It is the Jewish Question, for sure — why so few/so many of the few involved in every manner of crime, depravity, destructive force, financial blackmail invented by their brothers the Money Changers
Jun 29, 2026
What’s in a (difficult, Jewish) name?
In a world already filled with Ashleys and Samanthas, I fully endorse the radical notion of using your true ethnic name. Odeya Jablonski
Was Ze’ev ordering lattes:
Ze’ev Jabotinsky born Vladimir Yevgenyevich Zhabotinsky;
The name I use for ordering coffee is Ilana.
Ilana is actually my mother’s name, but it is also conveniently easy to pronounce, spell, and doesn’t come with 20 questions about my background, or a request for an alternate nickname that fits on the coffee cup.
Some time ago, I was standing at the counter of one of those trendy cafes in Fitzroy, giggling with a friend about our fake coffee order names, when the barista looked at us puzzled. He asked us if the names we provided weren’t actually our names. My friend and I exchanged glances, before explaining that we both have names that are difficult to spell and pronounce, so we use different names at the checkout to make things easier.
The barista laughed and said that he used to do the same thing. He told us his very Christian, African mother named him Josiah, which for some reason, was too abstract for his inner-city white friends to grasp, so they all just called him Joe. When his mother discovered his nickname, she smacked him on the back of his head and said, “I didn’t name you Josiah so you would go around calling yourself Joe!”
He left us with a note on our coffees to stop making our names more tolerable for others and gave us a free (sympathetic) donut.
Michal uses Isabella. Avital uses Abby. Wan uses Lee. Zev uses Zack. Mussie uses Rose. Two Yaron’s go by Aaron and Yaz.
Gilad Atzmon: More validation of that unique pathological misanthropy… The notions of peace, harmony, and reconciliation do not exist in modern Hebrew. The word Shalom means ‘security for the Jews’.
Here is Israeli Ynet’s headline a minute ago…above.
Is-RAW-HELL.
Take a look, man, and this fucking Jew Yorker and his fucking Jew York accent, go ahead, and see HOW many JEWS he taps for this “documentary.”
Misanthropy and all fucking sadistic:
Jew: My name is Sam Antar. I’m the former chief financial officer of a criminal enterprise known as Crazy Yetis. I’m a former CPA, and I am a convicted felon. Today I advise law enforcement, colleges, and universities about white collar crime.
Jew 2: Sam, you know, the issue of surveillance has become a big issue, but it’s not a new issue really. What have been your experiences with the surveillance state that we live in?
Jew: Back in my criminal days, let’s put it this way. In every organization, whether it’s a legitimate organization or a criminal organization, there are rivals vying for power. There are factions in every organization. in our criminal enterprise, which was crazy Eddie’s. My cousin Eddie used an Israeli security company to keep tabs on his rivals within the co-conspiracy. So everyone, in other words, there was no honor among thieves. Everyone was spying on everyone else.
Which fucking baboon or buffon is saying USA and USrael or Israel are dying?
Keiko Fujimori and Israel’s Growing Latin American Alliance
Peru’s electoral commission has officially declared right-wing candidate Keiko Fujimori the winner of the tightly contested presidential runoff against leftist Roberto Sánchez Cerón, making her Peru’s first female president.
Keiko Fujimori is the daughter of former President Alberto Fujimori, whose regime in the 1990s forged deep military-industrial ties with Israel that continue to shape Peru’s foreign policy today.
During Alberto Fujimori’s presidency, his intelligence chief Vladimiro Montesinos utilized Israeli arms dealers, including Israeli Air Force pilot Moshe Rothschild, to secure dozens of fighter jets for Peru’s military.
Following the regime’s collapse in 2000, Peru sought Rothschild’s extradition from Israel, but the relationship endured.
More recently, Peru’s Ministry of Defense finalized a major contract with Israeli defense company Elbit Systems (initially valued at $60 million USD) to upgrade the country’s military capabilities, cementing a strategic partnership in Latin America.
