… and so, these Ashkenazi’s man, lock-step little and big Eichmanns: “Ashkenazi” refers to the Jewish group whose ancestors lived in Central and Eastern Europe, particularly in the Rhineland …
Oct 07, 2025
It’s October 7 in Gaza.
Two years of a living Holocaust — bombs, starvation, disease, and death.
We are still here, bleeding, starving, forgotten.
If humanity still exists, prove it.
No no no: Socialism is about taking DOWN the asshole rich, the authoritarian fascists, the middling and mendling fucking personal liberties pukes.
How about ending DATA centers and AI and, but . . .
Mexico’s Congress is once again at the center of a free speech storm.
This time, Deputy Armando Corona Arvizu from the ruling Morena party is proposing to make it a crime to create or share AI-generated memes or digital images that make fun of someone without their consent.
His initiative, filed in the Chamber of Deputies, sets out prison terms of three to six years and fines for anyone who “create, manipulate, transform, reproduce or disseminate images, videos, audios or digital representations” made with artificial intelligence for the purpose of “ridiculing, harassing, impersonating or damaging” a person’s “reputation or dignity.”
Read the bill here.
The punishment would increase by half if the person targeted is a public official, minor, or person with a disability, or if the content spreads widely online or causes personal, psychological, or professional harm.
Fucking LIARS:
“I grew up without religion. That’s how my parents raised me,” Sheinbaum, 61, said in 2018 at gathering hosted by a Jewish organization in Mexico City. “But obviously the culture, that’s in your blood.”
Her maternal grandparents were Jews who immigrated to Mexico from Bulgaria before the Holocaust, while her paternal grandparents had fled from Lithuania in the 1920s. Sheinbaum’s parents were born in Mexico.
While campaigning, Sheinbaum said she considers herself a woman of faith but is not religiously affiliated; perhaps that’s why there has been relatively little discussion about her becoming Mexico’s first Jewish president.
She’s part of that Nazi EuroTrash and Jewish Tradition of digging and data crawling: Speaking of which . . .
Constant watching. Public microphones. This is what happens when budget shortfalls meet venture capital solutions.
Some counties get botanical gardens. Some get aquatic centers with water slides named after local mayors. Baldwin County, Georgia, got a $650,000 real-time crime center with facial recognition, license plate readers, and enough data-wrangling software to make your old Facebook privacy settings weep in the corner.
Corona Arvizu, proposed adding articles 211 Bis 8 and 211 Bis 9 to the Federal Penal Code: ‘Article 211 bis 8.- Whoever, by any digital means, creates, manipulates, transforms, reproduces or disseminates images, videos, audios or digital representations generated with editing technologies or artificial intelligence, that use without consent the image, voice or identity of a natural person, with the purpose of ridiculing, harassing, impersonating or damaging their reputation or dignity, will be sentenced to three to six years in prison and three hundred to six hundred days of fine.’
Use fucking Portland as an example, and make ICE illegal, stop the motherfucking “federalized” Gestapo at your cities’ and counties’ borders, and begin the upheaval now that the White Man’s House and its Jewish Minyan are after your LIVES:
Throughout the night, Oct. 4, and into the morning on Oct. 5, President Donald Trump sent over 100 “federalized” California National Guard troops to Oregon. Two hundred more are expected. The move was in response to a temporary restraining order by U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut that prevented the administration from deploying state guards to Portland, Oregon.
Demonstrators defend immigrant rights against ICE in south Portland, Oregon, Oct. 4, 2025. PHOTO: John Rudolf
The judge’s ruling came after Trump told the press he would send troops to Portland to “handle domestic terrorists.” Immergut said Portland’s small protests didn’t justify the use of federalized forces, which could harm Oregon’s state sovereignty.
Several hundred community activists, organizations and major education, health care and public employee union members protested at Portland’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facilities on Sept. 28. They faced 200 masked National Guard troops activated by Trump’s Department of War.
Trump’s remarks to the media are using fictional claims to send federal troops to Portland to suppress the “rebellion” taking place at the city’s ICE facility. He said that Portland is a “war ravaged, lawless, out of control city.” He told Portland Mayor Tina Kotek that it “looks like World War II” and like “the place is burning down.”
Intentionally confusing 2020 BLM demos with 2025 anti-ICE protests
Trump, stuck in the past, may be justifying his fictional description of Portland based on videos of the 2020 Black Lives Matter demonstrations. Three weeks ago, Fox News aired incorrectly dated videos of these protests to illustrate the recent anti-ICE protests. Far-right news outlets, including Turning Point USA’s Frontlines, exaggerate demonstrations taking place against the Trump regime.
Peaceful, non-violent protests at Portland’s ICE facility going on since spring usually involve no more than a dozen protesters at any one time. While protesters remained nonviolent, state violence was initiated by the national troops. Federal officers and police in military fatigues physically attacked the crowd. Portland Jobs With Justice Executive Director Tyler Fellini said, “When I saw a member of the Portland Association of Teachers being assaulted, I stepped in to support him before I was sprayed directly in the eyes with chemical agents.”
‘One of most urgent labor issues of our time’
A statement written by Fellini, called for “the abolition of ICE and the violent deportations, detentions and disappearances it carries out.” He called on the city to revoke a land use permit issued to ICE in 2011. Since then, ICE has repeatedly violated overnight detentions and detention time limits. Fellini noted: “Sunday’s use of chemical agents is one more reason why residents — especially those living near the ICE facility — are calling on the city to revoke the permit, given the grave public health risks created by ICE’s presence.
“We believe this is one of the most urgent labor issues of our time, as workers and organizers throughout our community face spurious arrests and violent repression while the Trump administration seeks to use these threats to suppress collective action to build a just and equitable society where workers and communities thrive.”
Immediately after Trump announced it had seized control of Oregon’s national reserves, Oregon’s Attorney General filed a federal lawsuit and a temporary restraining order to block deployment of the troops. He declared that Trump exceeded his authority by taking federal control of the guard away from the state.
Trump told top military commanders in Quantico, Virginia, on Sept. 30 that he wants to use Democrat-led cities as “training grounds” for the military. Portland will continue to demand: “Troops out of our city! No martial law in our cities. Stop using our streets for war preparations. No military dictatorship in the US.!” — SOURCE
That fucking Nazi org.
In August 1804, Walter Scott finished writing The Lay of the Last Minstrel. Therein, he asked whether
“Breathes there the man with soul so dead
Who never to himself hath said:
‘This is my own, my native Land?’
Whose heart hath ne’er within him burned
As home his footsteps he hath turned, . . .
From wandering on a foreign strand?”
Dead Souls: The Denationalization of the American Elite
In 1953, the head of General Motors, nominated to be secretary of defense, proclaimed, “What’s good for General Motors is good for America.” He was widely criticized for not saying that what’s good for America is good for General Motors. Either way, both he and his critics presumed some coincidence of interest between corporation and country. Now, however, multinational corporations see their interests as separate from America’s interests. As their global operations expand, corporations founded and headquartered in the United States gradually become less American. In the 1990s, corporations such as Ford, Aetna, Motorola, Price Costco and Kimberly-Clark forcefully rejected, in response to a Ralph Nader proposal, expressions of patriotism and explicitly defined themselves as multinational. America-based corporations operating globally recruit their workforce and their executives, including their top ones, without regard to nationality. The CIA, one of its officials said in 1999, can no longer count on the cooperation of American corporations as it once was able to do, because the corporations view themselves as multinational and may not think it in their interests to help the U.S. government.
Nationalism has proven wrong Karl Marx’s concept of a unified international proletariat. Globalization is proving right Adam Smith’s observation that while “the proprietor of land is necessarily a citizen of the particular country in which his estate lies . . . the proprietor of stock is properly a citizen of the world, and is not necessarily attached to any particular country.” Smith’s 1776 words describe the way contemporary transnational businessmen see themselves. Summarizing their interviews with executives of 23 American multinational corporations and nonprofit organizations, James Davison Hunter and Joshua Yates conclude:
Surely these elites are cosmopolitans: they travel the world and their field of responsibility is the world. Indeed, they see themselves as ‘global citizens.’ Again and again, we heard them say that they thought of themselves more as ‘citizens of the world’ who happen to carry an American passport than as U.S. citizens who happen to work in a global organization. They possess all that is implied in the notion of the cosmopolitan. They are sophisticated, urbane and universalistic in their perspective and ethical commitments.
Together with the “globalizing elites” of other countries, these American executives inhabit a “socio-cultural bubble” apart from the cultures of individual nations and communicate with each other in a social science-y version of English, which Hunter and Yates label “global speak.”
The economic globalizers are fixated on the world as an economic unit. As Hunter and Yates report,
All these globalizing organizations, and not just the multinational corporations, operate in a world defined by ‘expanding markets’, the need for ‘competitive advantage’, ‘efficiency’, ‘cost-effectiveness’, ‘maximizing benefits and minimizing costs’, ‘niche markets’, ‘profitability’ and ‘the bottom line.’ They justify this focus on the grounds that they are meeting the need of consumers all over the world. That is their constituency.
“One thing globalization has done”, a consultant to Archer Daniels Midland said, “is to transfer the power of governments to the global consumer.” As the global market replaces the national community, the national citizen gives way to the global consumer.
This isn’t a “dream.” It’s a blueprint for a planetary prison.
Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum, casually describes a dystopian future where elites have implantable brain surveillance tech.
He says: “I can immediately feel how the people react to your answers.”
Let’s translate this from the language of globalist euphemism into the truth.
What Schwab is really saying is: “We will bypass your voice, your choices, and your very thoughts. Your internal, subjective experience—your dissent, your joy, your skepticism—will become a data stream for us to monitor, measure, and manage.”
This is the endgame of The Great Reset and the Fourth Industrial Revolution. It’s not about “stakeholder capitalism” or “saving the planet.” It is about the final, irrevocable transfer of power. – From Sovereign Individuals to a Managed Collective. – From Private Thought to Public Data. – From “We the People” to “They the Controllers.”
They don’t want to just shape your behavior through social credit or digital IDs. They want to wiretap your soul. They want to eliminate the last frontier of human freedom: the sanctuary of your own mind.
This is the ultimate form of control—predicting and preempting dissent before it even fully forms as a conscious idea. When Schwab and his class talk about “fusion” between humans and technology, they mean their consciousness will be the pilots, and yours will be the engineered substrate. You will be the platform. They will be the users.
This isn’t conspiracy theory. It’s their stated goal, announced openly because they believe their vision is morally superior and therefore inevitable. They believe they have the right to do this.
The resistance to this future will not be fought with weapons alone, but with a fierce and unyielding commitment to the inviolability of the human spirit. We must reject their implants, their digital IDs, their CBDCs, and their entire control apparatus. We must build parallel systems based on freedom, sovereignty, and voluntary association. The future is not a prediction. It is a choice. Will we choose humanity, or will we submit to the hive?
And there are other Nazi’s with KKK crosses:
BONDI: The National Guard is on the way right now as we speak. You’re sitting here grilling me and they’re on their way to Chicago to keep your state safe.
DURBIN: It’s my job to grill you
+—+
Oct. 7: Gaza Genocide Enabled by Israel’s Web of Lies and False Narratives
Two years after October 7, the full scale of Israel’s deceit has come into view. What began as a torrent of sensational claims, of atrocities never proven, of crimes never committed, evolved into a machinery of deception designed to rationalize the annihilation of Gaza. What we are witnessing today is not merely a war of extermination but the collapse of a narrative built on lies, propaganda, and moral hypocrisy, a narrative that sought to erase an entire people while claiming to defend “civilization.”
A Genocide Built on a Lie
The war of extermination Israel has waged on Gaza for the past two years is not a “response” to October 7; it is the continuation of a settler-colonial project that has never tolerated Palestinian existence. The destruction of Gaza’s hospitals, schools, mosques, churches, and refugee camps was justified through an elaborate architecture of deceit, where every bomb dropped was accompanied by a story meant to sanitize the killing.
Israeli propaganda began to ramp up in the early hours of Operation Flood of Al-Aqsa. It exported a singular, rehearsed narrative: that Palestinian fighters were not resisting occupation but committing atrocities so unspeakable that their annihilation became a moral duty. Western media, politicians, and organizations embraced these claims uncritically, transforming Israel’s disinformation into the emotional scaffolding of genocide.
The Fabricated Crimes: Sexual Violence, “Beheaded Babies,” and “Weapons in Hospitals”
The first great lie was that of sexual violence. Israel claimed that Palestinian fighters had raped Israeli women in large numbers within hours of the October 7 attack. The story spread like wildfire, amplified by Western media and feminist organizations.
Yet, a full year later, Israel has failed to produce a single piece of forensic or testimonial evidence. Even the New York Times’ heavily promoted investigation fell apart when its sources proved unreliable, and one of its reporters, Anat Schwartz, was dismissed for her open incitement against Palestinians. Former Israeli captives themselves confirmed that they were treated humanely and not subjected to abuse, a fact quietly ignored by those who once shouted the loudest.
Then came the most grotesque fabrication of all, the story of “beheaded babies.” An Israeli i24 News correspondent, citing an unnamed soldier, claimed that forty infants had been decapitated in a kibbutz. The story was picked up by CNN, BBC, and Sky News and echoed by U.S. President Joe Biden, who falsely said he had seen photographic proof. Days later, the White House retracted his statement.
There were no photos, no witnesses, and no evidence. Even the Israeli newspaper Haaretz confirmed that “politicians and soldiers contributed to spreading false stories to fuel public anger.” But the image of the “slaughtered child” had already done its work; it branded Palestinians as monsters and turned genocide into a moral crusade.
When that narrative collapsed, new horrors were invented: claims that Palestinian fighters had burned children alive in ovens, invoking Holocaust imagery to solidify Western emotional allegiance. Many of these “images” were later exposed as AI-generated fakes, yet they circulated for weeks on prime-time television in Israel, France, and the United States.
The third great deception centered on Gaza’s hospitals. To justify bombing nearly every medical facility in the Strip, Israel claimed Hamas had built tunnels under hospitals and stored weapons in their basements. To “prove” this, the Israeli army invited journalists, including CNN, to inspect what turned out to be a doctors’ shift calendar hanging on a wall. Despite this absurdity, mainstream media outlets repeated the claims without scrutiny. Sean Casey, the emergency coordinator for the World Health Organization, said he did not witness any instances of hospitals being utilized for military purposes.
Journalists and independent groups subsequently verified that no tunnels or weapons were discovered. The lie, however, had already done its damage; every destroyed hospital and every murdered doctor was rationalized as a blow against “terror.”
The Collapse of the Narrative
Two years later, the edifice of Israeli lies is cracking. Fact-checkers have debunked dozens of fabricated stories. Journalists have resigned from major Western outlets in protest over biased coverage. Trust in corporate media has fallen to record lows. Even within Israel, commentators have begun to ask, “Have we believed our own story too much?”
Yet the collapse of the lie has not stopped the killing. More than 235,000 Palestinians are dead, tens of thousands of them children, and Gaza lies in ruins. The genocide continues, as though truth itself were powerless against power. Still, something irreversible has shifted.
Around the world, the myth of Israel as a “moral democracy” is crumbling. University students across the West chant for Palestinian liberation. Filmmakers refuse to share festivals with Israeli-funded productions. Artists, academics, and faith leaders speak openly of apartheid and genocide.
The exposure of Israel’s lies has become a turning point in global consciousness. What was once taboo to question is now widely seen: a state built on dispossession, sustained by propaganda, and defended by silence. Unquestionably, two years after October 7, Israel’s war on Gaza was motivated by ideology rather than fear or self-defense. And the world, having witnessed the machinery of deception laid bare, will not forget. The lie may have justified genocide, but truth has already begun to dismantle its power.
Oh, which Hamas grenade did this? Oh, the IOF and Hannibal!
[Hannibal himself does not appear as a character or figure in Jewish stories, but the Punic general’s name, meaning “My favor is with Baal,” is linguistically related to Hebrew and became the namesake for Israel’s controversial “Hannibal Directive” allowing lethal force to prevent Israeli soldier capture. The historical Hannibal was a Semitic general, and his family name, Barca, also has a cognate in Hebrew. ]
In the peace agreement that ended the Second Punic War, Carthage was allowed to keep only its territory in North Africa but lost its overseas empire permanently. It was also forced to surrender its fleet and pay a large indemnity in silver, and to agree never again to re-arm or declare war without permission from Rome. Hannibal, who escaped with his life from the crushing defeat at Zama and still harbored a desire to defeat Rome, retained his military title despite accusations that he had botched the conduct of the war. In addition, he was made a civil magistrate in the government of Carthage.
According to Livy, Hannibal fled to the Syrian court at Ephesus after his opponents within the Carthaginian nobility denounced him to the Romans for encouraging Antiochus III of Syria to take up arms against Rome. When Rome later defeated Antiochus, one of the peace terms called for the surrender of Hannibal; to avoid this fate, he may have fled to Crete or taken up arms with rebel forces in Armenia. He later served King Prusias of Bithynia in another unsuccessful war against the Roman ally King Eumenes II of Pergamum. At some point during this conflict, the Romans again demanded the surrender of Hannibal. Finding himself unable to escape, he killed himself by taking poison in the Bithynian village of Libyssa, probably around 183 B.C.
According to Israeli officials, the name was randomly generated by a computer in 1986, when the directive was created. Another source claims the name was chosen because it shares the first letter, het, with the Hebrew word for “captive,” hatuf.
The audio recordings provide a harrowing account of the officers engaging the terrorists, attempting to capture a Hamas base, and repeatedly attacking the mosque in which the terror tunnel ended – until reaching the conclusion that Sec.-Lt. Goldin was no longer alive.
In those critical hours – from the moment of the encounter which led to Sec.-Lt. Goldin’s capturing at 9:16am and until midday – the IDF implemented the Hannibal Directive which states that at the time of a capture of an IDF soldier the main mission becomes ending the kidnapping – even if that means injury to Israeli soldiers, including the one captured.
The Hannibal Directive allows commanders to take whatever action is necessary to prevent a situation where Israel is forced to negotiate with captors, including endangering the life of a captured soldier, to foil the capture.
The commanders in charge of the operation, who could be targeted by a military police investigation, were Lieutenant Colonel Eli Gino (commander of Givati’s reconnaissance company) and Colonel Ofer Vinter (Givati Brigade’s commander).
There should be ZERO air “shows” on planet earth: Organizers say Israeli companies will not participate in Dubai Airshow
Major Ben-Hemo was called up from his university studies to serve as the battalion commander’s second deputy.
Palestinians claim that the bombing that ensued as part of the Hannibal Directive, primarily from the air and from artillery units, included hundreds of shells and bombs that were fired recklessly and caused the deaths of dozens of innocent Palestinians and the wounding of hundreds more.
The reliance of ground forces on artillery support
The recordings clearly present the return to prominence of the armored corps during Operation Protective Edge. In one of the cases heard in the recordings, the tanks were asked to provide cover fire for Lt. Eitan Pond, the deputy commander of the reconnaissance company, after he came under enemy fire.
Lt. Eitan Fund (Photo: Ohad Zwigenberg)
In conversations with the commanders of Givati and Golani commanders before the incident and after the operation, infantry officers admitted there were few face-to-face battles with Hamas militants throughout the ground campaign – and that almost every target was captured after preemptive shelling by the armored corps.
The Flotilla participants, who have been illegally detained by Israel since October 2nd, most of whom are currently held in harsh conditions in Ketziot prison in the Naqab (Negev) in southern Israel, are being subjected to abuse and mistreatment. These harsh conditions include physical violence, verbal harassment, the deprivation of adequate drinking water, food, sleep, and medication, as well as prolonged confinement in uncomfortable stress positions. Such treatment constitutes acts of ill-treatment and torture under international law.
Alexis Deswaef, one of the two vice-presidents of the International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) currently on hunger strike alongside Aziz Rhali, was injured by a water cannon used by the Israeli navy during an intimidation maneuver against the ship on which he was sailing. FIDH member, Adalah, is providing legal representation for hundreds of Flotilla detainees and has documented these incidents. Representatives of embassies and consulates who have met with their nationals, participants in the Flotilla, have also relayed these messages, and Flotilla participants who have already been deported are speaking with the media about this abuse, particularly that inflicted on Swedish activist Greta Thunberg.
In addition, Israeli Minister of Internal Security Itamar Ben Gvir appeared on video on the evening of October 2nd, showing the detained members of the Flotilla, as he insulted them and accused them in Hebrew of being terrorists. Detainees were also presented with documents written in Hebrew, which they were ordered to sign. Those who refused to sign these documents continue to be detained.
Don’t count on this dude in Jew York City:
Sounds like he wrote the first paragraph with a loaded gun cocked in his mouth, just like he sounds like a hostage whenever he “condemns Hamas”
A Jew on his arm:
Heba Gowayed, a sociology professor at the City University of New York (CUNY), said many young people were drawn to Mamdani and got involved in his campaign because of his opposition to Israeli policies.
“The fact that he refused to back down from his position on Palestine is huge,” Gowayed told Al Jazeera. “In an atmosphere where we’ve been told that holding that position is politically disqualifying, it was a movement that not only insisted on this position but was, in a sense, predicated on it.”
She added that, if Mamdani had flipped to appease critics, he would have lost the support and enthusiasm that put him over the finish line. But Mamdani’s support for Palestinian “likely bolstered his campaign”, she said.
