Paul Haeder, Author

writing, interviews, editing, blogging

completely controlled, programmed, and manipulated by another person. In Yiddish slang, calling someone a golem implies they are a brainless tool, an idiot, or a puppet doing someone else’s bidding

Paulo Kirk

Sep 11, 2026

AI Mode Conversation: Philan-Tam-Duy

Philan-Tam-Duy

Philan-Tam-Duy Le is a 35-year-old tattoo artist from Julian, California, who gained international attention after being arrested near the U.S. Capitol with a 10-foot-tall, fully functioning homemade guillotine. On August 25, 2026, U.S. Capitol Police discovered Le’s black Toyota Tacoma illegally parked along East Capitol Street near the Supreme Court and the Library of Congress. The upright wooden frame and heavy, angled metal blade were fully assembled and plainly visible sticking out of his truck bed.

Chronology & Context

  • The Journey: Le constructed the device himself and drove it more than 2,500 miles from San Diego County directly to Washington, D.C..
  • Pre-Arrest Activity: Prior to his trek, Le posted an Instagram video on August 12 showing off the guillotine while wearing an executioner’s hood. The post included captions expressing deep frustration with lawmakers and defense contractors regarding foreign conflicts.
  • The Arrest: U.S. Capitol Police officers spotted the vehicle around 3:00 p.m. and quickly took him into custody without incident.

Legal Proceedings & Motive

Le was formally charged with a misdemeanor for attempted possession of a prohibited weapon. During his arraignment in the District of Columbia Superior Court, he pleaded not guilty. A judge denied the prosecution’s request to hold him in jail, noting that Le had no prior criminal record, made no specific threats toward individuals.

Two Jews you can ALWAYS count on to get it wrong . . .

Katie and Aaron, the ebony and ivory of the fucking alt/ulterior signs of life media.

Useful Idiots, two Jews in a Pod…. Meet Hillary Clinton: tin-foil hatter!

During a crazy episode of Morning Joe (which had so much ridiculous content that it takes up the majority of this extended Friday Free-for-All), Hillary Clinton made the astonishing claim that Netanyahu (much like 9/11 theorists believe about George W. Bush) KNEW about the October 7 attacks BEFORE they happened and still let them occur.

I just love those bar and bat mitzvah cunts calling anything against their dirty religion tin foil hat folk:

Oh, the separation of the sexes!

Have you ever noticed how in all the political commentary and debates since 2001, the truth about what happened on September 11, 2001, is never seriously discussed? It is just assumed that the government’s version of events is true, with minor, limited hangouts, such as the Saudi’s financing of some of the alleged hijackers.

It is a third rail of American politics; question it and your goose is cooked.

By September 2001, George Bush Jr. was in major political trouble in his first year in office. “9/11” saved his skin and made him into a national hero with a bullhorn in the wreckage of the Twin Towers. It allowed him to pursue his endless war on terror and win a second term even while destroying Iraq. Obama, picking up Bush’s baton while offering the usual phony critiques of his policies, quickly bailed out Wall Street and the banks and proceeded to attack seven Muslim countries.

In 2026, Donald Trump is in major political trouble as the mid-term elections approach in his second term. He is caught in a quagmire with his losing war with Iran. His patron and blackmailer Israel, has him up against the wall. Russia and China, ruled by far smarter leaders, are confounding him. His popularity has plummeted. All indications are that he is a man at the end of his tether, crazed, fascistic, and desperate. People like him do insane things. Nuclear weapons are at his disposal.

As the daily news makes clear, mentally unstable, desperate people do evil things. They take knives, guns, clubs, and walk out on an ordinary day and slaughter innocent people on a street, in a school, on a subway, everywhere and anywhere. Nuclear weapons can kill a few more, and we are ruled by madmen.

Judaism, Zionism and Conflation-grasping the Kosher Trinity…

Jewish Anti Zionists (AKA AZZ) are occasionally irritated by the ‘conflation’ of ‘Zionism and Judaism’ but the terms are inherently related.

Conflation is usually understood as the merging of two or more distinct sets of information, texts, ideas, etc. into one. Does this concept apply to Zionism and Judaism? Are Zionism and Judaism distinct terms? Are Jews and Zionism categorically different from each other?

For example, can Americanism and exceptionalism be conflated? Can round and circular be conflated? The distinction between terms that are related can be confusing. But the relationship between Jews and Zionism is clear. This is also true of the relationship among Zionism, Jews and Judaism. These terms are intrinsically related politically, culturally, religiously, and at times they form a metaphysical continuum.

[Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate Defend Tucker Carlson]

While pre-emancipated Jews were at ease with their ethno-religious identity, the French Revolution, emancipation, and secularisation introduced complexity to identity issues for European Jews. Since then, secular Jews have found it difficult or even impossible to consolidate their tribal identity within the emerging universal discourse around them. They find it impossible to fuse their cultural racial orientation with their anti racist progressive political rants. Zionism offered a solution. It promised to take the Jews away, to remove the problem. But Zionism only managed to move the problem to a new place.

Diaspora Jews have developed different tactics to deal with their identity crises. Contemporary Jewish identity is shaped like a tri-polar magnetic field in which one pole is religion, another is race, and the third is politics.

When Jewish politics is subject to criticism (Israel, Zionism, the Lobby, etc.) some Jews claim to be ‘racially offended’ in spite of the fact that race, biology, blood or ethnicity was never mentioned. When Jewish racism is subject to criticism (chosenness, Israel race laws, etc.) some Jews are affronted by a perceived attack on their religion. When the religion or some obscene Jewish religious teaching is disparaged, many Jews are quick to assert that they are hardly religious anymore (which is true, by the way). We are confronting a quantum leap–an evasive identity that is morphing constantly. It moves rapidly within its kosher trinity field; it is everywhere and nowhere. The reason for this is that the Kosher Trinity makes it very difficult, or even impossible, to criticise Jewish politics, ideology and religion. The Kosher Trinity allows Jews to boast about their cultural symptoms and great achievements while claiming offense when any of these symptoms are discussed by others. This quantum model is set to suppress any possible dissent and avoid Jewish self-reflection. As much as you may find it hard to grasp what Jews are, Jews share the struggle to address who they are and what they are up to. —- Judaism, Zionism and Conflation, October 09, 2017 by Gilad Atzmon

Books

These links will bring readers to a vast interconnected and diverse series of articles, books, and videos about September 11, 2001 (and much more). ratical.org, run by David Ratcliffe, is an extraordinary encyclopedia of online sources unmatched anywhere.

+—+

Moving on to the dirty patriarchal Judeo-Christian pedophile rings of the Crypto Christian and Jewish “faiths”

I watched this last night. Sure, it’s not a new thing out there, but oh how relevant to the issues of our time:

  • dirty weak men
  • pedophiles as Christians
  • families wrapped up in secrecy
  • that Generation, the old fucks, who never question
  • hundreds of kiddoes fucking probed and raped by a chiropractor
  • victim blaming

How Amanda Mustard Confronted More Than Her Pedophile Grandfather in ‘Great Photo, Lovely Life’

“I made this thing to be this Rorschach test for people,” Mustard told Jezebel of her HBO documentary, which is a rare revelation of family trauma.

“I made this thing to be this Rorschach test for people,” the 33-year-old first-time filmmaker told Jezebel of Great Photo, Lovely Life, which was filmed over eight years and co-directed by Rachel Beth Anderson. “I very intentionally do not try and tell you how to feel but to reckon with whatever’s coming up in all of its complexity. To me, it’s like taking the temperature of where we’re at as a society.”

Production began in 2014 when Mustard sat down with Flickinger for an interview. That conversation, she said, was her first attempt to get answers for herself and her family, and accountability for the scores of his victims–including, as it’s later revealed, her mother, Debi, and older sister, Angie. Flickinger responded with revolting frankness. Less than five minutes into the film, he describes one instance as “quite an engagement.” Of another, he says he “more or less experimented” with a prepubescent girl. What emerged is a film that manages to be grim, not glib; incisive instead of incendiary; and a conclusion that offers both answers and salient questions about intergenerational trauma, women’s complicity in men’s wrongdoing, and the ways forgiveness can harm rather than heal.

“In the evangelical faith that my family adheres to, not forgiving is equal to the sin that was committed against you, which is insane. But it’s also a milder form of victim-blaming.”

Mustard is well aware that Great Photo, Lovely Life could’ve been the kind of true crime retelling you’d find on Investigation Discovery or Netflix. “My pedophile grandpa…” Mustard says, imagining an alternative, Abducted in Plain Sight-esque take on her family’s story. But with a rich archive of photographs and home movies, Great Photo Lovely Life surpasses any ripped-from-the-headlines salaciousness and becomes a searing rumination not of a “monster” but a truly reprehensible human whose actions had a ruinous effect on innumerable lives.

