and who the fuck cares about some white woman, with a multimillion-dollar lawsuit against the psychiatrist who was “assisting her” with thoughts of infanticide

Paulo Kirk

Sep 10, 2026

Nah, September 11, 2001, that wasn’t a mass psychotic event that has unfolded the rape of the fucking mind.

Postpartum Psychosis: How Is It Different?

Although mental state defenses frequently are raised in cases of infanticide, legal criteria for these defenses vary across jurisdictions. We reviewed outcomes of such cases in states using M’Naghten or Model Penal Code (MPC) standards for insanity, and the factors considered by the courts in reaching these decisions. LexisNexis and Westlaw searches were conducted of case law, legal precedent, and law review articles related to infanticide. Google and other Internet search engines were used to identify unpublished cases. Despite the differing legal standards for insanity among states, the outcomes of infanticide cases do not appear to be dependent solely on which standard is used. The presence of psychosis was important in the successful mental state defenses. This case series suggests that states that use the stricter M’Naghten standard have not been less likely than states with an MPC standard to adjudicate women who have committed infanticide as not guilty by reason of insanity.

Infanticide, defined as the killing of children less than one year of age, has evoked questions and controversy in both psychiatry and the law. Infanticide is etiologically distinct from neonaticide, the killing of an infant in the first 24 hours of life.¹

Over the years, when a woman with postpartum mental illness has killed her child, the courts have responded in vastly different ways. In some courts, such women have been found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGRI) and ordered to undergo psychiatric treatment, while in others, they have been found guilty and sentenced to prison, sometimes for life. Some scholars have argued that differing state insanity standards result in disparate sentencing.² In this article, we explore this hypothesis and examine cases tried in jurisdictions with either the M’Naughten or model penal code (MPC) standard. We conclude by summarizing relevant data for forensic mental health professionals serving as experts in such cases.

Authorities say the two school-aged siblings of a toddler found hanging in their basement walked into their house as the horror was unfolding.

The deceased child, 2-year-old Barrett Walsh, was found hanging from a rafter in the basement of their Frankfort, Ill. home on Sept. 1, according to court documents reviewed by PEOPLE.

Their mother Corie Walsh, 40, was found trying to self-harm and has since been arrested on murder charges, according to the Frankfort Police Department.

Ed Curtain: Yet I was chagrined and amazed by so many people’s insouciant lack of interest in questioning and researching the most important world event since the assassination of President Kennedy. I understood the various psychological dimensions of this denial, the fear, the cognitive dissonance, etc., but I sensed something else as well. For so many people, their minds were like beds already “made up.” I found that many young people were the exceptions, while most of their elders dared not question the official narrative. These included many prominent leftist critics of American foreign policy, such as Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, Alexander Cockburn, and others, whose defenses of the official government and media explanations (when they even made such defenses; often they just trashed skeptics as “9/11 conspiracy nuts,” to quote Cockburn) totally lacked any scientific or logical rigor or even knowledge of the facts. Now that years have elapsed, this seems truer than ever. There is a long list of leftists who refuse to examine matter to this very day. And most interestingly, they also do the same with the assassination of JFK, the other key seminal event of recent American history.

I kept thinking of the ongoing language and logic used to describe what had happened that terrible day in 2001 and in the weeks to follow, with the nonsense proffered about the anthrax attacks that originated from a U.S. bioweapons lab. It all seemed so clichéd and surreal, as if set phrases had been extracted from some secret manual, phrases that rang with an historical resonance that cast a spell on the public, as if mass hypnosis were involved. People seemed mesmerized as they spoke of the events in the official language that had been presented to them.

So with the promptings of people like Graeme MacQueen, Lance de Haven-Smith, T.H. Meyer, et al., and much study and research, I have concluded that my initial intuitive skepticism was correct and that a process of linguistic mind-control was in place before, during, and after the attacks. As with all good propaganda, the language had to be insinuated over time and introduced through intermediaries. It had to seem “natural” and to flow out of events, not to precede them. And it had to be repeated over and over again.

