piracy and outright dirty dealing and death — the way of the Torah, Mayers, Lazards, Sterns, Speyers, and Seligmans—adopted the Rothschild plan of establishing local branches of usury in Europe

Paulo Kirk

Jun 15, 2026

Why wouldn’t you want to go on a rampage after the Jews have raped your mother, father, dog, cousin, sister, brother, uncle, aunt?

The Rothschilds were not, however, without competitors in the issue of public loans. Other Jewish families—the Lazards, Sterns, Speyers, and Seligmans—adopted the Rothschild plan of establishing local branches in European capitals, each headed by a brother, and after 1848 the governments of Europe adopted the plan of throwing loans open to the public instead of resorting to one or two banking firms like the Rothschilds. In this way the Sterns secured the chief Portuguese loans, while a number of smaller Jewish firms began to combine their resources and form limited liability companies like the Crédit Mobilier, the Dresdener Bank, and the Deutsche Reichsbank of Berlin.

The European invaders had their own traditions of torture, and the Huron and other North American Indians often found them shocking. Europeans ignored the conventions of Indian diplomacy. They dispensed unprovoked cruelty while waging what to Indians seemed indiscriminate war.

Torture is enmeshed in European history, in its statecraft, warfare and culture. The Ancient Greeks tortured, the Ancient Romans codified it in law, and the Catholic Church advocated it during the Middle Ages. Lawbreakers were publicly flogged, chained in iron collars, and tormented in stocks; they suffered having their hands and ears cut off, and their bodies racked, burned, flayed, and pulled apart. Churches featured representations of saints enduring horrific torments by knife, spears, arrows and fire. They displayed the nails, spears, thorns, whips and, especially, the Saviour’s blood, as reminders of the torture Jesus had endured. Manuals catalogued, in meticulous detail, accumulated wisdom about effective torture techniques.

European rulers used torture to demonstrate state power, especially against those accused of treason. Since the Roman era, treason had been considered an especially vile crime against the majesty and authority of one’s ruler. Torture occupied an equally prominent role in the Roman Church’s evolving campaign against heresy. Officially, the Church forbade inquisitors from permanently harming suspects or drawing blood. So they devised other effective methods of torture, including the rack, the strappado and simulated drowning to determine the guilt of heretics.

They faced a quandary when confronted with cases in which they lacked either witnesses or confessions. In such instances, communities before the 12th century relied on judicial ordeals during which they determined guilt or innocence by bodily torment (such as fire or water). By observing how the accused endured the ordeal or the extent of their injuries, courts claimed to be able to discern God’s judgment as to their guilt. After the Latin Church in 1215 withdrew its sanction for trials by ordeal, jurists experimented with new procedures to determine truth. They gradually settled on an elaborate method, including torture, to secure proof through confessions.

European torture was the prerogative of trained authorities who professed to act in the interest of society

Mohammed Al-Ali never got to celebrate the fall of Bashar al-Assad on December 8, 2024. It was the night his home was stolen by Israeli soldiers. As liberated civilians flooded the streets of Syria’s cities in euphoria, the Israeli military burst into his home in the village of Al-Hamidiya and ordered Al-Ali and his family to leave.

“They barely gave us ten minutes to get out,” Al-Ali, 50, told Drop Site News, teary-eyed as he recalled the night, clutching a cushion in his lap. “We weren’t able to bring anything with us, we left our whole lives behind.”

Al-Ali would never see his house again. Six months after his forced eviction, Israel demolished his home, alongside 15 others in Al-Hamidiya located in the Quneitra countryside of southwest Syria. According to a Syrian official, residents’ reported that Israeli soldiers told them that the homes “blocked sight lines” from a newly constructed military base at the edge of the village. The official dismissed this pretext, saying “Israel uses the same justifications in Gaza and Lebanon.”

[A damaged mosque in Jubat Al-Khashab, with the Golan Heights in the background, crowned by several Israeli military posts and communication towers on June 9, 2026.]

However, following the ouster of Assad in 2024, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu unilaterally claimed this agreement had “collapsed” and ordered the Israeli military into Quneitra province from the Golan Heights, which were seized from Syria in 1967, and unilaterally annexed in 1981, a move unrecognised by the international community. Since then, Israel has deepened its occupation of Syria, establishing new positions in Quneitra, and occupying Jabal Al-Sheikh. Israel also launched a massive wave of airstrikes on Syria’s military infrastructure in the days after Assad’s fall, destroying its conventional military capability.

Israeli officials claim without evidence that its raids target individuals linked to Hezbollah and other Iranian-linked groups. In April, Syria’s Ministry of Interior arrested an alleged Hezbollah cell in Quneitra, and seized a mobile rocket launcher—the only notable instance of its kind.

Nevertheless, Syrian officials reject Israel’s justification for occupation. “If Hezbollah cells do enter the province, our position is unambiguous,” said a local official, speaking on the condition of anonymity. “It is the Syrian government’s responsibility to arrest them and hold them to account, not Israel’s.”

“There is no social base for Hezbollah here, and so most of the arrests of local residents are baseless,” he continued.

“These were areas of the revolution, why would we harbor Hezbollah?” said Hail Abdullah, the Mayor of Rasm Al-Rawadi, a village on the border that has had several homes demolished by the Israeli military. For years, Syria helped fund and arm Hezbollah, which intervened in 2013 in the country’s civil war in defense of Bashar al-Assad. The group is opposed to Syria’s new government under President Ahmed al-Sharaa, who has sought to ingratiate himself with President Donald Trump.

When the Pentagon announced that the 82nd Airborne was deploying to the Middle East in March, it concealed a key detail: some of the paratroopers were headed to Israel, as revealed in an Army deployment order I obtained.

A military source involved in war planning tells me the deployment is tied to new U.S.-Israeli joint contingency plans, completed since February, for seizing Kharg Island and carving out coastal territory inside Iran.

The 82nd Airborne Division is the Army’s premier quick reaction force, trained to parachute into hostile territory.

By keeping the deployment quiet, the Pentagon headed off public debate over a joint U.S.-Israeli operation inside Iran — a prospect many considered plausible at the time, amid a fever pitch of mainstream reporting on a potential ground invasion. The secrecy also sidestepped what’s euphemistically called “host nation sensitivities.” A joint U.S.-Israeli operation raises thorny questions for America’s Gulf Arab “partners,” especially over logistical support — hence the 82nd, which could launch directly from Israel without any Gulf state’s consent to use its territory.

The Army deployment order, issued April 7, 2026, directs elements of the 2nd Battalion, 501st Infantry Regiment — the storied “Geronimo” battalion — to deploy to Israel on “temporary duty.” The Israel deployment has not been previously reported.

The House Armed Services Committee buried this dangerous proposal inside the annual military spending bill, the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act, which carries a total price tag over $1 trillion. The bill now heads to the Senate Armed Services Committee.

The proposal—Section 224—would arguably be more valuable to Israel than the billions in military funding the U.S. has been providing. It would mean integrating U.S. and Israeli weapons research, production, technology, and military operations. It would make U.S. complicity permanent, while Israel quietly negotiates another 10-year military funding commitment from the U.S.

So, whatever their fucking numbers are, really, the Jews have the greater armies as Jew Tech and Jew Apps and Jew Surveillance and Jew Finance and Jew Influence eats at the souls of 8.5 billion people.

[Amy Jewish Goodman talks with Craig Jewish Aaron about Jewish Ellisons and Jewish Bari Weiss . . . what a fucked up Mad Mad Mad Mitzvah Media WORLD.

[Craig Aaron, the co-CEO and president of the media advocacy organization Free Press, is Jewish and has publicly identified with his Jewish heritage and history]

CRAIG AARON: What we saw happen on Friday was the Justice Department say they could find no reason to block this merger. And that’s because they didn’t look for one. This has been one of the most shallow and corrupt merger review processes we’ve ever seen, and it has been marked by Paramount, the leadership of Paramount, David Ellison, his father Larry Ellison, wooing and capitulating to the Trump administration at every turn, having them for fancy dinners, promising to make sweeping changes to newsrooms like CNN if they can get this deal to go through.

