetables unable to be grown at large scale (for example, blueberries and cherries rely on honeybees for 90% of their pollination).
Bees are disappearing as a result of colony collapse disorder – in which the majority of worker bees spontaneously abandon a hive, leaving behind their queen. Its cause is mysterious, but is suspected to be due to pesticide poisoning and habitat change.
One-third of the United Kingdom’s bee population has disappeared just in the last 10 years, and 24% of Europe’s bumblebees are under threat of extinction.
What can you do to help the bees?
Plant bee-friendly flowers and herbs – just a few pots on the windowsill will do. And on hot days you can even leave out a little bit of water in a saucer for them!
Sign petitions to stop bee-killing pesticides from being used on our food: one started by Avaaz was signed by 5 million people, and pushed Europe to vote for a ban on the pesticides. Petitions can really work!
According to the research, 15% of all dragonfly species may be threatened. Dragonflies eat mosquitoes, and can be top predators in fishless wetlands. In turn, they provide food for fish and other amphibians, birds, bats, and spiders.
How can you help the dragonflies?
Drive at the speed limit! Dragonflies are often killed by cars, but conservational biologists from South Dakota found that dragonflies survived colliding with cars at speeds below 35mph!
You can also make a dragonfly garden, by introducing any kind of water source to your garden, and ensuring there’s a diverse selection of native plants.
Leafhoppers are part of a larger class of insects called Cicadellidae, and look amazingly similar to leaves. Leafhoppers feed on a wide variety of plants; because they’re one of the most common and abundant herbivorous insects, they’re an important food source for birds and lizards.
One study shows that the number of leafhoppers in Germany plunged by 66% in the 50 years up to 2010. Social acidification due to heavy fertiliser use is suspected to be the main factor in their declining numbers.
I don’t like beetles for a bunch of reasons (for starters, they’re just too freaking fast. Some can run 9 km/hour, making them one of the fastest land animals on earth in relation to their size). But ground beetles are far more important than my dislike for them!
They eat other bugs, including maggots, and will also eat the seeds of weeds, which helps to regulate weed population. Without ground beetles, we’d have more pests and weeds (which some people would then, in turn, attempt to kill with even more harmful chemicals). But in the UK alone, huge declines in ground beetles have been seen in three quarters of the 68 carabid species studied from 1994-2008.
How can you help the ground beetles?
First, recognise them as a helpful aide and not a pest, and encourage others to do the same. They’re not harmful to people (despite their alarming speed…).
Next, you can make safe places for beetles in your yard or garden by placing rocks; you can even create, “beetle banks”: raised beds of perennial grasses and flowers complete with rocks and plenty of places to hide.
Caddisflies resemble moths, and live near freshwater like lakes and rivers. They play an important role in aquatic ecosystems – fish and birds eat them, and their larvae even help control algae populations.
Caddisflies are very sensitive to water pollution, especially from human origin, according to the research. The removal of trees also threatens this species. 68% of caddisfly species are now considered to be threatened.
What can you do to help the caddisflies?
Plant trees (caddisflies enjoy cool shade); if you don’t have space in your own garden, you can use a proxy like search engine Ecosia, which uses your searches to plant trees!
To prevent freshwater pollution, recycle appropriately, and encourage your local authorities to properly manage storm runoffin your city.
Mayflies are one of the oldest-known winged insects in existence. They hatch in fresh water and only live for about 24 hours.
Mayflies are active in the warmer months and are found in almost all types of water. What’s the point of saving them if they only live for a day, you ask? Well, during their brief time on earth, they provide food for dragonflies and other insects and mammals, including flying squirrels and fish.
Acidification of water, through industrial chemicals for example, is killing mayflies. 37% of mayfly species are considered to be under threat.
What can you do to help the mayflies? See the above section on caddisflies.
Another tip: mayflies are known to swarm, but don’t be alarmed by them – they’re completely harmless!