In summary form, I will list the language I believe “made up the minds” of those who have refused to examine the government’s claims about the September 11 attacks and the subsequent anthrax attacks.

1. Pearl Harbor. As pointed out by David Ray Griffin and others, this term was used in September 2000 in The Project for the New American Century’s (PNAC) report, “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” (p.51). Its neo-con authors argued that the U.S. wouldn’t be able to attack Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, etc. “absent some catastrophic event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” Then on January 11, 2001, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld’s “Space Commission” warned that the U.S. could face a “space Pearl Harbor” if it weren’t careful and didn’t increase space security. Rumsfeld urged support for the proposed U.S. national missile defense system opposed by Russia and China and massive funding for the increased weaponization of space. At the same time he went around handing out and recommending Pearl Harbor: Warning and Decision (1962) by Roberta Wohlstetter, who had spent almost two decades working for The Rand Corporation and who claimed that Pearl Harbor was a surprise attack that shocked U.S. leaders. Pearl Harbor, Pearl Harbor, Pearl Harbor – those words and images dominated public consciousness for many months before 11 September 2001, and of course after. The film Pearl Harbor, made with Pentagon assistance and a massive budget, was released on May 25, 2001 and was a box office hit. It was in the theatres throughout the summer. The thought of the attack on Pearl Harbor (not a surprise to the U.S. government, but presented as such) was in the news all summer despite the fact that the 60th anniversary of that attack was not until December 7, 2001, a more likely release date. So why was it released so early? Once the September 11 attacks occurred, the Pearl Harbor analogy was “plucked out” of the social atmosphere and used constantly, beginning immediately. Another “Day of Infamy,” another surprise attack blared the media and government officials. A New Pearl Harbor! George W. Bush was widely reported to have had the time that night, after a busy day of flying hither and yon to avoid the terrorists who for some reason had forgotten he was in a classroom in Florida, to allegedly use it in his diary, writing that “the Pearl Harbor of the twenty-first century took place today. We think it is Osama bin Laden.” Shortly after the 50th anniversary of Pearl Harbor on December 7, Bush then formerly announced, referencing the attacks of September 11, that the U. S. would withdraw from the ABM Treaty. The examples of this Pearl Harbor/ September 11 analogy are manifold, but I am summarizing, so I will skip giving them. Any casual researcher can confirm this.
2. Homeland. This strange un-American term, another WW II word associated with another enemy – Nazi Germany – was also used many times by the neo-con authors of “Rebuilding America’s Defenses.” I doubt any average American referred to this country by that term before. Of course it became the moniker for The Department of Homeland Security, marrying home with security to form a comforting name that simultaneously and unconsciously suggests a defense against Hitler-like evil coming from the outside. Not coincidentally, Hitler introduced it into the Nazi propaganda vernacular at the 1934 Nuremberg rally. Both usages conjured up images of a home besieged by alien forces intent on its destruction; thus preemptive action was in order. Now the Department of Homeland Security with its massive budget is lodged permanently in popular consciousness and in fact.
3. Ground Zero. This is a third WWII (“the Good War”) term first used at 11:55 A.M. on September 11 by Mark Walsh (aka “the Harley Guy” because he was wearing a Harley-Davidson tee shirt) in an interview on the street by a Fox News reporter, Rick Leventhal. Identified as a Fox free-lancer, Walsh also explained the Twin Towers’ collapse in a precise, well-rehearsed manner that would be the same illogical and anti-scientific explanation later given by the government: “mostly due to structural failure because the fire was too intense.” Ground zero – a nuclear bomb term first used by U.S. scientists to refer to the spot where they exploded the first nuclear bomb in New Mexico in 1945 – became another meme adopted by the media that suggested a nuclear attack had occurred or might in the future if the U.S. didn’t act. The nuclear scare was raised again and again by George W. Bush and U.S. officials in the days and months following the attacks, although nuclear weapons were beside the point in terms of the 11 September attacks, but surely not as a scare tactic and as part of the plan to withdraw from the ABM treaty that would be announced in December. But the conjoining of “nuclear” with “ground zero” served to raise the fear factor dramatically. Ironically, the project to develop the nuclear bomb was called the Manhattan Project and was headquartered at 270 Broadway, NYC, a few short blocks north of the World Trade Center.