And the great risk here is so much media control under one umbrella, the idea that two of our major mainstream news outlets could be controlled by one company, which, as you said, has shown it is willing to warp and manipulate news coverage to please the president, the idea that HBO and major movie studios, again, falling under one corporate umbrella, raising serious questions about what projects are going to be made, what documentary films will be made, what information and news will we see if the Ellisons control this much of our news media.

AMY GOODMAN: So, talk about this in the context of all these corporate mergers, what it means when CNN, CBS, HBO are all under the same roof.

CRAIG AARON: Well, I think we’ve seen it happening at CBS. So, the Ellisons aren’t hiding the ball. They’re not really making any — the promises they’re making are to turn CNN into something like what they’ve done with CBS, where they’re getting rid of independent journalists asking hard questions. They’re spiking stories about crimes being committed by the Trump administration. And what they’re promising is more of the same. And every big media company that’s gone before this administration to get a deal done, to push through megamerger after megamerger, has promised — and because they know this is what appeals to Trump, they’ve promised them to change their coverage, get rid of activist journalism, get rid of the kind of independent accountability that we need. And they’re going for even the most mainstream types of outlets, like 60 Minutes, you know, a program that is well regarded but certainly not the source of any kind of radical coverage, but serious coverage when it comes to what’s happening in this country and around the world. And under the Ellisons, there’s no place for it. So, we’ve already seen what they’ll do. And what we don’t know what will happen is what programs no longer get made. We get fewer and fewer choices, and we get more and more of the same kind of cookie-cutter content produced.

Fucking a month ago, this ain’t going to do diddly squat, and proof is in the Jewish Pudding:

This is why the Jewish Way of Life Should be Wiped from the Face of the Earth:

Two and a Half Days with His Martyred Wife in the Refrigerator: The Story of a Father Who Could Not Bury His Wife and Children Who Kept Calling for Their Mother

In Gaza: When Grief Becomes Greater Than Words

Abood A

Jun 15, 2026

In the early days of the genocide in Gaza, as Israeli occupation forces advanced toward the outskirts of the Gaza Strip, the town of Beit Hanoun was living through some of its darkest hours. Many residents did not realize how close the occupation forces had come, so they remained inside their homes, clinging to what little hope they had left and trying to survive amid bombardment, fear, and siege.

Inside one of those homes lived a simple family: a father, a mother, and their children, struggling to endure like thousands of other families. They had managed to store some food and had a solar power system that helped them survive those dark days, believing it might give them a better chance of staying alive.

But war does not ask permission.

One day during the siege, the mother was holding her infant child in her arms. It was an ordinary moment in the life of a mother who spent her days embracing her children, protecting them, and giving them comfort. She did not know it would be the last moment of her life.

Suddenly, a bullet fired by an Israeli occupation soldier pierced her body. She collapsed to the ground in front of her husband and children, and within a single second, life inside that home turned into a tragedy beyond words.

The husband rushed toward her in disbelief. He called her name again and again. He shook her gently, trying desperately to wake her. He attempted to save her and revive her by every means he could think of. He clung to every shred of hope, refusing to accept the reality unfolding before his eyes.

But the truth was too cruel to deny.

His wife, his life partner, and the mother of his children had been killed.

The man sat beside her in shock, unable to comprehend what to do next. He could not leave the house because of the siege, the snipers, and the danger surrounding them. He could not even give his wife the basic dignity of a proper burial.

Imagine losing the person dearest to your heart and then being denied the chance to say goodbye.

He spent hours thinking of a way to preserve his wife’s dignity. He looked at her face, at his children, and at the walls that imprisoned them all. Then he made a decision he had never imagined he would have to make.

He placed his wife’s body inside the refrigerator.

Not because his heart could bear it, but because he had no other choice.

He carefully placed her inside, closed the door, and tied it shut with ropes so that it would not open, as if he were trying to protect her one last time or delay a farewell he was not ready to face.

But the real pain stood before that refrigerator every day.

Her young children would stand before the closed door and call out:

“Mom… Mom… Mom…”

They waited for her to come out as she always had.

They believed she could hear them.

They believed she would answer.

Their father stood helpless before those heartbreaking cries. He watched his children reaching their hands toward the refrigerator, calling for their mother while tears filled his eyes.

Later, the father said that the hardest thing he had ever experienced was not the siege, not the hunger, and not even the fear of death.

It was watching his children call for their martyred mother while he was unable to explain the truth.

How can a small child understand that his mother will never come back?

How can a broken-hearted father tell his children that the arms they once ran to for comfort are gone forever?

He said he cried silently, grieving for his children even more than for himself. He did not know what to tell them, how to convince them that their mother had left this world, or how to ask them to stop waiting for her.

The hours passed with unbearable slowness.

The siege grew harsher.

And the refrigerator holding his wife’s body stood in the corner of the house as a silent witness to a tragedy beyond imagination.

Many times, the man thought about leaving the house and confronting the occupation forces, regardless of the outcome. He thought about ending all the pain at once.

But then he would look at his children.

He saw the fear in their eyes.

He knew they had no one left in this world except him.

So he endured.

He endured for them.

He remained strong for them.

And he continued trying to protect them even as his heart bled with every passing moment.

The siege lasted for two and a half days.

Two and a half days spent beside his children and the body of his martyred wife inside the refrigerator.

Two and a half days of tears, fear, waiting, and helplessness.

Two and a half days during which he could not bury her, say goodbye to her, or give her the grave she deserved.

Then, at last, relief arrived.

After a limited withdrawal of Israeli occupation forces, civil defense crews were finally able to reach the area. They found the father, his children, and the body of the martyred wife, and evacuated them from the scene.

This story was recounted by one of the civil defense workers who personally participated in the rescue operation. It became known to many residents of northern Gaza who lived through those painful days and witnessed their horrors.

This is not a story from a novel.

It is not a scene from a movie.

It is not the imagination of a writer trying to exaggerate suffering.

This is a true story from Gaza.

The story of a mother killed while holding her baby.

The story of a father forced to place his wife’s body in a household refrigerator because he could not bury her.

And the story of children who stood for two and a half days before that refrigerator door, calling for their mother, unaware that death had taken her from them forever.

It is one of thousands of stories that never reached television screens, and one of countless tragedies endured by the people of Gaza away from the cameras.

Once again, this article is based on a true story told by a civil defense worker who witnessed these events firsthand. We ask only that you respect the reality and suffering of the people of Gaza, remember them in your prayers, and help them in any way you can.

Behind every number announced, every image published, and every headline that quickly disappears, there is a human being who once had a life, dreams, a family, and a story that may be more painful than words can ever describe.

The Persian TRAPS:

These guys aren’t just criticizing the government — they’re accusing it of treason. Out loud. In print. On state TV, no less. Kayhan, which is basically the voice of the old revolutionary guard, has called the MoU a “retreat” and a “betrayal of our long-standing resistance.” One columnist wrote — I’m paraphrasing but barely — that shaking hands with the “Great Satan” now just guarantees the devil asks for a foot next time.



Their argument is dark but consistent: any deal with America is a trap. They don’t see a truce; they see a timeout before the final battle. And here’s where it gets spicy — they’re using this moment to openly accuse the government of serving foreign interests. On state television. Let that sink in. The regime’s own hardliners are airing dirty laundry in the middle of a war, calling their own leaders sellouts.

THere should be millions of Muslim children ready to do what they can to destroy the great Satan and his pimps and prostitutes.

Settlers and the IOF:

The recruitment pipeline includes many U.S. day schools — from more conservative yeshivas to modern Jewish day schools — that advertise how many alumni go on to serve in the Israeli military.

The Frisch School in Paramus, New Jersey, had 51 alumni serving in the Israeli military as of 2023. Another school in New Jersey, the Rae Kushner Yeshiva, has congratulated an alum who became a social media manager in the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit.

“Her work was recognized as important for hasbara by the Israeli news,” the school boasted on Facebook, using a term for Israeli public diplomacy, including propaganda tailored to international audiences. Another alum of the school served as a lone soldier in the army and was a friend of the son of Netanyahu, who commemorated him after he died while traveling in 2018.

