That Epstein Island was/is the Poison Pill that has all those Goyim Geeks’ Zippers Down and Golden Showers Recorded in Memorex

Jewish supremacy, Eugenics, Pedophilia, Epstein’s DNA spreading throughout the Jewish and Non-Jewish Land — Deviant motivations

Paulo Kirk

Dec 06, 2025

“A system of Jewish supremacy, wherein non-Jews are structurally discriminated against or excluded in a tiered scheme: some non-Jews have most of the rights… while most non-Jews live under severe segregation, separation, and domination… If it’s not apartheid, it rhymes”

Leonard Cohen. In a poem from his 1975 collection The Energy of Slaves he wrote:

The 15-year-old-girls

I wanted when I was 15

I have them now

it is very pleasant

it is never too late

I advise you all

to become rich and famous.

Cohen was driven in particular by his hunger for young women. He was skilled at framing his lust not as a desire to consume, but as an homage to beauty. “When a woman becomes your content, and you become her content—that’s love,” he once said. It isn’t, of course—content is consumed, not cherished. It is interesting how many are willing to make excuses for the unforgivably selfish behavior of great artists—all of Cohen’s biographers do. But anyone who has read Cohen knows he was an extraordinarily keen observer of the human condition. So what excuse can be made for the way he treated women, time and again?

The most romanticized period of Cohen’s career was his time on the Greek island of Hydra, where he wrote novels, poems, and songs; mingled with other artists; and shacked up with the blond Scandinavian beauty Marianne Ihlen. As one of Cohen’s close friends, Steve Sanfield, put it: “There were revolutions going on in literature, and there was a sexual revolution, which we’d thought we won and we probably lost.” But it didn’t seem that way for a time on Hydra, with the yellow beaches and bronzed bodies and endless booze and conversation. As Cohen noted giddily in one interview, the fact that the sexual revolution exploded just as his desires did was “magic.”

The adults used that magic to live in Neverland as long as they could. But as Irving Layton’s wife, Aviva, noted, few marriages survived that island paradise (her husband insisted on an open marriage, which gave her great pain). Few children did, either. The histories of those raised on the island are rife with substance abuse, suicide, and institutionalization. Marianne’s son Axel never recovered and spent much of the rest of his life in mental hospitals.

For all the high-flown poetry, Cohen’s copulations were fundamentally cannibalistic. His biographer Sylvie Simmons writes that he tried to make women love him, withdrew when he succeeded, and used the subsequent heartbreak to fuel his writing. A line in his 1963 novel, The Favourite Game, sums it up: “Supposing he went along with her toward living intimacy, toward comforting, incessant married talk. Wasn’t he abandoning something more austere and ideal…something which could apply her beauty to streets, traffic, mountains, ignite the landscape—which he could master if he were alone?” Like so many artists, he deluded himself into believing that passionate promiscuity could be the pursuit of art.

It was the women and children who paid the price of these delusions. There is a trail of blood through Cohen’s canon. In Leonard Cohen, Untold Stories: The Early Years, musician Julie Felix says of Marianne: “He made her have five abortions. Five sounds about right. She told me. He has that song [“You Know Who I Am”] where he says, ‘I need you to carry my children in/And I need you to kill a child.’” Cohen’s friend Peter Katoundas recalled that one abortion had left Marianne sterile, which gave birth to these gruesome lines in Cohen’s song “Diamonds in the Mine”:

Fucking rapists and sex traffickers and pedophile rapists and blackmailers and ZIM/Murder Inc, and here you have the Jews defending and yukking it up about the fucking slime dirt shit named Jeffrey Epstein:

Fucking Jew siblings, man, what whores:This cunt Mark will be looking for money money money!

At an X-space discussion with Live Radio 1 on November 11, Mark asserted that, at first, he thought that his brother had committed suicide, as the FBI and other government agencies claimed.

“I had no reason to doubt it [the suicide claim]. He was facing a long time in jail,” Mark said. “The life of a convicted pedophile is not very pleasant and Jeffrey was used to living life the way he wanted, with people around who catered to him and took care of him….He had no kids, our parents are gone; he didn’t have anyone to worry about. I thought he took the decision not to go through a trial and potential prison sentence, and decided to take himself out.”

Mark said that, when he hired the renowned forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden, he expected Baden to confirm that his brother had committed suicide. However, he said that Dr. Baden instead said he couldn’t call it a suicide because it “looked too much like a homicide.”

Dr. Baden told 60 Minutes that fractures found in the autopsy photos under Jeffrey’s neck and jaw were inconsistent with a suicide hanging. Baden said: “Going over a thousand jail hangings, suicides in the New York City state prisons over the past 40-50 years, no one had three fractures [as Epstein did].”^{[ Covert Action Magazine}

But the newly released emails also raise ethical questions about the role played by acclaimed author Michael Wolff as he appeared to provide advice to Epstein on how to handle his dealings with Trump.

In the exchanges published by the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, Wolff – best known for his bestselling books on the first Trump presidency – appeared to share confidential information before a presidential debate on CNN in December 2015 with Epstein, advising him on how to exploit his connection with Trump.

“I hear CNN planning to ask Trump tonight about his relationship with you – either on air or in scrum afterwards,” Wolff wrote.

“If we were to craft an answer for him, what do you think it should be?” Epstein replied.

“I think you should let him hang himself. If he says he hasn’t been on the plane or to the house, then that gives you a valuable PR and political currency,” Wolff told Epstein.

I’ve had Jeremy on my radio show, but whew, with Garland, man, that fucking Oreo Cookie, that Pig, so proud of his ACAB uniform days, yukking it up about a pedophile and sex trafficker and drug dealer and thief and, well, honey traps ALWAYS lead to murder and suicide. Amazing how calm Jeremy, a Jew, is. Very odd people! And then Garland is going homo-gridiron with the supposed Italian prison inmate who helped lift Jeff up to strangle him.

Fucking Jews: Summers and Epstein, the pieces of bar mitzvahed cunts of the world

As Summers Sought Clandestine Relationship With Woman He Called a Mentee, Epstein Was His ‘Wing Man’

Former Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers processes into the University’s 2018 Commencement ceremony. The former Treasury secretary remained in contact with convicted sex offender Jeffrey E. Epstein until the day before Epstein’s arrest in 2019. By Amy Y. Li

When former Harvard President Lawrence H. Summers was pursuing a romantic relationship with a woman he described as a mentee, he sought guidance from a longtime associate: convicted sex offender Jeffrey E. Epstein.

In a sequence of texts and emails between November 2018 and July 5, 2019, Summers turned to Epstein for advice on his pursuit of the woman. Epstein was quick to chime in with assurance and suggestions, describing himself in one November 2018 message as Summers’ “wing man.”

The messages became public after House Republicans released more than 20,000 files from the Epstein estate on Wednesday. Summers’ correspondence with Epstein, a financier who pled guilty to soliciting prostitution from a minor in 2008, ends just one day before Epstein was arrested on new sex trafficking charges.

Together, the messages show Summers — who served as Treasury Secretary under former United States President Bill Clinton — placing an extraordinary degree of trust in Epstein, asking him for help in navigating a relationship that blurred the boundaries of his professional and personal lives.

Summers, who has been married since 2005, told Epstein he thought the woman was reluctant to leave him because she valued his professional connections. Epstein told him in one June 2019 text, “She is doomed to be with you.”

“Think for now I’m going nowhere with her except economics mentor,” Summers wrote in November 2018. “I think I’m right now in the seen very warmly in rear view mirror category.”

“She must be very confused or maybe wants to cut me off but wants professional connection a lot and so holds to it,” Summers wrote in a March 2019 exchange to Epstein, explaining why he believed she continued to engage with him despite tensions.

A spokesperson for Summers said that the woman described in the exchanges was never Summers’ student, but declined to comment further for this article.

In at least some of his exchanges with Epstein on the relationship, Summers appears to refer to macroeconomist Keyu Jin ’04, a tenured professor at the London School of Economics at the time, who is mentioned in a series of late 2018 messages between the two men.

In one, Summers forwarded Epstein an email from Jin asking for feedback on a paper. Summers mused to Epstein that it was “probably appropriate” to hold off on responding.

“She’s already begining to sound needy 🙂 nice,” Epstein replied.

Jin, who earned her bachelor’s degree and Ph.D. at Harvard between 2000 and 2009, declined to comment on the months of messages between Summers and Epstein. In the messages released by the House, she does not refer to a romantic relationship with Summers. It is not clear whether she was aware that Summers shared her emails or discussed her with Epstein.

Throughout the seven months of correspondence reviewed by The Crimson, Summers and Epstein referred to the woman Summers was pursuing in some messages by the code name “peril” but never used her name in messages directly describing the relationship. On at least two occasions, the two men discussed Jin’s emails to Summers, which he forwarded to Epstein. In later messages, the two men appeared to joke about the probability that Summers would have sex with the woman, apparently Jin.

Summers’ long relationship with Epstein has been well documented, but the depth of their conversations, including over intimate matters, became public only this week. He traveled on Epstein’s private airplane on at least four occasions, including at least three times while serving as president of Harvard. Summers also met more than a dozen times with him and solicited donations from the disgraced financier for his wife, Harvard English professor emerita Elisa New. The messages released Wednesday show Summers organizing visits to Harvard on Epstein’s behalf and discussing contributions for New’s work.

“I have great regrets in my life,” Summers wrote in a Wednesday statement to The Crimson. “As I have said before, my association with Jeffrey Epstein was a major error of judgement.”

The exchanges concerning Jin’s messages and Summers’ relationship began shortly before a November 2018 investigation from the Miami Herald surfaced accusations from 80 girls and women that Epstein had abused them between 2001 and 2006, drawing on court records and interviews. Summers continued to correspond with Epstein about his relationship even after the Department of Justice opened an investigation in February 2019 into Epstein’s 2008 plea deal.

Wednesday’s documents also revealed messages where Summers, whose speculation that innate differences between men and women could drive women’s underrepresentation in science contributed to the end of his Harvard presidency in 2006, joked about women’s intelligence and what he described as excessive penalties for men who “hit on” women in the workplace.

In an October 2017 email to Epstein, Summers retread the same terrain that had proven treacherous for him in the past, writing that he “observed that half the IQ in world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent of population….”

Summers has continued to teach at Harvard since, interrupted by brief stints in Washington, and currently holds Harvard’s highest faculty distinction as a University Professor. This semester, he is teaching two large undergraduate courses and one graduate class.

The first interactions between Summers and Epstein on his relationship with the woman — apparently Jin — appear in late November and early December 2018, when she and Summers seem to have met during an academic conference. For two days, Summers sent Epstein updates on his interactions with her.

On Dec. 1, Summers wrote that the woman had been “interested in my commentary on her outfits” and said he had “referenced your having figured us out” — suggesting Summers told her that Epstein was aware of their relationship.

Summers described his feelings as conflicted in the messages to Epstein, writing in remarkably candid terms.

“When I’m reflective I think I’m dodging a bullet,” he wrote. “Think right thing is to cut off contact. Suspect she will miss it. Problem is I will too.”

The next morning, Summers struck a different tone: “Game day at conference she was extremely good Smart Assertive and clear Gorgeous. I’m fucked.”

In messages from later that month, Summers and Epstein discussed Summers’ relationship with Jin’s father, a former high-ranked Chinese Communist Party official and the founding president of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, who Summers had long been close with.

When Jin emailed Summers on Dec. 22 to thank him for his support of her and her father — minutes after she sent Summers an outline of an academic paper — Summers forwarded the exchange to Epstein, explaining that he had recently “sent a comment in mtg w her father flattering her father and saying other China officials had flattered him as well.”

Summers continued to detail his interactions with the woman — who appears to be Jin but is not named in the Epstein emails after December 2018 — throughout March 2019, now expressing frustration that she was canceling or shortening plans and appeared to be interested in another man.

“I think she is tired of this alas. Sustaining w secrecy hard,” he wrote.

The final tranche of messages, beginning in mid-June, shows the relationship still unresolved and Summers again turning to Epstein for guidance on how to pursue it. Summers asked Epstein whether it was “meaningful” to discuss the probability of “my getting horizontal w peril,” drawing parallels to forecasting Trump’s reelection.

“U r better at understanding Chinese women than at probability theory,” Summers told Epstein. The two men bantered about probability and mathematics, but repeatedly steered the conversation back to Summers’ relationship.

Epstein joked that “the probability of you in bed again with peril” was “0,” before reversing course and assuring Summers that “she is never ever going to find another Larry summers. Probability ZERO.”

Summers went on to describe what he saw as his “best shot”: that the woman finds him “invaluable and interesting” and concludes “she can’t have it without romance / sex.”

Throughout June, Summers fed Epstein updates about the woman’s workload and continued contact. Epstein urged him to play the “long game” and keep her in what he called a “forced holding pattern.”

The final messages, dated July 5, 2019, show Summers still in regular contact with Epstein. That morning, Summers wrote he was in Cape Cod with his family — “Bit of an Ibsen play,” he joked — and the two men exchanged a brief flurry of literary one-liners.

The thread ends at 1:27 p.m.

Epstein was arrested the next day.

A young Jeffrey Epstein plays the accordion at a bar mitzvah celebration, accompanied by a live band. The handwritten note at the bottom reads ‘Aaron Brown Bar Mitzvah, Wynn Hotel, Philly, Sept. 23, 1961.’

Amid the misogyny, however, runs another, less examined thread: traces of Epstein’s Jewish identity. The book reveals his Jewish name, Yudel; shows him squeezing an accordion at a bar mitzvah; records a family trip to Israel in 1985; and contains affectionate notes from childhood friends who grew up with him in the Jewish enclave of Sea Gate, Brooklyn.

It is a portrait of a man whose Jewishness, while never central to his public persona, was interwoven with his life story and social circles, which in later life included close ties with prominent Jewish figures like Leslie Wexner and Alan M. Dershowitz, both of whom contributed letters to the birthday book.

A letter signed “Leslie” features a drawing of a set of breasts below the words, “I wanted to get you what you want.”

Born in 1953 to Seymour and Paula Epstein, the children of Jewish immigrants, he grew up in Sea Gate, a gated community at the tip of Coney Island. In the 1950s and ’60s, Sea Gate was a predominantly Jewish, middle-class enclave, and the Epstein family lived across the street from the Kneses Israel synagogue, today affiliated with the Chabad-Lubavitch movement.

According to the 2017 investigative biography “Filthy Rich,” he was known to friends as “Eppy” and remembered as sweet and generous. He showed talent in math and the piano. Much of his extended family had perished in the Holocaust.

The birthday book adds new texture. A biographical note beneath his birth certificate appears to record his “Jewish name” as Yudel, a Yiddish form of the Hebrew name Judah. Before he took up the piano, Epstein played the accordion. A letter from his mother recalls him performing on the instrument at both his own bar mitzvah and that of his “uncle Lenny.” Another page features a photograph of Epstein playing the accordion, captioned “Aaron Brown bar mitzvah.”

A brief recollection by Epstein’s father notes that the family traveled to Israel in 1985 to visit relatives. The trip reflects a typical American Jewish connection to Israel, though with luxuries rare for the time, when Israel was far less developed than it is today. The account mentions stays at the Plaza Hotel in Tel Aviv and the King David Hotel in Jerusalem, “where my son Jeff hired a limo to take us around.”

This period in Epstein’s life coincided with his foray into international intrigue. In 1981, he founded Intercontinental Assets Group, a consulting firm he described as a high-level bounty-hunting operation, working at times for governments or billionaires and at other times for embezzlers themselves.

By the mid-1980s, he was traveling frequently across the United States, Europe, and the Middle East, and reportedly telling some people he worked in intelligence. He forged ties with defense contractors, financiers, and media baron Robert Maxwell, the father of his future girlfriend. One of his clients was Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi, who played a central role in the Iran-Contra affair by acting as an intermediary in the covert transfer of American weapons routed through Israel to Iran.

Several letters come from Jewish childhood friends, capturing the camaraderie of boys who came of age together in Sea Gate. These reminiscences are presented as tender and humorous, but they also hint at patterns that would later curdle.

One letter recalls Epstein’s antics at a Jewish singles weekend at the Concord Hotel, a Catskills resort that epitomized mid-century Jewish leisure. Epstein and his friends, the note says, were kicked out of the resort after setting a room on fire and throwing food. The letter also appears to recount a prank in which Epstein impersonated a rabbi to lure his daughter close, the payoff described as a chance to “touch her boobs.”

Alongside these youthful stories appear tributes from some of the most powerful Jewish figures in Epstein’s orbit as an adult.

The presence of Wexner — a major donor to Jewish causes and the billionaire founder of L Brands, the company behind Victoria’s Secret and other retail chains — reflects his well documented and longstanding ties to Epstein, which have caused angst among the many Jewish professionals who have received prestigious fellowships that still bear his name.

A letter from Alan Dershowitz, the famed Harvard law professor, jokingly boasts that, as a birthday gift, he persuaded Vanity Fair to shift the focus of an article away from Epstein and onto former president Bill Clinton. The private equity titan Leon Black, a benefactor of the Jewish Museum and other Jewish institutions, signed off “Love and Kisses” after likening Epstein to Ernest Hemingway’s fisherman in “The Old Man and the Sea.”

Another letter comes from the real estate and media magnate Mort Zuckerman, a past president of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. Peter Mandelson, the British diplomat of Jewish heritage, and the late Nobel prize laureates Murray Gell-Mann and Gerald Edelman, the mathematician and biologist Martin Nowak, and the influential Harvard administrator Henry Rosovsky round out the group.

Many of the men who once praised Epstein have since sought to explain or distance themselves from the relationship. Wexner has said he was “deceived” by Epstein, who misappropriated vast sums of his fortune, while Dershowitz has downplayed the entry and denied any wrongdoing.

Black called the association a “terrible mistake.” Mandelson said he deeply regrets the relationship. Others, including Nobel laureates and prominent scientists, acknowledged Epstein primarily as a patron of research but later condemned his conduct.

Rosovsky, a refugee from the Nazis who shaped Harvard for decades including by nurturing Jewish life on campus, died in 2022 at age 95 without commenting publicly about the allegations against Epstein. Decades earlier, Epstein and Wexner had underwritten Rosovsky Hall, the home of Harvard Hillel, in his honor; the building had a plaque naming Epstein that was removed as he became associated with scandal.

Last month, Rosovsky was implicated in Epstein’s exploits for the first time, when a court transcript was released showing that Ghislaine Maxwell testified that he had received a “massage” — a euphemism for a sexual encounter — at Epstein’s townhouse.

The entry in the birthday book attributed to Rosovsky is in keeping with the dominant theme. “For the man who has almost everything — but never enough of these!” it says in handwritten cursive, alongside two color images labeled “tit print.”

With the birthday book now in the congressional record, its contents are poised to ripple through partisan battles in Washington, as lawmakers debate what, if anything, should come next in reckoning with Epstein’s web of connections. — In Jeffrey Epstein’s birthday tribute, traces of his Jewish upbringing surface alongside lurid tales

Read all about this fucking JEW, not so unlike other JEWS: The Jewish paedophile network of Epstein and Maxwell

Maria Farmer, Epstein’s earliest known victim and one of the few insiders willing to speak publicly in clear, unvarnished terms, has repeatedly described how Epstein racialised himself. Not merely in the sense of seeing himself as above others — most grandiose predators do that — but in specifically biological terms, tied first to his ancestry and then to his haplotype. Farmer recounts Epstein mocking her for her “European” ancestry, dismissing her as inferior because she was “white”, and insisting that he himself was not white. That claim is baffling to anyone who sees Epstein as just another white American financier. But for Epstein, the distinction was crucial. He believed his Jewish lineage marked him as biologically separate, and superior.

Farmer describes Epstein discussing his haplogroup at length — a specific combination of genetic markers he believed endowed him with particular intelligence, vigour, and evolutionary fitness. He told her, in all seriousness, that his Ashkenazi haplogroup placed him above the “ordinary” Europeans whose ancestry he viewed as weaker, less refined, or less valuable. Ghislaine Maxwell reportedly reinforced the same hierarchy, joining Epstein in mocking Farmer’s “white girl” lineage.

Survivor testimony is not a laboratory report; it stands or falls on credibility. But in Farmer’s case, her record of accuracy — especially regarding Epstein’s relationship with Les Wexner, which she was the first to expose — makes her account more than plausible. It fits with what scientists and journalists later documented independently: Epstein’s near-messianic fixation on genetics, heredity, and the improvement of the human species through selective breeding.

The eugenics dimension

In August 2019, The New York Times revealed Epstein’s self-proclaimed plan to “seed the human race” with his DNA by impregnating up to twenty women at his New Mexico ranch. Other outlets reported his attempts to build a private “human colony” based on his genetic lineage. Epstein courted scientists steeped in IQ research, transhumanism, and hereditarian theories of intelligence: Charles Murray, Steven Pinker, George Church, Murray Gell-Mann, Stephen Hawking, and others. He funded research in genetics and neuroscience, attended academic salons on evolutionary selection, and used philanthropy to embed himself within scientific circles fascinated by biological enhancement.

In other words, when Maria Farmer says Epstein believed in the biological supremacy of his Ashkenazi haplogroup, she is not fabricating an isolated eccentricity. She is giving us the missing conceptual frame through which the rest of Epstein’s conduct — previously inexplicable — becomes coherent. The sexual predation, the recruitment of girls, the abuse of power, the blackmail, the connections to intelligence services, and the transhumanist ambition were not disconnected phenomena. They were different faces of the same, deeply pathological worldview.

According to Farmer, Epstein constantly talked about his “haplogroup” — something like “R-B”, she said (likely R1b or related). Farmer’s recollections suggest he had researched his own haplotype extensively and viewed it as elite or superior. Farmer also states that Epstein tied this directly to his “Ashkenazi Jewish intelligence”. Ghislaine Maxwell reportedly behaved the same way; Farmer has stated that Ghislaine also ridiculed her for being European-white, and joined Epstein in this racialised elitism. This again aligns with Maxwell’s own background: daughter of Robert Maxwell, who very openly emphasised Jewish identity, superiority complexes, and ethnic exceptionalism.

Even without bringing in anything speculative, Maria Farmer’s account shows that Epstein held a racialised hierarchy of ancestry: Epstein’s DNA was superior to Farmer’s European non-Jewish ancestry. He openly mocked “white” people, and specifically chose blue-eyed, blonde haired white girls as his victims in order to humiliate them and demonstrate his racial superiority.

An inverted mirror of the grooming-gang narrative

And this is where an unsettling irony comes into focus — a mirror image of one of Britain’s most toxic political narratives. For years, far-right commentators in England have insisted that the so-called “grooming gangs” were racially motivated: that “Muslim men” sought out young white girls, especially blonde and blue-eyed ones, in order to degrade English society and demonstrate their civilisational dominance. This story, repeated endlessly in certain tabloids and nationalist circles, claims that the victims were chosen for symbolic reasons — that their white ancestry made them targets. It is now well established that this reading is inaccurate, simplistic, and politically loaded. The Home Office has repeatedly stated that “race” and “white girl targeting” are not proven drivers in these cases. But the story persists because it satisfies a particular emotional need: the idea of white Britain under siege by racialised outsiders.

Yet if Maria Farmer’s testimony is accurate, something resembling this narrative — racialised humiliation through sexual exploitation — did happen. Just not where the far-right imagined it. Not in Rotherham or Rochdale, but in the penthouses of Manhattan, the mansions of Palm Beach, and the private island in the Caribbean. Not among marginalised immigrant communities, but in the elite world of a billionaire financier with connections to royalty, intelligence services, and global scientific networks.

Epstein appears to have chosen girls who visually represented the “European” phenotype precisely to degrade them. In Farmer’s account, the blonde-haired, blue-eyed appearance of his victims was not incidental — it was symbolic material. He viewed European ancestry as biologically weaker than his own and used sexual domination as a performance of that imagined supremacy.

In other words, the far-right’s favourite fantasy — a racialised predator humiliating white girls — is not a description of the British grooming-gang scandal. It is, rather, a grotesque inversion of what Epstein himself appears to have enacted.

This parallel is important not because it scores points in a culture war, but because it exposes something fundamental about the way racial ideologies function. The far-right constantly projects onto others the very impulses it refuses to acknowledge in itself: hierarchy, domination, fantasies of purity, and obsessive anxieties about who is breeding with whom. Their narrative about “foreign predators” mistreating white girls turns out to be a mirror held up to their own obsessions — obsessions that Epstein, in an entirely different social register, appears to have embodied. The story Britain tells about grooming gangs is a projection.

Why this changes everything

Epstein was not merely a predator or a blackmailer. He was, in his own mind, a genetic visionary — grotesque, delusional, and cruel, but nonetheless driven by a coherent ideology. Once we take this ideology seriously, Epstein’s network looks qualitatively different.

The standard model of his operation assumes a simple logic: (1) acquire victims for personal gratification; (2) use sexual access to curry favour with elites; and (3) employ kompromat techniques to gain leverage. This model, though grim, remains relatively narrow. It sees Epstein as a morally deranged opportunist, not an ideologue.

But Farmer’s testimony, combined with the documented eugenic dimension, suggests a fourth pillar: use victims as raw material in a racialised project of hereditary Jewish supremacy.

The ranch in New Mexico — long dismissed as a bizarre footnote — looks different through this lens. So do Epstein’s relationships with scientists, his obsession with IQ genetics, his fascination with human breeding, and his insistence on the biological distinctiveness of his own ancestry. The entire network reconfigures itself into a system that served three functions simultaneously: sexual exploitation, elite influence and blackmail, and a delusional programme of genetic “improvement” through personal propagation. It is a structure that begins to resemble the most nightmarish visions of twentieth-century eugenics — except privatised, globalised, and hidden behind the smiling, cosmopolitan veneer of the billionaire class.

The Mega Group

It is in this context that we should take a fresh look at Epstein’s connections with Les Wexner and the Mega Group. Epstein became Wexner’s financial adviser in the late 1980s, and Wexner granted Epstein power of attorney over his affairs in July 1991. Epstein managed many of Wexner’s assets and business matters, and the only publicly confirmed billionaire client of Epstein was Wexner. Wexner later said Epstein misappropriated “vast sums of money” from him and his family. Multiple accounts suggest that the relationship gave Epstein access to the Wexner networks, properties, and social circles. For example: the very large Manhattan townhouse that was later linked to Epstein was originally owned by Wexner.

Together with Charles Bronfman, Wexner also co-founded the Mega Group. Some sources claim that Epstein used or leveraged the Mega Group network to build his elite contacts. Establishing the exact link between Epstein and Bronfman via the Mega Group is hard to verify, however, because the Mega Group is a very private, loosely organised club; there are no public membership lists, no formal charter, etc. There is a lot more that needs investigating here.

Maria Farmer recounts a time when she was at one of the fancy country clubs ran by the Mega Group and wasn’t allowed to go get food. When she called Ghislaine Maxwell and asked why she couldn’t eat there, Ghislaine replied: “It’s a Jewish country club. You’re not Jewish. They’re not going to serve you.” Commenting on this reply, Farmer expressed her astonishment: “This is how this woman spoke to me. This is how these people think. They honest to God think their DNA is better than everybody else’s. I swear to you, it was a theme all the time with them — with Eileen Guggenheim, with Jeffrey Epstein, with Ghislaine. It was a theme.”

The ideology behind the evil

Recognising Epstein’s genetic Jewish supremacism does not lessen the horror of his crimes; it sharpens our understanding of them. Predatory behaviour on its own can be explained by appetite and impunity. But when the predator believes he is biologically superior, when he mocks victims for their ancestry, when he envisions himself as a genetic seed for a future elite, the abuse becomes ideological. It takes on a meaning beyond personal gratification. It becomes the enactment of a worldview.

If Maria Farmer’s accounts are accurate — and there is every reason to treat them seriously — then Epstein’s crimes were rooted in an explicit belief in the hierarchical value of human DNA. His network was not merely a pleasure palace or a blackmail operation. It was, in Epstein’s diseased imagination, an inverted form of Nazism — a project of Jewish biological supremacy.

This does not require conspiracy theories. It requires listening to survivors, reading the documented record, and taking seriously the ideological dimension of a man who was, in his own mind at least, a eugenicist for the globalised Jewish elite.

Until that dimension is confronted, Epstein’s network will continue to be misunderstood — and the lessons of his crimes will remain incomplete.

Donald Trump, Melania Trump (then Knauss), Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell at the Mar-a-Lago club in Palm Beach, Florida on 12 February 2000.

US media barely touches Epstein links with Israeli intelligence

This was 1947, and I had just turned eighteen. I was deeply interested, as I had been for some years, in radical politics with an anarchist or left-wing (anti-Leninist) Marxist flavor, and even more deeply involved in Zionist affairs and activities—or what was then called “Zionist,” though the same ideas and concerns are now called “anti-Zionist.” I was interested in socialist, binationalist options for Palestine, and in the kibbutzim and the whole cooperative labor system that had developed in the Jewish settlement there (the Yishuv), but had never been able to become close to Zionist youth groups that shared these interests because they were either Stalinist or Trotskyite and I always been strongly anti-Bolshevik.

He eventually stayed on a kibbutz for a few months in 1953 and had a positive experience of this spartan, egalitarian community:

The kibbutz where we lived, which was about twenty years old, was then very poor. There was very little food, and work was hard. But I liked it very much in many ways. Abstracting it from context, this was a functioning and very successful libertarian community, so I felt. And I felt it would be possible to find some mixture of intellectual and physical work. I came close to returning there to live, as my wife very much wanted to do at the time.

+—+

Moving on: The Cunt-Try Tis of Semen Drips, this time from Joe to Don!

A tenured professor at San José State University in California is fighting for her job after the university fired her last month over her pro-Palestinian activism – the first tenured faculty member fired from a public university in connection to campus protests against Israel’s war in Gaza.

Sang Hea Kil, a longtime member of the university’s justice studies department and a faculty adviser for its Students for Justice in Palestine chapter, is the latest in a growing list of university professors and staff who have been suspended, investigated and in some cases dismissed or forced out in connection to the wave of pro-Palestinian protests that swept US campuses in the first year of Israel’s war in Gaza.

Kil, who is contesting her dismissal, was the second tenured faculty member dismissed from a US public university over pro-Palestinian activism after Steven Salaita, who was fired in 2014 from the University of Illinois over a series of social media posts critical of Israel’s bombing of Gaza that year. Maura Finkelstein, another tenured professor, was fired from Muhlenberg College, a private liberal arts college, following her criticism of Israel’s most recent war in Gaza, while Katherine Franke, a Columbia University law professor and longtime advocate for Palestinian rights was forced out amid what she called a “toxic and hostile environment for legitimate debate around the war in Israel and Palestine”.

Kil’s firing adds to mounting concerns about academic freedom and campus free speech at a time when universities are facing unprecedented pressure from the Trump administration – but her case also raises questions about faculty’s free speech rights when engaged in so called “extramural” speech outside the classroom.

Hitler’s and Bibi’s internment camps: The Trump administration is seeking to roll back the historical understanding that birthright citizenship extends to almost anyone born in the United States.

+—+

Whoops, back to a fucking megalomaniac Jew: Michael Bloomberg, who donated $600 million in 2024 to support medical schools at four historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs), has a new plan to back Black education: Funding K-12 charter schools on HBCU campuses. On Thursday, the billionaire former New York City mayor’s Bloomberg Philanthropies and the education nonprofit City Fund announced a $20 million initiative to fund two public schools in Alabama, one at Stillman College and one at Tuskegee University, that will create direct pipelines into HBCUs and promote career success.

Which fucking Oreo Cookie will be sucking on Jewish, well, you know what?

Bloomberg’s $27.8 million project to boost Israeli cities hit hardest by war is ‘up and running’

Bloomberg Philanthropies initiative looks to build up the capacities of 65 Israeli cities and towns, seeing municipal governments as the key to the country’s recovery post-Oct. 7

2020:

Pledges strong action against anti-Semitism, as President Trump has politicized America’s long-standing bipartisan support for Israel and set a divisive tone as incidents of anti-Semitism and hate crimes rise

Speech Coincides with Campaign’s Launch of United for Mike, a Nationwide Effort to Rally Support Among Jewish Americans

MIAMI — During a major address at Aventura Turnberry Jewish Center and Tauber Academy, Democratic presidential candidate Mike Bloomberg discussed his Jewish identity and values and how his heritage will inform his presidency. He also addressed the dangerous rise in anti-Semitic hate crimes in the United States. President Trump has politicized America’s long-standing bipartisan support for Israel and set a divisive tone as incidents of anti-Semitism and hate crimes rise. Mike delivered his remarks as part of the launch of “United for Mike,” a nationwide outreach effort to rally support among Jewish Americans in support of Mike’s commitment to rebuild America and defeat Trump.

“I’ve spent a lot of time in synagogues in my life, but my parents taught me that Judaism is about more than going to shul,” Mike said in his speech. “It’s about living our values – including our obligations to help others, to ‘repair the world’ in the tradition of Tikkun Olam and to revere the miracle that is the state of Israel, which, for their generation, was a dream fulfilled before their very eyes.”

Nachum Segal, host of “JM in the AM,” opened the program. Other speakers included Abigail Pogrebin, National Director for Jewish Outreach for Mike Bloomberg 2020; best-selling author Rabbi Joseph Telushkin; and Patricia Halfen Wexler, co-founder and managing director of Starlight Ventures. Mike was introduced by Phil Levine, former mayor of Miami Beach, FL.

“As the granddaughter of Holocaust survivors and a Venezuelan who witnessed my community disintegrate under Chavismo, I am keenly aware of the importance of having a safe, welcoming, and thriving place to call home,” said Halfen Wexler. “This is why it is crucial – at this time of increasing partisanship – that we vote for a proven leader like Mike Bloomberg who is a pragmatic, compassionate, and reasonable executive who can bring our country together.”

During his remarks, Mike reaffirmed his lifelong support for Israel, including a commitment to provide unconditional military aid to Israel if elected president. He also outlined his policy to stop Iran’s effort to become a nuclear power.

“As president, I will work to make the strongest deal possible to constrain the Iranian regime’s aggression and territorial ambitions, and put an end to their nuclear program, because the world must never allow Iran to threaten Israel and the whole region with a nuclear attack,” Mike said.

Mike also assailed President Trump for politicizing America’s long-standing bipartisan support for Israel and his role in the rising incidents of anti-Semitism and hate crimes.

“When the President calls his supporters ‘real Americans’ – an echo of the language that nativists, anti-Semites, and the KKK used for many decades, – and when he is silent – and even supportive, through his words and tweets, as racist groups spread hate, he undermines our fundamental national values,” Mike said.

Mike said he would take strong action as president to reduce the number of anti-Semitic attacks and hate crimes by labeling them as “domestic terrorism” and charging those responsible. He also pledged to launch a national, coordinated effort led by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and Department of Justice to crack down on violent extremist groups. Mike also wants to expand the Department of Education’s and Department of Health and Human Services’ “Stop Bullying Campaign” which was started in 2012 and works to end harassment in schools, including anti-Semitic activity.

Mike has been a longtime champion of Jewish causes in the U.S. and in Israel. He has provided support to UJA and his own synagogue, Temple Emanu-El, as well as Temple Shalom, his hometown synagogue in Medford, Mass. Mike donated to the renovation of the Magen David Adom emergency medical center in Israel in honor of his father and dedicated the pediatric wing of Hadassah Hospital in Jerusalem in honor of his mother. In 2019, Bloomberg Philanthropies launched a program to spur innovation in 12 Israeli cities, building on its work in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, and Be’er Sheva, which started in 2015. In 2014, he was awarded the inaugural Genesis Prize, a $1 million award that annually recognizes an honoree who has attained excellence and international renown, and whose actions and achievements embody the character of the Jewish people through commitment to Jewish values, the Jewish community and/or the State of Israel.

United for Mike is the national coalition of Jewish Americans who are supporting Mike Bloomberg 2020. As part of this outreach, Mike Bloomberg 2020 is announcing today that dozens of Jewish leaders from across the country will help build support for Mike’s candidacy by serving on the United for Mike Leadership Council. United for Mike will be hosting “Bagels for Bloomberg” events in communities around the country to share Mike’s record and vision with Jewish Americans.

This is how fucked up the news (sic) is: Unlike the United States, which operates eleven nuclear aircraft carriers, Chinese models require frequent refueling, which limits their range, mobility, and endurance. U.S. carriers only need a single reactor refueling during their entire 50-year service life.

Oh, Jordan?

Israel is advancing a plan to develop a hospital on its territory to treat Jordanian patients as part of a joint Israeli-Jordanian industrial park along the border of the two countries, the Emek HaMaayanot regional council head tells The Times of Israel.

“One of the ideas is that [the hospital] might be a center for cancer treatment, so that people from Jordan or further away could come and receive treatment,” says Itamar Matiash, who heads the council in northern Israel that will house the Israeli side of the industrial park.

The park, dubbed the “Jordan Gateway,” will enable Israelis and Jordanians to cross between the sides to work on joint projects. An existing bridge, the Jordan River Crossing, already connects the two sides of the proposed Jordan Gateway zone, near the Israeli city of Beit She’an.

As Palestinians and Israelis were trying to work out their relationship, Israel did not cease to prefer a Jordanian option of sorts as a solution for the question of Palestine. So-called moderate Israelis, mostly those of the Labor Party, preferred the Allon Plan, named after the Labor Party minister, Yigal Allon; it called for large swaths of the Jordan Valley to be annexed to Israel while the remaining parts of the West Bank to become part of Jordan. The more right-wing Israeli Likud Party and its allies had an even more sinister plan, namely, to keep all of the West Bank and declare Jordan the Palestinian state.

Despite it being authoritatively debunked by Sheila Ryan and Mohammad Hallaj in 1983,¹ the “Jordan is Palestine” idea became—and in some ways continues to be—an existential concern for Jordanians, who fear a potential increase in the number of Palestinians in Jordan. To them, the result would be the de facto elimination of their country to appease Israeli Zionists. Additionally, Ryan and Hallaj argued that this plan places the burden of Palestinian homelessness on Jordan and exonerates Israel.

Oh, those fucking Orthodox Jews First, Money First, too, and USA later: MAHA Activists Urge Trump to Fire His E.P.A. Administrator

As head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Lee Zeldin has weakened protections against toxic chemicals, say members of the MAHA movement.

Last month, the E.P.A. approved the use of two pesticides that meet the internationally recognized definition for “forever chemicals,” which are also known as PFAS and are linked to serious health risks.

In July, the E.P.A. proposed allowing the use of the contentious herbicide dicamba on some cotton and soybean crops. And in May, the agency said it would delay deadlines for water utilities to limit two types of PFAS present in the tap water of millions of Americans.

“If our enemies were to write a plan on how to poison Americans and prevent us from growing our own food, this would be it,” said Zen Honeycutt, the founder and executive director of Moms Across America, a group closely linked to the MAHA movement.

The Jews know how to strangle, man-oh. Water, man, forget Iran taking on ZIM and AZIM and 14 Eyes:

The Karaj dam, which supplies a quarter of the city’s drinking water, is just 8% full.

Water rationing has begun in some areas, with the flow from taps reduced or even stopped altogether overnight.

President Masoud Pezeshkian has urged people to use water sparingly – or the city, or at least parts of it, may even have to evacuate.

China’s fertility rate has slipped to one of the lowest in the world, falling to just 1.01 births per woman in 2024, far below the replacement level of 2.1 needed to sustain a stable population. Even a decade of policy reversals, from the end of the one-child rule in 2016 to the introduction of a three-child policy in 2021, has failed to stem the decline. Births briefly ticked up during auspicious Dragon Years, long considered favourable for starting families, but the effect has grown increasingly faint: the 2024 Dragon Year lifted fertility by a mere 0.1.

The gorilla got it right:

The basic idea is that when our human population grows large enough, we will run out of resources, most important of which is food. Have you considered though, that as our population grows, humans themselves will become a food source to other humans?

Of course, our population may be growing too fast for our beliefs about the “sanctity of human life” to change enough to tolerate cannibalism. But what do you think about the possibility? Might we simply become a cannibalistic society and continue on our normal course?

The film Soylent Green, loosely based on Harry Harrison’s novel Make Room! Make Room!, depicts the “basic idea” you describe, but I’m afraid this basic idea is not only oversimplified but highly unlikely.

If our population continues to grow, at some point the biological infrastructure supporting it will collapse, producing widespread and profound environmental changes. If this occurs, the earth will very probably cease to be a habitable place for large mammals (as it once ceased to be a habitable place for dinosaurs), and this includes us; we won’t be able to “continue on our normal course” by eating each other, any more than dinosaurs were able to continue on their normal course by eating each other.

[Spain, which already struggles with extreme drought, is set to see its dry season extended if the AMOC collapse, the study found.[

And how much is Nato and EU spending on death machines?

Collapse of key Atlantic current could bring extreme drought to Europe for hundreds of years, study finds

Scientists modeled Europe’s future if a key Atlantic current were to collapse and found that the continent faces a much drier future.

According to a report in the Hebrew-daily Calcalist on Oct. 21, the Spike missile deal is valued at approximately 2 billion euros. The missiles are reportedly intended for German infantry and armored infantry units, replacing older systems and filling capability gaps exposed by the war in Ukraine.

The deal will be implemented through EuroSpike, a joint venture owned by Rafael and German defense firms Rheinmetall and Diehl Defense.

This procurement is the latest in a series of major purchases of Israeli arms by European nations, who are in a race to rebuild their own defense industrial bases and build capabilities, as they also continue to supply Ukraine with arms.

Jews, man, money changers and grave robbers: Israel seizes dozens of archaeological artifacts

Back to the head of USA Gestapo — Glosser.

The shelter in Tijuana set up to welcome deported Mexican migrants from the U.S. has seen 12,000 people arrive at the facility through the end of November.

María José Juárez Becerra, director of Baja California’s Migrant Affairs Office, said all the migrants who have been brought to the shelter violated terms of their visas in the U.S., or were arrested in ICE raids or detained during the asylum process.

“And we’re seeing cases where people are voluntarily returning to Mexico like a tourist would normally come back,” she said. “We’re also seeing men being deported who have families remain in the United States, and we’ve seen entire families who decided to come back together.”

Deplorables, MAGA, or deportables . . . A man pardoned by President Donald Trump for his role in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol returned to Washington in recent days and has been wandering the neighborhood of Democratic Rep. Jamie Raskin — alarming police and prosecutors, who urged a judge to immediately jail him.

U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, who convicted Taylor Taranto at a bench trial this year for a threat to federal buildings and for bringing weapons to President Barack Obama’s D.C. neighborhood, did not immediately order him back to prison, but said he would weigh the request over the next few weeks.

Uniformed Mercenaries! Double or Triple Taps?

Jews in the wing.

The phrase “triple tap on world kitchen in Israel” refers to the April 1, 2024, incident where Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) strikes killed seven World Central Kitchen (WCK) aid workers in Gaza. The term “triple tap” refers to the multiple, consecutive missile strikes that hit the three-car convoy.

Key details of the incident:

• The Attack An IDF drone launched three separate missiles at the WCK convoy vehicles, which were clearly marked with the WCK logo and traveling in a de-conflicted zone along a route coordinated with the IDF.
• The Victims Seven aid workers were killed: Saifeddin Issam Ayad Abutaha (Palestinian), John Chapman, James Henderson, and James Kirby (UK citizens), Zomi Frankcom (Australian citizen), Damian Soból (Polish citizen), and Jacob Flickinger (US-Canadian dual citizen).
• Responses The IDF called the event a “grave mistake” and a “tragic event” that was not intended to harm non-combatants, while WCK founder Chef José Andrés and other external investigations claimed the convoy was systematically targeted.
• Aftermath The incident sparked global outrage, and the WCK suspended its operations in Gaza for a period. The IDF dismissed two officers and reprimanded three others following its internal investigation.

“Israel’s commitment to liberalism has always been shaky. As a Jewish state, it fosters a form of ethnic nationalism rather than a civic one.” That argument flows easily into this policy advice: “A better U.S. policy would advocate for equality, citizenship, and human rights for all Jews and Palestinians living within the single state dominated by Israel.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s return to power in Israel with a narrow, extreme right-wing coalition has shattered even the illusion of a two-state solution. Members of his new government have not been shy about stating their views on what Israel is and what it should be in all the territories it controls: a Greater Israel defined not just as a Jewish state but one in which the law enshrines Jewish supremacy over all Palestinians who remain there. As a result, it is no longer possible to avoid confronting a one-state reality.

MICHAEL BARNETT is University Professor of International Affairs and Political Science at the Elliott School of International Affairs at George Washington University.

NATHAN J. BROWN is Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at George Washington University and a Nonresident Senior Fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

MARC LYNCH is Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at George Washington University.

SHIBLEY TELHAMI is Anwar Sadat Professor for Peace and Development at the University of Maryland and a Nonresident Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution.

They are the editors of The One State Reality: What Is Israel/Palestine?