Paul Haeder, Author

writing, interviews, editing, blogging

U.S. commerce secretary, Wilbur Ross, glibly remarked in January that the COVID-19 epidemic in China would be positive for the U.S. economy. Some cynical journalists believe Wuhan was a good spot for release because any genetic modifications revealed in its sequence could later be blamed on Wuhan’s biosafety level-4 lab, thus achieving plausible deniability – the CIA’s operational hallmark.

Continually, the narratives around Big Pharma, the lockdowns, the Ministry of Truths (media, government, business, academic) tied to any sort of inquiry into what the hell is going on with jabs, lockdowns, virus X, Y, Z, omega variants, what the human microbiome is, all of that, you’d expect, to be questioned and discussed. You know — journalists not taking the words hook-line-and-sinker from anyone, any entity, any government body, any PR spinner, any authority, any policing agency, any corporation, and any of it if it stinks of group think and ramrodding forced feeding.

There are the legacy media/press, and then the big time media, the cable networks, the entire thuggery of mainstream newspaper and magazine journalism, where again gatekeeping and a bizarre code of “not going after the drug-pharma-virology-research end of science” holds them captive. This positioning that everything coming out of CDC and NIH and the various countries’ Covid-Task Forces as being sacrosanct is not just troubling, but is anti-free speech, anti-humanity.

Because, there is a history of bad acting by science and technology and engineering, and there is a boatload of reports and books on the cover-ups and the mistakes and the outright fear mongering science-engineering-medicine-pharma has unloaded onto humanity.

The lab coats, the shiny labs, the triple post doc degrees for each vaunted scientist, all the fawning, all the glory through grants, through agency titles and gigs, all the university associations, it all seems as if these people are many cuts above the rest of us ignorant fools, so even scientists-turned-journalists are made to look like fools when questioning the mainstream narratives.

So many earnest, smart, working doctors are made to look like fools by global media. But, Richard Fleming, MD, JD? Drats, his comments airing on InfoWars, so it must be BAD.

So, calling Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., a looney makes a lot of sense in this upside down world of left is right and lies are truth. War is the peace given those mandates, lockdowns, fear, Zoom Life, inflationary trends, poverty, unemployment, eviction, foreclosures, and “getting anything anyway possible” training for the masses are played out and propped up by a compliant media and lockstep authorities from city, county, states and nations, across the globe.

The fact that many many doctors and scientists — a few million — are not at the center of discussion on what is happening with Omicron, or are not buying the PR spin from Big Pharma on not only pushing more and more more boosters, but now more new and improved (sic) main shots for Omicron, that is the crime against humanity.

Really, there are literally many many folk who have the training, the degrees (if that’s your litmus test) and direct work experience with medicine, the virus research, physics, more, gaslit and censored, silenced, marginalized, and, well, finished.

Yet, RFK, Jr., is a looney.

Story at-a-glance:

  • Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci have created a formidable public-private partnership that wields incredible power over the American public, along with global health and food policies.
  • Inspired by Rockefeller’s business model, Bill and Melinda Gates donated $36 billion worth of Microsoft stock to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) between 1994 and 2018.
  • Gates also created Bill Gates Investments (BGI), which predominantly invests in multinational food, agriculture, pharmaceutical, energy, telecom and tech companies with global operations.
  • Gates strategically targets BMGF’s charitable gifts to give him control of the international health and agricultural agencies and the media, allowing him to dictate global health and food.
  • Fauci and Gates met in person, shaking hands in 2000 in an agreement to control and expand the global vaccine enterprise.
  • You can read all of the details in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s best-selling book, “The Real Anthony Fauci,” which contains more than 2,200 footnotes of referenced data.

It does seem crazy, no, with all the cable news yammering, with all the lock-step health department promos to jab-jab-jab. It is amazing that other methods of preventing severe flu illness or severe Covid-19 symptoms are not in the toolboxes. So many other ways to tackle sickness.

Yes, the following words, in the context of the narrative set forth by the elite and those following the elite, and all the journalists who follow their orders from the colonies of compliant thinking — Ivy League schools, think tanks, media operations, etc. — seem like lunacy in this day and age:

A new press release published on the 17th August, which can be viewed here, confirms that the pair have received sworn affidavits from leading experts including research scientist and nuclear cardiologist Dr Richard M. Fleming, the Nobel Laureate virologist Professor Luc A. Montagnier, and Dr Kevin W. McCairn, a neuroscientist and expert on neurological disease.

A new claim has since been submitted to the ICC due to the vast amount of new evidence and information that has come to light in the past few months, and the lawyers say they now have compelling evidence that “the SARS-CoV-2 virus and the Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ are deliberately engineered bioweapons that have been released in two phases on unsuspecting peoples of the world”.

Attorney Melinda C. Mayne, and Kaira S. McCallum have also confirmed that they have now been joined by lawyers who have filed similar Requests for Investigation to the International Criminal Court, in France, the Czech Republic and Slovakia.

In any case, the facts need to be investigated, and any sort of lockdown on robust investigative journalism is a crime against the people.

