Paul Haeder, Author

writing, interviews, editing, blogging

fa$ci$t$ are the new Technocrats a la DARPA

So, the SARS-CoV2 is in, well, pets. Ferrets, dogs and cats. And deer, tigers, minks, well, you get the picture. This virus has animal hosts. None of what the lock-step folk say about second booster and 3rd and 4th, forced upon everyone, is bizarre.

Again, the breakthroughs, the Omicrons, the variants, for god’s sake, this zoonotic disease is in the water, air, food, crops, and, yep, pets. That program will be launched soon, since the head of Pfizer is a PhD in vet science. All those animals, all those feedlots and barns, all those cuddly ones on the bed and in the house, they too will be forced to get jab and booster.

This is a huge money maker — as big, but scaled up, as the Pet Rock. Can you imagine, a common rock, put in a cheap box, with a cute one page Care Instructions printed up, and sell it for $9.99. But at least you get a rock, which can be used for many many things.

The vaccines x 5, annually, what are they good for? Yep, profits.

It is, alas, a health threat that has been contrived, but now, Merck has a new pill, hmm, so close to ivermectin. Anti viral. Within three days, bringing down the viral load by 95 percent.

Or, SaNoTize — Quote: “A well known antimicrobial, Nitric Oxide, has been found to rapidly reduce SARS-CoV-2 viral load, knocking it down by 95% within 24 hours, and 99% within 72 hours, according to a recent study by researchers funded by England’s NHS foundation trust and SaNOtize Research & Development Corporation – a Canadian biotech company currently conducting Phase II trials of a nitric oxide nasal spray.

A group of 80 adults (18-70 years) with confirmed (Alpha strain) Covid-19 infections were divided into two groups, with half receiving nitric oxide nasal spray (NONS) that were self-administered 5-6 times daily for 9 days. (source)

On the one-year anniversary of the declaration, some of those involved in the public health proposal spoke to The Eagle about their intentions, the fallout, pandemic data and the idea of “focused protection.”

They say what they proposed was a long-accepted public health concept designed to both protect the old and compromised while allowing the young and healthy to live normally. Their idea was to avoid the collateral health damage of the lockdowns, which would hit the poor the hardest.

The scientists drafted the declaration at the American Institute for Economic Research, a think tank off Division Street in Great Barrington. It has received more than 860,000 signatures from around the world, of which nearly 15,000 of those are from scientists and more than 44,000 are from medical practitioners.

The concept was denounced by other researchers worldwide as both callous and impractical. Great Barrington town officials quickly tried to distance the town — one wanted the policy renamed, while residents joined the chorus. The situation soon dropped the declaration scientists into a political cauldron, as some politicians seized on the proposal, while others rejected it as far-right heartlessness.

In Great Barrington, scientists declare policy for living with COVID: Shield only the most vulnerable for herd immunity

GREAT BARRINGTON — Three top scientists say there’s another public health crisis underway, and it is the poor and working class who suffer the…

‘Nothing new’

The scientists say that when they traveled to the Berkshires six months after the lockdowns and began to discuss the crisis, they were upholding a well-established public health practice of “focused protection.”

“So there’s nothing new or innovative in the declaration,” said Dr. Kulldorff, who is a member of the scientific advisory committees to the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “What we saw was that, because people thought that these lockdowns and the masks and so on would protect everybody, [authorities] did not do the focused protection.”

The resulting deaths bear this out, he added. Kulldorff said there are two underpinnings to the declaration that data now supports: The “thousand-fold difference in mortality” between old and young, and what he says is strong and lasting natural immunity after infection.

“One of the stunning things through this pandemic is the questioning of natural immunity after having COVID,” Kulldorff said. “We didn’t know this a year ago, but now we know that the immunity from having COVID is stronger than after the vaccine.”

Kulldorff is, in part, referring to health officials who appear to be dancing around the immunity issue post-infection, concerned that it will undermine inoculation efforts. The results of a large Israeli study showing robust natural immunity, for instance, demonstrates this.

‘Our crucible’

Dr. Bhattacharya, who is also a professor of health policy and specializes in the economics of health care, moved last month to the school’s newly established Department of Health Policy. It was DeSantis’ Aug. 1 tweet with Bhattacharya’s photo that was nailed to campus kiosks, in which Bhattacharya is quoted about focused protection and linked to death counts in Florida. DeSantis has sown derision for his support of declaration-style COVID policy and opposition to vaccine and mask mandates.

