How Trump and Three Other U.S. Presidents Protected Israel’s Worst-Kept Secret: Its Nuclear Arsenal
Jul 11, 2026
Jonathan Pollard, Wolf Blitzer wrote, there is “a widely held attitude among Israeli officials that Israel can get away with the most outrageous things. There is a notion among many Israelis that their American counterparts are not too bright, that they can be ‘handled’.”
Jonathan Pollard, who served 30 years in US prison for passing classified intelligence to Israel, told Channel 13 he’s joining new right-wing party Orot HaShachar ahead of the upcoming election. He’s calling for the annexation of Gaza and forced transfer of Gazans.
DIRTIEST FUCKING PEOPLE ON EARTH.
Addressing the Martyred Imam directly, he pledged that Iran would preserve his school, continue along the path he charted, and hold those responsible for his blood accountable.
“We pledge to avenge your pure blood and the blood of all the martyrs of these two wars upon the criminal and disgraced killers. This revenge is the demand of our nation, and it must certainly be carried out.”
The Supreme Leader delivered an even more explicit warning to those responsible for the assassination, saying that their identities are known and that none should expect to escape the consequences of their actions.
“These criminals, whose names from the highest to the lowest are all on a list, will take with them to the grave their wish to die peacefully in their beds.”
A network of lobby-aligned organisations, several with direct connections to Israeli government ministries, has built a public adverse information infrastructure — blacklist databases, employer-notification campaigns, adverse media trail production — whose explicit operational goal is the professional destruction of people who express political views about Palestine, Lebanon and wherever’s next.
1981, Jew York TImes:
‘’We don’t have any atomic bomb now,’‘ Mr. Dayan said. ‘’But we have the capacity; we can do that in a short time. We are not going to be the first ones to introduce nuclear weapons into the Middle East, but we do have the capacity to produce nuclear weapons, and if the Arabs are willing to introduce nuclear weapons into the Middle East, then Israel should not be too late in having nuclear weapons too.’‘
Mr. Dayan did not explain what he meant by Israel’s not taking steps to ‘’introduce the weapon,’‘ but it appeared that this referred to the actual assembling and manufacturing of bombs. Ability Was Widely Assumed
It was believed to be the first time that any Israeli holding or having held a position of authority had confirmed what has long been widely assumed about Israel’s nuclear capacity.
US presidents since Bill Clinton are said to have signed a secret letter that they will not interfere with Israel’s nuclear weapons, and Israel acted as if it was entitled to such a commitment from every incoming US president. It got the commitment. When President Obama took office in 2009, the first question at his first televised press conference, from veteran reporter Helen Thomas, was:
“Do you know of any country in the Middle East that has nuclear weapons?”
The president’s slippery reply was: “I don’t want to speculate.”
Helen Thomas got fired soon after, and while this was for her anti-Israeli remarks on a different occasion, no reporter has asked the question since. In February 2017 Israeli ambassador Ron Dermer managed to infuriate even the newly arrived Trump White House staff, sympathetic to Israel, with his heavy-handed demands the new president sign “the letter.” Still, it worked.
Veteran White House correspondent Helen Thomas resigned from her position as an opinion columnist at Hearst Newspapers on June 7, 2010. Her resignation came after widespread backlash regarding an interview in which she stated that Israeli Jews should “get the hell out of Palestine” and return to countries like Germany and Poland.
House house triple fucking menorah Shabbat Goy Niger Obama:
President Barack Obama has said it was the right decision for White House reporter Helen Thomas to resign after she called for all Jews to “get the hell out of Palestine”.
He said in a television interview that Helen Thomas’ remarks were “offensive”.
The veteran reporter, who has worked in Washington since the Kennedy administration, announced her resignation after footage emerged of her saying Jews in Israel should “go back home to Poland, Germany, America and everywhere else”.
FUCKING JEWS:
He nicknamed fellow Obama staffer Ben Rhodes “Hamas” for daring to suggest that Palestinians in Gaza not be carpet bombed with impunity.
Responsible Statecraft reports in “The U.S. wants to end aid to Israel but replace it with something worse“ that “Congress is trying to move the controversial relationship out of the public eye.” Netanyahu himself recently stated:
“I want to stop American aid. It’s like welfare; I don’t want it.”
A window into their panic. The one thing they never do is ask what it is about them that invokes that animosity… It’s difficult to watch, but . . .
The same Jewish state that suffocated the USA with faulty intelligence and misleading predictions that led the USA into its final war, is now telling the retard Ginger Caligula that the Iranians are planning his assassination.
Let me assure you, the resistance wants Trump and Netanyahu alive and kicking. No one in America or Sodomstan can replace the level of destruction these two inflict on their own states and their own people…
The Ginger KaligulStein is committed to to reduce the planet into dust on behalf of his Tel Aviv puppeteer. The only thing that can save the planet at this point is an Iranian bomb..
Indonesia, 1965: Dozens of civilians, including children, await execution by firing squad in a mass grave in a period in which more than 1.5 million people, some say up to 3 million, would be exterminated by Indonesian fascists, with support and funding from the CIA, simply for being suspected communists.
At that time, the Communist Party of Indonesia was one of the strongest parties in the world, though lacking its own armed forces. This genocide against the communists in Indonesia was committed following a coup d’état organized primarily by the US.
The death of U.S. imperialism is necessary for the world to know abundant life.
Susan Nevens
Last week I was questioning the timing of the burial and funeral of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei 4 months after his assassination.
Needless to say, I wasn’t sold on the ‘security reason’ narrative offered by the majority of the well-meaning people who commented on my post!
If you know Islam as much as I do, you would know that it’s very regimented and textually oriented faith. And if you know Shiite Muslims you would know that they are even more regimented and they up the rituals and symbolisms a few more notches than the Sunni Muslims do.
So it wasn’t until I saw a photo of the funeral procession, the lamenting ritual of death, and a sea of red flags adorned with verses from the Quran and religious slogans and its resemblance to ‘Aashura’ (explained below) that I managed to connect the dots and realized the reason behind the postponement of Ayatollah Khamenei’s burial/funeral.
So here we go, a very quick education on one of the most significant Shiite Islamic rituals, ergo the connection to the timing of Ayatollah Khamenei’s delayed burial.
The month of Muharram is the first month of the Islamic Lunar calendar, as January is to the Gregorian calendar. Muharram started on June 15th and ends on July 15th this year. The month of Muharram is also identified as one of the four sacred months in Islam by Allah.
The entire month is dedicated to constant reflection and self-improvement, seeking Allah’s mercy and forgiveness, whilst staying away from conflict and the evil whispers of the Shaytan (devil).
The main symbolism and the significance of the month of Muharram is the victory of the oppressed over the oppressor. The month contains many events; however, there are two major occurrences that are regularly reflected upon by Muslims (both Sunnis & Shiites) worldwide.
1. The Martyrdom of Hussain Ibn Ali, who was the grandson of the Prophet Muhammad, also known as Ashura, which took place during the Battle of Karbala and is commemorated on the 10th day of the month of Muharram, which fell on June 25th on the Gregorian calendar. This day consists of mourning by Shia Muslims, who make up one of the 73 sects in Islam.
2. The Splitting of the Sea for Moses also marks one of the first miraculous events to have occurred in the month of Muharram when Allah split the sea to save Prophet Moses and all those who believed in the message of Islam from Pharaoh.
It is not an exaggeration to say that religious rituals and symbolisms are as old as religion itself and have been around as long as human history. But what we see these days is not a mere practice of religious rites but serious efforts for extensive staging, producing narrative, restoring awe, and mobilizing masses.
For the Islamic Republic of Iran, the funeral of Ayatollah Khamenei being the first public ritual after the end of the war, not only signifies the battle between the oppressed and the oppressor, but it also reflects a life sacrifice and martyrdom of the man (Khamenei) to be as equally significant as the Martyrdom of Hussain Ibn Ali, aka Imam Hussain, in the Battle of Karbala. And what better time to hold such a public ritual than the month of Muharram, hence taking the body of the Ayatollah Khamenei to Najaf, Iraq, for pilgrimage to Imam Ali, the father of Imam Husayn, the martyr.
Therefore, for the Muslims around the world, let alone the Iranians (99% of whom are Muslims by faith), attending Ayatollah Khamenei was not only paying respect but a religious duty, one of which has not taken place since the martyrdom of Hussain Ibn Ali himself.
Having explained the importance of the chosen timing of this funeral, one cannot ignore the fact that as soon as the staging and excitement subsides, the realities, troubles, and deep social and economic problems that have made Iranian society in particular and the region in general prone to instability will reappear.
But at the end of the day, it is symbolism that counts, and the lack of awareness and understanding of ‘others’ cultural significance of religious heritage by the United States and the Western world would always be palpable and the dividing factor between the Muslim communities and populations and their Christian counterparts.
Ayatollahs, Imams, religious figures come and go, but the divisions will remain and carry over to the generations to come, and THAT is the problem.
Federal agents delivered subpoenas to the homes of four New York Times journalists Friday night, ordering them to appear before a federal grand jury this week. Reporters Julian E. Barnes, Eric Lipton, Tyler Pager, and Eric Schmitt are all being compelled to testify after their reporting on a security threat involving Trump’s new Air Force One, the jet Trump accepted as a gift from the Qatari government.
The Times called the move “an extraordinary escalation” in efforts to intimidate independent journalism, and the paper’s lawyer described federal agents showing up at reporters’ homes as a “brazen act” that “should shock the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution.” The subpoenas themselves are vague, asking only that the journalists testify about an unspecified violation of federal criminal law.
The DOJ insists the reporters are not targets and that the investigation is focused on whoever leaked classified information. The underlying story reported that Trump switched planes during a trip to Turkey at the Secret Service’s request because of an unspecified threat, something Trump has since tied to an Iranian assassination plot, even as he publicly claimed the swap was so troops in the UK could admire the new jet.
Trump Quietly Reopens Canadian Bridge After Donor Family Suspicions
Trump is backing off his aggressive trade posture toward Canada, quietly allowing the completed Gordie Howe International Bridge between Detroit and Windsor, Ontario to finally open on July 27. The bridge had sat closed for months after Trump refused to open it, officially as protest over Canadian trade practices, while demanding the U.S. be given at least half ownership despite an existing agreement to simply split toll revenue.
Political observers had pointed out that the new bridge would compete directly with the privately owned Ambassador Bridge, controlled by a trucking family that contributed heavily to Trump’s super PAC, raising questions about who the closure was really protecting. Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer celebrated the announcement, calling the bridge a testament to Michigan and Canada’s partnership.
Fucking Hell, aye? A fucking hockey player gets a bridge name!
If you have applied for a job at any large organisation in the last decade, the first human being to see your application almost certainly wasn’t the first entity to evaluate it. Before any person read your CV, an algorithm did. And the algorithm was configured by someone who may have had instructions you never saw, operating on criteria you were never told about, producing a score you were never shown, attached to reasons you have no legal right to access in any meaningful form.
This is not speculation. This is the normal functioning of modern recruitment technology, used by over 98% of Fortune 500 companies, the vast majority of large UK employers, most Australian corporate and government sector employers, and every significant financial institution in North America and Europe.
The core technology is the Applicant Tracking System (ATS). The dominant players are Workday, Greenhouse, Lever, iCIMS, and SAP SuccessFactors. These systems do several things that matter for this story:
They parse CVs and LinkedIn profiles automatically, extracting named entities — employers, institutions, locations, and increasingly, associations. They score candidates against keyword profiles configured by the client employer. They log candidate social media handles for downstream screening. They can be configured with custom exclusion flags by HR administrators — flags that produce no visible rejection notice, no explanation, and no candidate-facing record. And critically: the exclusion logic is invisible to applicants, and is not subject to disclosure requirements in most jurisdictions. A candidate rejected by an automated filter has no right to know why in the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, or the United States. The EU’s GDPR creates a theoretical right to explanation for automated decisions, but its practical enforcement in hiring contexts has been negligible.
To the candidate, it looks like: no response.
To the employer: they acted on an independent, risk-based assessment of applicant suitability.
To the data feed that triggered the flag: successful outcome.
The people who built this did not do it secretly. They announced it. They funded it through charitable foundations. They accepted government contracts and ministerial briefings. They published the goal — “will not be able to find employment” — on a website with their logo.
The only thing that happened in secret was the connection to the HR software.
THE ECOSYSTEM MODEL: No Single Crime, Just Coordinated Data Poisoning
This is the analysis that should stop you in your tracks, because it’s the part that makes this not just disturbing but genuinely difficult to challenge.
No single actor in this chain needs to do anything illegal. The system produces political persecution as an emergent property of commercially normal operations by commercially normal entities, each acting on commercially normal incentives, each operating within their legal mandate. Let’s run the sequence:
Step one: Canary Mission publishes a profile of a student who attended a campus protest and signed an open letter. The profile is public, indexed by Google, and contains accurate factual information about where the student goes to university and their political expression.
Step two: StopAntisemitism.org posts about a journalist who published a thread citing civilian casualty figures from Gaza. The post is public, indexed by Google, and characterises the journalist as promoting antisemitic narratives.
Step three: An adverse media scanning product used by a background check firm indexes both pieces of content as part of its routine media monitoring operation. The student and the journalist now have adverse media hits in the candidate profiles generated whenever their names are run through the background check system.
Step four: A social media screening vendor used by financial services firms runs the student’s and journalist’s social media handles. The posts that triggered Canary Mission and StopAntisemitism.org appearances are flagged under the “political controversy” risk category. The vendor’s report notes: potential reputational risk / political controversy.
Step five: The student applies for a position at a financial services firm. The ATS processes their application. The background check returns an adverse media hit. The social media screen returns a political risk flag. The candidate is automatically deprioritised or excluded. No human being makes a discriminatory decision. The algorithm processed available data and produced a risk score.
Step six: The journalist’s Stripe account is flagged by automated transaction monitoring following an increase in payments associated with content about Gaza. Stripe’s compliance team reviews and terminates the account, citing “unacceptable risk.” The journalist’s Substack revenue stops. Their ability to fund the journalism stops.
Step seven: The university employing an academic who signed a ceasefire letter receives a call from a major donor expressing “concern.” The university’s development office flags the concern to the provost’s office. The provost’s office flags it to the academic’s dean. No instruction is given. None needs to be. The academic’s next grant application is reviewed with particular care. Their contract renewal is discussed in terms of “institutional fit.”
Each person in this chain — the background check vendor, the ATS product manager, the social media screening algorithm, the Stripe compliance officer, the development office staffer, the dean — made a commercially or institutionally normal decision. None of them coordinated. None of them needed to. The coordination happened upstream, in the data environment, where the content that triggers all of these downstream decisions was produced by organisations whose explicit stated goal is employment destruction.
The legal concept you need here is disparate impact: discrimination that occurs not through intent but through the systematic application of neutral-seeming processes that produce discriminatory outcomes for a protected class. Disparate impact is a recognised legal theory in UK, Australian, US, and EU employment law. It has never been successfully applied to a case of this type. The primary reason is the evidentiary problem: you cannot bring a disparate impact claim without access to the data that produced the outcome, and automated screening systems are not required to produce that data.
Paul Haeder, Author 