Paul Haeder, Author

writing, interviews, editing, blogging

this is what these two criminals produce — more baby fucking criminals

LAURA MARQUEZ-GARRETT: And if I may, there’s a more recent whistleblower, Sarah Wynn-Williams, who wrote the book Careless People.

MATTHEW O’NEILL: Yes.

LAURA MARQUEZ-GARRETT: Chapter 44, it should be mandatory reading for every parent, teacher and doctor. Chapter 44 will tell you — it lays it right out there, right? You literally have Meta developing a technology where they can determine when teen girls, 13 to 17, are at their lowest, their most insecure, their most anxious, their most depressed. What do they do? They go to advertisers and say, “Hey, I got a great new product for you. When that kid is at their lowest, I can hit them with your diet ad, I can hit them with your makeup ad.” And she cites two memos, two meetings, when she finds this out — right? — when she’s saying, “Hey, this isn’t OK.” And that’s what parents need to understand.

AMY GOODMAN: Wait a second. You talked about Sarah Wynn-Williams —

LAURA MARQUEZ-GARRETT: Yes.

AMY GOODMAN: — and Careless People.

LAURA MARQUEZ-GARRETT: Yes.

AMY GOODMAN: Is it true she’s not allowed to talk about this book?

LAURA MARQUEZ-GARRETT: So, my understanding is that Meta went in and got a temporary injunction to say that she cannot publicize it, right? But —

AMY GOODMAN: They can’t stop the publication of the book.

LAURA MARQUEZ-GARRETT: Already been published.

AMY GOODMAN: But the author can’t talk about it. Only everyone else can.

LAURA MARQUEZ-GARRETT: Yes, but I will say — yes, of course, because they don’t want you to see what’s in the book. Chapter 44, don’t forget that chapter. Seven pages, if you’re only going to read it, that’s it. But 100% I will say that the district, or the district court, the MDL, recently determined that she can be deposed for the litigation. So, the attorneys, we will be able to ask her questions, because it’s —

AMY GOODMAN: And what do the CEOs, like Mark Zuckerberg, understand? We only have 30 seconds.

LAURA MARQUEZ-GARRETT: Everything. They know. They know.

AMY GOODMAN: And what does that mean? How are you holding them accountable? Your organization, Social Media Victims, represents 4,000 kids.

LAURA MARQUEZ-GARRETT: Right. They are putting profits over people. They have known for years that they are hurting children. They have concealed that fact from all of us. They have told us their products were safe, so that they can make billions and billions of dollars with no accountability. And until we start holding them accountable, they have no reason to change.

AMY GOODMAN: Laura Marquez-Garrett is a lawyer with the Social Media Victims Law Center in Seattle. The film centers around her and many of the victims of social media. Matthew O’Neill is the co-director of the new documentary, Can’t Look Away. And, Matt, where can people start watching today?

MATTHEW O’NEILL: Go to Jolt.Film now. There are share codes. One of the things that’s important about this is that we want people to be able to share it with their family. And also there’s a discussion guide. So, if you want to watch this film with your children, you can do it.

+—+

Jews:

+—+

Fucking Jews:

Grow­ing up in the sev­en­ties ful­ly embrac­ing the spir­it of funk and dis­co music in my fan­cy foot­work and swivel­ing hips, my ears took it hard upon hear­ing that Jews have no rhythm. I, for one, knew oth­er­wise. Even if this asser­tion were true, I would argue that what some Jews lack on the dance floor oth­ers have more than off­set with the quick tem­po and intel­lec­tu­al wit­ti­ness they have con­tributed to Amer­i­can advertising.

His­tor­i­cal­ly, Jews had to be one step ahead to out-maneu­ver a hos­tile world, espe­cial­ly dur­ing the height of anti-Semit­ic pogroms in the late nine­teenth cen­tu­ry. Quick think­ing, adapt­abil­i­ty, and resilience — all syn­ony­mous with cre­ativ­i­ty — became instru­ments of sur­vival both in the Old World and as they tran­si­tioned into the new. The Jew­ish fond­ness for text found new forms of expres­sion in an open soci­ety, one of them being copy­writ­ing. Begin­ning with Albert Lasker in the 1920s (sole own­er at age 32 of the Chica­go based agency Lord and Thomas, lat­er to become Foote, Cone & Beld­ing), Jews have had an affair with copy­writ­ing. Catchy klitchiks (an unex­pect­ed twist in a piece of copy) made much Jew­ish copy­writ­ing mem­o­rable. Of course, there were the leg­endary taglines that spelled out a product’s Jew­ish asso­ci­a­tions like, ​“You Don’t Have to Be Jew­ish to Love Levy’s Real Jew­ish Rye,” script­ed by Jew­ish copy­writ­ers at the two-thirds Jew­ish owned firm, Doyle Dane Bern­bach (DDB). But from ​“Mama mia, I can’t believe I ate the whole thing,” to ​“Plop, plop, fizz, fizz, oh what a relief it is,” to ​“Try it, you’ll like it,” even non-Jew­ish prod­ucts like Alka Seltzer — first a client of DDB, then a client of the swanky 1960s agency Wells, Rich, Greene — have a whiny, dep­re­cat­ing, Jew­ish sen­si­bil­i­ty to thank for their notoriety.

From the birth of copy­writ­ing in the twen­ties, to the cre­ative rev­o­lu­tion of the six­ties, attrib­uted to DDB, Jew­ish clev­er­ness has cer­tain­ly made a last­ing impres­sion on Madi­son Avenue. Equal­ly, if not more inter­est­ing though, is how adver­tis­ing brought Jews from the out­side to the inside of Amer­i­can life. Sure, Jew­ish moves on Madi­son Avenue shaped the indus­try. But, all the mun­dane ads that, albeit unknow­ing­ly, inte­grat­ed the klitchik or the ques­tion­ing sen­si­bil­i­ty of New York Jews, unknow­ing­ly also uni­ver­sal­ized the par­tic­u­lar­i­ties of Jews. Intru­sive and col­o­niz­ing of our pre­cious space and time, adver­tis­ing can eas­i­ly be dis­missed as the back­ground chat­ter of mod­ern life. How­ev­er, it is pre­cise­ly because of its ubiq­ui­tous pres­ence and influ­ence that we should heed adver­tis­ing. Doing so teach­es us how Jews moved on Madi­son Avenue, and how Madi­son Avenue moved the Jews.

RE: We’ve Got the Moves: Jew­ish Mad­ness on Madi­son Avenue

Ear­li­er this week, Ker­ri P. Stein­berg wrote about the Jew­ish women in adver­tis­ing a in 1960s New York. She is the author of the recent­ly pub­lished book Jew­ish Mad Men: Adver­tis­ing and the Design of the Amer­i­can Jew­ish Expe­ri­ence and has been blog­ging here all week for Jew­ish Book Coun­cil’s Vis­it­ing Scribe series.

+—+

Fucking mind warping, brainwashing, frontal lobe stripping JEWS:

Fucking JEWS:

FILM DESCRIPTION

Can’t Look Away is a gripping documentary that exposes the dark side of social media and its devastating impact on young users. Directors Matthew O’Neill and Perri Peltz take viewers inside the high-stakes legal battle to hold tech companies accountable for the harm caused by their negligence and dangerous algorithms. Based on investigative reporting by Bloomberg News’ Olivia Carville, the film follows the Social Media Victims Law Center fighting for justice for families whose children suffered tragic consequences linked to social media use. As families seek justice, Can’t Look Away underscores the urgent need for industry reform and serves as both a wake-up call about the dangers of social media– and a call to action to protect future generations.

+—+

Two Jews and their Jewish Monsters Children:

Those mother fucking Tech Fascist Bar and Bat Mitzvah Cock Suckers.

+—+

Oh, you say if you had been in Germany as a Good Little German and if You Could Have Gotten Close to Hitler’s Entourage You Woulda Done Something with a Luger?

You fucking pieces of shit liars, blow-hearts, puffed up chest cocksuckers.

How’s that good little German and good little Jew working out now in Nazi Land U$A and Isra-Hell?

110!!!! IQ:

Early Tuesday morning, as Israeli rockets struck Gaza in retaliation for Hamas’s devastating attacks over the previous weekend, X owner Elon Musk took a victory lap. “If successful, X will evolve to be the collective consciousness of humanity or, more accurately, the human-machine collective,” Musk tweeted in response to a verified user praising what has been a disastrous stewardship of the company formerly known as Twitter as a “civilization critical purchase.”

The mix of hyperbole and inscrutability is a hallmark of most of Musk’s utterances—as is the sinister, dystopian edge he lends to his inability to be publicly normal. Deducing what he means precisely, on just about any subject, is difficult to do: Musk posts a lot, but he posts badly, his tweets a sort of recorded refutation of Malcolm Gladwell’s (absurd) “10,000 hour rule.”

Nevertheless, Musk is nothing if not consistent. His most recent statements follow the same trajectory as almost any others dating back to when he first made the critical, foolish decision to purchase Twitter in 2022: He believes his efforts to root the social network around his own twisted, hypocritical conception of “free speech” will be liberating, transforming the platform into a “digital town square” that ultimately elevates humanity.

Musk has always talked in the same grandiloquent and messianic terms about Twitter as he does about his other projects. He may genuinely believe that “X,” as it is now known, will be a transformational force for good; it may also be marketing speak aimed at glossing his decision to turn the network into a teeming bazaar of antisocial chuds—and keeping this legion of worshipful followers wedded to him. Often, he seems to be trying to simply convince himself that everything is going well. But over the weekend what became abundantly clear is that Twitter is a ruin.

That Musk’s endeavor was a failure had long been clear—the failing came fast and early after the ill-fated acquisition last fall. But the failure to succeed at what Twitter was in its heyday is one thing. That the service has been drained of its utility is another. Indeed, Twitter’s great strength was its ability to connect its user base to reliable information in moments of fast-moving, complex breaking news. Musk has wrecked all of that, seemingly with that purpose in mind.

RE: Oh what two years can produce: Alex Shephard, October 11, 2023, Heel Turns

[By Guthrie Scrimgeour, BusinessDec 14, 2023 6:00 AM, “Inside Mark Zuckerberg’s Top-Secret Hawaii Compound”

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is building a sprawling, $100 million compound in Hawaii—complete with plans for a huge underground bunker. A WIRED investigation reveals the true scale of the project—and its impact on the local community.

Pure fucking Bernays Fucking Evil Chinese Jew:

It’s easy to criticize billionaires for enjoying their wealth, and Mark Zuckerberg, the world’s fourth-richest man, worth $198 billion, is no stranger to such scrutiny. When Zuckerberg acquired an extraordinary 1,300 acres of beachfront land on Kaua‘i’, Hawaii, reactions were swift and largely negative, with some accusing him of “colonizing” the island. However, the Meta CEO pledged to collaborate with the local community, promising “a new approach.” True to his word, thanks to the Chan Zuckerberg Kauaʻi Community Fund of the Hawai‘i Community Foundation, Kaua‘i’s north shore will soon welcome its first public charter school.

The Namahana School, named after the Namahana Mountain, will span 11 acres in Kilauea and is set to open by the end of next year. This milestone is made possible by a generous $1.5 million gift from Zuckerberg and his wife, Priscilla Chan.

The new school aims to ease the burden on students who currently endure commutes…

Unmasking the evil spirit of Hasbara.

Zionism is Terrorism

3 months ago

It’s horrible stories after horrible stories of those Chabad/talmudic terrorists but what is done about those crimes they committed and continue to commit??

The whole world is to blame for failing to stop the holocaust atrocities and the occupation of Muslims lands occupied by those subhumans.

The world must stop its crocodile tears and must act swiftly to hold notorious criminals entity responsible with those nonstop violations of all international laws and international treaties. Their nasty supporters led by amerika must be stopped too!

+—+

Goddamn, three Jews talking in code about their fucking evil people? God I hate Klein!

+—+

“They were careless people, Tom and Daisy,” as F. Scott Fitzgerald’s classic Great Gatsby quote has it. “They smashed up things and creatures and then retreated back to their money or their vast carelessness, or whatever it was that kept them together, and let other people clean up the mess they had made…”

Swap Thomas and Daisy Buchanan for Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg, Meta’s CEO and former COO, and you’re getting to the heart of Sarah Wynn-Williams’ scathing, darkly humorous exposé, Careless People – a chilling portrayal of unchecked corporate power.

As Wynn-Williams, the former high-ranking employee-turned-whistleblower argues, Zuckerberg and Sandberg, driven by self-interest and hubris (with Zuckerberg’s leadership dubbed an “autocracy of one”), left a trail of destruction far worse than their fictional Roaring Twenties counterparts. Far from being ‘straight-shooters,’ they presided over a company more focused on profit and unchecked power than on genuine altruism, “callously indifferent to the price others would pay for their own enrichment” as the Sunday Times puts it.

Simply, if you’ve ever wondered how such an idealistic platform designed to connect friends and family became such a gigantic Trojan horse for disinformation, hate speech, and collusion with authoritarian regimes, Careless People provides the unvarnished answers.

+—+

Evil Jews:

Jewish Archives:

Leave a comment