The World According to Jews in Israel, Jews in NYC, and Goyim in the Lobotomy Rooms, well, you shall soon see this Substacker in prison?
Mar 29, 2026
13-Year-Old Bride of Rock and Roll Star Jerry Lee Lewis Shares Her Story

Oh, the other Jerry Lewis (Levitch) : Jerry Lewis’s Costars Speak Out: “He Grabbed Me. He Began to Fondle Me. I Was Dumbstruck”
Women first interviewed by the directors behind Allen v. Farrow say the comedy icon sexually harassed—and in at least one case, sexually assaulted—them with impunity. A special collaboration, including a mini doc, between V.F. and the filmmakers.
[Lewis was born as Joseph Levitch on March 16, 1926, in Newark, New Jersey, to a Jewish family. His parents were Daniel “Danny” Levitch (1902–1980), a master of ceremonies and vaudevillian who performed under the stage name Danny Lewis, whose parents immigrated to the United States from the Russian Empire to New York, and Rachael “Rae” Levitch (née Brodsky; 1904–1982), a WOR radio pianist and Danny’s music director, from Warsaw.]

“It’s as broad as possible, and that’s by design,” TrackAIPAC co-founder Casey Kennedy told The Intercept. Instead of just AIPAC, the group tracks spending from across the pro-Israel lobby. “We want to provide the most encapsulating picture that we can of who’s giving to the lobby and where they’re giving to,” Kennedy said.

In 2017, police in Laredo, Texas, arrested citizen journalist Patricia Villarreal under an obscure and never previously used law making it a felony to ask government employees for nonpublic information for personal benefit. Her supposed crime was asking a police officer about two local tragedies — a suicide and a deadly car wreck.

Her arrest was widely ridiculed, and a judge quickly threw out the charges. When Villarreal sued over her arrest and mistreatment by officers, the legal question wasn’t whether the charges against her were permissible but whether they were so obviously bogus that she could overcome qualified immunity, the unjust and expansive legal shield that protects government employees from liability for all but the most blatant violations. That issue went to the Supreme Court twice, but on Monday, the Court declined to review a federal appellate court’s ruling that the officers were shielded from liability.
+—+
These reporters and media organizations wrote about how this important First Amendment case will impact the rights of all journalists:
- The Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and 24 news organizations including The New York Times, The Washington Post, and Dow Jones & Company (owner of The Wall Street Journal) demonstrate how history shows that “no technique has been more routine or central to newsgathering — from the Founding through the present day — than pursuing information about government affairs simply by asking for it.” In addition to attorneys from the Reporters Committee, the media coalition is also represented by Jackson Walker LLP.
- The MuckRock Foundation, an organization that drives public records requests across the country, is a nonprofit that assists the public in filing governmental requests for public records and then publishes the returned information on its website for public access. Journalists routinely use records MuckRock publishes to expose government corruption, misuse of government funds, and other matters of public concern. MuckRock’s brief warns that if upheld, “the Fifth Circuit’s decision will encourage other government officials, both high and petty, to harass, threaten, and arrest people for requesting information that the government would prefer not to release — even if the government may lawfully release the information under state law.” MuckRock is represented by Prince Lobel Tye LLP.
- A group of five current and former journalists — David Barstow, Kathleen McElroy, Walter Robinson, John Schwartz, and Jacob Sullum — emphasizes that no reasonable official would have thought Priscilla’s basic reporting practice was criminal. They also use real-life examples to demonstrate that “journalists cannot do their jobs if they must fear that any interaction with the government — even a simple request for truthful, factual information — may be used as a pretext for an arrest and criminal prosecution.” The journalists are represented by counsel at Covington & Burling LLP.
- The Dallas Free Press submitted a brief with Avi Adelman and Steven Monacelli, two independent journalists who, like Priscilla, have been arrested or detained while reporting on law enforcement. The brief details how when faced with “closed doors and empty mailboxes … journalists must develop alternative sources to perform their job — a public service indispensable to our democracy.” And if communicating with these sources could result in arrest, independent journalists “are especially vulnerable … given that they may lack the resources and institutional backing of a larger news outlet in the event that they are prosecuted.” The Dallas Free Press, Adelman, and Monacelli are represented by the SMU Dedman School of Law First Amendment Clinic, Thomas Leatherbury, and Vinson & Elkins LLP.
This impressive group of organizations across the ideological spectrum wrote to emphasize the problems with applying qualified immunity in cases like Priscilla’s:
- First Liberty Institute explains that “the government arresting a journalist for asking questions so obviously violates the First Amendment that no reasonable official would sanction such an action.” And FLI points out that “it comes as no surprise that there is no case directly on point with the facts here” because “these sorts of outrageous fact patterns are more frequently found in law school exams than in real life.” FLI is represented by Dentons Bingham Greenbaum LLP.
- The Americans for Prosperity Foundation articulates that qualified immunity is inappropriate when it shields government officials from liability for “intentional and slow-moving” infringements of First Amendment rights. Moreover, AFPF argues, qualified immunity especially threatens constitutional rights when officials enforce rarely-used statues, because “the more obscure the state law, the less likely it is that a prior case was decided on a similar set of facts.”
- The Law Enforcement Action Partnership — whose members include police, prosecutors, and other law-enforcement officials — stress that the Supreme Court “has consistently held that qualified immunity does not shield obvious violations of bedrock constitutional guarantees.” The brief observes that “the dramatic expansion of criminal codes across the country has made it easier than ever” for law enforcement to pretextually arrest someone as punishment for exercising their First Amendment rights. LEAP is represented by Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
- Young America’s Foundation and the Manhattan Institute highlight that “the First Amendment’s guarantees limit state law, not the other way around.” Their brief also explains how the Fifth Circuit’s failure to recognize decades of Supreme Court precedent protecting “routine news-gathering activities under the First Amendment … erodes essential free-speech and free-press rights.” YAF and the Manhattan Institute are represented by the Alliance Defending Freedom and The Dhillon Law Group.
- The Institute for Justice urges reversal of the Fifth Circuit’s decision because “it undermines the text and original meaning of Section 1983,” which protects constitutional rights when violated “under color of” state laws and “notwithstanding” state laws that purport to limit those rights. IJ also stresses that the Fifth Circuit’s application of qualified immunity in the context of an obvious constitutional violation “is inconsistent with the prudential rationale underlying qualified immunity: the carefully calibrated balancing of government and individual interests.”
- The Constitutional Accountability Center details the history of Section 1983 and cautions that because “qualified immunity is at odds with Section 1983’s text and history, courts should be especially careful to respect the limits on the doctrine.” CAC points out that this is an especially inapt case for qualified immunity because Section 1983 was adopted precisely to combat things like the criminalization of speech by pre-war slave codes and retaliatory prosecutions against critics of slavery.
- The Cato Institute underlines that in the context of qualified immunity, “clearly established law is an objective inquiry of reasonableness, not a blind reliance on a lack of judicial precedent.” Cato also warns that “freedom of the press cannot meaningfully exist if journalists are not allowed to seek information from government officials.”

For fuck’s sake — Russia, big bad tough Russia? The Russian tanker Anatoly Kolodkin, sanctioned by the US, would be minutes away from entering Cuban territorial waters with approximately 730,000 barrels of crude oil. Almost impossible for a US intervention at this point.
First delivery in three months. Partial relief for the island.

Pelosi and the other San Francisco liberals made 1,000 arrests of Food Not Bombs over eight years for sharing food with the hungry. They even tortured some of us. I spent 500 days in jail, nine days in a stress position cage and faced 25 to life in prison.

Keith McHenry : Co-founder of the Food Not Bombs movement, author of The Anarchist Cookbook and still against this corporate dystopia. Stand with Haiti


Kelechi DonPido —To my African brothers and sisters, a vote to condemn this act, call us slavery, I call it black genocide, was voted against at the UN by Argentina, Israel and the USA.



They lost in Vietnam.

The fact that CENTCOM downplayed this hit and the Wall Street Journal reported the aircraft as only being “damaged” should tell you something about how credible American public pronouncements are becoming at this juncture of the conflict.

Our bone spurs pedophile!

The 2 commanders who were in charge of the strike on the Elementary school, killing 150+ children. They should be shot on the streets wherever they go buy this TP at whichever Costco they favor!


The CIA with cheese and bread strikes again: Chef José Andrés deploys to feed the Israeli settlers who steal homes and land in occupied Palestine. Victimizing the genocidaires is part of the role that World Central Kitchen plays as a legitimizer of the Zionist project.


The IRGC have announced that it was a $20,000 Shahed-136 drone that destroyed the $700 million US E-3 aircraft.

And somehow the US is losing? The Army and Amazon are creating an online storefront to buy drones as the technology transforms the battlefield.

Russia’s winning?
“We discussed how to provide greater protection for people’s lives in our countries and agreed on a mutually beneficial defense partnership for at least 10 years. At the end of the meeting, our Chiefs of General Staff signed the relevant agreement, which предусматриє joint projects in the defense industry, the creation of co-production facilities, and technological partnerships between companies,” he said in his address.”
Later, during a video call with journalists, Zelensky announced that a similar agreement with the UAE would be signed “within the next few days” and stated that all three agreements with Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE include 10-year cooperation.

Something about Trump LOSING?
The European Union is expanding its powers to track, raid and deport migrants to “return hubs “ in third countries in Africa and elsewhere, quietly adopting tactics of the Trump administration that have drawn public criticism across the 27-nation bloc.
The E.U. continues to tighten migration policies after right-wing parties took power in some countries in 2024. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, from the center-right European People’s Party coalition, has said the new measures will prevent a repeat of the 2015 crisis caused by Syria’s civil war, when about 1 million people arrived to seek asylum.
“We have learnt the lessons of the past. And today, we are better equipped,” von der Leyen has said. The new policies, known as the Pact on Migration and Asylum, go into effect on June 12.
Far-right parties in Europe have praised the deportation policies of U.S. President Donald Trump and called for the E.U. to adopt a similar approach. Human rights groups warn that authorities are already illegally pushing back migrants at E.U. borders and hollowing out their legal protections.

Losing? To the demon-crats?

Border czar says ICE may not leave airports once TSA officers are paid
An almost billionaire, he speaks for me . . . . As of 2026, Robert De Niro’s net worth is estimated to be approximately $500 million. While he is one of Hollywood’s most successful actors, a significant portion of his wealth is derived from his business ventures, particularly his stake in the global restaurant and hotel empire, Nobu.
Sure: A real event: Fonda went on a press blitz yesterday — including The Briefing With Jen Psaki and The Source with Kaitlan Collins — to promote the rallies, which took over cities including San Diego, San Francisco, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Boston and more. A No Kings protest also took place in London.
In St. Paul, Minn., Springsteen was also joined by Sen. Bernie Sanders, Rep. Ilhan Omar and Gov. Tim Walz at one of the largest rallies in the country, where he sang “Streets of Minneapolis,” the song he introduced after the ICE killings of Alex Pretti and Renee Good.

Zelensky or Bibi, all the same fucking Mitzvah Neuroperversity: Israeli police block Latin Patriarch from Palm Sunday mass in Jerusalem.

USA is losing? How the fuck do you think that? USS Massachusetts – submarine with ability to carry 24 Tomahawk cruise missiles – joins Navy fleet.

- No Kings Protests (March 2026): Thousands of Southern Arizonans participated in “No Kings” rallies on March 28, 2026, primarily focusing on opposing President Trump’s use of power and policies regarding the war in Iran and immigration enforcement. Rallies were concentrated in areas like Downtown Tucson, along Speedway, and at major intersections such as Ina and Oracle.
- Raytheon Disruptions (March 2026): Activists (not explicitly identified as “No Kings”) disrupted a Raytheon rocket booth at a Tucson book festival in mid-March 2026, using the slogan “Books not bombs!” to protest military involvement in Iran.
- Past Raytheon Protests (Late 2023): Groups including the Tucson Coalition for Palestine, Arizona Palestine Solidarity Alliance, and Jewish Voice for Peace staged a “die-in” at Raytheon’s Tucson office in November 2023 to protest weapons sales to Israel.

[Demonstrators lie on the asphalt during a previous protest of Raytheon’s weapons sales to Israel on Thursday, Nov. 2, 2023.]

Don’t believe the department of War Crimes, please: Supercarrier USS Gerald R. Ford Might Not Be Combat Ready for 12 to 14 Months.

Now, help me out: how are the Jews of Raping and Murdering Occupied Palestine LOSING? Netanyahu says Israel will widen invasion of southern Lebanon
The announcement intensifies fears that Israel will model its invasion of southern Lebanon on its scorched-earth campaign in Gaza.

[The U.S.S. Tripoli entering the Singapore Strait earlier this month. The 2,500 Marines who have been dispatched to the Middle East are part of the U.S.S. Tripoli amphibious ready group.]
The infrastructure and electrical grids are being bombed now….
There Are Now Over 50,000 American Troops in the Mideast
The arrival of 2,500 Marines and another 2,500 sailors is keeping the number of American troops in the region at roughly 10,000 more than usual.

I get it, I do . . . But, for fuck sakes, the Epstein Class is raping and murdering girls: At their schools and in their HOMES.
A top modeling industry activist has called for business leaders to be hauled before lawmakers in Washington to investigate what role modeling agencies may have played in the Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking scandal.
Sara Ziff is the founder of the Model Alliance, a non-profit advocacy group calling for fair treatment, labor rights and safe working conditions for fashion industry workers.
“I’d like to see a proper investigation into how modeling agencies facilitated Epstein’s abuse,” she told the Guardian in an interview, adding that bringing the heads of the companies before the oversight committee is “totally appropriate”.
Ziff and more than 40 Epstein survivors have signed a letter sent to New York attorney general Letitia James, and congressmen Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie to ask for an inquiry into the issue. They say the number of people in the model business – agents, owners, scouts – whose names have come up in Epstein document releases and through witness testimony “point to more than a single predator operating in isolation”.
The letter describes a power structure in the fashion business that made model agencies “a pipeline through which vulnerable teenagers were regularly delivered to powerful predators” and describes Epstein as “not a rogue outlier, but a beneficiary of – and a participant in – this system”.