[Palestinians celebrate on the third day of Eid al-Adha at a park in Khan Younis in the southern Gaza strip, July 11, 2022.]
Two Years of Genocide: The guilt we live with from the miserable safety of exile
By Tareq S. Hajjaj October 6, 2025
Every day, when we turn on the news, we thank God we survived the genocide. And every day, we regret it.
A few days before the genocide began, I had a visa to enter the UK. I was happy and beyond excited, as I was planning on going to London to represent Mondoweiss and talk about the stories I tell. I was excited to meet some of my readers and to engage with the audience that follows my stories. I felt secure in the idea that I would briefly leave my wife, son, and elderly mother behind in our large family home. They were surrounded by loved ones, and I wouldn’t be away for more than two weeks.
Then the war came, and it changed everything. The crossings were closed overnight, and the primary concern of people in Gaza became survival and finding enough food and water.
From the second month of the war, all of us realized that this war was completely different from anything we’d experienced before. We were sure of it when the Israeli army insisted on evacuating the entire northern half of Gaza, which included our home.
Now, the family home we once had, the window I always woke up beside, the lemon, olive, and fig trees that surrounded our building — all of it is gone now.
At the beginning of the war, I did not think of leaving Gaza. As Palestinians, we know what exile means. But this changed after my mother fell ill. She was hospitalized and died shortly thereafter because treatment was unavailable. What my mother needed was so simple: a few dietary supplements and some medications would have been enough to save her life. I scoured the entire area between Rafah and Khan Younis in an attempt to find them. I failed.
That made me think: what if I fail in finding food for my son tomorrow? Would I be able to watch him die of hunger before my eyes, just as I watched my mother die of illness? How much was I willing to keep facing this fate, again and again, until I have no one left? I decided then and there that we must survive.
My son hadn’t turned one yet. He had committed no sin to deserve this fate. Why should my child and all the children of Gaza live under these harsh conditions? Surely, if I took him away from his homeland so he could be safe, it wouldn’t be a crime, would it? Surely this wouldn’t be considered a betrayal of our homeland?
Leaving Gaza was the hardest decision of my life. After much hardship, we were finally able to secure passage to Egypt, where we spent a year and a half. Exile set in, settling in our minds and making itself felt in every step.
But I wasn’t the one who was most affected by our displacement. It was my son.
He’s two-and-a-half now, and he’s never had the chance to get to know his neighborhood or grow up with his cousins. He’s never run out to the street to play with the other children in the neighborhood. He never got to stroll through the market with me or to tag along on family visits. I couldn’t even celebrate his first birthday in our home. I had a huge party planned, but we ended up celebrating it in an abandoned home in Yibna refugee camp, whose glass was broken in the dead of winter. My son has no friends. He hasn’t been able to find even one in exile to visit and play with. We’re his only friends, myself and his mother, and my son was robbed of his childhood.
It drives me mad with guilt, even if that was the price of survival. My child is now alone after having been surrounded by a family that was his world — aunts, uncles, cousins. His older cousins used to come over day after day to play with him and his toys. Now, whenever I look at him, I know he will never again have the love we left behind in Gaza.
Being forced to leave behind your home, your siblings, and countless loved ones carries a finality that is too much to bear. Gaza is the only place in the world where he could have found that kind of love, and we left it behind.
Now, I talk to him about Gaza and browse the photos that connect us to home, where our whole lives have been spent. I showed him picture after picture and explained a great deal. I tell him: Look, this is Gaza! This is our home, our land. We’re going to return one day. I try not to show him the images of destruction. We always watch the news on television, and whenever a report comes on, we remember and talk about Gaza and all the areas that appear on the screen.
He has picked up all these words while sitting with us. When he sees destruction on the TV screen, he loudly says: “Gaza, Gaza, our home.” But I don’t want him to think of Gaza as a place of death and destruction. It is the most beautiful place on earth.
For long months, I often thought twice before eating anything: I told myself that my family back home is unable to find a piece of bread right now.
What is strange is that we are the owners of the land. Every time I discover a new country, I realize that the land from which we were driven out is the most remarkable and ancient of lands in the world. It is a place blessed with geographical and natural diversity. We have everything, from the mountain against the sea to the rolling fields, thick forests, and sprawling deserts. We have everything that makes us the owners of a free country. The only thing stopping us is the occupation.
Whenever we watch the news, we thank God that we survived. And we regret it every day.
Paul Haeder, Author 