The Horrors and Whores on Sub-Terranean-Stack . . . Soap Box and Lunacy

you’ll never know what you stumble upon when signing up for a free ride on the insane side of Substack

“This time will be different. Agentic AI’s software will be capable of ‘eating’ the core functions of government. The Agentic State… marks a shift in the nature of government.” — advisor to Ukraine’s Digital Gulag!

Now, moving to my email in-box and some wimpy comment BACK at me.

There are fucking white boy trash defending the murderer Kyle, still, five years later:

5 Years Later, Big Tech is Still Censoring Kyle Rittenhouse/ The Censorship of Self-Defense: Five years ago, one of the most tyrannical smear and censorship campaigns in modern history was unleashed on a 17-year-old boy.

Check out Mister Fish from Wisconsin commenting. And Paulokirk, tambien!

The Maywand District murders: In 2010, a “Kill Team” of U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan was responsible for killing several unarmed civilians. An investigation revealed that low-ranking soldiers were sometimes coerced into participating by a senior leader. In one instance, a young private pleaded guilty to murder, admitting he made a “bad decision” when he shot an unarmed teen after a higher-ranking soldier ordered him to.

“The crux of the prosecution’s case was based squarely on Morlock’s testimony that Gibbs generated the idea of killing noncombatants and covering up the killings as lawful combat engagements,” the court filings read. “Although Morlock initially told CID during a videotaped interview that he did not witness Gibbs commit any offenses, Morlock later testified at trial that Gibbs gave him a grenade to toss at the first Afghan, resulting in the first murder.”

And way way back, the US Army did studies on all the shoot first, ask the dead questions later mentality of 18, 19 and 20 year old punks. Putting in 23 year old soldiers in the mix, in these squads, they studied and observed, created a more “empathetic attack force” which would possibly not shoot every living thing in a home or on a farm in that foreign country where the mercenary forces have been deployed.

Rittenhouse? The punks defending a car business? Fucking amped up and juiced up on that phallic gun in his hands.

A US soldier has shot dead 16 Afghan civilians, nine of them children, in a night-time shooting spree in a village outside his base in southern Afghanistan, a rampage the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai, said was “impossible to forgive”.

The unprecedented attack on families asleep in their homes came as anti-foreign sentiment was already running high after Afghans discovered US troops had burned copies of the Qur’an at a military base.

The US president, Barack Obama, and the British prime minister, David Cameron, are due to discuss UK and American plans for Afghanistan at a meeting in Washington on Tuesday.

Obama said he was deeply saddened.

“I offer my condolences to the families and loved ones of those who lost their lives, and to the people of Afghanistan, who have endured too much violence and suffering. This incident … does not represent the exceptional character of our military and the respect that the United States has for the people of Afghanistan.”

The Army has missed its recruiting target twice in the past five years—by roughly 8 percent in 2018 and by 25 percent in 2022. While COVID shocks and a stronger job market may have hurt its efforts in 2022, other services mostly made their recruiting quotas—if in some cases by advancing recruits who had signed contracts but were not scheduled to enter service until fiscal 2023.

Yet the Army has yet to make substantial movement toward changes that could sizably increase its number of recruits. Gen. James McConville, the Army’s chief of staff, even doubled down, insisting that standards will not be lowered in such a way that would sacrifice soldier quality for quantity. While lowering standards is no doubt one way to enlarge the pool of the military-qualified applicants, it is by no means the only way to do so. Recent research indicates that looking at people who are somewhat older than today’s typical recruit could broaden that pool while also maintaining quality—or even increasing it.…

Recruiting older people to enlist in the Army could help with more than just its raw recruiting numbers. In our 2022 RAND study, we found that individuals who enlist over the age of 21 perform better as soldiers on several metrics. For instance, recruits in the 25-to-35 age range were about 15 percent less likely to attrit due to poor performance than recruits ages 16-to-18, and about 6 percent more likely to reenlist. In that same study, recruiters noted a perception that older recruits are “of higher quality, more focused, and more motivated, as well as being ready to ship to basic training more quickly.”

Recruiters told us that older recruits were also more likely to walk into a recruiting station on their own without targeted outreach, indicating ample room for increased efforts to inform older individuals about Army opportunities. In interviews with young soldiers, some even insisted that older recruits’ maturity made them better suited for military life. And to pile on, a previous study found that older recruits have higher qualification test scores, higher levels of education, and are more likely to be promoted compared to younger recruits.

Abstract

Early childhood is a sensitive period for learning and social skill development. The maturation of cerebral regions underlying social processing lays the foundation for later social-emotional competence. This study explored myelin changes in social brain regions and their association with changes in parent-rated social-emotional development in a cohort of 129 children (64 females, 0–36 months, 77 White). Results reveal a steep increase in myelination throughout the social brain in the first 3 years of life that is significantly associated with social-emotional development scores. These findings add knowledge to the emerging picture of social brain development by describing neural underpinnings of human social behavior. They can contribute to identifying age-/stage-appropriate early life factors in this developmental domain.

Uses experience to temper new recruits: Newer, less-experienced soldiers are typically integrated into squads and platoons alongside seasoned veterans. This structure allows younger service members to benefit from their more experienced peers and leaders who provide mentorship and oversight.
Implements rigorous training: Before deployment, soldiers undergo extensive training to prepare them for the stresses of combat. This includes:
- Stress inoculation: Repeatedly exposing soldiers to controlled, simulated combat scenarios to build resilience and improve their performance under pressure.
- Tactical exercises: Drills that prepare soldiers to follow orders and execute specific tasks as a coordinated team.

I’ll go here for a little mainstream, middle of the road discussion about this fucking murderer, KR: Stop calling Kyle Rittenhouse a hero. He killed two unarmed people

Kyle Rittenhouse, who shot three men at a riot in Kenosha, killing two of them, was acquitted of all criminal charges.

He has been hailed as a hero. He has been feted by politicians, including Donald Trump. He has been compared to John Wayne as a symbol of law-abiding people fighting back against lawlessness. When he took a rifle to a protest over the earlier police shooting that left Jacob Blake paralyzed, Rittenhouse said his intention was to protect property against violence.

But the two men Rittenhouse killed were unarmed. John Wayne never shot an unarmed man.

Rittenhouse was acquitted because of changes in the legal understanding of self-defense in recent years. Based on the Rittenhouse verdict, the rest of us are now unsafe around anyone with a gun.

Rittenhouse had been guarding an auto dealership at which several cars had been set on fire when he was confronted by Joseph Rosenbaum, the first man Rittenhouse killed. Evidence showed that Rosenbaum was aggressive and lunged for Rittenhouse’s rifle while cursing him. Rittenhouse testified that he feared that Rosenbaum would seize the rifle and shoot him. The jury found this fear to be reasonable and this may be a fair interpretation of the current law of self-defense in Wisconsin.

But that is precisely the problem. No one actually knows what Rosenbaum intended. Rittenhouse admitted that he pointed his rifle at him. Rosenbaum might have intended simply to disarm a dangerous man.

The acquittal means that the person holding the gun gets to decide who lives and who dies.

You can see where this interpretation of self-defense can lead in the trial of the three men who were convicted of killing Ahmaud Arbery, an unarmed black jogger running through a suburb of Brunswick, Georgia. One of the men charged, Travis McMichael, said that Arbery lunged for his gun.

McMichael was convicted of malice murder, so this defense failed. But George Barnhill, the second prosecutor in the case, who later recused himself, refused to prosecute on just this basis: “at the point Arbery grabbed the shotgun, under Georgia Law, [Travis] McMichael was allowed to use deadly force to protect himself.”

John Wayne would not have shot a man he knew was unarmed, as Rittenhouse did. The Duke would have defended himself against non-lethal force by the use of his fists.

After Rittenhouse killed Rosenbaum, he made a phone call to a friend saying that he had just killed someone. He did not seek medical attention for the man on the ground. He did not call the police. Instead, he continued his armed patrolling.

Anthony Huber, the second man killed, considered Rittenhouse to be dangerous. Huber’s girlfriend said in an interview that Huber rushed Rittenhouse to protect her and others nearby. Huber struck Rittenhouse with a skateboard he always carried and reached for Rittenhouse’s rifle. That is when Rittenhouse shot him once, fatally wounding him.

Clearly, Huber was not trying to shoot Rittenhouse, but to disarm him. As the events of that night demonstrated, he was not wrong to fear that Rittenhouse was irresponsibly dangerous. Huber’s courage cost him his life.

