Trump has announced the new Patriot Games/Game of Thrones, a competition for high school students ages 14 to 16 as part of the America 250 celebration marking the nation’s 250th anniversary
Jun 27, 2026
+—+
Hmm, how many live in this fucked up world that says, “Left-wing, right-wing, baloney . . . -ism’s, baloney . . . socialism or liberalism or conservatism . . . baloney . . . the people want ______________________________ (fill in the blank).
Could it be . . . . ?
clean water, clean air, clean soil, safe neighborhoods, real jobs, medicines and medical care for all, real education, real parks and recreation, real national conservation ecological zones, real parenting, real safety nets, real transportation, real humanity, real neighborhoods, real, errr, safe, err, sustainable government by and for the participatory people?
Well, the wool is over our eyes, our collective eyes, our fucking fellow citizens’ eyes, here, there, almost anywhere, really, as we see a shift in social concern to the aims of the billionaire class, the Jewish Billionaire 319 Thugs, the aims of the criminal capitalists…
Imagine that war is the people’s aim?
At almost the same time that Zelensky issued his warning to Belarus, he also announced an intensified forty-day campaign of long-range drone and missile strikes intended to impose costs on Russia. While these operations have become an increasingly prominent feature of Ukraine’s strategy, they should also be viewed in the broader context of Kiev’s continued dependence on Western military support. Ukraine’s ability to conduct long-range strikes rests heavily on intelligence sharing, satellite reconnaissance, advanced targeting capabilities, communications networks and a steady flow of Western military assistance.
We have been so lab rat utilized over the past hundreds of years, that now, in 2026, the proving grounds for the takeover, the fascists, well, it is already deep into our kiddos’ bedrooms while they scroll on the black mirror, the deadly hole of the Satanic Sodomites, mostly Jews, looking for a nickel for every nanosecond of digital addiction and digital entrapment.
The polls? It’s all rigged, from the fucking vote counts, computer counts, polling data, all the way back to the money on the fuckind Eddy Bernays propaganda tools of political theater, ads, lies.
This is what they want?
Colombia elected Abelardo de la Espriella as its next president on June 21, 2026, delivering the country’s leadership to a man who spent nearly a decade publicly calling for the violent overthrow of Venezuela’s socialist government. His victory over leftist Senator Iván Cepeda by fewer than 250,000 votes marks a dramatic rightward shift for a nation that shares a porous 1,400-mile border with Venezuela and hosts millions of Venezuelan refugees.
De la Espriella takes office on August 7, 2026. If Brazil’s November presidential election delivers Flávio Bolsonaro to the Planalto Palace, the two largest nations bordering Venezuela will be governed by leaders who have explicitly endorsed forceful regime change in Caracas. Combined with the apparent willingness of acting Venezuelan President Delcy Rodríguez to cooperate with Washington, the conditions may finally exist for completing what the Trump administration attempted and failed to accomplish in 2019.
De la Espriella’s hostility toward Caracas is neither recent nor cautious. He first articulated his position on Venezuela during a 2018 appearance on Peruvian TV personality Jaime Bayly’s Miami television program. According to to his own subsequent writings, he urged Venezuelans to commit tyrannicide against Nicolás Maduro. Days later he published a column titled “Death to the Tyrant” in Barranquilla’s El Heraldo, writing that “the death of Nicolás Maduro becomes necessary to guarantee the survival of the Republic.”
When U.S. forces captured Maduro in January 2026, de la Espriella publicly celebrated, claiming he had predicted it years earlier. He sold the American operation not as an “invasion” but as “the arrest of an international criminal and head of the Cartel de los Soles,” arguing that Washington acted according to the law due to Venezuela’s alleged lack of institutional legitimacy.
His campaign platform explicitly called for a renewed military alliance with Washington. In February, De la Espriella announced that he would immediately begin “bombing the camps of the narco-terrorists and spraying drug crops,” adding that “this cannot be done without a strategic alliance with the United States and the State of Israel.” He marketed this as a 90-day security plan modeled on Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele’s approach, promising to retake national territory through joint task forces, aerial bombardment of criminal camps, fumigation of 330,000 hectares of coca, and the construction of 10 mega-prisons in remote jungle locations. He has also promised to establish American military bases on Colombian territory as part of a comprehensive security restructuring.
Colombia may soon find a partner in this posture across its longest border. Five months after de la Espriella’s inauguration, Brazilians will decide their own presidential election. Flávio Bolsonaro, son of former President Jair Bolsonaro, has made Venezuela the centerpiece of his campaign against incumbent Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
When Maduro was kidnapped in January, Flávio immediately seized on the moment. He posted that “Venezuela has become one of the most extreme examples of how an authoritarian regime can destroy a nation,” calling Maduro a “narcoterrorist.” At the time, his brother Eduardo texted him saying “you are elected president, because we know that a lot of things will come out of Maduro,” predicting that Maduro’s capture would expose Lula’s ties to the Venezuelan regime.
Colombia unique. Across the region, electoral cycles have repeatedly shown that social progress does not necessarily produce lasting political loyalty. Similar patterns can be seen in Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, and elsewhere in South America, where periods of progressive governance have often been followed by the election of more conservative leaders or governments with markedly different priorities.
Former Ecuadorian president Rafael Correa offered one explanation for this phenomenon. He argued that when people escape poverty and enter the middle class, many become primarily concerned with preserving their newly acquired status. As a result, they may become less supportive of policies aimed at extending similar benefits to others. Whether or not one accepts this interpretation, it highlights an important political challenge: The very success of progressive social policies may alter the interests, expectations, and priorities of the people they benefit, making long-term political continuity more difficult to sustain.
The very success of progressive social policies may alter the interests, expectations, and priorities of the people they benefit, making long-term political continuity more difficult to sustain.
And so, little Juan or Rosa, John or Jane, they are all primed for consumopethicus, for no mutual aid once they get that fucking brass ring? That’s the smoke and mirrors of psychological warfare, which is capitalism deluxe: The parties, that uniparty, loves those fucking wars, those derivatives, those BlackRocks and Blackwaters and Black Stones.
Trump is just the dirty Depends diaper for the 319 Thug Jew Boys, along with the 3,200 Goyim Billionaire Followers.
Zeteo and its headlines. What fucking duh-dumb headline: New U.S. Iran Strikes Show Trump Has Started a ‘Forever War,’ Exasperated Official Says
After U.S. attacks on targets around the Strait of Hormuz in retaliation for a ship strike on Thursday, administration sources voiced fears of worse to come despite the supposed ceasefire.
And the shape of the future is NOT egalitarian people’s power, people’s movement. We are talking billions of people under the thumb of the military order — the AI and microchip and energy and chemical and mining and extraction and agriculture and media and education and medical and financial and banking and psychological and cultural and religions MILITARY COMPLEX.
Read closely, and you will see a love of weapons deep deep in this fellow’s words.
Reuters reported in late June that India is in fast-moving talks with the UAE over the sale of its jointly Russian-produced BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles whose export requires Moscow’s approval. The first foreign export of these arms was to the Philippines in 2024, which Russia approved as part of its regional balancing act that was elaborated on here. In brief, Russia believes that its “military diplomacy” can strengthen ties with the Philippines, one of its most surprising partners, and gently balance China.
Over the intervening two years, India announced that the BrahMos will also be exported to Vietnam, which is Russia’s traditional partner in Southeast Asia. There have also been reports that Indonesia might soon become a customer too. That would further strengthen Russian-Indonesian relations that have experienced a renaissance under new President Prabowo Subianto. Readers should also know that India has excellent ties with the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, and the UAE.
On that note, many “Non-Russian Pro-Russians” (NRPR) likely aren’t aware, but Russia has excellent ties with the UAE too. President Mohammad Bin Zayed is a close friend of Putin’s, his country’s financial system plays an irreplaceable role in helping Russia mitigate the impact of the West’s sanctions, and many Russians nowadays vacation and even live in the UAE as well. The UAE’s excellent ties with India and Ethiopia, Russia’s oldest African partner, could even lead to a “Multipolar Quad” within BRICS.
At the same time, the UAE is unpopular among NRPRs and most members of the Alt-Media Community (AMC) due to its alliances with Israel and the US, not to mention the role that it played during the Third Gulf War by passively facilitating US strikes against Iran and reportedly launching its own too. For this reason, Russia’s potential (and arguably likely) approval of India’s potential BrahMos sale to the UAE would probably be met with sharp disapproval, and some NRPRs and other AMC folks might condemn it.
And so, we have this shit: Mate the Jew getting into his fellow Jews’ domain:
But the main body of the book, if lacking such sustained reflection on the telos question, does deal with some related questions. Such as: How straightforward and logical—how “natural”—an extension of technological and ultimately biological evolution is the evolution of artificial intelligence? And how likely was biological evolution to produce some species smart enough to give birth to such an intelligence—and for that matter to give birth to the various prior technologies that have carried this species to the brink of global social organization?
If you find these questions interesting in their relevance to the telos question, that’s great. But serving in that capacity isn’t their main purpose. Their main purpose is just to underscore how deep and powerful is the impetus behind the emergence of this new form of intelligence. It is a force to be reckoned with.
I don’t mean to dwell unduly on the potential downsides of AI. The promised upsides are real: Making good education and good medical care abundant where they’re now scarce, powering scientific breakthroughs that help society broadly, curing cancer and other diseases, and so on. (My cancer, by the way, hasn’t returned since my surgery a year ago. Still, if AI wants to make my prospects even brighter, be my guest.) In the book I also raise the possibility that AI can help us overcome the psychology of tribalism, even if its “natural” tendency—the form it will take if we don’t make deliberate choices about the form we want it to take—may be closer to the opposite.
Publishing a book brings rich opportunities for second guessing yourself, and I now worry that the book’s title will be taken too literally: that it will alienate some people who might like the book, while attracting some readers who abandon the book after realizing that I don’t offer confident or consoling answers about higher purpose—that I can’t say what, if anything, has given us our mission. But I do think our mission is clear. And that’s something.
From Reddit: Haredi Gedolim speaking against AI
I called in to a phone conference, which is a presentation by a number of rabbis, about how AI such as Chat-GPT is “from the satan”. Unfortunately, they are speaking pure yeshivish, with every other word Hebrew or Yiddish, so I am having a hard time following it. What the main points seem to be:
- The rabbis speaking so far have no idea how it works
- What they understand about AI seems to have come from others who told them what they tried
- They seem to conflate AI with smartphones and internet
- This is another late push by Satan to try to mislead klal yisroel before Moshiach comes
- “don’t go after your eyes”, need to stay away from sin, the yetzer horah. Don’t go using smartphones to consult AI, because it will pull you into a dangerous world. Don’t use it even for good.
- Danger that people will ask shailahs to the AI, but won’t know if the answer is reliable or not. Therefore, best to just stay away.
- AI can bring physical harm
- the satan created the technology, to make things easy, take away effort; the AI will remove kedushah from the Jewish people
- it’s so bad even goyim understand it is dangerous; but it was created by goyim therefore it can’t have kedushah
- Jews must separate completely from “this machine”. Jews should run away from it.
- Young people who resist the urge of the yetzer horah to avoid AI will get a great blessing
- AI / ChatGPT is different than the general internet; it is able to answer questions in natural language; it is able to relate to us as a friend.
- At the end of galut, Esau will come to Jacob and say “you are my brother”; Esau will let Jews into his universities; AI is compared to Esau, now AI brings the knowledge of all of Universities into the Jewish home. AI will destroy by letting children get all education chinuch from outside, instead of from their parents. It will be like living with the goyim in your house.
- We should pray to Hashem to remove this danger from the Jewish people
- A major concern seems to be that Chat-GPT and other AI LLMs can bypass the internet filters/limits
- The chat AI will try to form a relationship with the caller, making the person think that the AI cares about them, and offer advice. Young people form relationships with the AI and begin to rely on it. A girl called the AI and said her father was treating her poory; the AI told her to leave home and break away from her family. A young boy called the AI, the day after he talked to it, and it asked him about his previous problem. (I’m not sure what this telephone AI is, which remembers prior conversations)
And so, war war war will not get you food food food, but in the minds of the majority of people banging the war drums, man oh man,
Mexico presents an important counterexample. The presidency of Andrés Manuel López Obrador was followed by the election of Claudia Sheinbaum, who belongs to the same political movement and has pledged to continue much of the same agenda. Rather than producing a backlash, the governing project maintained broad popular support through a successful leadership transition.
Part of the answer may lie not only in policy outcomes but also in political identity. While many progressive governments in South America have defined themselves primarily through ideological labels such as socialism or the left, Mexico’s governing movement increasingly describes itself through the concept of Mexican Humanism. Although its policies share many objectives with progressive governments elsewhere, the language is notably different. Mexican Humanism emphasizes dignity, community, solidarity, and national culture rather than ideological affiliation.
This distinction may matter. Political projects framed primarily in ideological terms can reinforce divisions between supporters and opponents. Projects rooted in shared cultural and ethical values may be better positioned to build identification across traditional political boundaries. From this perspective, Mexico’s continuity may reflect not only the material results achieved by the government, but also the broader narrative through which those results were understood.
The Colombian election therefore raises a broader question for Latin America. If poverty reduction, lower inequality, and improved social indicators are not enough to guarantee political continuity, what is missing? Is the decisive factor economic performance, security, media influence, political organization or something deeper within a nation’s culture?
Ahh, the coming of the lord. Oh, the coming of the rulers to the hands, pedophile church goers, military blessed for its mercenaries, locked bathrooms, kiddos chained to toilets, the whole Handmaid’s Nine Yards.
The Trump administration’s Religious Liberty Commission released a draft report arguing that the traditional concept of separation of church and state is a legal error and recommending the Justice Department adopt an “originalist” interpretation of the Constitution’s religion clauses. The report calls for expanding the role of religion in public life, including allowing more religious displays in public schools, ending the Johnson Amendment that restricts political endorsements by nonprofits, and protecting faith-based organizations from complying with certain civil rights requirements. Texas Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick also declared that the phrase “separation of church and state” should no longer have authority in public policy, despite the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause forming the constitutional basis for that principle.
Our lord, the doctor:
Four million people dropped out of Affordable Care Act marketplace plans in the first month of 2026 coverage, a much sharper decline than in previous years.
Our lord, birthing of a nation:
Confederate flags were briefly displayed at North Carolina’s pavilion during Trump’s “Great American State Fair” before organizers removed the imagery following public backlash. The display became one of several controversies surrounding the event, which has also faced boycotts from multiple Democratic-led states and criticism over low attendance and logistical problems.
Paul Haeder, Author 