Speaking with MintPress News, Linsey McGoey, a professor of sociology at the University of Essex, U.K., explained that Gates’ philanthropy comes with a price:

“Philanthropy can and is being used deliberately to divert attention away from different forms of economic exploitation that underpin global inequality today.

“The new ‘philanthrocapitalism’ threatens democracy by increasing the power of the corporate sector at the expense of the public sector organizations, which increasingly face budget squeezes, in part by excessively remunerating for-profit organizations to deliver public services that could be delivered more cheaply without private sector involvement.”

We are in dark times, where people will not open themselves up to discussion. Case closed. Remember those cases closed days a few weeks ago?

In a recent article (“The Anti-Science Left Doesn’t Want You Asking Questions”), Candace Owens did some­thing brave: she told the truth, that many women said they were experiencing symptoms after getting the jab. Predict­ably, Owens was accused of being a conspiracy theorist, a liar and an “anti-vaxxer caus­ing vaccine hesitancy.”

But now, the National In­stitutes of Health (NIH) are looking into the trend be­cause apparently, what Ow­ens described is happening at an alarming rate. The NIH is “ordering a $1.6 million study into how covid vaccines im­pact menstrual cycles,” she says.

Although people like National Institute of Child Health and Human Develop­ment director Diana Bianchi knew that changes to men­struation were happening, she characterized them as “‘not a life-or-death issue,’” Owens said. “So, they allowed women to be gaslit for months online – censored by fact-checkers because it wasn’t a priority for them to look into the is­sue. Disparaging labels were slapped on any woman who shared the truth about what they were experiencing, be­cause after all, ‘experts say there is no evidence that vac­cines impact fertility.’”

Owens simply told the truth and asked important questions. So did rapper Nic­ki Minaj when she shared an anecdote about someone she knew in Trinidad who re­ported swollen testicles after getting the jab. Minaj merely encouraged people to do their own research. The reaction? MSM journalists attacked her in the most vicious manner. Piers Morgan, a loosely de­fined “journalist” with The Daily Mail, said, “She is ped­dling lies that will cost lives.” As if some Science god made him the soothsayer of truth and honest journalism. At best, Morgan is a peddler of banal gossip and trite, second­hand news.

Well, I suppose everyone is a looney in “their” book:

Here, my response to a friend concerning a journalist who will not look at questions surrounding these “vaccines” or look at the research behind them and other aspects of agency capture and nefarious testing and hidden projects tied to the gain of function work, and the mRNA warp speed.

Quoting myself: “Yeah, I got it too, Joe. I am not saying you shouldn’t go at it with him, but I don’t have much context about he and his blog. But I do know colonized minds, and shoot, you know, polio and Salk, and then, how does this relate to anything tied to mRNA, and why there are no WHY’s allowed in the discourse even by research journalists, MDs, PhD’s, virologists, and others. That’s the problem here, is that the narrative this fellow follows is pretty fucking limited, and if you look hard at his position, it is a position that comes from the mainstream, truly, and then if he tries to go outside that, then it’s coming from a democrat-progressive(sic) left. 

I just talked with Bob Z, 80, who just had a knee replacement in Spokane. He is from Minnesota, ex hippie, does archival stuff tied to the Dylan days, and the ’60s. He was my producer on my radio show. He loves what I did then, and my writing, but he still basically admits he watches cable, CNN, and does read some things thrown at him via the emails. I do not hit him with much of my stuff anymore.

He says that he could have had a week in rehab, but the doctors and med staff at the hospital in Spokane stated that the unvaccinated are taking up bed space in rehab centers, retirement facilities and hospitals so no room. We can go back and forth with what he knows and what I know, and he admits I know a lot more on a lot more topics, including the SARS origins, the dark side of DARPA and NIH, etc., etc. And what these jabs are, etc.

Yet, he states, or asks, “Isn’t RFK, Jr a looney?” And there it is, so I go back, walk him back to 2005 when RFK Jr. came to Spokane to dedicate the new Riverkeeper. How his talk was jam packed. How people swooned over his smarts, his licks, and his speaking and litigation abilities. I even wrote a piece on him for the local weekly. Bob Z knew that, and I mentioned the appearance in my hour-long weekly radio show, which he produced. Then, in 16 years, most of those same formerly fawning people will call him looney, crackpot, anti-vaxx, and off the deep end.

So, in those 16 years, RFK Jr has been at work. Has been working hard, in fact, and in many countries and in fields still tied to environmental law arena and other arenas. Like drug companies, big Pharma and the vaxxing  biz. And he’s talked with scientists, doctors, advocates, lay people, and others. A lot of talks and depositions.

He’s 67, and now, somehow this fellow at age 51 when he was well regarded in 2005 and talked in Spokane and was loved then, now is looney. 

That is the issue, then, no, maybe I who was sort of well regarded, but a dissenter and dissident and disbeliever in all those sacred cows, but smart enough, maybe now, at age 64, I too am a Looney Tunes?

Even though in 16 fucking years I have had more than a dozen different jobs, entered more than 5 very different fields, have been writing and publishing, and teaching, and learning, but alas, those fucking 16 years are meaningless, or speak to a sliding slow lunacy? These people are Ministry of Truth fuckers, and while not 1984 and Big Brother of Orwellian modeling, they still are big on science. It goes to environmentalism and climate change and sustainability. They think somehow that doctors working on diseases and disease prevention are protected from criticism. Put some of those experts in the BIPOC category, and many in the female category, and, most being Democrats, and this is where we are. Those labs and those petri dishes and those studies and animal modeling and computing and all of that, it is sacred space.

I don’t know what else to say. Because if you are in echo chambers like these folk are, the echo sounds valuable, important and loud. Leaps of faith. The greater good even given the risks? All of the marketing that they laugh about, tied to smoking or big defense industries, but then, they are bamboozled when it comes to CDC, Johns Hopkins, UNC, NIH, et al marketing. 

Are there fewer people I can count on to have a smart discussion on many things? Yep. Do I have anything in common with these docs and scientists who yammer about the USA being the United Socialist America? Nope. Do they have some things to say about Covid-19, mRNA, PCR, origins? Yep. Do I throw everything they know and all the work they have done on this pandemic out the window because I think they are abhorant and stupid when it comes to China, Russia, Iran et al?  No. Would they line my ass up for firing squad and imprisonment for my work on critical race and my communist leanings and my idea about world government and world corporate fascism? Yep, I believe many might. But . . . . .

No discussion with the liberals? No open minds? No willingness to doubt the authorities? No going outside their lanes? That is what I have issue with, and so I am feeling like the walls of common sense and decent rhetoric and humane thinking, well, all are being exploded. Or, the walls are closing in on me. It feels like that daily, truly.
Just give in, just stop doubting the jabs, just line up and get the shot. Even those who defend (maybe) the right to not be forcibly vaccinated still caveat that statement with the fact they got the jabs and believe in their efficacy. That line tires the shit out of me, too.” +–+ end of quoting myself!  

No matter what we say, there isn’t enough time, not enough bandwidth, and most of these people believe Fauci and believe every single person with a lab coat, Ivy League MD degree, attached to their post-doc work in immunology, virology, biochemistry.

But there are other scientists:

Overall, it’s stunning to read how the scientific community marvels at the ability of influenza type viruses to cause pandemics, because unlike Ebola people don’t die-off within days of exposure but productively transmit the airborne pathogen for two weeks undetected when asymptomatic.

Influenza is usually transmitted by direct contact but can also be transmitted by aerosol (e.g. on a passenger plane). Indeed, international transmission is increasingly frequent. Notably, aerosol transmission of influenza requires up to 27,000 times fewer virions to induce equivalent disease. Taken together with the fact that the influenza virus is readily accessible and may be causing more deaths than previously suspected, the possibility for genetic engineering and aerosol transmission suggests an enormous potential for bioterrorism.”

Some of the more fascinating discussions in the scientific community involve ethical issues with gain-of-function experimentation. Gain-of-function research involves genetic manipulations that expand the adaptability and/or virulence of a given pathogen.

Ralph Baric, an infectious-disease researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, last week (November 9) published a study on his team’s efforts to engineer a virus with the surface protein of the SHC014 coronavirus, found in horseshoe bats in China, and the backbone of one that causes human-like severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in mice. The hybrid virus could infect human airway cells and caused disease in mice, according to the team’s results.”

Other interesting discussions involve the resistance of certain DNA and blood types to particular infections and the sensitivity of others:

One of the reasons COVID-19 can be so fatal to some people is because of their bodies elicit an overzealous immune response called a cytokine storm, which may originate in their DNA. A small study of patients who died from the 2009 H1N1 flu outbreak found that many carried mutations that triggered this self-destructive flood of cytokine molecules. Results from studies on the genetics of COVID-19 susceptibility and severity are beginning to trickle in. One study suggests that variants in the HLA genes likely play a role. Others point to differences in the ABO blood type, as well as variants in the ACE2 gene, which codes for the protein SARS-CoV-2 latches onto to infect human cells. But the findings are all preliminary and require follow-up with larger datasets.”

Also noted by scientists are the distribution of similar DNA and blood types to particular geographical regions and ethnic groups which could potentially enable effective targeting.

Rather than specifically triggering the toxic effects of organisms such as anthrax, the Sunshine project warned that weapons based on a new medical technique called RNA interference could shut down vital genes. If the sequence of the target gene varies between two different populations the technique could be used to interrupt key body functions in one population and not the other. If as little as 10% or 20% of a target population would be affected, this would wreak havoc among enemy soldiers on a battlefield or in an enemy society as a whole, the group said.” (Fighting the Invisible Enemy – Not COVID 19, but Imperial Fascism)

Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency Attorney Aaron Siri, who represents PHMPT, said:

“Americans must routinely produce documents, pay fines, and otherwise expend resources to comply with the law. Courts don’t inquire as to the ability or financial resources to comply with the law — they must comply.

“In fact, it would be laughable if a billionaire defendant came before a court and claimed poverty to escape making a document production, but that is the FDA’s position.”

The FDA budget for fiscal year 2019 was $6.1 billion.
In the FDA’s
 64-page briefing, the agency argued it needed the full 75 years to redact and release the documents out of “fairness” to other FOIA requesters.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: