everything was going fine with Kevin Barrett’s Substack until his White Malice surfaced, once again: Calling Chauvin righteous, following policies, doing his duty.
Jan 11, 2026
Press TV, i.e. Iran, and this fucking buggering shit is America’s spin on things for Iranians?
Kosher Nostra Is Behind Trump’s Destruction of the Rule of Law
I just had to let it go. After major surgery, well, I want to make sure NOTHING inside has been lobotomized. I know I would have argueing with this piece of shit if I had been a fellow faculty member. Something about Wisconsin, Toothless, no?
You are a fucking whore, dude. Calm, collected, you state this from your fucking Moroccan cabana?
For instance, the earlier controversy in Minneapolis-St. Paul over George Floyd was actually distorted by the left-wing people. And an injustice was done to the police officer who was actually following department procedure, tragically and perhaps unwisely. But that particular George Floyd incident was not a case of egregious, extreme abuse by law enforcement.
+–+
So, the fired faculty — you– speaks the fucking truth with his swollen racist lips.
You are just another side of the same dirty American coin that makes Trump Trump. If Trump had been brought up by a Muslim lawyer, Roy Abdul, and had hung out with Muslim businessmen, well, I believe you would be proud of him. Support him. Rationalize EVERYTHING about him.
Hands down, the injustice done to George Floyd was murder and then murder again by white ghouls like you. Adios.
YOU DON”T KILL PEOPLE who are telling you they can’t breathe, okay, fucker Kevin.
You are just so outside of humanity’s core, well, time to just get you off my fucking feed.
The killing of George Floyd, 46, of St. Louis Park — who repeatedly told a Minneapolis police officer he couldn’t breathe as the officer knelt on his neck on May 25, 2020 — sparked days of unrest in Minneapolis and St. Paul and mass protests across the globe over the treatment of Black people by police.
Since then, lawmakers both nationally and locally have debated police reform and whether law enforcement officers must change how they do their jobs. In schools, educators and students have tackled discussions on race and equity, sometimes with controversy. And across Minnesota, community members have marched and come together in a call for change.
In April 2021, former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin — who pressed his knee on Floyd’s neck for more than nine minutes — was convicted of murder and manslaughter in Floyd’s death. He was sentenced to 22 1/2 years in prison.
The three other ex-cops who were involved with the arrest have been charged with two counts each of aiding and abetting in the death. Thomas Lane, J. Alexander Kueng and Tou Thao go on trial in June 2022.
A federal grand jury has also indicted all four on criminal civil rights charges.
DEFENDING white trash Chauvin. Whewww, that takes the cake!
Moving on:
More from a friend, this time, celebrating “the end of Iran?” Fucking Nigerians, man, and Moroccans, and and and …. He’s big on Trump bombing his home country, Nigeria, except he’s an older man in Houston with a family. Easy to call for executing Muslims from fucking Houston in the Diaspora.
Jamaica:
Israel and Morocco signed a joint military work plan for 2026 this week during the third meeting of their Joint Military Committee, held in Tel Aviv, marking five years since relations were normalized under the Abraham Accords, the IDF announces.
The talks were led by the IDF’s Planning Directorate and its Tevel Division, and included professional working meetings, alongside visits to IDF units, defense industries, military units and relevant directorates.
At the center of the visit was a panel focusing on force build-up from a strategic perspective and shared objectives for cooperation between the two militaries, according to the IDF.
Fucking Jew York City: from Nate Bear’s Substack…..
Yesterday the mayor of New York City, Zohran Mamdani, condemned people for protesting against the sale of land in the West Bank, sales which were happening in a New York synagogue. As part of his condemnation, he labelled Hamas a terrorist organisation.
I did a tweet in response that said this.
Lots of people didn’t like it. It was reposted by the editor of Current Affairs magazine, Nathan Robinson, who said this.
I stand by everything I said.
If the people you elect to fight fascists are regurgitating fascist propaganda, propaganda that manufactured consent for a genocide, A GENOCIDE, then that is, on a very material level, more harmful to justice than the fascists themselves.
To me this is not complicated.
It’s not the fascists who rob you of hope and the possibility of justice, because they offer none in the first place. The people who rob you of hope and the possibility of justice are those who claim to stand for hope and justice then side with the oppressor.
An ally who stabs you in the back is worse than an enemy who stabs you in the chest.
Again, I struggle to see how this is complicated.
What Mamdani said was shameful, utterly shameful.
Labelling Palestinian resistance ‘terrorism’ is literally how consent was manufactured for a genocide. Doesn’t everyone know this? Did we not just watch two years of Israeli politicians and western Zionists cry ‘Hamas’ to defend, cover and justify genocide? Surely everyone saw this, including Mamdani.
So given this, how can anyone defend what he said? And how can anyone defend what he didn’t say?
+—+
Hell, Mamdani will be opening up Jew York hotels to ICE with all-you-can-eat bagels and lox thrown in.
+—+
Binoy, who I had on my radio show. Talking to a Counterpart in Australia
Candid Imperialism: Trump, Racketeering and Venezuelan Oil by Binoy Kampmark / January 10th, 2026
It usually takes archival digging, the golden gaffe, an ill-considered remark, and occasional spells of candour by those in power, to admit that the United States has, in common with other imperial powers, brutal ambitions. An example of the latter was General Smedley Butler, who, at his death in 1940, had become the most decorated Marine in US history. After retiring from active service, he was frank about his role. Professing to be a “racketeer” and “gangster for capitalism”, he went on to explain how: “I helped make Mexico, especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Boys to collect revenues in. I helped the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street.” That was just a selection.
With President Donald Trump in power, we do not need a Butler to give the game away or expose any frightful cabal. The empire is out of the closet, bolshie, bright, and more thieving than ever. While the Donroe Doctrine is intended to reprise the Monroe Doctrine, it offers nothing more than imperial rapacity, seizure under pretext. The January 9 meeting with two dozen oil executives at the White House to discuss the fate of the Venezuelan oil market showed Trump to be in full flight as cocky pip and proud procurer of corporate thieving under the cover of government protection.
Representatives from such veteran behemoths as ExxonMobil and Chevron were present to listen to calls from the president that they invest handsomely in modernising and tidying up Venezuela’s tattered oil infrastructure. Problems with the oil itself – heavy, hard to refine, and packed with sulphur, not to mention the questionable number of proven reserves – did not blight the conversation. “American companies will have the opportunity to rebuild Venezuela’s rotting energy infrastructure and eventually increase oil production to levels never seen before,” he crowed at the start of the meeting. Our giant oil companies will be spending at least $100 billion of their money.” In the course of this merry investment, Venezuela would “be very successful, and the people of the United States are going to be big beneficiaries.”
The choice of companies involved in the venture would, however, not be determined by free market wiles or any invisible hand. “We are going to be making the decision as to which oil companies can go in, which we will allow to go in.” They would mostly be American, naturally. Forget the Venezuelans, he insisted. “You’re dealing with us directly. You’re not dealing with Venezuela at all. We don’t want you to deal with Venezuela.”
Jeffery Hilderbrand of the oil and gas producer Hilcorp Energy, and noted Trump donor, was all salivation and gratitude. He was also pleased with the implausible alibi Trump had offered for controlling and pilfering Venezuelan oil for American interests: finding imagined enemies who might do the same thing. “Thank you for your great, tremendous leadership in protecting the interests in the Western Hemisphere,” he sighed with oleaginous gratitude. “The message that you have sent to China and our enemies to stay out of our backyard is absolutely fantastic… Hilcorp is fully committed and ready to rebuild the infrastructure in Venezuela.”
CEO Bill Armstrong, of the Armstrong Oil and Gas company, also smacked his lips at the plunderous prospects. “We are ready to go to Venezuela,” he declared. “In real estate terms, it is prime real estate. And it’s like West Palm about 50 years ago. Very ripe.” Fracking executive and Trump supporter Harold Hamm was tickled by the prospect of adventure, seeing Venezuela as little more than a playground to roam in and profit from. “It excites me as an explorationist.” The country was “exciting” with its abundant reserves, posing “challenges and the industry knows how to handle that.”
Chevron, which already has a presence in the country in partnership with the state-run oil company Petróleos de Venezuela SA, accounting for 240,000 barrels per day, expects to bolster its production by 50% over the next 18 to 24 months. Those at Repsol are dreaming of tripling the current daily production of 45,000 barrels over the next few years, provided the conditions are appropriate.
Not all the oil companies expressed the same level of glowing confidence. Naked plunder comes with its challenges and logistical tangles, not least the touchy issue of Venezuelan sovereignty. Exxon CEO Darren Woods was, for instance, concerned that much would have to be done to make Venezuela an appropriate recipient of capital. One way was to ensure that whoever was in control in Caracas would be eternally reliable and amenable to US oil interests. “We have had our assets seized there twice and so you can imagine to re-enter a third time would require some pretty significant changes from what we’ve historically seen and what is currently the state.” As things stood, given “legal and commercial constructs and frameworks in place”, Venezuela was “ininvestable”.
That same day, Trump further confirmed the choking of Venezuela by signing an Executive Order to prevent “the seizure of Venezuelan oil revenue that could undermine critical US efforts to ensure economic stability in Venezuela.” The Order prohibits US courts from seizing revenue collected from Venezuelan oil and any relevant holds in US Treasury accounts. The customary, absurd justifications follow: to lose control of such funds would “empower malign actors like Iran and Hezbollah while weakening efforts to bring peace, prosperity, and stability to the Venezuelan people and to the Western Hemisphere as a whole.” Were these funds to be tampered with, US objectives to stem “the influx of illegal aliens and disrupting the flood of illicit narcotics” would be compromised.
Trump has signaled that he could order strikes against drug cartels on Mexican territory.
He renewed the threats against America’s southern neighbor after US commandos abducted Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro during a lightning raid on his compound in Caracas last week. The US government accuses Maduro of narcotics trafficking, which he has denied.
[Of course it is perfectly 1st Amendment legal to pray for the death of each and every uniformed mercenary slug going into another country under orders of Trump and Company, for whom a thousand wicken and a thousand witches are conjuring up spells for the death of not just Trump . . . hint hint!]
Trump has also accused Mexico of “flooding” the US with drugs and illegal immigrants, many of whom he has described as violent criminals. Since September 2025, the US has struck at least 35 alleged cartel boats in the Caribbean.
Justice can exist, but not judicial independence
In a civilized world, the U.S. would not get away with war crimes that killed 100 people (combatants and civilians combined) to kidnap Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife. The U.S dictatorship would face being overthrown by foreign armies (with UN authorization) if it did not return Maduro and his wife to Venezuela, and pay massive reparations to all the victims’ families in Caracas. In this fantasy scenario the U.S. would never have dared to perpetrate this crime in the first place, or imposed murderous illegal sanctions (more recently an armed blockade) on Venezuela.
And so Hedges is still reeling from a year now, and the genocide of more than two years, now, and, maybe from the AmeriKKKa that always was:
Terror is the engine that empowers dictatorships. It eliminates dissidents. It silences critics. It dismantles the law. It creates a society of timid and frightened collaborators, those who look away when people are snatched off streets or gunned down, those who inform to save themselves, those who retreat into their tiny rabbit holes, pulling down the blinds, desperately praying to be left in peace.
Terror works.
The iron doors have not yet shut. There are still protests. The media is still able to document state atrocities, including the Jan. 7 murder of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent Jonathan Ross. But the doors are closing fast. ICE has deported over 300,000 people and detained nearly 69,000 others — as well as been involved in 16 shootings, including four killings — since Trump began his campaign against immigrants.
ICE, our Americanized Gestapo, is being birthed.
+—+
But wait, Chris, Nazi Trump has plenty of murderous history from the annals of this dirty country that for all intents and purposed should be wiped off the face of the earth.