One charity reviewed by The Intercept, the Lone Soldier Foundation, specifically provides funds for the children of families that attend a synagogue in northern New Jersey who join the Israeli military. According to the group’s most recent tax filing, it also supports the units in which the children of members of its congregation serve. In 2023, the group spent over $80,000 on providing “non-combat and equipment to IDF units in which eligible American citizens served.”

The biggest known funder is Friends of the IDF, which has spent nearly $20 million on its lone soldier program since 2020, supporting more than 6,500 lone soldiers each year, according to documents filed with the Internal Revenue Service. In a statement, Friends of the IDF, an official partner of the Israeli military, said it provides more than 7,000 lone soldiers “with practical, emotional and mental health support throughout their service to make sure they never feel alone.” The group said about half of the soldiers it backs are from Israel but are considered lone soldiers because they don’t have family support.

On its Instagram page, the group says it is the “only U.S. non-profit working directly with IDF leadership to provide critical support for Israel soldiers’ health, well-being & education.”

Other organizations help offset the costs of living for lone soldiers. Bayit Brigade, which operates in both the U.S. and Israel, helps lone soldiers find affordable housing in Tel Aviv and raises emergency funds to help transport soldiers to their bases and provide supplies in the field.

Bayit Brigade has posted videos of volunteers providing resources to the Israeli military’s Yahalom Unit, which conducts “tunnel warfare” and demolitions in Gaza, including destroying areas to allow the military to operate. The organization’s revenue jumped from approximately $160,000 in 2022 to $1.3 million in 2023, according to nonprofit documents. In a statement, the group told The Intercept that following October 7, it “temporarily expanded its community support efforts to address urgent needs on the ground,” but have “no formal relationship with any government entity or with the IDF.”

For Jerusalemites like myself, that symbol is nothing new. It is plastered throughout the city — on cars, signposts, and bus stops — often accompanied by the slogan: “We face the Temple.” A few months ago, I even came across a photograph of the same icon on a mock road sign along a major West Bank highway directing travelers toward Jerusalem, one of dozens placed by Temple activists across the country.

Yet the proliferation of the symbol at this year’s march reflects the growing mainstreaming of the Temple Mount movement within Israel’s religious-nationalist camp. To understand this convergence, it is worth recalling how the Flag March came to stand at the center of the national-religious experience of an entire generation of Israelis.

Although the first procession took place in 1968, soon after Israel’s illegal occupation of the West Bank, Gaza Strip, Golan Heights, and East Jerusalem began, for decades it remained a relatively peripheral event within the religious-Zionist sector. In the early 2000s, however, a new dimension of the march became central to public discourse around it: violent attacks on Palestinians and their property in Jerusalem’s Old City.

That flag has come to signify something that extends far beyond the Temple Mount itself. It has become a shared symbol for a broad political camp, stretching from committed Orthodox activists to national-religious communities, conservative traditionalists, and many secular or non-observant members of the Israeli right. Its growing visibility at the Flag March, on cars, along roadsides, and at settlement outposts reflects the emergence of a common political language that cuts across older religious and social boundaries.

Fucking Jewish packs of rats — A crowd of ultra-nationalist Israelis attack a Palestinian man during the Flag March, in Jerusalem’s Old City, June 6, 2026.

[Maj. Gen. David Zini, head of Israel’s Shin Bet security service, prays with ultra-Orthodox Jewish soldiers from the Hasmonean Brigade after they complete their beret march at the Western Wall in Jerusalem’s Old City, August 6, 2025]

Vile snakes + A Jewish man prays near the Temple Mount/Al-Aqsa Mosque compound during Jerusalem Day celebrations, in Jerusalem’s Old City, May 14, 2026.

Do those pundits, those ex-CIA cunts, ex-Colonel cunts, all those fucking Substackolytes and AltMediaMuckrakers, get it?

Israel’s war is no longer confined to a single front or geography. Since Operation Al-Aqsa Flood on 7 October 2023, Tel Aviv’s military operations have stretched across Gaza, the occupied West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Iran, forming a continuous theater of conflict rather than a series of isolated campaigns.

The scale matters not only for its human cost, but for what it reveals about how war is being used.

Across these fronts, Israel has deployed a wide range of military systems, from precision missiles and drones to interception platforms, radars, and electronic warfare tools. The battlefield now serves as a proving ground, where these systems are not only used but also showcased.

The central question, then, is no longer simply who arms Israel. It is who enables the system that turns ongoing war into a sustained cycle of production, testing, and global sales.

For decades, US and western support formed the backbone of Israel’s military capacity, providing political cover, financial backing, and technological cooperation. That structure remains intact. But it is no longer the only pillar.

A second layer has taken shape over recent years: normalized Arab states, particularly those tied to the Abraham Accords. These states have become a growing market for Israeli defense exports, forming part of a financial circuit that feeds directly into the industries underpinning Israel’s wars.

The numbers behind the industry

Data released by Israel’s Ministry of Defense shows that defense exports reached a record $19.2 billion in 2025, marking the fifth consecutive year of growth. Over five years, exports have doubled; over a decade, they have quadrupled.

Roughly half of these deals, about $10 billion, are direct government-to-government agreements. That detail is critical. It points to a system where arms exports are not merely commercial transactions, but embedded in political and security relationships.

The trajectory of Arab participation in this market reflects the same pattern. In 2022, Abraham Accords countries accounted for 24 percent of Israeli defense exports, roughly $3 billion. In 2023, their share dropped sharply to around three percent, as the Gaza war reshaped public optics and political messaging.

That decline proved temporary. By 2024, their share had rebounded to 12 percent, or about $1.78 billion. In 2025, Israel reclassified its export categories under the broader label of “Middle East and North Africa,” which accounted for 15 percent of exports, approximately $2.88 billion. This grouping includes the UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco.

The shift in terminology does little to obscure the underlying trend. Arab demand for Israeli military technology has resumed its upward path, even as the wars driving that demand continue.

Notably, in 2025, this regional category surpassed the US as a destination for Israeli defense exports, with 15 percent compared to 13 percent. That comparison underscores the extent to which normalization has moved beyond diplomacy into structured military and financial integration.

Three companies dominate this sector: Elbit Systems, Israel Aerospace Industries, and Rafael Advanced Defense Systems. Together, they account for roughly 90 percent of exports. Their growth reflects not only rising demand, but a system in which battlefield use feeds directly into sales.

[An Israeli settler steals a sheep from Palestinians in the Bedouin community of Dar Abu Faza in the occupied West Bank on May 12, 2026.]

JEWS: It’s a position more and more Palestinians are finding themselves in. Across the West Bank, attacks on Palestinians’ animals – sheep, goats, horses, guard dogs – have become a documented feature of Israeli settler violence. Two videos last month – one of a settler beating a dog named Lucy and another of a settler running over sheep with his ATV and beating a shepherd – went viral. But such cases often receive less international attention than attacks on people. Still, they serve the same purpose: making Palestinian life on Palestinian land unsustainable.

And so that cocksucker, Blumenthal with fucking smirks of Jewish smirking:

Sidney Blumenthal and Sean Wilentz (Jews Jews Jews) dive deep with New York Times reporter Devlin Barrett ….

Synagogue Hostage Crises: Barrett co-authored key coverage on the federal response to the 2022 Texas synagogue hostage situation.Antisemitic Threat Investigations: He has reported widely on FBI probes into bomb threats targeted at Jewish Community Centers (JCCs) across the United States.

Mass Shooting Plots: He broke details regarding federal charges filed against individuals plotting terror attacks on Jewish targets, including an intercepted plot aimed at New York on the anniversary of the October 7 attacks.

Campus Antisemitism Task Forces: He regularly tracks the Trump administration’s Department of Justice civil rights task forces investigating allegations of antisemitism at elite universities.

into his new book, “The Department of Revenge: How Trump Took Control of American Justice,” on FBI director Kash Patel’s lunatic search for a “Grand Conspiracy,” the firings at the FBI and DOJ, and the installation of incompetent stooges.

The head of Hungary’s central bank has called for the International Monetary Fund to close its office in Budapest.

The name Rothschild is literally associated with wealth. This is because for over 200 years, the family has remained the most powerful and wealthy family in the world. Most of the Rothschild fortune has been made in the world of banking, but investments in other industries, such as coal, estates, and construction, have helped secure the family’s wealth and immense power.

[The Rothschilds are a prominent Ashkenazi Jewish banking dynasty originating from the 16th-century Judengasse (Jewish ghetto) in Frankfurt, Germany. Their surname derives from their ancestral home, zum rothen Schild (at the sign of the red shield). The family established an international financial empire and has actively championed Jewish causes and Zionism. ]

One of the banks owned by the Rothschild group (the biggest banking group in the world) is the International Monetary Fund (IMF), AKA ’Imposing Misery and Famine’. Not only does the group make money off usurious interest rates at the misfortune of crumbling economies, it literally owns Governments and people of power. Because it’s nearly impossible to escape the clutches of the banking group, news of IMF being booted from Hungary is being heralded as a victorious happening.

1 Like∙

3 Restacks

the Jewish State of Hell, Israel, and the Jewish state of mind — swindlers, back stabbers, klannish, cold, natural born killers

Paulo Kirk

Jun 12, 2026

This is a Kapo mixed with an Incel mixed with a White (sic) Supremacist mixed with a Dirty Little Boy mixed with a Jew on a Mission mixed with Racist Deluxe. What do we get? Neurotoxic Glosser . . . Glosser-Miller.

And in the end, dumb goy will continue to get the ex-colonels on their fucking channels who declare “the end of zionism . . . the end of Israel . . . is near!”

THE PETRO-MONARCHIES of the Gulf are celebrated big spenders—not least by the West’s defence industry. Their oil wealth pays for about a fifth of global arms imports, with a shopping list ranging from fighter jets to frigates. In a noisy, volatile neighbourhood, safety comes at a price.

Jewish PUSHERS: Israeli Pharma Giant Teva Lays Off 250 of Its Israel-based Staff

The layoffs are carried out as part of a reorganization of the global division’s operations, which employs 4,000 employees, 650 of whom are in Israel ■ The division was put up for sale in January 2024 at a value of $1.5 billion – efforts to sell it have so far failed

Demand for the division’s products has declined in recent years. This is due both to Teva’s accelerated transition from a company focused primarily on generic drugs to a biopharmaceutical company investing mainly in innovative medicines and biosimilars – produced in living cells that are highly similar to the original product – and to intensifying competition from active ingredient manufacturers in East Asia, particularly in chemical drugs where competition is fierce and profit margins are relatively low.

Related Articles

• Israeli pharma giant Teva to pay Nevada $193 million over role in opioid epidemic Reuters
• Israeli Drugmaker Teva Fueled Opioid Addiction in New York, Jury Finds Reuters
• U.S. Justice Department Charges Teva in Generic Drugs Price-fixing Probe Yoram Gabison

The Trees of DEATH: Jews.

Jews burn down EVERYTHING:

THree years ago: Palestinians pick olives during a ceremony marking the start of the olive harvesting season last year in Deir el-Balah in the central Gaza Strip [

Sure, it’s not the UnUnited Snake$ of Israel, tell me about it. Israel’s Smart Shooter wins $5.8 million contract with US Marine Corps

Earlier this year, Smart Shooter secured a $10.7 million contract with the US Army and, in early June, another valued at $1.8 million with the US Navy.

Some of the dirtiest Jews on Earth: Senate Democrats’ political fortunes have improved. ‘It didn’t happen by accident,’ Schumer says.

The embattled Senate minority leader isn’t popular with the base of his own party. But he says he has laid the groundwork for a Democratic resurgence.

National party operatives fear an unabashedly progressive candidate, Abdul el-Sayed, could emerge from a messy three-way primary and complicate Democrats’ chances at keeping retiring Sen. Gary Peters’ seat in November.

In what many interpreted as an attempt to winnow the field and box out el-Sayed, Schumer voiced this week what had been a not-very-well-kept secret — he’d prefer Rep. Haley Stevens, telling Punchbowl News “she has the best chance to win.”

But the third leading candidate, state Sen. Mallory McMorrow saw an opportunity Thursday — attacking Schumer.

“Michiganders are sick and tired of the party putting their fingers on the scales,” she said in a social media video attacking Stevens and her national backers. “Schumer doesn’t decide — you do.”

And you thought the people hate AI:

Prometheus, the industrial AI startup led by Jeff Bezos and former Google exec Vik Bajaj, today will announce that it’s raised $12 billion in Series B funding at a $41 billion valuation.

Why it matters: It’s a massive bet to rearchitect how physical things are made, from jet engines to medical devices to consumer electronics.

What they’re saying: “The cycle from dream, to manufacturing at rate, to having it out in the world can be very long,” Bezos tells Axios.

• “For example, if you go to a current jet engine manufacturer and say you want the exact same engine but with 10% more thrust, it could be a 10-year program. Not because they’re lazy or bad at their jobs, but because it’s so complex. So what we’re doing is building a set of tools that will empower engineers to compress that cycle time and make that dream-build loop be 10 times faster or even more.”

Nothing from their mouths is TRUTH: Amazon Says Its Data Centers Used 2.5 Billion Gallons of Water in 2025

The company said water use at sites it owns and operates directly fell 2% from 2024 levels, even while it expanded its data-center footprint

We’re in the Army NOW: Cunts.

The U.S. Army commissioned its second cohort of senior technology leaders into the Executive Innovation Corps, known as Detachment 201, during a ceremony June 10 at Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall.

Detachment 201 is a specialized Army Reserve unit designed to bridge the gap between private-sector innovation and military modernization. It reflects the War Department’s broader push to leverage private-sector technical capabilities to address complex national security and defense challenges.

The program selects applicants who are highly skilled civilian technology professionals at the executive or C-suite level to serve as part-time strategic advisers. These officers use their advanced expertise in commercial tech and private industry to offer a different perspective and advise senior Army leaders on solving military problems.

The three newly commissioned officers of Cohort 2 are Dane Knecht, chief technology officer of Cloudflare; Sam Pallura, managing director and chief technology officer of Sutter Hill Ventures; and Serkan Piantino, co-founder of Facebook AI Research and former vice president of products at Reddit.

The officers shared their perspectives on joining the unit:

“I was drawn to Detachment 201 because it’s a unique opportunity to apply private-sector technical expertise to national defense challenges,” Knecht said. “I’m excited to contribute to helping the Army innovate and maintain a strategic advantage.”

I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO WAR SO HELP ME MOSES. THe first Lieutenant Colonels are Shyam Sankar, Chief Technology Officer for Palantir; Andrew Bosworth, Chief Technology Officer of Meta; Kevin Weil, Chief Product Officer of OpenAI; and Bob McGrew, advisor at Thinking Machines Lab and former Chief Research Officer for OpenAI.

Over the past year, the pilot cohort of Detachment 201 has provided strategic counsel on the Army’s critical challenges. Their work has influenced key initiatives, including munitions supply chain data analysis, Organic Industrial Base investments, and foundational strategies for autonomous systems and counter-drone technologies.

The Army’s acquisition pipeline for highly skilled talent is managed through the modernized Direct Commissioning Program, which has been overhauled to compete more effectively with the private sector for technical talent. By streamlining the centralized application process, the military has reduced the onboarding timeline from more than 18 months to approximately six months. This pathway allows senior corporate leaders to serve in uniform part-time without abandoning their civilian careers.

Something about the Jews losing in Occupied Palestine? Israel Set to Rapidly Expand West Bank Settlement.

In a major push, the government is rushing to place temporary housing at about 60 empty sites in the Israeli-occupied West Bank before national elections this fall.

Rats.

Vermin.

The language of death.

They are EVERYWHERE for a fucking demographic of 18 million globally (I do not believe that number at all, the same numbers game as 6,000,000 Dead in Ohio

The other side of Israel’s defense export boom — The world condemned Israel. Then it bought $19.2 billion of its weapons

Behind record global sales, smaller manufacturers say orders from the Defense Ministry are drying up.

Alongside an unprecedented accumulated debt of NIS 15.5 billion ($5.2 billion) to Israel’s three largest defense companies, the Ministry of Defense is also slowing the flow of orders to small and medium-sized defense suppliers due to budget constraints.