“We so rarely hear the perspective of a perpetrator,” Mustard said of the importance of confronting her grandfather onscreen. “As a survivor myself, it is weirdly healing to see somebody own it. There’s value in that. The whole question that led me to that interview in the first place was, ‘How did we get here?’”

Yeah? The older generation? Take a look at these fucking crazy faces of younger women with their Pedophile and Rapist in Chief:

Mustard recalled asking her grandfather, while interviewing him in the Florida retirement facility where he was living, if there was anybody that he ever felt like he could talk to about it.

“Did you ever open up?” Mustard said.

“I wished I could have,” he responded, Mustard recalled. “I wanted to talk to somebody, but I didn’t know who I could really talk to.”

“What if there had been somebody he could talk to? Imagine how different things could have been for my family,” Mustard told the Times. “In the U.S., we spend $5.4 billion a year on locking child abusers up and only $3 million on child sexual abuse prevention research.”

Amanda Mustard (L) and Rachel Beth Anderson attend the HBO Documentary Films SXSW 2023 Reception at Eberly on March 10, 2023 in Austin, Texas.

Jeffrey Epstein’s crimes were partly crimes against children. However, that is not how the country talked about them. The coverage went to the celebrity angle, the money angle, and the political angle, and the one conversation the case never started was a national conversation about child sexual abuse.

Elizabeth J. Letourneau, PhD, a professor at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health who leads the Moore Center for the Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse, does not mince words about it. “I am outraged,” she told Newsweek’s Parting Shot podcast while discussing her new book, One in Five: Why Child Sexual Abuse Is Our Biggest Public Health Crisis and What We Can Do to Stop It, co-authored by journalist Luke Malone. “There is almost nothing about [it in] the coverage of this case, and not just the coverage but the law enforcement aspect of it, that treats it as child sexual abuse.”

Letourneau and Malone spent years working on a book to highlight the thing that the Epstein case could have potentially started a conversation about: child sexual abuse.

The title comes from a sobering statistic: One in five kids will experience sexual abuse before they turn 18. Numbers like that are why the authors treat this as a public health crisis rather than a crime story, and why Malone keeps returning to how ordinary it is. “It affects one in five kids,” he said. “It is so prevalent.”

Episode Description

In 2024, as public conversations about abuse, grooming, and accountability unfolded again and again, Amanda found herself watching familiar patterns repeat. These patterns felt uncomfortably close to the high-control religious world she thought she had left behind. For Amanda, this was not just cultural commentary. It was personal.

In this episode, Amanda and Kyle step away from sensationalism to offer something different: structure.

Using the cases of Jeffrey Epstein and Bill Gothard, Amanda explains the architecture of abuse. She examines how power is built, protected, and normalized, how grooming operates long before it becomes criminal, and why systems so often defend themselves at the expense of survivors.

Rather than focusing on graphic details or individual pathology, this conversation examines the conditions that allow abuse to flourish. It explores why the stories in the news feel eerily familiar, why true accountability and justice rarely occur, and why simply removing bad actors never fixes the underlying problem.

By the end of this episode, you will have a clearer framework for recognizing grooming and power dynamics.

This episode is for anyone who has felt disoriented watching recent narratives unfold, and for those who want language, clarity, and a steadier way of understanding what is really happening beneath the headlines.

No photo description available.

THE EPSTEIN FILES, EXPLAINED: Everything You Need to Know

&

EPSTEIN SURVIVORS’ ATTORNEY WHO EXPOSED GOVERNMENT CONSPIRACY: Brad Edwards.

MONEY from the pedophile and rapist, and of course a Chabad Jew. Donald Trump has offered a $5,000 payout to every adult American if Republicans secure both chambers of Congress in the midterms. It is a $1.3 trillion promise, supposedly funded by magical thinking and tariff revenues.

The question is whether this is legal. The answer depends entirely on which side of the Atlantic you stand, and how much you still believe in the myth of American institutional integrity.

Under US law, federal statutes explicitly prohibit payments intended to influence voting. Yet Trump’s legal team will inevitably camouflage this as a promised “tax cut” or shield it behind the First Amendment. In a system where billionaires buy political petitions and the highest court treats corporate lobbying as free speech, a blunt bribe to the electorate is just another Tuesday. Legality is a technicality. Enforcement is a joke.

[Notice the witch’s finger. Too many Benjamins counted late at night. Paper cut. Why OpenAI Hired Chuck Schumer’s Daughter Away From Amazon — The AI industry has a greater need for government influence than anyone else.]

Schumer is a veteran of Democratic politics who has worked in the Obama White House and on Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. But she’s not just any government relations professional with public-sector experience; if the name didn’t tip you off, Schumer is also the daughter of Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY). She brings to OpenAI knowledge of how Democrats might approach the AI industry’s growing power, both from her firsthand revolver experience and from more tacit understandings culled from the types of personal relationships the child of a Senate leader is able to develop.

The Schumer family’s deep ties and support to both Wall Street and Silicon Valley are well established by now, and played a central role in legislative fights around antitrust legislation policy in the Biden years. That this allegiance to industry complicates efforts to hold powerful bad actors to account has become almost droll.

Interactive_Trump_cases_Nov27_2024

Yeah,, the fucker needs rehabilitation! At least 28 women have publicly accused Donald Trump of sexual misconduct since the 1970s, with allegations ranging from unwanted groping and forcible kissing to sexual abuse and rape.

“The suspect, 35-year-old Philan-Tam-Duy Le of Julian, CA, was arrested for Carrying a Dangerous Weapon for being in possession of the guillotine,” USCP said.

BUT HE STILL fails to put the fucking DIRTY Jews and DIRTY Occupation fake cuntry, Israel, in his fucking piece: A tidbit I found on this scum woman…

Shayna Steinger is Jewish and comes from a prominent Jewish family.

Public records and family announcements confirm her heritage through multiple personal and institutional connections:

  • Family Connections: Her late sister, Jessica C. Steinger, had funeral services held at the Tifereth Israel Synagogue and was buried at the Jewish Glendale Cemetery, with the family requesting memorial contributions to the Jewish Federation of Greater Des Moines.
  • Extended Family: Her uncle, Lawrence L. Ladin, was actively involved with Des Moines’ Temple B’nai Jeshurun.
  • Professional Background: Beyond her personal heritage, Shayna Steinger is a former Foreign Service Officer for the U.S. Department of State, where she served from 1999 to 2016, including a role as the Chief of the Political and Economic Section at the U.S. Embassy in Yemen.

Kit: Adding to the mystery, 12 of the 14 visas were approved by a single consular official, named Shayna Steinger. Almost immediately after being appointed to the Jeddah consulate in July 2000 fresh out of Columbia University, she began rubberstamping applications of future 9/11 hijackers. At the time, the consulate’s approach to issuing visas was strict, specifically due to local “terrorism” concerns. Internal guidelines stated applicants – particularly young male Saudis – should always be interviewed in person, and have clear grounds for travel.

However, Steinger personally took it upon herself to reverse this policy. Moreover, she issued visas to future 9/11 hijackers despite their applications frequently being incomplete or error-strewn, based on forged documents, and their contents giving ample grounds for suspicion. Steinger nonetheless interviewed Hani Hanjour, who purportedly piloted Flight 77, which struck the Pentagon. Afterwards, she rejected his application for a three-year US visa, due to apparent doubts over his stated purposes in the country. Nonetheless, Steinger approved Hanjour’s renewed application two weeks later.

In ensuing official investigations, she offered wildly contradictory accounts of why the hijackers’ visas were granted. In Hanjour’s case, Steinger initially claimed he provided requested supporting documentation. She subsequently admitted he actually hadn’t, but Hanjour’s “middle class” background purportedly led her to conclude he was trustworthy. Thanks to the court filing, we know in reality future 9/11 hijackers were granted entry to the US so they could be recruited by the CIA upon arrival, suggesting Steinger was acting on Agency orders.

UK Column’s Substack

UK Column News — 11th September 2026

LOOSE CHANGE, man, loving it:

00:50 9/11: 25 years on. Comment and analysis plus latest edition of ‘The Column’

07:13 9/11: Special guest Piers Robinson, co-director, Organisation for Propaganda Studies

23:20 9/11: Filmography of last 25 years – including interview with Jason Bermas, co-producer, Loose Change

41:55 Support UK Column’s Independent Journalism

43:26 9/11: Special guest Ryan Dawson, director, The Empire Unmasked

LOOSE British Bowels.

UK Column News — 11th September 2026

Discussion about this post

Leave a comment