Two days after the Dakota surrendered at Camp Release on September 26, 1862, a military commission began trying Dakota men accused of participating in the war. The rapid trials — some no more than five minutes — of 392 prisoners were completed in November. According to the Minnesota Historical Society, 303 men were sentenced to death and 16 received prison terms.
After reviewing the trial transcripts, President Abraham Lincoln provided a list of 39 names of prisoners to be executed. One received a last minute reprieve. On the morning of December 26, 1862, in front of an estimated crowd of 4,000 spectators and on a specially constructed mass-hanging scaffold, the men were executed. They were left dangling from the scaffold for a half hour.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise (1787): Counted three-fifths of the enslaved population for legislative representation, embedding racial inequality into the U.S. Constitution.
- Fugitive Slave Acts (1793, 1850): Federal laws that mandated the return of escaped enslaved people to their owners, even from free states.
- The Dred Scott Decision (1857): A Supreme Court ruling that declared African Americans, whether free or enslaved, could not be U.S. citizens.
10 Examples of Systemic Racism in the USA
In 1787, A Negro Slave In The United States Was Counted As Three-Fifths (60%) Of A White Person. In 2024, A Resident Of Gaza Is Worth Less Than One-Thirty-Sixth (2.79%) Of A Jew.
The GI Bill should’ve been race neutral, politicos made sure it wasn’t
The blinding of a WWII vet opened America’s eyes to the evil of Jim Crow
On the evening of Feb. 12, 1946, Isaac Woodard, a 26-year-old black Army veteran, boarded a bus in Augusta, Georgia. Earlier that day, he’d been honorably discharged, and he was heading to Winnsboro, South Carolina to reunite with his wife.
The bus driver made a stop en route. When Woodard asked if he had time to use the bathroom, the driver cursed loudly at him. Woodard would later admit in a deposition that he cursed back.
Neither man said anything until the bus stopped in Batesburg, South Carolina. There, the driver told the local police about Woodard’s impudence. Woodard was ordered off the bus. When Woodard tried to give his version of events, a police officer struck him with a night stick. Woodard was escorted to the jail, where, he later testified, he was repeatedly beaten by the police chief, Linwood Shull. Woodard said that Shull pounded him in his eyes with the end of the night stick until he blacked out (charges Shull would deny).
NOTE: Real time breaking news on local Facebook Page, Waldport Free Speech Forum. Ahh, interruption. So my spouse said I have both been blocked by some freaky Waldport Free Speech Forum administator, AND, get this, the White Trash announced on his fucking FB page, “the authorties have been contacted.”
You know, for condemning Trump, ICE, Gestapo, and he lists the same old shit: against our president, against our country, against police and military, against Israel, blah blah blah.
Yeah, my wife is concerned, but I am not. All those fucking good little Germans. His name is T. Swift? More of the dirty shame that is now and HAD ALWAYS been AmeriKKKa, stiff armed racists by many other mothers.
I will keep you tuned in, but . . . . And, yes, you can thought experiment anything, including the death of ICE agents in their hotel rooms or the bombing of Air Force One. Fucking THOUGHT and ASPIRATION thinking.
+—+
AGAIN, anyone can say he or she WANTS Trump DEAD. He or she can say ALL ICE should be Molotoved, fragged, dead.
Shit dawg, from the comfort of my keyboard desk, yep, I am not in a movie theater yelling fire.
Here, Google Gulag Brin AI:
Legal Standards for Speech
- True Threats vs. Opinions: Under federal law (18 U.S. Code § 871), it is a felony to knowingly and willfully make a “true threat” to take the life of or inflict bodily harm upon the President or a former President.
- General Statements: Simply wishing for harm to come to someone, or saying “I wish somebody would kill him,” is generally considered protected speech as long as it does not include a specific plan or intent to act.
- Incitement: Speech is only unprotected if it is directed to inciting “imminent lawless action” and is likely to produce such action, a standard set by the Supreme Court in Brandenburg v. Ohio.