John Wayne would not have fired his weapon at Huber, just as John Wayne would have led the police to Rosenbaum’s body.

Ironically, there was someone in Kenosha that night who embodied the grace and restraint of John Wayne—Gaige Grosskreutz, the man Rittenhouse wounded after killing Huber.

Grosskreutz, who was at the protest to provide medical care, and who was carrying a handgun, was told that Rittenhouse had shot someone and was trying to get away. He saw Rittenhouse fire at Huber and moved directly toward him with his own gun visible. He and Rittenhouse confronted each other. Grosskreutz did not fire. Rittenhouse did.

Rittenhouse did not hesitate to shoot, did not assess the situation, did not act like an adult who understood the responsibility of possessing a firearm.

And then, this KR murderer gets to go to the Semen Drip Trump’s Pedophile Mar-a-Lago?

We need Chris Smalls on every ship, in every warehouse, on every fucking stage where Democrats with pencils weild their putrid spinelessness to go up against this Cunt-Tree’s Dumpy Brained Trump and his one million knives:

Bernie/AOC “Are Compromised, They are Class Traitors.” Labor SILENT on Israel? (w/ Chris Smalls)

No mention of Trayvon Martin as Trump talks in the city he died in about blacks getting shot

“I say to the African-American community and to the Hispanic community, what the hell do you have to lose? I will fix it. We will make them good. We will make them safe. We will bring back jobs. We will create good, good schools and education. I will fix it,” Trump said.

Trump has previously faced criticism from African-American leaders and Democratic officials for his description of African-American life as one of utter poverty, which does not match the reality of the lives of most African-Americans, and for equating “inner city” life with the lives of minority citizens. Trump has also issued his pitch to black voters while addressing predominantly white audiences, though he has made three forays into predominantly black churches in Michigan and Ohio.

During one of those stops, at a church in Flint, Michigan, he was heckled and the church’s black pastor also cut him off as he launched into a political speech attacking his opponent Hillary Clinton.

His support among African-American voters remains in the single digits.

+—+

Pepe Fucking Escobar, the Jewish Guy.

Mythic Narcissus, depending on his mood while facing his reflection in the pool, may at any moment authorize Kiev hits on Moscow and St. Petersburg with long-range missiles.

Alastair Crooke’s remarkable analysis of Trump in the context of myth as geopolitics has left us with much to ponder. There’s no escape from Trump’s “extraordinary ability to dominate the discourse”, globally, as well as his capacity for “bending people to his will” – and thus wreak havoc on the geopolitical chessboard.

Alastair stresses how Trump is skillfully “using mythic imagery” – actually crude archetypes – to always impress his (italics mine) narrative. The only narrative.

Here, this gold-selling Neopolitan Cunt, a judge?

Ahh, that semen drip Musk does it again over at Twitter. @marlene4719 = the AI Bot Miss Manners and Ms Grammer and Sir Censor!

Here we go, another Substack, but a good one:

In my interview with Jacob, we discuss the rapidly expanding GovTech infrastructure that the global elite has been developing over the last years to lay the foundation required to transform traditional governments into globally controlled “Agentic States.”

These Agentic States represent a fundamental departure from conventional systems of governance. According to plans proposed by the UN and World Economic Forum, states are expected to evolve into AI-driven systems, standardized across nations, that operate with minimal to no human involvement in decision making and policy formation.

Luukas Ilves writes in the GGTC’s white paper: “The rise of agentic AI will have a particularly profound impact on government and public services… Previous rounds of digital transformation have altered the medium by government functions… but have not altered the fundamental organisational structure or business model of government.

And he continues: “This time will be different. Agentic AI’s software will be capable of ‘eating’ the core functions of government. The Agentic State… marks a shift in the nature of government.”

Ukraine, man, Ukraine:

The Agentic State: How Agentic AI Will Revamp 10 Functional Layers of Government”, the document was initially published by the GGCT in May of 2025. Its lead author, Luukas Ilves, formerly served as Chief Information Officer for the Estonian government and now advises Ukraine’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Digital Transformation.

Of course, my Substack, maybe a new one before Bari Weiss and Substack cuts me off, will be the Jew Patrol. Remember that other weird TV Show? Rat Patrol!!!

Jews, man, commenting on the murderer Kyle and parallels with Israel. Fuck rats.

How does all this relate to Israel? The answer has to do with the role of news media, politicians, and social commentators. This collection of societal influencers can be called the Chorus.

There is a striking parallel between the roles played by the Chorus in both the Rittenhouse case and that of Israel.

The Chorus has claimed that Rittenhouse had no right to be where he was the night of the events. Although he lived only 20 minutes from the scene of the riots, his home was in another state. The Chorus was unimpressed that his father lived in Kenosha. The anti-Israel Chorus levels a similar charge: Jews have no right to be in “Palestine.” They are unimpressed that Jewish forefathers lived there.
Both Rittenhouse and Israel faced violent and unprovoked attacks.
The Chorus blames both Rittenhouse and Israel for attacking in self-defense.
The Chorus has demonized both Rittenhouse and Israel for its own purposes. In both cases, the media falsely adopted a narrative that the victim was the aggressor. This served the purpose of satisfying their base and lending moral legitimacy to their good guy-bad guy narrative.
Both cases exemplify a dishonest media that misreports events and motives. Some media reported that Rittenhouse came to Kenosha to hunt people down. Some international media report that Jews deliberately forced out an entire people to make way for a Jewish state. The Kenosha Chorus and the international media both impugn the motives of the actors they dislike. In Kenosha, the media suggested that Rittenhouse was a “right-winger” and a racist, out to get the rioters. Israelis are similarly castigated as racists who hate Arabs.
In both cases the Chorus blames the true victim for arming himself—-this, despite the overwhelming danger presented by violent elements. The Chorus does not believe that the true victims here—-Rittenhouse and Israel—-were in danger of attack. According to the Chorus, the fact that they have armed themselves is proof of their culpability.
The bias of the Chorus is evident in the way it characterizes the parties it dislikes. It assigns to them those characteristics that are most despised by their reference group.
For the radical left, the worst thing a person can be is a white nationalist. So for them Rittenhouse became a white nationalist.
The anti-Israel Chorus levels the same charge against Israelis. In the case of Israel this is a particular distortion of the facts: over half of Israelis and their forbearers came to Israel from Arab countries, and thus are not exactly white. And while Israelis generally are proud of their country, many of Israel’s pioneers were victims of European nationalism. Unlike nationalist states, Israel guarantees the rights of all its citizens, irrespective of the origins of their forebears.
In both the Rittenhouse and Israel cases, the rhetoric of the Chorus is often deranged. It is irrational to believe that a 17 year old kid with decent motives, or a country founded on democratic ideals, is uniquely evil. Yet that is what the Chorus says.

In July 2020, just under a month into his tenure as George Mason University’s president, Gregory Washington sought to position the university as a national model of diversity and inclusion in higher education.

He established an Anti-Racism and Inclusive Excellence task force, and by that November, convened its members and other administrators in a virtual forum where they spoke about the university’s goal to increase faculty diversity.

He’s a hero, man, and Racist Semen Drip Trump is going after them all: In 2022, the board approved “Mason Is All Together Different,” a five-year plan that outlined the university’s goals to increase “faculty and staff demographics that mirror student demographics.” (The Chronicle’s publisher, who does not have a role in journalistic decisions, served on the George Mason board from 2019 to 2023.)

“Our practices and initiatives, including some being questioned by the DOJ, emanated from this framework,” Washington said in a statement responding to the Department of Justice investigation. “They were developed in collaboration with our Board of Visitors, and through shared governance with our students, faculty, and staff. It has never been a ‘one man show’ at Mason.”

Tracking Higher Ed’s Dismantling of DEI

Illustration of a steamroller rolling over a colorful road and leaving gray asphalt in its wake.

Jew Patrol: Gaza to Donbass: How Israel and Ukraine Built a Fascist, Transnational War Machine

JEWS, man:

King David Hotel after Irgun terrorist attack, July 1946.

Engineers clear the debris of the King David Hotel, 22 July 1946. Library of Congress, G. Eric and Edith Matson Photograph Collection. Public Domain.

Rat Patrol, err, Jew Patrol: From Pogroms to Prime Ministers: The Complicated History of Ukraine and Israel

Ukraine contributed significantly to Zionism: Golda Meir (Kiev), Yitzhak Ben-Zvi (Poltava), and Ze’ev Jabotinsky (Odessa), who would go on to shape Israel’s political, military, and ideological architecture.