Most of the revenue generated by Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI), Elbit Systems, and Rafael comes from defense exports. In 2025, the three companies accounted for about 90% of Israel’s record $19.2 billion in defense exports and held a combined order backlog of approximately $90 billion.

Good luck, and Good night, Arabs:

There’s a long Jewish tradition of wrestling with power, land, and law. The canon that gave us lo tirtzach (do not murder) and tzedek tzedek tirdof (justice, justice shall you pursue) also gave us Eretz Yisrael, a sacred geography that has animated prayer for millennia. But turning liturgy into latitude – elevating “Greater Israel” from scripture and slogans into a political program – isn’t faith; it’s maximalist cartography dressed in messianic rhetoric. It collapses ethics into acreage and swaps mamlachtiyut (statecraft) for a theology of permanent exception.

The debate, which has always simmered beneath Israeli politics, roared back into full flame in mid-August 2025. In a highly controversial August 12 interview with i24NEWS, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was presented with an amulet depicting a map of the “Promised Land.” Asked whether he “feels a connection to the vision” of Greater Israel, he replied simply, “Very much.” It was not a throwaway line; it was delivered with a knowing smile, no walk-back, and, tellingly, in a friendly domestic setting. Within hours, Arab governments from Saudi Arabia to Qatar, Egypt, and Jordan, joined by the Arab League, condemned the remarks as evidence of “a mentality steeped in colonial delusions,” a threat to regional stability, and a confirmation of expansionist intent. Israeli outlets clipped it and ran it; the line reverberated precisely because it was simple and maximalist.

What “Greater Israel” actually means has always been contested. The Hebrew phrase most Israelis use is Eretz Yisrael HaShlema – the “Whole Land of Israel.” In practice it has carried two main meanings: a narrower, post-1967 claim to all the territory “between the Sea and the Jordan,” and a maximal, biblicist claim stretching to the Euphrates and, depending on who is speaking, down to the “brook of Egypt.” The first has been embedded in party platforms; the second is a religious-text reading sometimes weaponized by ideologues and conspiracy theorists. Either way, it is territorial irredentism, not a doctrine of peace.

The textual seed for these visions lies in the Bible itself. Genesis 15:18, Exodus 23:31, Deuteronomy 11:24, and Joshua 1:4 all sketch boundaries far beyond the 1949 Armistice Lines. Yet having verses in scripture does not make them modern border treaties. Ancient sacral maps varied, and none were zoning laws for a 21st-century nation-state. Treating them as such is a category error – theology misapplied as cadastral survey. These are the verses that move the debate from maps to metaphysics and back.

In the Zionist archive, there exists a combustible line in Herzl’s diaries (Vol. II) summarizing a discussion with Zionist leader Bodenheimer: “Area: from the Brook of Egypt to the Euphrates.” Maximalists love to cite it; serious historians note the context – Herzl frames it as Bodenheimer’s ideas in a brainstorming list, not as a binding program. Context matters all the more given that Herzl also pursued the (rejected) Uganda Scheme and repeatedly treated borders as negotiable instruments for securing refuge, not as biblical inevitabilities. A diarist’s brainstorm is not a platform plank. Not all of Herzl’s contemporaries were modest; maverick Davis Trietsch fantasized about a “Greater Palestine” absorbing adjacent territories. In the Revisionist tradition, Jabotinsky’s Betar anthem – “Shtei gadót la-Yardén: zó shelánu, zó gam ken” (“Two banks has the Jordan: this one is ours, that one too”) – turned the East Bank into a youth-movement chant, embedding the claim in Betar’s political liturgy rather than leaving it as mere cartographic wish. These were eddies in the current, not the current itself.

David Ben-Gurion understood the power of ambiguity. In the drafting of Israel’s 14 May 1948 Declaration of Independence, he opposed locking in fixed borders or even explicitly referencing the UN Partition Plan as binding, insisting instead that Israel’s borders would be determined by the realities of war – whether territories like Galilee or areas near Jerusalem could be captured and held. Later, in the early 1950s, he acknowledged that Israel had been founded “in only a portion of the Land of Israel” and that many doubted whether its full historic boundaries would ever be restored – but he never framed this as a “hidden occupation” nor promised inevitable expansion. It was calculated flexibility, not a biblical mandate.

On July 9, 1947, Rabbi Yehuda Leib Fishman (Maimon) told the UN Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) that the “Promised Land was quite a large one, from the river of Egypt, up to the Euphrates” – a theological citation voiced in a diplomatic hearing. The resulting partition plan, of course, bore little resemblance to that sermon. The modern revival of the concept took on political flesh after the 1967 Six-Day War. The Tnu’a Lema’an Eretz Yisrael HaShlema (Movement for Greater Israel) demanded permanent retention and settlement of newly captured territories. Its leaders blended poets, generals, and ideologues; its spiritual charge came from the Kook school’s religious Zionism, with Rabbi Zvi Yehuda Kook sacralizing the land as divinely granted. In parallel, Likud’s 1977 platform canonized the formula: “Between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty.” That sentence has since framed coalition politics for decades.

The maximalist imagination also drew fuel from Oded Yinon’s 1982 essay – later dubbed the “Yinon Plan” – which argued that fragmenting neighboring Arab states would serve Israel’s strategic ends. Scholars have debated its influence; conspiracy theorists have treated it as scripture. It is best read as one ideologue’s blueprint, not state policy, but its logic – rule by engineered balkanization – has haunted the more aggressive strategic visions ever since. Then there is the “10 agorot coin” controversy. In 1990, Yasser Arafat waved a coin before the UN General Assembly, claiming it bore the map of Greater Israel. The Bank of Israel’s own records make clear it features motifs from ancient coins – pomegranates, palms, lyres – not a Nile-to-Euphrates map. Nonetheless, the myth has persisted in polemics.

The Israeli constitutional framework adds another twist. Israel never adopted a single written constitution; instead, it operates via Basic Laws passed by the Knesset – the Knesset’s own explainer is plain about this. The 1948 Declaration of Independence deliberately avoided defining borders after an internal debate; Ben-Gurion argued that the realities of war would dictate them. De jure borders since then have been formalized only through treaties, such as with Egypt in 1979 and Jordan in 1994, not through any constitutional clause. Practically, that constitutional vacuum leaves maximalists to say, with a wink, that borders are “elastic,” while jurists insist – correctly – that it is treaties and statutes that bind.

The so-called “New Middle East” Netanyahu loves to parade is not some visionary project – it’s a recycled slogan. Its most famous early mainstream use came from Shimon Peres, whose 1993/1994 book The New Middle East branded the concept worldwide as a utopian vision of economic integration after Oslo. But after the Iraq War in 2003, US policymakers – most notably Condoleezza Rice in 2006 – revived the phrase with a very different edge: not cooperation, but redrawing borders through regime change and enforced democratization. Born in that crucible of post-Iraq chaos and the Lebanon war, today’s “New Middle East” is once again less about prosperity and more about power. It’s a map of the region carved up to fit Israel’s security obsessions and expansionist appetites, sold under the false banner of “stability” and “peace.” What it really means is an entrenched regional order where Israel dictates terms, Arab fragmentation is permanent, and the Palestinian cause is buried under economic deals and normalization photo-ops.

Today, Israel’s slow-burn application of the “Greater Israel” doctrine is no longer subtle. Piece by piece, it has entrenched irreversible control over the West Bank, normalized its occupation through diplomatic breakthroughs, and tested its reach in Gaza with unprecedented destruction and displacement. The Golan Heights, seized from Syria in 1967 and unilaterally recognized by the United States as Israeli territory in 2019, is another example of how conquest has been laundered into permanence. The map Netanyahu hints at is not hypothetical – settlements, annexation laws, and military dominance have already shifted facts on the ground. This is progress not toward peace, but toward a maximalist reality where Israel extends its influence from the Mediterranean to deep into Arab heartlands, using war, diplomacy, and economics as interchangeable tools. It’s not a “new” Middle East – it’s an old colonial fantasy dressed in modern PR.

Demographics, too, challenge the fantasy. An Arabic Rawabet Center think-tank analysis in 2016 described the global Jewish population – then “not exceeding fourteen million” – as too small to sustain the Greater Israel project. Today, the figure stands at roughly 15.8 million worldwide, about 7.3 million of them in Israel. The increase changes little: it remains less than 0.2% of the global population, underscoring the gap between ambition and human resources.

The rhetoric around Greater Israel has not vanished. Netanyahu himself, in January 2024, declared that Israel must retain “security control over all territory west of the Jordan River” – a functional “river to sea” position couched in security terms. In August 2025, he doubled down with his “Very much” endorsement of the Greater Israel vision, reviving the debate with a single phrase. Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has pressed ahead with plans for the E-1 settlement bloc, which critics say would bisect the West Bank and extinguish the possibility of a Palestinian state; in 2023, he even said the Palestinian town of Huwwara “should be erased,” later calling it an “emotional slip.” Smotrich’s “Decisive Plan” outlines permanent Israeli sovereignty, forced choices for Palestinians, and an architecture of annexation by administrative attrition. National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir has been more blunt still: “My right, the right of my wife and my children, to move around Judea and Samaria [West Bank] is more important than freedom of movement for the Arabs [Palestinians]. The right to life comes before freedom of movement.” Former UN ambassador and Likud MK Danny Danon co-authored a Wall Street Journal op-ed proposing the “voluntary resettlement” of Gazans – a genteel phrase for demographic engineering. These are not isolated slips but part of a continuum: statements, plans, and policies that keep the Greater Israel idea alive under different guises – “security control,” “normalization corridors,” “facts on the ground.”

Against this backdrop, dismantling the idea requires confronting it on every front. Biblically, theology isn’t a title deed. Biblically inflected borders shift from Genesis to Joshua to Ezekiel; rabbinic sources themselves dispute their scope and applicability. To elevate one expansive verse while ignoring the prophetic corpus’ insistence on justice over conquest is cherry-picking as statecraft. Ancient maps were fluid, contingent, and often symbolic; prophetic texts tethered the covenant to ethical conduct, not perpetual annexation. Political sovereignty may draw inspiration from tradition, but it cannot outsource the drafting of modern borders to antiquity – turning a covenantal promise into a cadastral survey is to commit a category error, confusing theology with zoning law.

Historically, Herzl sketched big, then sought charters; Ben-Gurion repeatedly prioritized viability over “sanctified borders,” accepting partitions in 1937 and 1947 and later arguing that fetishizing lines was a political mistake. Maximalists like to wear the mantle of founders; the record shows the founders were transactional.

Legally and demographically, permanent annexation without citizenship entrenches an apartheid-like regime; annexation with citizenship dissolves the Jewish majority. International law is not optional: settlement and annexation in occupied territory carry costs, from ICJ opinions to sanctions and isolation.

Strategically, it’s a boomerang. “Security control” over millions of unwilling subjects produces not stability but a permanent mobilization – perpetual reserve duty, perpetual guard duty, perpetual flashpoints. Ask any IDF planner what bitachon costs when your map hard-codes daily friction next to Nablus, Jenin, Hebron, and Gaza. You don’t shrink the threat surface – you pave it. The project has never been a plan with governance, only a mood with bulldozers: hasbará in English, bitachon in Hebrew, then concrete in E-1 – while ministers say the quiet part out loud and then “clarify” when the embassy phones ring. Ask any serious machdav (policy planner): permanent control “west of the Jordan” with no rights architecture for millions of non-citizens is either apartheid or annexation with mass disenfranchisement. There is no third door, just euphemisms.

Internally, organizing politics around sacred soil corrodes the state and breeds messianic governance – coalitions held hostage by the most theocratic partners, budgets bent toward gushim (settlement blocs), and judicial independence attacked to keep the project alive. That isn’t mamlachtiyut; it’s a state in thrall to a sect.

Regionally, the “from river to sea” frame – whether chanted by Palestinians or coded into Israeli platforms – zero-sum-ifies the conflict, ensuring it remains endless. You cannot normalize with neighbors or stabilize alliances while signaling that Palestinian self-determination will never be realized. Even Israel’s friends have said as much when its leaders flaunt the maximalist line. You can’t chant Eretz-Yisrael Hashlema at home and then demand international coalitions abroad; you can’t point to Abraham Accords while hinting that Abraham’s borders are your borders. It detonates legitimacy, hardens boycott politics, and hands your worst critics their exhibit A. If Zionism is a movement to normalize Jewish self-determination, “Greater Israel” is its self-abnormalization – the place where a Jewish democratic state melts into a forever-occupation state and loses the mamlachti soul Ben-Gurion insisted on preserving.

Ethically, the Jewish story is not just sovereignty regained; it is sovereignty restrained – law binding king, prophet rebuking ruler. Jewish sovereignty has always been bound to law and restraint. A “Greater Israel” sustained by permanent domination is not a Kiddush Hashem – a sanctification of the divine name – but a desecration of the very values invoked to justify it. That’s not Torah she-be’al peh; that’s proof-texting to launder power. It is political messianism masquerading as statecraft, a misreading of scripture, a misquotation of history, and a misplacement of power. Zionism’s actual tradition worth defending is not the maximalist chant but the hard, unglamorous tachlis of defensible borders, functioning institutions, and the capacity to live with neighbors in dignity.

Even on its own terms, the project is unserious. It presumes unlimited manpower, infinite resources, and zero diplomatic blowback. The IDF is over-tasked, reserves are exhausted, the economy absorbs political-risk shocks, and the Jewish people – 15-plus million worldwide – remain small in number and bound to higher principles than territorial hunger. The Jewish story doesn’t need an ever-widening border to be secure; it needs a border that is morally defensible and therefore politically sustainable. As the saying could go in Hebrew, ha-gdalat gvulim b’li mishpat hi k’tanut ruach – expanding borders without justice is small-souled. Zionism has endured because it could distinguish emet (truth) from myth and tachlis (practicality) from talk. Greater Israel collapses those distinctions. It turns a living people into an annexation project. It’s time to end the illusions. Savlanut, yes — but no more illusions.

Bottom line. “Greater Israel” is political messianism masquerading as strategy. It misreads scripture, misquotes history, and mistakes force for future. The actual Israeli tradition worth defending is not the maximalist chant but the hard, unglamorous tachlis of borders you can defend, institutions you can trust, and neighbors you can live with. That tradition – the one Ben-Gurion recognized and even Likud once hedged with diplomatic pragmatism – demands that Jews choose a state that is proportionate, law-bound, and livable over a map that is maximal, lawless, and unendingly violent. If the choice is between Eretz Yisrael HaShlema and a Jewish-democratic homeland that can look its own prophets in the eye, Jewish history has already told you which one survives.

About the Author

A Moroccan journalist with a Master’s degree in Media Studies from Qatar. I contribute about the Western Sahara dispute, Morocco-Israeli relations, and Jewish-Muslim coexistence in a country that was once home to around 250,000 Jews—the largest Jewish community in the region. I also run the Instagram account @murakuc.officiel, which now has over 300,000 followers and focuses on old photographs and archives of Morocco, including its deep Jewish roots that the country officially recognizes in its 2011 constitution as the Hebraic component

+—+

But dumb as rocks goyim have bigger issues to deal with. Umbrella BANS!

Sardinian beach bans umbrellas for people aged 10 to 65

Incredulous Italians ask if they should bring grandparents to beach to stay safe, after unpopular move in Villasimìus

Umbrellas have been banned on a beach in Sardinia for anyone between the ages of 10 and 65 in the latest flashpoint in Italy’s long-running beach disputes.

The measure was among several imposed by local authorities at Punta Molentis beach in Villasimìus, on Sardinia’s south-east coast, as part of an initiative to protect its pristine environment.

On top of having to pay €10 to set foot on the public beach, only families with children under 10 are permitted to pitch an umbrella – just one, at that – and those over 65.

Punta Molentis is within a designated conservation area. Photograph: REDA/Universal Images Group/Getty Images

The measure has not gone down well with beachgoers, generating a mix of incredulity and bemusement online, as well as raising concerns about the risks of skin cancer or heatstroke.

“To put up an umbrella I have to rent a child??” asked a commenter beneath a post announcing the guidelines on the Facebook page of Villasimìus’s council. Another joked: “So to come to the beach with an umbrella I either bring my grandad or need to have a child between now and tomorrow?”

Some called for a boycott of Punta Molentis, while others said they would simply go to a beach where they could shield themselves safely from the sun.

Punta Molentis is reopening after being closed since last July after a devastating wildfire started by arsonists.

Villasimìus council said the fire and “exceptional marine weather events” had moved it to impose stricter rules in order to preserve the natural beauty of Punta Molentis, which is located within a designated conservation area.

Some called for a boycott of Punta Molentis. Photograph: Fabrizio Villa/Getty Images

“For this reason it’s necessary to limit the [human] impact and ensure the protection of this heritage for future generations,” the council said in a notice on its website.

People are also banned from putting up gazebos, tents or other forms of shade providers. The rules will remain in place until the end of October.

Meanwhile, on Jesolo beach near Venice, authorities have reduced the number of lounger and umbrella spots by 20,000 in an attempt to create more space between visitors.

Italy’s public beaches often get crowded, especially owing to the rising cost of renting loungers at private beach clubs. According to recent figures from Italy’s largest consumer watchdog, Altroconsumo, the average cost of renting two loungers and an umbrella at a private concession has increased by 24% within the past five years, and 6% in the past year alone.

As a result, many Italians are snubbing beach clubs while protests calling for more free beaches have intensified in recent years.

FUCKING PALESTINE, cunts, PALESTINE: The cost of going to a beach club has also increased. The daily price for two loungers and an umbrella averages €20-30, and reaches €75 in the more upmarket resorts.

Zionists love rape. They don’t have any concept that it is abuse, or if they do, they glory in their right to commit abuse. Even former President of “Israel, Moshe Katsav, has been convicted of rape!

Paulo Kirk

Jun 10, 2026

Tel Aviv is a leading global powerhouse in applied artificial intelligence. Often referred to as the heart of “Silicon Wadi”, it ranks among the top 4 global startup ecosystems, with artificial intelligence companies driving a massive portion of the nation’s tech funding.

Shifting Baseline Disorder is even Bigger than you CAN imagine: There is NOT an UPSIDE/Light Side of AI-VR-MR-AIG:

“The dark side of AI – Exploitation of humans and nature” | DW Documentary

Tee Ashby

The dark side of AI – Exploitation of humans and nature | DW Documentary

Magical, autonomous, all-powerful: Artificial intelligence fuels our dreams and nightmares. While tech companies promise us a better future, AI is already causing serious harm…

Listen now

7 hours ago · 9 likes · Tee Ashby

I keep telling you, Watch Their/Our Jews: EPA won’t set nationwide standards for data centers.

“EPA is not the party that is negotiating and or mediating or refereeing that deal,” the EPA administrator said.

JUST 37 percent support them? That’s HUGE. They will want more of them:

Just 37 percent of Americans would support a data center being built in their area, according to a POLITICO poll earlier this year. There are myriad reasons cited by opponents, but water usage and air pollution are common complaints.

Tech giants are expected to spend a whopping $7 trillion on AI infrastructure by 2030, according to McKinsey (1). That’s more than the size of Germany and Spain’s GDP combined, per World Bank data (2).

If you’re wondering where all that money is coming from, the answer might surprise you: It’s your “savings accounts and pension accounts.” That’s according to BlackRock CEO Larry Fink, who made the prediction at the Texas State Technical College in Waco alongside Texas Governor Greg Abbott, according to 25 News KXXV.

Yeah, can American college students wear noose lapel pins over the faces of our favorite fascist neurotoxic depraved Jews?

Some Jewish State! Is it in the eyes? Only the nose knows? Fucking condom wearing cunts.

I can’t keep the fucking Jew News out of my Jew-oogle Box:

The Israeli filmmaker Nadav Lapid said he would not attend FID Marseille, an international film festival taking place in July, according to a report in Le Monde. Several directors who had planned to participate withdrew their films from the festival to protest the inclusion of Lapid, because they support a cultural boycott of Israel.

Lapid, 51, who has been living in France since 2021, was invited to serve on the festival jury. Tsveta Dobreva, director of the FID, told Le Monde: “We invited Nadav Lapid solely out of respect for his filmmaking. That is the only criterion at FID. Then I started receiving calls demanding that he be disinvited. At first, I didn’t respond because I fully accepted our decision. But the pressure continued and intensified.”

She said the festival considered alternate plans, such as that Lapid would present his first film, Policeman, at an event that would include a discussion and the launch of a book of interviews with Lapid published in French. But then activists called to boycott FID if Lapid were involved in the festival at all. “Selected filmmakers began withdrawing their films; in the end, about 10 of them did so,” she said.

And so the Jewish 972+ has to review one of their fellow Jew’s fucking dirty flicks: Noam Sheizaf is an independent journalist and editor. He was the founding executive director and editor-in-chief of +972 Magazine. Prior to joining +972, he worked for Tel Aviv’s Ha-ir local paper, Ynet, and the Maariv daily, where his last position was deputy editor of the weekend magazine. He is currently working on a number of documentary films.

[Aaron Mate? Ben Stiller? Adam Sandler? Fucking Inbred cunts!]

We get to see one of the most complete attempts to show the all-Israeli machismo at least since the 1970s. Israeli highbrow cinema tends to show different characters, none of whom smell the Naplam in the morning. This also relates to issues of responsibility and guilt: many critics see the new Israeli anti-hero as another attempt by the cultural elites to distance themselves from any responsibility for the wars and occupation. These are not anti-war films, but films which rationalize war for certain social groups.

In Israeli war films of the last decades, the heroes are usually powerless guys who are dragged into the war; a fact that reflects something deep in the psychology of an extremely powerful and potent society. But the policeman in Lapid’s film is more like the Israel who is idolized in the local news. Yaron is chauvinistic, militaristic, childish and rude, but also charismatic and even charming. I found him to be rather lovable – yet at the same time there is something disturbing about him, and the automatic nature in which he carries himself. Yiftach is like a machine, which only comes to a brief halt at the very last moment of the film.

This study of Israeli males and manhood continues with the portrait of the revolutionary group. Though I found this part of the film to be less interesting or compelling, there is a touching plot line about a one rebel who is raised by a single father, a political activist who gave it all up. The mother is absent – I don’t remember why – and there is some gentle hopelessness in both father and son. If Yaron runs on autopilot, these two simply lost their way. In both cases, the results are just as disastrous in both cases.

[No immunity for Jews? Right, Poisons!]

Over 57,000 pesticide products are currently registered for use in the United States, ranging from powerful chemicals used in conventional agriculture, to common insect repellents approved for use on children. Scientific evidence is accumulating that some of them are linked to illnesses ranging from cancer to Parkinson’s disease.

But beginning in 2024, a powerful coalition of chemical manufacturers and industry groups launched a coordinated national effort to pass “immunity laws,” bills designed to shield companies from potential legal claims tied to harms from their pesticide products. Over the past three years alone, industry lobbyists attempted to pass pesticide immunity legislation in 15 different states.

The Jews’ pedophile is hot, man, at the Knicks cuntology game: Trump floats the option of a nuclear strike to Iran.

Four months into a difficult air war with Iran, President Donald Trump’s popularity is sinking among American voters. I have been told that in a recent secret meeting in the White House, he began speculating, albeit vaguely, about a nuclear option that could perhaps bring a quicker end to the war.

It should be said immediately that it was just inside talk to senior staff by a frustrated president. On Monday night Trump was intensely booed at the NBA Finals game between the Knicks and the Spurs at Madison Square Garden in New York City, and polls have consistently indicated that the Democrats will return to a majority in the House this fall and might flip enough Republican seats to gain control of the Senate. — Sy Hersh, yet another fucking Jew Yorker!

By Craig Anderson* | May 29, 2026

President Donald Trump said he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and not lose a single voter. The press called it hyperbole. His opponents called it proof of insanity. His supporters called it Tuesday.

Everyone missed the point.

Oh, shit, more armchair Doctor Ruth shit:

Trump was not boasting. He was explaining his theory of power. The theory is simple: The rules do not apply to him because he has convinced everyone — allies and enemies alike — that he does not play by any rules at all.

He is not crazy. He is strategic. And the strategy is working.

The absurdity as armor

Trump says things that no normal politician would say because he understands something that normal politicians do not. Normal politicians are constrained by the fear of looking ridiculous. Trump is not. He has weaponized absurdity.

When he called for banning all Muslims from entering the country, the press was outraged. His opponents were horrified. His supporters shrugged. The policy was never implemented. It did not need to be. The goal was not to ban Muslims, but to demonstrate that he was willing to say what no one else would say. That demonstration was the message.

The message is always the same: I am not afraid. I do not care what you think. I will say anything. And you cannot stop me.

That is not craziness. That is a calculated display of fearlessness.

The contradiction as confusion

Trump contradicts himself constantly, sometimes in the same sentence. His opponents collect these contradictions like trophies and present them as evidence of incompetence. They are wrong.

Whatever. Real news:

I am one of 22,000 Gaza patients waiting in desperation for evacuation

Like thousands of other sick and wounded Palestinians, I am slowly dying, trapped between a devastated health system and a heavily restricted border.

[The author and her son, Zakaria, before the war [Courtesy of Saeda Hamdona]]

This is the double cruelty ill Palestinians face: We are denied access to adequate medical care in Gaza because hospitals were destroyed and then are told that connections – not medical necessity – determine whether we can seek care abroad, whether we live or die.

I do not have links to any international organisations or local authorities. I am merely a patient whose body is gradually failing.

I have no idea if I will be able to leave in time. Time is always a prerequisite for hope, and time is not on my side.

My son Zakaria is what keeps me going. I gave birth to him after a lengthy and difficult medical journey, knowing that I will never be able to bear another child because doing so would cost me my health.

+—+

In Gaza, the human body is no longer a carrier of life and dreams but a record of survival. Doctors are no longer medical professionals but warriors fighting a battle with their bare hands. Hospitals are no longer places of healing but final lines of defence.

In this place of despair and agonising limbo, I hang on to the fleeting hope that the world will hear our cry for help.

Far-right Israeli settlements minister’s daughter accuses parents and brother of years-long sexual abuse.

But who is Orit Strook?

Orit Strook helped to spread the totally false fabricated claims that the Palestinian Resistance committed sexual assaults during Al-Aqsa Flood. She, of course, has stated there is ‘no such thing’ as a Palestinian people. Strook is part of the fascist Jewish Power party (led by Itamar Ben-Gvir) and sits in the Knesset as part of the National Religious Party–Religious Zionism.

In 2007, Orit Strook’s son, Zviki Strook and his friends had entered a Palestinian neighbourhood, captured a 15-year-old boy, handcuffed and beat him, stripped him, and allegedly hit him with an ATV (all-terrain vehicle) before leaving him tied up in a field. The victim escaped hours later, suffering from severe injuries.

Zviki was also reported to have killed a newborn goat at the scene by kicking it to death. He was convicted on charges related to the attack and served 30 months in an Israeli prison.

But the Strook family is not the only one in the Zionist colony seemingly addicted to abuse. And nor is abuse confined to the far right, the settler movement, or ultra-orthodox Haredi sects. There is a sickness which permeates the whole settler society.

Most Israeli men say forced sex with acquaintance is not rape, as reported in an academic survey. Six out of 10 men said forced sex was not rape – and so did four out of 10 women. The results illustrated, the author said, the Israeli public’s “tolerant attitude to rape by an acquaintance”.

Fucking INFLATION, the cost of goods and services, has doubled (100 percent inflation ). Maths, cunts, math: If an item costs $10 and experiences 100% inflation, the price increases by the exact value of the original price $10 times 1.00 = $10). The new total is the original price plus the increase: $10 + $10 = $20, which is twice the initial cost.

Trump Proclaims ‘I Love the Inflation’ as His Approval Rating Plummets

Annual inflation just hit 4.2 percent. That’s the fastest year-over-year pace since early 2023, and it’s being driven largely by high oil prices from Donald Trump going to war with Iran.

The sickness of JEWS: Israel’s ethnic cleansing of West Bank Bedouin and herding communities

Huckabee, where thou art? Taybeh’s Christians see soaring rates of Israeli military-assisted settler violence; Christians in Lebanon’s ancient city of Tyre flee as Israeli bombs kill 8.

Pedophile producer and actor: Netanyahu Isn’t ‘Defying’ Trump Any More Than He Ever ‘Defied’ Biden,

Jews are the dirtiest, man, the dirtiest: Jewish State of Israel puts Palestinian paediatrician in solitary confinement after 17 months held without charge or time limit

First image of Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya during his ongoing hearing before the Israeli Supreme Court in occupied Jerusalem.

Dr. Hussam Abu Safiya, conveyed a message through his lawyer during today’s latest court session:

“I am a paediatrician who provides medical care to patients, the wounded, and the most vulnerable in the Strip. I carried out my work in accordance with international law and humanitarian standards. My detention is unjust and arbitrary, and I demand that the court release me immediately.”

Accordingly, his lawyers have asked the court to issue a decision, which may be delivered in the coming hours or days.

His son Elyas Abu Safiya, who is also a doctor, told The Guardian newspaper that his father required surgery to remove shrapnel that had become lodged in his left thigh when he was detained, and that he continued to suffer persistent pain and swelling at the site of the wound.

“What we know [about his time in detention] shows severe suffering,” Elyas said. “During the first months of his detention, he was not allowed to change his clothes, and he developed skin diseases without receiving proper treatment.

“We were told that he is [now being] held in an extremely small solitary cell, no larger than one metre by one metre, a space barely enough to move or sit properly,” he added.

According to Elyas, at the time of his detention his father was wearing a white medical coat that he had refused to wash since his son Ibrahim was killed by a drone strike at the hospital entrance in October 2024.

Abu Safiya had kept the hospital running through more than 80 days of siege and attacks by Israeli forces amid an intensive military operation in the surrounding refugee camp.

More than 525 days after his arrest, Israeli authorities have yet to bring any formal charges against him. He was classified as an “unlawful combatant”, along with more than 375 medical workers – a designation Israel has frequently used to justify prolonged detention without trial. Since his detention, the family has not been able to communicate with him directly.

“The only accusation is his refusal to obey the Israeli army’s orders to evacuate the hospital and leave the patients to their fate,” Elyas said.

Jews worldwide are disgusting, depraved, and perverse supporting this treatment.

Who are the 95 Palestinian healthcare workers held captive by Israel?

Israel continues to hold 80 Palestinian doctors and medical workers from Gaza and 15 from the occupied West Bank.

Out of balance!! Fish farms, and they are afar, so county on father oil to bring them to your fucking table.

To get contaminant-free branzino (European sea bass), your best option is to source from specific regenerative aquaculture farms in Spain. These farms raise fish without antibiotics, pesticides, or added growth hormones, and yield an exceptionally clean, low-mercury, and microplastic-free product.

The unique and stable water of the Mediterranean is a perfect home for our fish farms. We proudly produce Bronzini sea bass, Dorade bream, and Ombrina meagre. The natural currents bring in a constant supply of fresh water to create the perfect environment to raise high-quality fish.

Bandera products are harvested at night and at dawn to ensure the freshest fish for you. This means ready for shipping in less than 24 hours so you can experience the a premium quality from anything else in the premium market.

Experience the fresh, intense taste of the Mediterranean sea in each and every one of our Bandera products. We recommend simple techniques like grilling, baking, and steaming to bring out the elegant and natural flavor. Bandera is a premium choice for the finest chefs across North America. Enjoy an authentic Spanish fish in every bite.

WOW — 450 milion data workers around the world . . . They need microplastic-free protein. Millions of low-wage workers worldwide are busy feeding data to, and training, the algorithms for AI programs — often at the expense of their mental and emotional health. These workers, many of them young and living in the Global South, are exposed to all manner of harmful content to train AI models to detect such material.

6 Likes∙

5 Restacks