Current Political Context (Late 2025 – Early 2026)
- Assassination Rhetoric: A federal jury recently acquitted a former Coast Guard lieutenant who called for Trump’s assassination on social media, with attorneys successfully arguing the posts were protected First Amendment speech.
- Recent Tensions: Following the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk in September 2025, the Trump administration has signaled a crackdown on “hate speech” and rhetoric that it claims facilitates violence.
- Controversial Statements: In November 2025, Trump himself sparked backlash for social media posts labeling Democratic members of Congress “traitors” and calling their actions “seditious behavior, punishable by death“.
Potential Consequences
- Secret Service Investigation: Even if speech is legally protected, the Secret Service frequently investigates individuals who make public comments about the death of the President to determine if they pose a genuine risk.
- Employment Actions: While the government may be limited by the First Amendment, private employers are often free to terminate employees for making callous or violent remarks, as seen in numerous firings following Charlie Kirk’s death in 2025.
Wishing or praying for President Trump’s death is not illegal under U.S. law, as it is considered protected free speech under the First Amendment. The law distinguishes between a genuine threat and merely expressing an opinion, however offensive.
Legal, and not all that unusual. Merely wishing for someone’s death is not illegal, nor is offering up a hope for supernatural intercession on that wish. Hell, you could make actual offerings, make vows, and otherwise take material actions to try to persuade the divine to carry out your wishes.
We have live examples to draw on. Boebert isn’t exactly doing poorly in spite of her tasteless and very public prayer for Biden’s death. There’s also Psalm 109, if you want examples straight from Biblical sources, which is an impressively extensive curse against the foes of (probably) David.
I know that it’s illegal, possibly treasonous (?) to say or imply that someone wants to or is going to kill or conspire to harm (?) the sitting US president.
Saying that someone is going to kill the president is neither illegal nor treason.
It is against the law to threaten the president (18 U.S. Code § 871). That’s narrow – there’s a ton of jurisprudence on what constitutes a threat, and while little of it is specifically about this section, the consistent thing is that it takes more than a mere statement of a violent outcome to count as a threat. Watts is a good place to start.
People have been prosecuted for saying that they themselves are going to “hang the former President” (Stephen Taubert, charged in 2017), but someone saying that “fuck the niggar, he will have a 50 cal in the head soon” was found to be protected speech under the First Amendment (Walter Bagdasarian, acquitted on appeal in 2011). Against that background, a mere prayer hardly registers.
Bad shot or flase flag crap?
Of course the world would have been better if a missile had hit this Semen Drip Circle Jerk Off. Yes, a Houthi drone and missible congrats package on his coronation!
“HANG THEM GEORGE WASHINGTON WOULD !!”
Slotkin, a former CIA officer, is joined in the video by fellow Democrats including Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona and Reps. Jason Crow of Colorado, Chris Deluzio of Pennsylvania, Maggie Goodlander of New Hampshire, and Chrissy Houlahan of Pennsylvania, all military veterans and former intelligence officers, where they urge military members to “refuse illegal orders.”
“This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens,” Slotkin, Kelly and Crow say.
A sitting president of the United States has called for the execution of six legislators. I don’t know this for certain, but it seems nearly impossible that this has happened before. I don’t think Abraham Lincoln did it, and he was dealing with actual traitors. Maybe, you know, Franklin Pierce or James Buchanan did it on a bad day. Or Andrew Johnson. He was temperamentally capable of something like this. But that hardly makes it defensible. As they were three of the worst presidents in U.S. history, that only makes it worse.
He is a Nazi, drawing plans for internal and external illegal operations. So, with Hitler in your midst, you call that a disagreement with Hitler’s Policies or Political Supporters or the Mob Supporting Hitler?
“Threatening death against people you disagree with is totally unacceptable and un-American—especially when it comes to lawmakers who have dedicated their lives to serving this great nation and the Constitution,” Hertel said. “Trump’s threats today go against everything this country stands for, and every single leader, Republican and Democrat, should be wholeheartedly condemning this behavior.”
Paul Haeder, Author 