Former President Alejandro Toledo, who followed Alberto Fujimori, also maintained close ties to Israel. His wife, Eliane Karp, holds Israeli citizenship. Toledo even fled to Israel in 2017 amid corruption and bribery charges.
Keiko Fujimori’s victory is part of a rightward shift across Latin America. Chile, Colombia, and Peru have all elected conservative leaders in recent months. This conservative turn is largely seen as favorable to strengthening diplomatic and security channels with Jerusalem.
That pathological animosity to everything around…
Choseness is defined by negation, AKA Negative Dialectics. Things can be defined by what they are but also by what they aren’t. The dining table, for instance, can be defined as an elevated surface designed to comfortably serve diners. But it can also be defined by not being a chair, a window, a woman, the moon, a donkey, etc.
Zionism, bizarrely enough, was born to allow Jews to identify (positively) with a piece of geography (sadly other people’s land), but Zionism was defeated by Judaism. The Israelis are defined by negation. They are living in Palestine, but they aren’t Palestinians; they live in the Middle East, but they are not real Middle Easterners. They are the only democracy in the Middle East except that they aren’t a democracy at all. They are a ‘Western Nation’ but it is the ‘enemies’ that bring the worst of them.
There is nothing wrong with negative dialectic (being defined by negation) when it comes to objects, but when applied to humans it entails a constant conflict. In the case of the Jewish state, it means a constant and endless war with everything around. Just in case you wonder why they have hundreds of nukes in their disposal.
If Zionism was invented to solve the Jewish problem, in practice all it did was move the problem to a new location. The Jewish State i.e., the Zionist product, has managed to amplify the problem into a cosmic threat. What we see is a pathological animosity toward everything around.
Some analysts say that the U.S. and Israel are trying to remove the leverage Iran has and undermine the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). However, the U.S. does not understand one thing: Iran can retaliate. This is not like the JCPOA.
The MOU operates on the principle that a commitment is met with a commitment. If one side does not fulfill its commitments, the other side is under no obligation to do so.
Key points raised by analysts include:
– Strait of Hormuz: The U.S. has been trying to use alternative routes through Oman. Iran hits them.
– Lebanon: The U.S. and Israel are trying to use the Lebanese government to sign a deal with Israel to legitimize Israel in Lebanon. According to these analysts, this is not going to work.
– Enriched uranium: Grossi is reportedly engaging in a media campaign, saying he will visit Iran to obtain the enriched uranium — Iran will not let the enriched uranium to leave the country.
– The $300 billion: The U.S. has said that Arab rulers have to pay Iran.
– Regional diplomacy: The U.S. has also been trying to encourage Arab rulers to adopt a hostile stance toward Iran. Analysts point to Rubio’s visit to West Asia in this context.
The Strait of Hormuz is not fully open yet. It is not going to solve the economic problems overnight. So, forget what Trump is saying about oil prices going down and all of that. Just a small amount of oil coming through the Strait is not going to change anything.
NATO turning Ukraine into test ground for deep strikes into Russia – Foreign Ministry
NATO is working on advanced weapons systems for Ukraine designed to disable Russian airfields and airbases, including those located deep inside Russian territory, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said.
“Israel will help Ukraine in the US, and Ukraine will help Israel in the EU”
Other statements:
The systems are intended to inflict massive damage and keep Russian airbases out of operation for extended periods
The project is being promoted by NATO’s Allied Command Transformation with Ukrainian involvement
Proposed weapons are expected to operate autonomously, function without GPS and use AI for targeting
NATO requirements reportedly do not mandate continuous human control over the weapons
NATO and Ukraine are increasingly integrating their military and defense industries against Russia
NATO is “losing the remnants of rationality” by trying to wring maximum benefit from Ukraine as a testing ground for arms
The Ukrainian government is trying harder to drag NATO into a direct conflict with Russia to reverse its battlefield losses
NATO and Ukraine underestimate the dangers of further escalation, including the risk of the conflict spreading beyond Ukraine
The Russian Foreign Ministry warned that such plans increase the risk of further escalation
“Ukraine and Israel are natural allies, because we are actually fighting against the same evil. We can be very useful. Israel can be a very strong lobbyist for Ukraine in the US, where the perception of Ukraine is worse today than before and worse than its perception in Europe. Meanwhile, Ukraine can be a very good lobbyist for Israel in Europe. We can be very mutually beneficial, helping each other on different continents. I think it is quite possible. And I don’t just think that — I do it. We hope to see a reciprocal action from Israel.
Our Black Sea Security Forum was attended by American senators, MEPs, ministers, and Iranian Prince Reza Pahlavi. Rabbi Moshe Azman, a wonderful person, also gave a speech there. On my initiative, we invited Israeli speakers to the forum, and they were very well received. From Israel, lawyer Ariel Bulshtein, a strong thinker and a very intelligent person, spoke on one of the panels. I hope an entire Israeli delegation will come to the Odesa forum next year, especially given the city’s importance in the history of Zionism and Israel.
When Iranian drones target Odesa and Iranian missiles target Israel, it is obvious to everyone that we are dealing with one axis of evil — Russia-Iran. I am absolutely convinced that Russia, to one degree or another, participated in or pushed Hamas to attack Israel on 7 October 2023, because Russia benefited the most from thе attack.
Thus, I believe that Ukraine and Israel have the same enemy and the same values. We are really two frontier countries. Ukraine is a frontier of such values as human rights, rule of law, and democracy in Eastern Europe, because they are not to be found either to the north or to the east of us — there are dictatorships there. Meanwhile, Israel is the only country in the Middle East that shares these values, and you are surrounded on all sides [by undemocratic countries — Sh.B.]. Therefore, this is our common strategic struggle, and we must support each other.
Regarding historical disputes [between Ukraine and Israel — Sh.B.], our entire Odesa forum is focused on the need to talk about the future rather than the past. Let’s talk about the future, and let historians talk about the past. You can always find something bad in the past. So, I do not see any sense in all these disputes outside the history departments. But let’s make sure these pages of history are not repeated. Let’s build a better future together.”
Israeli Ambassador to Ukraine Michael Brodsky took part in the Black Sea Security Forum for the first time. At the forum, he talked with the Iranian Crown Prince.
“I told Prince Pahlavi that we hope for regime change in Iran and that Israel will have normal relations with Iran. He fully supported this and said at the Odesa forum that three countries are fighting for freedom — Ukraine, Israel, and opposition Iran,” Ambassador Brodsky noted in an interview with the UJE portal.
jew Jew JEWS: Left to right: Ariel Bulshtein, Congressman Jim Himes, and Senator Richard Blumenthal.
Gilad again on Facebook.
On the way in which Jewish so-called “solidarity” has been policing the Palestine debate:
My FB friend Caruthers Sebastian, who is one of the most sophisticated and scholarly-oriented commentators on this page, found a 14-year-old exchange between Noel Ignatiev and myself last night. In the post, Ignatiev details how the Jewish so-called “anti-Zionists” ADL (Atzmon Defamation League) mounted pressure on him to denounce yours truly and to support the cancellation of my upcoming USA tour around that time.
It goes without saying that Ignatiev and I agreed on very little. I believed that a lot of Ignatiev’s work on what he describes as ‘white supremacy’ was actually a projection of his own Jewish cultural roots. What is amazing to witness, however, is the obvious fact that neither Ignatiev nor I needed a genocide to see the most obvious connection between Jews, Judaism, Jewishness, and the insane brutality of the state that refers to itself as The Jewish State.
Yet at the time, the entire Jewish “solidarity” movement—from Max Blumenthal to Mondoweiss, to JVP, to Ilan Pappé—was engaged in one prime objective: namely, obscuring the connection between the “J-words” and the Jewish State by suffocating the discourse with some peculiar misleading ‘explanatory’ models (e.g., colonialism, settler colonialism, apartheid) and fantasy resolution promises (e.g., One Democratic State).
Here is an extract from Ignatiev’s 2012 blogs:
“From Noel Ignatiev, Monday, March 5, 2012, 4:35 PM
Dear Mr. Atzmon:
I am writing in dismay at what may have been a mistake on my part. To establish the background, I am letting you know that I have been involved in exchanges with people who oppose your U.S. tour and condemn you as a “racist” and an anti-Semite, including people whom you list in your March 3 post as members of the “Atzmon Defamation League.” As part of these exchanges, I wrote the following:
1) Atzmon says that the Zionist settler-colonial state is an outgrowth of “Jewish ideology” going back to antiquity. To him, the essence of “Jewish ideology” is chosen-ness, exclusiveness . . . I agree with him . . .
2) He says that any attempt to retain a Jewish identity (other than on purely religious grounds) plays into the hands of Zionism . . . leading those who hold it to be more Jewish than Socialist, more Jewish than internationalist, more Jewish than Marxist. I am not sure he is right, but it often seems to work that way.
3) Atzmon says that European Jews were not mere victims chosen at random but by their actions bore some responsibility for the hostility of their neighbors, which the Nazis were able to mobilize as a political force . . . I agree.
Gilad:
For writing these things in a semi-private exchange, I have been criticized and even personally attacked by people I respect and who up until this point have respected me, and warned by friends that I am jeopardizing the good will I have accumulated through decades of struggle against all forms of racial supremacy, including Zionism. I understand that people feel strongly about these issues, and so I try not to take the attacks personally, and moreover I like to think I cannot be swayed by finding myself a minority of one, but I would hate to be mistaken on something this important.”
Sebastian found another Ignatiev’s blog presumably from around that time where Ignatiev summarises that which he agrees with me upon and that which we disagree about. I guess Ignatiev died prematurely, by now he would agree with me on all points.
Ignatiev writes:
First let me set down where I agree with Atzmon:
1) I agree that the influence of American Jewry, what Atzmon calls Jewish power, plays an important role in shaping U.S. foreign policy.
2) I agree that one aspect of Jewish power is its ability to inhibit discussion of it.
3) I agree that Jewish power determines the limits of acceptable debate over US support for Israel.
4) I agree that the refusal of many “progressives” to examine and confront Jewish power holds back the Palestine solidarity movement.
5) I agree that it is not the orthodox or right-wing but the secular and “progressive” who give Jewish power its force.
Here are some things about which I do not agree with Atzmon:
1) I do not agree that “Jewish power is the most effective and forceful power in the land.” That distinction belongs to the power of capital.
2) I do not agree that setting the limits of dissent is distinctively Jewish. Capital has long ruled by “determin[ing] the boundaries of the political discourse and criticism.”
3) I do not agree that the heart of neo-conservatism is “Judeocentric tribal politics.”
I will post the links to Ignatiev’s blogs in the comment section.
There can be no disputing the extent of Israel’s obliteration of the Gaza Strip since October 2023. Its military forces have damaged or destroyed at least 92 percent of housing units, 95 percent of university buildings, 94 percent of hospitals — and the list goes on and on.
But as Eyal Weizman writes in his new book “Ungrounding: The Architecture of Genocide,” Gaza is not only a demolition zone; it is also a construction site. Almost nine months into a so-called “ceasefire,” Israeli bulldozers roam freely through two-thirds of Gaza’s pre-war territory, tearing up everything that once was and carving out an unrecognizable landscape of military roads, fortifications, and vast expanses of nothingness.
Weizman is well placed to analyze this process. Over the past two and half years, Forensic Architecture — the research agency he founded and directs, based at Goldsmiths, University of London — has catalogued thousands of incidents of violence in Gaza; conducted audio-visual investigations challenging Israel’s official narrative on several high-profile incidents; and contributed a bank of evidence to the International Court of Justice to support South Africa’s application under the Genocide Convention.
Listen to the full episode now on The +972 Podcast through the link.
Jews:
How Jews Have Made an Impact on the Modern World…
Reciting Jewish achievements and Judaism’s contribution to civilization in order to fight anti-Semitic propaganda is a well-established genre that flourished in 19th-century Europe. After reaching the United States in the first part of the 20th century, it arguably culminated in the 1960s with the writings of popular authors like Max Dimont. Norman Lebrecht’s “Genius & Anxiety” belongs to that genre: Both the subtitle of his book and the preface testify to Lebrecht’s commitment to demonstrating “how Jews changed the world” as a response to the current moment, which, he laments, is yet again beset by anti-Semitism.
Spanning a century, between 1847 (the death of Felix Mendelssohn) and 1947 (the United Nations’ vote in favor of the creation of the State of Israel), the book features dozens of remarkable scientists, artists and politicians of Jewish descent. Lebrecht’s wide net captures the usual suspects — Marx, Freud, Kafka, Einstein — but also many lesser-known, and equally fascinating, individuals, like Karl Landsteiner, the father of blood types; Albert Ballin, the shipping industry magnate who changed trans-Atlantic journeys and migration patterns; and Eliza Davis, an acquaintance of Dickens who harassed him until he amended “Oliver Twist,” doing away with negative Jewish references in the book’s later editions. Some of Lebrecht’s transitions from one vignette to the next flow particularly well: His account of the revival of ancient Hebrew under the auspices of Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, meant to foster a Jewish national consciousness, is aptly followed and contrasted by the depiction of the near-simultaneous creation of Esperanto by the Polish idealist Eliezer Ludwig Zamenhof, who strove to create a universal idiom that would encourage greater understanding among peoples.
Sources in the organization told journalist Mohammed El-Kurd that “The Board of Directors at the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) will formally change its definition of who qualifies as a journalist, to broadly exclude slain Palestinian and Lebanese journalists who worked for government-funded media outlets.”
He also reported that, “ Sources say that CPJ has put together a ‘special task force’ to ‘reexamine the question of ‘Who is a Journalist?’ (direct language). The main objective of the task force is to explore excluding journalists working for ‘state-backed propaganda outlets and terror-affiliated organizations’ from their database, as well as journalists who exhibit actions and behaviors that the organization finds to be discrediting.”
This decision, according to the whistleblowers, was done at the behest of The Free Beacon, a Neo-con outlet and the mouthpiece of Zionist mega-donor Paul Singer .
CPJ similarly fired one of its board members, Drop Site News’ Dr. Nika Soon-Shiong, for questioning this decision.
In an email to the board, Soon-Shiong wrote:
I request that the Board vote on whether to proceed with this effort, given the absence of a clear objective, defined scope of work, or assessment of the potential institutional risks. The proposal to exclude journalists who exhibit certain “behaviors and activities” or who work for “state-backed propaganda outlets, militant- and designated terror-affiliated organizations” emerged from our discussion of Adam Kredo’s Free Beacon article alleging I am too vocal against genocide and apartheid.
Kredo placed me on the cover and accused me of terrorism by virtue of my role as publisher for an “extremist” outlet. Similar accusations have been made against Drop Site by the Trump administration, Pakistan’s military dictatorship, and ideological activists tied to the Israeli government—all in an effort to suppress and silence our critical reporting. I raise this not because my case is unique, but because it illustrates how accusations of terrorism are widespread and politically motivated to discredit journalists and political opponents.
She added, “Reopening the question of ‘who is a journalist’ carries profound implications for the individuals CPJ protects and for the organizations with which they are affiliated. It’s a betrayal of our colleagues in Gaza who have faced the deadliest conflict for journalists ever recorded.”
