Paul Haeder, Author

Oh, the shadow-fearing alternative leftists just can’t call a Jew a Jew, so they come up with this fucking thing called Zionist?

Fucking Putin, disaster after disaster, and he is the little boy Jew Judo Jerk for Judaism:

I’ll take Pussy Riot over the rot of these fucking Semen Drips:

‘I never felt like a convict because I always felt free,’ Maria Alyokhina

Nadya Tolokonnikova’s new exhibit at the Honor Fraser Gallery in Venice, called “Punk’s Not Dead,” couldn’t emerge in L.A. at a more fitting time— post-election and amid tensions between the president and local leaders, not to mention Donald Trump’s Putin-like, “dictator on day one” moves.

Pussy Riot, the creative activist collective she started in protest of the Russian government’s authoritarian regime 14 years ago, became a global phenomenon for their audacious art, even if it landed her in a Russian jail for nearly two years.

And so, the Semen Drip Jew Miller, no, not Zionist Miller, has his foot soldiers of the Goyim Variety at the ready!

The colonial regime is a regime instituted by violence. It is always by force that the colonial regime is established. It is against the will of the people that other peoples more advanced in the techniques of destruction or numerically more powerful have prevailed.

I say that such a system established by violence can logically only be faithful to itself, and its duration in time depends on the continuation of violence.

But the violence which is in question here is not an abstract violence, it is not only a violence perceived by the spirit, it is also a violence manifested in the daily behaviour of the colonizer towards the colonized: apartheid in South Africa, forced labour in Angola, racism in Algeria. Contempt, a politics of hate, these are the manifestations of a very concrete and very painful violence.

Colonialism, however, is not satisfied by this violence against the present. The colonized people are presented ideologically as a people arrested in their evolution, impervious to reason, incapable of directing their own affairs, requiring the permanent presence of an external ruling power. The history of the colonized peoples is transformed into meaningless unrest, and as a result, one has the impression that for these people humanity began with the arrival of those brave settlers.

During a visit to Union Station along with Vice President J.D. Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Miller took a shot at local residents who in recent days have demonstrated against Trump’s takeover of their city’s law enforcement.

“All these demonstrators that you’ve seen out here in recent days, all these elderly white hippies, they’re not part of the city and never have been,” Miller claimed. “We’re gonna ignore these stupid white hippies that all need to go home and take a nap because they’re all over 90 years old.”

And what will the ailing fucked up AmeriKKKa do with all these Jews Running Around attacking the Goyim?

In the end, Russia, Putin, will sell Iran and China down the river:

Beyond Ukraine: Alaska Summit of Shadows Signals Hidden Economic Agenda Between Washington & Moscow

Stop listening to the white ghouls, the white boys, men to boys shits on Substack and on Podcasts, on all the fucking variety shows:

READ:

We divulge what happened, what’s to come and the specifics as well as the likely reasons behind all of it. We pose that not only was the Alaska Summit between the U.S. and Russian delegations theatrical, as much has already been decided and pre-negotiated, but that these deals involve much more than Ukraine. The real agreement involves economic cooperation, particularly on mineral resources in now Russian-occupied and former Ukrainian territories, the Arctic, West Asia (Middle East), corridors, Israel, and how this could affect China and perhaps endanger Iran, the Resistance, and global order.

We discuss how Latin America, specifically Venezuela, as we predicted, is Washington’s next pivot, along with the expansion of Greater Israel and its war on Iran. A crucial part of the bargain is Russia’s apparent acceptance of a NATO-style security guarantee for Ukraine; tho it is not accepting its entrance into NATO. It is perhaps mirroring Israel’s occupation of the West Bank-as stated by Steven Witcoff.

In exchange, Russia is being granted significant concessions in Syria, Africa, and other areas to secure its economic interests and military bases, facilitated by U.S. and Israeli approval. This requires Russia to collaborate with Israel, effectively acting as its security proxy in Southern Syria to enable Zionist expansion. The deal is part of a larger U.S. strategy to redraw trade and energy corridors across West Asia, isolating Iran and squeezing China out of critical supply chains.

Oh, more Jew Jujitsu!

Notice the Jew Richard Wolff leaves out the JEWS:

And by now, we’re quite familiar with who the coalition partners are. The deals were made long before Mr. Trump arrived on the scene. The Republicans cut no deal now, they just continue. They are the party that throws money, and opportunities, and lots of symbols at, what? We know them, right? Fundamentalist Christians, white supremacists, people in love with their guns, people who hate immigrants. I could collect a few more, but you know, it’s familiar. And on the Democratic side, who? Better educated people, women, non-white people… and that’s what they do. And the elections are assigned outcomes, depend on who’s a bit more effective one year than the other, either in getting the money — look at Elon Musk throwing $200 to $300 million at Mr. Trump to counteract whatever Kamala Harris might have achieved otherwise — et cetera.

And the election is decided by one, two, three percent of the vote. Trump has no mandate. If he had one, maybe he could talk, that he took this conventional arrangement one step further — he made a deal — but he didn’t. He didn’t take it one step further at all. His vote is the same Tweedledum–Tweedledee oscillation that we have always seen.

And how much did the Jews throw at the Converted Jew Trump, and what outsized influence do Jews have on USA and USA geopolitical hell?

Oh, we know Norman Lear and his variety show making fun of Goyim.

And so the condescending and lecturing hectoring Wolff barks barks barks about his supposed socialism, but in the end this is the Century of the Jew.

Again, bark bark bark, Dick:

True, the Russians could save the lives and the expense of another six months, or twelve months, of war. But look, the reality is, again, that going to war has increased the rate of economic growth in Russia, compared to what it was before the war. In other words, this war is doing for the Russian economy what World War II did for the depressed American economy. We shouldn’t be surprised at that as a possible outcome. That’s what all of Keynesian economics teaches us: Massive government intervention, whether it’s for war or growing flowers, has a stimulative effect, and it has done that in Russia. Their problem is a bit of inflation, not a bit of collapse.

Do the Russians have their economic problems? Of course they do. And if you’re a child, you’ll cherry-pick a few statistics of where they’re having trouble, and say, the way a lot of people are these days: Mr. Trump, be aware that the Russian economy is in terrible… That’s not true. The repetition of that doesn’t make it true. The failure to show it makes it false.

Read this shit here — people who haven’t worked a day in their fucking lives: Trump Declares WAR on Russia in Alaska

“This violence of the colonial regime…irreparably provokes the birth of an internal violence in the colonized people.” Franz Falon

I’ll take Gerald Horne on this analysis over Hudson and Wolff:

U.S. Out of Africa: Voices from the Struggle

AFRICOM Watch Bulletin spoke with Professor Gerald Horne for a special two-part exploration of the Russia/Africa relationship. Professor Horne holds the John J. and Rebecca Moores Chair of History and African American Studies at the University of Houston. He is the author of more than 30 books, including most recently The Capital of Slavery: Washington D.C. from 1800-1865, a regular guest on the Horne Report, which airs on Black Power 96 Radio Sundays at 3:30 PM EST, and host of Freedom Now on KPFK Los Angeles, Saturdays at 11 AM PST.

AFRICOM Watch Bulletin: When people discuss Russia in Africa these days, the primary focus is on security relationships. From the West (which is to say the US and most of the rest of NATO,) the narrative is that Russia is an agent of destabilization, whereas for many Africans, Russia is a lifeline providing arms and materiel that the NATO camp has either refused to or offered only with onerous conditions attached. Can you speak to this discrepancy?

Dr.Gerald Horne: Well, it’s obvious that the North Atlantic camp, they do not want the African nations to have allies. They want to be able to feast on Africa without Africa being able to call on Russia for assistance. That particularly is the case with regard to the Sahel nations, speaking of Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger who are trying to move in a progressive direction, witness the recent trips to Moscow of the leaders of both Bamako and Ouagadougou, the latter being Ibrahim Traore, who of course was in Moscow on May 9th, 2025, the holiest day on the Russian calendar, marking the victory over fascism. This was the 80th anniversary marked in 2025. And so it reminds me of North Atlantic nations and their relationship to China as well. I mean, [the] United States is in hot to the people’s bank in Beijing, and if you go to Walmart or most major US retail establishments, a good deal of the merchandise is made in China, but at the same time, hypocritically, they turned to African nations and say, don’t deal with China! Well, of course, the African nations might well say, Physician heal thyself! When you break relations with China, we will consider it. But until then, you should shut up, basically, and mind your own business. So we really can’t take seriously these complaints in the North Atlantic camp about Russia’s relations with Africa. African nations are sovereign nations. They’re allowed to make their own decisions. The North Atlantic nations, of course, they don’t necessarily listen to the instructions from Africa, and Africa therefore reciprocates by not listening to the instructions from the North Atlantic nations.

AFRICOM Watch Bulletin: Much of Russian military activity on the continent over the last several decades has occurred through private entities ranging from the Bout network, to PMC Wagner. Especially in light of the documented relationship between Viktor Bout and the late Yevgeny Prigozhin, coupled with the fact that RSF (Rapid Support Forces) in Sudan is reportedly being supported by both Wagner and the UAE where Bout had much of his operation based, (notwithstanding Russia making overtures to the Sudanese armed forces at the same time,) are private military contractors a fundamentally destabilizing force? Do victories such as the retaking of Kidal in November of 2023 challenge this thesis?

Dr.Gerald Horne: Well, I would say that it was probably a step forward when Moscow decided in the wake of the death of Mr. Prigozhin, the founder of the Wagner Group, to seek to restrain shall we say euphemistically the Wagner Group and to fold its operations into the government, the Ministry of Defense in Moscow, because I think that these private military groups in some ways are an expression of some of the unfortunate post-Soviet trends. You might recall that in the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union, December 25th, 1991, there was a kind of free-for-all in terms of the looting of natural resources creating billionaires for example, some of whom had to be reigned in subsequently by Mr. Putin to the consternation of Washington and London. And the Wagner group in particular, although as you suggested, was able to accomplish certain victories that could very well be deemed to be progressive, this sort of security for minerals proposition which they embodied was not necessarily a step forward, speaking in euphemisms. In fact, you see another expression of security for minerals with regard to these recent deals cut by US imperialism with the Democratic Republic of the Congo. And of course when you talk about these private military groups, we have to bring up Eric Prince, a comrade of Mr. Trump, who has sent forces most recently into Haiti for example in the wake of the apparent failure by Kenyan police forces to reign in what are called gangs in Haiti. And now Eric Prince and his band of thugs was supposed to accomplish that goal. So I think it would be good for Black Alliance for Peace to look skeptically at these minerals for security/security for minerals deals, to look skeptically at these private military groups. But notice that I said look skeptically. I think that presumption and opposition to them can be overcome, but there has to be a considerable weight of evidence to overcome that particular presumption.

AFRICOM Watch Bulletin: After the 2023 death of Wagner founder Yevgeny Prigozhin, we are seeing the transition from Wagner to the newly inaugurated Africa Corps which is run by the Russian Ministry of Defense. Does national attribution bode to increase accountability and how would you compare and contrast Africa Corps with AFRICOM? Is there a reason why African nations could not forgo both for the much vaunted but seemingly ephemeral APSA (African Peace and Security Architecture?)

Dr.Gerald Horne: Well, with regard to the latter, that is something to consider. The problem with the latter is whether or not the Pan-African bodies have the muscle and the resources to combat these malign forces. I mean, for example, to cut to the chase, you mentioned Sudan and you mentioned the United Arab Emirates. My own supposition, and I would like your crack research team to look into this more deeply, is that a number of the Gulf monarchies are interfering grievously in the internal affairs of African states, not only Sudan, but I would argue that the religious zealots who are seeking to destabilize the Sahel nations also have a lifeline that leads back to the Persian Gulf. That creates contradictions because on the one hand, US imperialism, as referenced by Mr. Trump’s recent trip to that part of the world, he is clearly in bed with the Gulf monarchies, witness the ill-fated, ill-advised Abraham Accords whereby some of these monarchies were warming relations with Israel, and of course that stretches all the way to Morocco. At the same time, these religious zealots, the contradiction is that they can easily destabilize US allies. Speaking of Cote D’Ivoire, for example, speaking of Northern Nigeria for example. But in any case, I think that the Gulf monarchies, they’re trying to satisfy internal domestic issues with regard to religious zealotry in their own homelands by allowing them to run amuck in Africa. They’re sort of exporting the issue to the continent, which they think will allow them to continue in their merry way. But in any case, my point is, I’m not sure if Pan-African bodies have the resources to confront the complexities of what I’ve just outlined which therefore causes them to call upon external allies such as Moscow to help them to resolve these tensions and contradictions reference my speaking to the trips to Moscow, Traore, Goita, et cetera.

AFRICOM Watch Bulletin: Widening our aperture, how do you assess Russia’s overall relationship with the continent? Considering multilateral entities such as BRICS, or perhaps energy affairs, what are Russia’s interests, what are Africa’s, and do they appear congruent?

Dr.Gerald Horne: I think so. I think that obviously the African nations have historic and contemporary grievances with regard to the North Atlantic countries. Russia, as I’ve tried to indicate, has historic grievances with regard to the North Atlantic countries. And at this point, let me issue a footnote that is rarely addressed, but I think it’s important, which is that with the breakup of the Soviet Union, and here advert to what I said about how even defeats can lead to contradictions that are difficult to resolve, you saw that Russia or the Soviet Union, it was disrupted. You created these independent states. Now on the one hand, this allows for the North Atlantic countries, for example, to try to turn Azerbaijan against Russia, to try to turn the Baltic republics against Russia, Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. The breakup of the Soviet Union and the socialist camp in Eastern Europe then allows for the attempt to turn or to enhance and exacerbate Polish tensions with Russia. Of course Poland has talked about creating a Fort Trump, for example, which would be useful to that end, even Bulgaria, which traces its sovereignty to 1877/1878 when Russia intervenes to try to rescue it from the clutches of Ottoman Turkey has been moving in that Polish, Baltic, Azerbaijan direction. So that’s on one side of the ledger. It creates enormous complexities and complications, not only for Russia, but I would say for international peace and security. But at the same time, the breakup of the Soviet Union created new contradictions for the North Atlantic camp. I mean, for example, you have geostrategic analysts going back to the beginning of the 20th century who suggested that the fulcrum of planet earth rests in Central Asia, in the ‘Stans’ for example, Turkmenistan, Kazakhstan, et cetera, once part of the Soviet Union, now close to Russia and close to China. So if you had honest analysts of US imperialism, they would look into that and draw appropriate conclusions. But of course, you cannot expect honesty from thieves. I should also say that, to put this in language that Wall Street can understand, in many ways Russia was subsidizing many of these other republics. And so when the Soviet Union breaks up, that curtails, if not ceases, the subsidies which helps to explain the economic growth of Russia despite sanctions by the North Atlantic countries, and that’s not even to mention the fact that the Ukraine proxy war has driven Russia and China closer together and geostrategic analysts from the beginning of the 20th century through Henry Kissinger have thought that that would be a nightmare for US imperial interests. But in the footnote, now to return to the question, I would say that the interests of Africa and Russia are parallel insofar as both have a common grievance with regard to the North Atlantic countries. However, given the fact that post 1991 Russia is not the same as the Soviet Union, you have billionaires, you have profit making enterprises, inevitably there are going to be contradictions between certain interests of Russia and certain interests of sovereign and independent Africa. But as the BRICS example tends to illustrate, BRICS includes not only South Africa, but Ethiopia and Egypt, I think that those contradictions can be overcome. It’s not as if they’re the same as the contradictions between say the African nations and the North Atlantic camp.

AFRICOM Watch Bulletin: Finally, if we avoid tired US tropes, do there remain any exploitative conditions deserving of challenge in the name of African sovereignty and self-determination?

Dr.Gerald Horne: It depends on what you mean. I mean, for example, both Africa and Russia, or raw material exporters heavily dependent upon the export of oil; if you look [at] in the case of Russia, Nigeria, Angola, Gabon, for example, the export of energy, energy including natural gas; Russia, Algeria, for example, the export of precious resources; platinum in the case of South Africa and Russia; diamonds in the case of Namibia and Russia; uranium in the case of Namibia and Niger. And so the OPEC example, the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, which is the exporting countries banding together for mutual benefit, in some ways that sheds light on the parallel interests between Africa and Russia. That is to say, the parallel interests are seeking reasonable prices for their commodities being exported and therefore taking it out of the pockets of the importing countries, speaking of the North Atlantic countries. And therefore you begin to see the contradiction because the North Atlantic countries would like to pay lower prices for the aforementioned commodities. Russia and the African nations would like to see higher prices. The latter then unites Russia and Africa on a common platform. For example, Russia and Africa would like to see the rampant and rampaging interference of North Atlantic countries in the internal affairs of sovereign nations be circumscribed, to put it mildly. And the North Atlantic countries would like to continue that because they think that it’s to their benefit, and certainly US imperialism thinks it’s to their benefit at least up to July, 2025.

Oh, the dumb Ukrainians, you say?

Six Republican-led states have now pledged National Guard troops to the Trump administration’s takeover of Washington, D.C., where it has assumed control of policing under the claim of tackling crime. Along with the D.C. National Guard that Trump already controlled, this brings the total number of troops in the streets of the capital to more than 2,000.

“What we’re seeing is lawlessness, but it’s all coming from the White House,” says community activist Keya Chatterjee, the executive director of the group Free DC.

[Armed officers prepare to place handcuffs on a man from within an apartment complex, Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2025, in the Petworth neighborhood of northwest Washington. The officers pictured had “Washington Field Office” on their shirts underneath tactical gear that said Police.]

Two House Niggers black on black hate!

Slave masters:

Ebony and Ivory mother fucking hired guns:

Five heads-of-state from West African countries were invited to the White House to meet with United States President Donald Trump.

These leaders were Presidents Joseph Boakai of Liberia; Mohamed Ould Ghazouani of Mauritania; Bassirou Diomaye Faye of Senegal; Brice Clotaire Nguema of Gabon; and Umaro Cissoko Embalo of Guinea-Bissau.

This invitation took place amid the massive round-up, detentions and deportations of people of color, including Africans, by the Trump administration as a cornerstone of their domestic policy. The arrests, detentions, torture and deportations of migrants are not limited to people with Latin American and Caribbean ancestry. People who were born on the African continent and have migrated to the United States directly or circuitously through Mexico, Central and South America, are also being victimized by the domestic and foreign policies of the Trump administration.

In addition, there have been unprecedented cuts in humanitarian aid from the U.S. to African states having a negative impact on economic development, healthcare, scientific research and political stability. Other measures having a negative impact on Africa are the imposition of 10-50 % tariffs by the White House, a process which has been shifting over the last six months.

Moreover, of the dozens of countries subjected to travel bans by the White House into the U.S., a disproportionate number of these states are members of the African Union (AU) based in Ethiopia. No European countries have been listed in these bans illustrating the racist character of Washington’s domestic and foreign policy.

The renewal of the Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) which was enacted during the last year of the administration of former President Bill Clinton in 2000, may not be renewed by the U.S. Congress in September. This bill provided for the targeted production and imports of goods produced on the African continent.

In Lesotho, a country attacked by Trump in his rambling speech before a joint session of Congress, has been hit with 50% tariffs by the U.S. prompting the closure of garment factories resulting in the layoffs of over 55,000 workers. The country located in Southern Africa, has declared an economic “state of emergency” in efforts to address the rising jobless rates, particularly among the youth of the country.

ECOWAS Leaders and Others in the White House Subjected to Racist Insults

These five African states with relatively small populations were invited to meet with Trump, while other countries in the same region have been attacked by the U.S. and its ally France. The Alliance of Sahel States (AES) has been threatened with regime change by the outgoing U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) director General Michael Langley, who singled out the political and ideological leader of Burkina Faso, Capt. Ibrahim Traore.

Three of the leaders present at the White House meeting were members of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), a previously 15-member regional organization which was formed fifty years ago. Due to differences over relations with France and the U.S., three states led by military administrations have broken with ECOWAS and formed the Alliance of Sahel States (AES). Although ECOWAS claimed that its differences with the AES members has its origins in the usurpation of power by the military within these states, there are obviously more substantive disagreements related to nationalization of resources and foreign policy orientations related to the Russian Federation.

The Republic of Liberia located in West Africa is the oldest “formally” independent state on the continent being declared a sovereign entity in 1847. This nation was founded in response to the failure of the U.S. to integrate manumitted Africans who had been brought into the North America region through the Atlantic Slave Trade.

[Image: President Joseph Boakai]

The Trump Administration’s Africa Policy

Although the nation-state of Liberia was created by the U.S. government alongside Africans freed from enslavement in the U.S. and that English is the official language of the country,

Trump asked President Joseph Boakai: where did he learn to speak such good English. Such a condescending remark whether from ignorance or a paternalistic impulse, is a clear reflection of the lack of sincerity on the part of the administration.

In the past prior to the decimation of the personnel at the State Department through the layoffs carried out by the Trump White House, there were people assigned to compile briefing papers for presidents before meetings with foreign leaders. Although the State Department briefings on African affairs often provided a rationale for continued imperialist and neo-colonial arrangements between Washington and the African continent, it would seem that these so-called “experts” would have avoided embarrassing and ridiculous questions from the head-of-state of the world’s most powerful imperialist government.

FUCKING SLAVE MASTERS! VD Rubio, Trump, Vance!

Slavers”

Slavers:

Tourists in Antwerp are redirected time and again to the Brabo narrative; the city has no memorials dedicated to the Congolese murdered during colonial rule.

The severed hand symbolizes the triumph of the Flemish spirit over a maniacal giant. It is also a sinister reminder of the brutality enacted upon Central Africans during Belgian colonial rule.

Belgians strategically separate past from present in offering up carefully parceled bits of history to evoke pride, rather than shame. Failing to connect the chocolate hands with severed Congolese hands is not the result of collective forgetting, per se, but of studiously compartmentalizing historical events into separate spaces.

Slavers in Isra=HELL.

The belief that there are no innocent civilians in Gaza, including children and women, is shared by two-thirds of the Israeli population.

In other words, the government’s policy is not an extremist fringe position; it has become mainstream. This policy is supported by Donald Trump, who has called on Israel to finish the job:

“It got to a point where you’re going to have to finish the job… They’re going to have to clean it up.”

What is most shocking is not just the hunger or the violence itself, but our response to it—or rather, the lack thereof. While thousands of people are being starved, slaughtered, and displaced right before our eyes, the West is looking the other way.

We offer little more than verbal protests, cynical food drops, and a few crocodile tears. Our governments have refrained from economic or diplomatic sanctions and continue to politically support this genocidal regime. Our moral bankruptcy could not be greater.

All fucking a proving grounds for Gazafication of the World: Puny Putin is a Puppet of the Jews!

Get RID of these fucking Jewish-Loving Semen Drips!