4. The Unthinkable. This is another nuclear term whose usage as linguistic mind control and propaganda is brilliantly analyzed by Graeme MacQueen in the penultimate chapter of his very important book, The 2001Anthrax Deception. He notes the patterned use of this term before and after September 11, while saying “the pattern may not signify a grand plan …. It deserves investigation and contemplation.” He then presents a convincing case that the use of this term couldn’t be accidental. He notes how George W. Bush, in a major foreign policy speech on May 1, 2001, “gave informal public notice that the United States intended to withdraw unilaterally from the ABM Treaty”; Bush said the U.S. must be willing to “rethink the unthinkable.” This was necessary because of terrorism and rogue states with “weapons of mass destruction.” PNAC also argued that the U.S. should withdraw from the treaty. A signatory to the treaty could only withdraw after giving six months’ notice and because of “extraordinary events” that “jeopardized its supreme interests.” Once the September 11 attacks occurred, Bush rethought the unthinkable and officially gave formal notice on December 13 to withdraw the U.S. from the ABM Treaty, as previously noted. MacQueen specifies the many times different media used the term “unthinkable” in October 2001 in reference to the anthrax attacks. He explicates its usage in one of the anthrax letters – “The Unthinkable” [sic]. He explains how the media that used the term so often were at the time unaware of its usage in the anthrax letter since that letter’s content had not yet been revealed, and how the letter writer had mailed the letter before the media started using the word. He makes a rock-solid case showing the U.S. government’s complicity in the anthrax attacks and therefore in the Sept 11 attacks. While calling the use of the term “unthinkable” in all its iterations “problematic,” he writes, “The truth is that the employment of ‘the unthinkable’ in this letter, when weight is given both to the meaning of this term in U.S. strategic circles and to the other relevant uses of the term in 2001, points us in the direction of the U.S. military and intelligence communities.” I am reminded of Orwell’s point in 1984: “a heretical thought – that is, a thought diverging from the principles of Ingsoc – should be literally unthinkable, at least as far as thought is dependent on words.” Thus the government and media’s use of “unthinkable” becomes a classic case of “doublethink.” The unthinkable is unthinkable.
5. 9/11. This is the key usage that has reverberated down the years around which the others revolve. It is an anomalous numerical designation applied to an historical event, and obviously also the emergency telephone number. Try to think of another numerical appellation for an important event in American history. It’s impossible. But if you have a good historical sense, you will remember that the cornerstone for the Pentagon was laid on September 11, 1941, three months before the attack on Pearl Harbor, and that the CIA engineered a coup against the Allende government in Chile on Sept 11, 1973. Just strange coincidences? The future editor of th New York Times and Iraq war promoter, Bill Keller, introduced the emergency phone connection on the morning of September 12 in a NY Times op-ed piece, “America’s Emergency Line: 911.” The linkage of the attacks to a permanent national emergency was thus subliminally introduced, as Keller mentioned Israel nine times and seven times compared the U.S. situation to that of Israel as a target for terrorists. His first sentence reads: “An Israeli response to America’s aptly dated wake-up call might well be, ‘Now you know.’” By referring to September 11 as 9/11, an endless national emergency fear became wedded to an endless war on terror aimed at preventing Hitler-like terrorists from obliterating us with nuclear weapons that could create another ground zero or holocaust. Mentioning Israel (“America is proud to be Israel’s closest ally and best friend in the world,” George W. Bush would tell the Israeli Knesset) so many times, Keller was not very subtly performing an act of legerdemain with multiple meanings. By comparing the victims of the 11 September attacks to Israeli “victims,” he was implying, among other things, that the Israelis are innocent victims who are not involved in terrorism, but are terrorized by Palestinians, as Americans are terrorized by fanatical Muslims. Palestinians = Al Qaeda. Israel = U.S. Explicit and implicit parallels of the guilty and the innocent. Keller tells us who the real killers are. His use of the term 9/11 is a term that pushes all the right buttons, evoking unending social fear and anxiety. It is language as sorcery. It is propaganda at its best. Even well-respected critics of the U.S. government’s explanation use the term that has become a fixture of public consciousness through endless repetition. As George W. Bush would later put it as he connected Saddam Hussein to “9/11” and pushed for the Iraq war, “We don’t want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud.” All the ingredients for a linguistic mind-control smoothie had been blended.

Karp has often spoken about his Jewish identity shaping his worldview, according to Weinberger, and framed Israel’s war with Palestine as a struggle of good versus evil. “From my perspective, it’s not just about Israel,” he said in a 2024 interview with CNBC. “It’s like, ‘Do you believe in the West? Do you believe the West has a superior way of living?’” The young radical who once stood up against racism, it seems, now has a cultural superiority complex.

Palantir did not immediately reply to Gizmodo’s request for comment. Weinberger’s Valley of Death will be available in bookstores later this month.

More Jews telling the world about their Jews: Valley of Death, a forthcoming book from journalist Sharon Weinberger about the relationship between Silicon Valley and the U.S. military, suggests his political views have changed over time.

[Jim Doherty, a rancher and former Morrow County Commissioner, center right, listens to a House Interim Committee on Climate, Energy, and Environment informational meeting on data centers at the Oregon State Capitol in Salem, Ore., on Sept. 8, 2026.]

Your typical fucking redneck:

As the debate over data centers heats up in Salem, the industry is poised to grow 200 miles away in Eastern Oregon, where more than 50 facilities are already online with another in the works.

Morrow and Umatilla counties were among the first places in Oregon to welcome data centers, as Amazon Web Services began building the facilities in the area 15 years ago. Amazon has since turned the region into one of the biggest hubs in the state.

As the industry rises to the forefront of Oregon politics in an election year, its corporate leaders are defending infrastructure they say has become “critical to the way we live and work,” while politicians respond to public outcry over data center tax breaks, power costs and environmental trade-offs.

Oregon Gov. Tina Kotek announced Tuesday that she supported a statewide moratorium on the construction of new data centers, hardening her stance as she campaigns for reelection. She also issued an executive order pausing any new developments on state-owned land. Kotek delivered the news to a cheering crowd at an anti-data center protest on the steps of the state capitol, calling on state lawmakers to take action.

Kotek’s announcements are unlikely to slow projects already planned near Boardman in Morrow County, local officials said. David Sykes, the chair of the Morrow County Board of Commissioners, said the state can do what it wants with its land, but decisions over data centers on private property are up to local government.

“This should be left to the counties to decide what to do,” he said.

Doherty, the former Morrow County commissioner, wasn’t persuaded by Amazon’s pitch.

He said in an interview that he was worried the company’s water use would worsen the region’s longstanding nitrate crisis by concentrating nitrate-contaminated groundwater, and that it was running its generators far more than 12 hours per year.

He also dismissed Amazon’s efforts at community investment in light of the tax breaks it receives through the state’s enterprise zone program. Kotek signed a bill this year that pauses state tax breaks for data centers.

“When they’re paying you 10 cents on the dollar and giving you another 10 cents, that’s not philanthropy,” he said.

He was also skeptical that the governor’s executive order would have any effect on his home in Morrow County.

Morrow County Planner Tamra Mabbott said she didn’t think any of the data centers in the pipeline involved state land. Sykes, the current Morrow County commissioner, declined to say whether he supported or opposed more data center developments in the county, but later added that they could continue as long as they went through the proper channels.

Says it all about this War Dog Economy — WILDFIRES?

General Atomics unveils ‘Wildfire’ drone to replace Reaper

Pitched for the Massed Modular Aircraft program run by the Air Force and Defense Innovation Unit, General Atomics says its new drone design can exceed requirements set by the Pentagon to succeed the MQ-9A Reaper.

Ahh, that fucking AmeriKKKa:

• Trump said Thursday that the federal government would issue $500 Obamacare refunds to about 1 million people starting in October.
• Health policy experts said the money isn’t enough to make up for soaring Affordable Care Act insurance premiums, following the expiry of enhanced premium subsidies.
• The refunds would come just a month before midterm elections, in which affordability has become a central theme.
• Trump’s announcement came one day after he said he wanted to send a $5,000 election “dividend” to every American.

Another fucking roveling Jew in the News!

Lies, more lies, and Jewish-inspired lies: ‘Surge in construction’ at suspected Iranian nuclear site, analysts say, as US considers ways to strike deep underground.

Iceland’s government will submit a bill in ​February to ban whaling, a move that would leave Norway and Japan as the only two countries in the world to continue commercial whaling.

Whaling in Iceland has ⁠sparked years of protests from animal welfare campaigners and Hollywood celebrities.

The bill will include “a permanent ban on whaling,” the government, which has a majority in parliament, said on its website late on Wednesday.

In this ⁠year’s hunting season, which runs ​from ⁠June to around the end of September, 80 fin whales had been caught as of Wednesday, according to ⁠Humane World for Animals, an animal welfare group that tracks ​the ⁠catches. The quota allows ‌150 fin whales to be killed this year.

“There is considerable political and public support for this bill to ban commercial whaling, ‌and compelling ethical, veterinary, legal and conservation ‌reasons to hope it succeeds,” said Wendy Higgins, a Humane World for Animals spokeswoman.

Guts.

Gutless — The Genocide Quintet. Main opposition factions ink surplus-vote deals in bid to maximize Knesset representation

Dirty Nose Job JEW, LGBTQA: OpenAI pulls out of Caltech math hackathon after mathematicians issue open letter criticizing AI math ‘slop’

A researcher at OpenAI said on Thursday that the ChatGPT maker is no longer sponsoring Caltech’s “math hackathon,” an event where participants use large language models to solve research problems.

OpenAI’s exit follows an open letter released on Wednesday from current and former Caltech mathematicians, who said the event, which is sponsored by AI companies, “is likely to have destructive impacts for the mathematical community.”

John Judge – 9/11, Afghanistan, and Iraq: Unanswered Questions of September 11, Part 1, 2002

John Judge – 9/11, Afghanistan, and Iraq: Unanswered Questions of September 11, Part 1
Roxy Theater, Allentown, 10 October 2002

September 11, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Some of the History of 20th Century Wars

at 7:10
I’ve been following 9/11 since its inception. It was close enough to me in DC that it shook my windows when the plane hit. And I was quite amazed at what did and didn’t happen that day. The two things that I have focused on primarily, beyond the background information, because I think these are the two areas that the administration and the national security system are most vulnerable in, are the events of that day, especially in Washington, DC, or what I would call a military stand-down on 9/11 in Washington, DC, and somewhat nationally. And I’ll go into that. The other is the history of the Anthrax investigation.

I was not enamored of the idea of asking, as some were, what did Bush know and when did he know it? I mean, I think the proper formation of that question would be, When was Bush told, and how soon did he forget it? We know that Colin Powell, for instance, was informing India, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, and many of the surrounding countries in June of 2001 that the United States would militarily intervene against the Taliban in Afghanistan in mid-October to take them out. This is in June. And we were also told on Tom Brokaw’s ABC News that the war plans for Afghanistan were on Bush’s desk on September 9th. Well, what that says to me is—some people were shocked; Bush knew about the plan even before 9/11—what it says to me, though, is that Bush is out of the loop. Bush is the last to know, the last to be told.

The Implications of 9/11, A conversation with John Judge, Part 1, The Peace Cafe, Seattle, 2 February 2002

Our choice now seems to be between a “new war” and a new world. As always, the forces of reaction and wealth are telling us we have no choice but war, and no right or power to decide. They are calling for a secret investigation, a secret conviction, a secret method of execution, and a totally secret war abroad. The American people as a whole are the only ones in the world who have the right to decide on a national response to this tragedy, and it must be one that takes into account the rights of all the other peoples and nations of the world.

—John Judge, 23 September 2001

Transcript: 9/11, Afghanistan, and Iraq: Unanswered Questions of September 11, Part 1

John Judge, Allentown, 10 Oct 2002