She also pointed out the double standard, where any journalist who at any time was affiliated with armed Palestinian groups will now not be considered a journalist, but the many journalists affiliated with the IDF will be.
She wrote, “What should happen to NYT or CNN reporters who have children serving in the IDF, or mentor journalists to help Israel win an ‘information war ‘? What should happen to outlets like The Atlantic, LA Times, or BBC where editors served in the IDF directly?”
For asking these questions, she was “ informed that I’m no longer a member of the Committee to Protect Journalists board.”
It is clear what the Committee to Protect Journalists is doing with this review: to take any Palestinian journalist that the Zionist lobby can connect in any way to armed groups to hide the real number of journalists killed in Gaza by Israel.
This is not the first time the CPJ has covered for Israel at the behest of Zionist donors.
Whistleblowers have previously said that CPJ CEO Jodie Ginsberg has “shut down a research piece that was going to prove that Israel deliberately targets journalists”, “refused to classify journalist killings as targeted murders” and “decided to cancel [CPJ’s] Impunity Index simply because the math showed Israel is number one” at the behest of pro-Israel donors.
JEW: In a recent statement, Jodie Ginsberg said, “CPJ condemns in no uncertain terms the misrepresentation of combatants as journalists or media workers — or the misuse of ‘Press’ insignia”, referring to eight Palestinian journalists removed from the list, despite the fact that there is no evidence there was “misrepresentation of combatants as journalists or media workers” only that the journalists at one point worked in media departments of armed groups.
This gives credence to Israel’s main deception used to kill journalists in Gaza.
Israel has previously made provably false claims that well-known journalists working in Gaza, such as Anas Al Sharif and Hossam Shabat, were combatants to justify murdering them for their reporting.
The Israeli magazine 972 reported that after the Gaza genocide began, the Mossad created a Legitimization Cell tasked to “identify Gaza-based journalists it could portray as undercover Hamas operatives, in an effort to blunt growing global outrage over Israel’s killing of reporters”.
One source inside the cell admitted that “The team regularly collected intelligence that could be used for hasbara … The idea was to [allow the military to] operate without pressure, so countries like America wouldn’t stop supplying weapons” and another admitted that “the Legitimization Cell misrepresented intelligence in a way that allowed for the false portrayal of a journalist as a member of Hamas’s military wing”.
8 individuals were removed after CPJ’s subsequent research and investigations indicated that they participated in combat
- Palestinian man Mohamed Manhal Abu Armanah, Palestinian man Mohamed Naser Abu Huwaidi, Palestinian man Yacoup al-Borsh, Palestinian man Rizq Abu Shakian, Palestinian man Maisara Ahmed Salah, Palestinian man Mahdi al-Mamluk, Palestinian man Mustafa Bahr, and Palestinian man Abdullah Darwish.
7 individuals were removed after CPJ’s subsequent research and investigations confirmed that they were not journalists or media workers
- Palestinian man Mohamed Khaireddinem, Palestinian man Bahaa Okasha, Palestinian woman Salma Mkhaimar, Palestinian man Ahmed Fatima, Palestinian man Mohamed al-Jaja, Palestinian man Assaad Shamallakh, Palestinian man Mohamed Fayez Abu Matar.
3 journalists were removed after CPJ’s subsequent research and investigations confirmed that they were not on assignment
- Israeli journalist Shai Regev, Israeli journalist Oded Lifschitz, and Israeli journalist Ayelet Arnin were removed after their outlets confirmed that they were not on assignment to cover the music festival.
2 journalists were removed after CPJ’s subsequent research and investigations confirmed that they were not killed
- Palestinian journalist and presenter Alaa Taher al-Hassanat was removed following reports that she survived the attack thought to have killed her. Canadian-Palestinian journalist Mansour Shouman was removed from this list after he was found alive on February 6, 2024, after being reported missing over two weeks prior.
For decades, the media narrative surrounding North Korea has focused on extreme isolation, famine, and economic decay. But recent articles from the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal reveal a jarring new reality: a booming economy complete with new skylines, Chinese EVs, modern restaurants, and widespread smartphone technology.
Ju-Hyun Park, BT’s engagement editor and member of Nodutdol, joins Amanda Yee to break down the reality behind an economic surge so successful, even corporate media can no longer deny it.
They also pull back the curtain on diplomatic shifts happening behind closed doors. Earlier this month, Chinese President Xi Jinping made a historic state visit to Pyongyang, marking his first trip to North Korea in seven years. While Western media dismissed the summit as purely symbolic, Park discusses how the meeting actually marks an important development in the Beijing-Pyongyang strategic partnership.
This is just part of this episode. The full interview is available to Breakthrough News members only.
CHRIST? CHRIS? Is the Talmud, Torah, and Book of Genesis real?
In this haunting graphic narrative, an award-winning writer, artist, and descendant of genocide survivors brings history’s darkest horrors to life, calling on us to remember, repair, and resist.
The Book of Genocides is a haunting graphic narrative that compels readers to confront the most harrowing chapters of human history not as distant events but as visceral experiences. Dana Mashoian Walrath covers ten major atrocities across five centuries: the mass slaughter of the First Peoples of the Americas, the brutalization of Black Americans, the devastation of Aboriginal Australians and Torres Strait Islanders, the Armenian genocide, the Holocaust, the Cambodian killing fields, the Rwandan genocide, the Bosnian genocide, the deadly persecution of the Rohingya in Myanmar, and the genocide in Gaza.
Walrath makes plain that the purpose of genocide is always a land grab, and its central apparatus is dehumanization: each chapter delves into how dehumanization operates, not just through violence but through the political and intellectual systems that enable it. The book’s unique interactive design allows readers to reshape images of victims into grotesque forms mirroring the mental mechanisms of dehumanization. With each page turn, the victims’ humanity is restored, making their suffering undeniable.
The Book of Genocides is an unsettling experience, shot through with the emotional gravity of horrific events—not just historical memories but ongoing realities, painful truths that shape our world and demand our action.
Dana Mashoian Walrath’s award-winning books include Aliceheimer’s, a graphic memoir, and Like Water on Stone, a verse novel about the Armenian genocide. Her comics, art, essays, and poetry have been featured by The Nation, The Lancet, Slate, and NPR.
Advance Praise
“With her singular artwork and revelatory approach, Dana Walrath is an unflinching guide through the long sweep of humanity’s most shameful episodes. This is how art answers back.” —Joe Sacco, author of Palestine and The Once and Future Riot
“Through an ingenious welding of words and pictures, the personal and the historical, Dana Mashoian Walrath helps us overcome our resistance to the horrific and urgent subject of genocide. Even turning the pages of this very book in our hands becomes an interactive tool for undoing the process of dehumanization. Walrath’s vision is deeply humane, and her message couldn’t be timelier.” —Alison Bechdel, author of Spent and Fun Home
Mosab Hassan Yousef, a former Hamas member turned Israeli intelligence asset, suggested at a recent conference that Israel holds undisclosed advanced weaponry — a remark that Ana Kasparian called a thinly veiled nuclear threat on The Young Turks.
“Israel has not used everything that it has, and Israel on purpose did not expose the advanced weapons that it has for a very important reason,” Yousef said in a video. “We don’t want the enemy to know what we are having. And now at this point we are just playing around.”
Ana dismissed any ambiguity of this comment.
“Everyone knows you guys have nuclear weapons,” she said. “Everyone knows that’s what you were talking about here. You’re threatening to use nuclear weapons.”
Israel maintains a widely acknowledged but officially undeclared nuclear arsenal. Ana contrasted its posture with that of Iran, which is routinely accused of pursuing a bomb but has never brandished one rhetorically.
“How many times has Iran threatened to use nuclear weapons against the United States or any country? Zero,” Ana said. “The only country that has ever used atomic bombs, and that’s us, along with Israel, which has a clandestine nuclear program and continuously threatens to use said nukes. These are the two countries fear-mongering about Iran’s non-existent nuclear capacity.”
She tied Yousef’s latest comments to a pattern of threats from Israeli figures. In an October 2024 appearance on “Piers Morgan Uncensored,” Yousef warned that Western politicians who oppose Israel’s military action against Iran “are going to fall.” Pressed by the panel, he retreated to a claim that such politicians would be voted out.
“Loose lips sink ships,” Ana said. “He just said it and thought, ‘Yeah, not a big deal.’ But it is a big deal.”
She also pointed to Jonathan Pollard, the American who sold U.S. intelligence to Israel in the 1980s. In one interview, Pollard called for preemptive nuclear strikes against Iran. In another, he recalled that Israel parked a fighter carrying “unconventional weapons” on a runway during the 1973 Yom Kippur War to force the U.S. to resume an arms airlift — a threat Ana described as nuclear blackmail against the United States.
“There’s one country that is consistently threatening to use nukes,” Ana said. “And not just use nukes, use nukes against us. That’s an ally…I loathe Israel.”
Ana argued that the United States should fully decouple from Israel and pursue what she called an even more critical objective: “finding a way to denuclearize Israel because Israel keeps talking about how they’re going to nuke people.”
She concluded by rejecting any suggestion that her criticism is motivated by animus toward Jewish people, framing the issue solely around national interest and morality.
“I don’t care about identity. What I care about is a foreign country sucking up our resources, committing genocide, committing ethnic cleansing, having blood on our hands because we aid and abet it, we fund it,” she said. “I know the difference between right and wrong. And what you just saw on your screens is as wrong as it gets.”
Comments:
Srs Masons, Editors, Journalists, please help me, do you believe that Freemasonry has truly revealed itself to me and is protecting me and reporting all the crimes that these fake Masons are committing inside of the Incredible Freemasonry? I don’t deserve this. I’m an honest, good guy, and all I’ve done and continue to do is fight for my life and obey and write down everything Freemasonry tells me because the Freemasonry said that’s the only way I could achieve JUSTICE and to get my privacy back. Please help me take my case to the Supreme Masonic Court. I’m going with THE TRUTH, AND I HAVE THE INCREDIBLE FREEMASONRY WITH ME.
Those criminals have being very cruel intense to me by the envy for my communication with The FREEMANSORY. Please, I need my psychological freedom, my privacy, my life, It’s utter madness what I’m suffering. Everything is so intense, so cruel, every day, 24 hours a day, for all these years. I haven’t had a birthday, a New Year’s Eve, a weekend, a single day, an hour, or even just a minute.
For me, not even taking a bath, my prayers or to enjoy my intimacy with myself , or in my prayers, These worms stole my intimacy, my privacy they are 24hrs inside my head and follow me, manipulating everything around me, hacking and al by the ENVY, and I can’t find a way to get it back. I’ve spent 7 years and 7 month suffering with Brazilian worms which got involved and supported these fake Masons pedophiles from Barcelona (which are doing the most cruel crime on earth they are sacrificing girls in satanic rituals in the past 28 years those pedophiles have sacrificed 25 girls and the Brazilians fake Masons got involved knows that i tells the truth) and I’m in Bauru it’s a country side of São Paulo, Brazil and they still attacking and harassing me over 9 years and 5 months which is where it all began, here in this flat where I live with my mother in the building those criminals made 5 soundproofing rooms with all the apparatus from the Masonry installed attacking me and my family, my niece with Down Syndrome, also attacking me soundproofing rooms from other states SP,MG,PR,BA,RJ, you wouldn’t believe so many people got involved in this crime by ENVY.
Jews Jews Jews. The Chosen People, the Assimilating People, the Liars Club, and a people with many forked tongues.
Paul Haeder, Author 