The poster campaign was initially a response to comments Bhattacharya had made about the lack of “high quality” evidence that masks stop the spread of infection, which also led to a faculty petition to silence public health pronouncements contrary to university policy — one that does not overtly target him. But the posters felt threatening, and it took him several days to return to his office.

“It felt like targeted harassment,” he said. “The poster campaign really shook me.”

In April, Bhattacharya was further linked to DeSantis when he participated in the governor’s April roundtable about “Big Tech censorship and the COVID-19 pandemic.” Kulldorff also participated, as well as Scott Atlas, a fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford who had resigned as former President Donald Trump’s coronavirus advisor.

Bhattacharya says he has never registered for a political party and is obligated as a public health scientist to consult with anyone, regardless of politics. “I’d happily speak with any politician on any side of the issue — I don’t limit my advice,” he said.

The campaign to censure him marks a dangerous decline in discourse, particularly at a university, he said. Bhattacharya says he feels a responsibility to speak what he believes is the truth, given his tenure and job protection.

“I think many people who signed the Great Barrington Declaration have lost their jobs or have been silenced or lost opportunities for grants and collaborations,” he said.

Can we not look at strengthening our immune response, our general terrain healtlh? For hardly any weekly dollar outlay? Zinc, Turmeric Curcumin, D3, aspirin, other supplements and some pharma drugs.

Merck COVID Pill

The fate of molnupiravir — developed in partnership between Merck and Ridgeback Therapeutics — is important for both society’s battle against Covid-19 and Merck’s financial fortunes. Experts say that an easy-to-give, oral treatment that keeps people who contract the SARS-CoV-2 virus from being hospitalized or dying would go a long way toward helping society return to normal. Existing pills, such as hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, have failed to deliver convincing results. Monoclonal antibodies treatments, though very effective, must be given as shots or intravenous infusions.

The entire show has many smoke and mirrors brigades, and many curtains and endless house of mirrors.

Those who oppose the neofeudal authority of the corporate, stakeholder Technate and refuse to comply with the imposition of biosecurity obligations will have their CBDC restricted or switched off. The pseudopandemic has established the framework of the biosecurity state that will control all our lives. The vaccine passports are the gateway to full biometric identity for every citizen in the new normal Technate.

We will be required to show our biometric ID on demand. Access to goods and services will be monitored and restricted as desired by the Technate. UBI and CBDC combined with biometric ID will ensure our compliance. The central planners of the Technate will oversee the AI controlled system which will automatically limit the freedoms of those who defy the rules decreed by the stakeholder capitalists.

Money, as we currently understand it, is no longer required by those behind the pseudopandemic. The net zero carbon economy enables them to seize control of the “global commons.” This means that they will have dominion over all of the Earth’s natural resources. All land, the oceans, the atmosphere and even space is being converted into assets via Stakeholder Capitalism Metrics. (Source)

From left, Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University; Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a Stanford University professor.

China owns Nature magazine’s ass: Debunking “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2” claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t from a lab — Source. Read the peer reviewed research paper published by BioEssays that this paper seeded, as well as its addendum which conclusively demonstrates the bioengineered nature of the 1977 H1N1 Pandemic Strain leak.  

Cat resting on man's chest

The researchers said that cats have biological factors that make them more vulnerable than dogs to COVID-19, such as viral receptors that allow the virus to more easily infect cells. Cats are also more likely than dogs to sleep near their owner’s face, which increases their exposure to the virus.

They added that because the infection rate in animals with owners was higher than in those at the shelter and the stray cats, humans are more likely spreading the virus to pets than vice versa, something previous studies have also shown.

Lead author Dorotheee Bienzle, DVM, PhD, recommends that infected owners keep away from their pets and not allow them into their bedroom. “I’d also recommend that you keep your pet away from other people and pets,” she said in the release.

“While the evidence that pets can pass the virus on to other pets is limited, it can’t be excluded,” she added. “Similarly, although pets have not been shown to pass the virus back to people, the possibility can’t be completely ruled out.” (source)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: