How Israel is weaponising everyday tech into terror devices . . . And why you will never be safe again. by Palestine Will Be Free
Oh, those fucking Substacker Cock Blockers. Who woulda thunk?
Oh well: Ralph Nader today? Maybe blocked tomorrow?
My comments, but also sent to Emanuel:
Cognitive dissonance. The murdering maiming jailing poisoning starving state of Jews did the killing of their own people Oct 7. Larry Wilkerson should know that by looking at the straffed and immolated cars at the military rave.
Then. This idea that Rapist in Chief Trump’s Minyan and Goyim support democracy?
Look at these monsters, Larry: Rapist Pete? What a guy
Trump’s connection to all of these monsters, pray tell? Emanuel, come on. Andrew Mellon onward. Oil, media, megalomania, anti-democracy, anti-people. All of them, and so, NSA and CIA and deep state and the deeper data state?
Liars, cheats, outright grifters, and not a word coming from their mouths can be trusted: 2025? https://theintercept.com/2024/07/17/project-2025-advisory-board/https://theintercept.com/2024/07/17/project-2025-advisory-board/
But it’s data, and 4IR, and, well, again, Greater Israel now is Great Wailing Wall White House. Larry Ellison and Larry Fink?
I know you are leaning toward Jewish being separate from Zionism, Ralph, but the old saying, even from the mouths of Jews — “Never trust a Jew” is really the coming of the MOABs and nukes.
Out of the list below, 3 Jews. And the value system of a Mellon, or Mellons, well, this is Project of New American Jewish Century gone wild.
I’ll update you on more:
Thiel
https://theintercept.com/2023/03/23/peter-thiel-jeff-thomas/
Feinberg
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/stephen-feinberg/
Adelson
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/luka-doncic-miriam-adelson-dallas-mavericks
Stephen Miller
https://www.them.us/story/stephen-miller-donald-trump-deputy-chief-of-staff-policy
Jean Guerrero
Hatemonger: Stephen Miller, Donald Trump, and the White Nationalist Agenda―An Examination of Radicalization and Right-Wing Extremism
Mellon
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Thursday, Timothy Mellon, grandson to Gulf Oil founder Andrew Mellon and heir to his fortune, gave $50 million to Donald Trump, who inherited $413 million from his father.
Alex Glass, Managing Director of Communications at Climate Power, released the following statement. “Trust fund baby Donald Trump and his new best friend Tim Mellon have something in common besides getting rich without doing any work: Trump, like Mellon, is completely dependent on fossil fuel billionaires for his continuing “success.” That’s why Donald Trump has been promising Big Oil CEOs to extend tax cuts for the ultrawealthy while asking them for $1 billion on campaign contributions – tax cuts that would let Andrew Mellon hold onto his unearned oil fortune, which Trump surely relates to.”
+—+
The Pentagon is now led by one of the least-qualified persons ever to be Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth. He was exposed by the Democrats and the media when he was going through the congressional-confirmation process as ignorant, belligerent, vengeful, a woman-abuser denounced by his own mother, and a financial mismanager of the two groups that he directed. He’s now Secretary of Defense.
Ralph Nader
What I’d like to see Hegseth do is try his best to get Trump to help him refuse that money (the $150 billion that Congressional Republicans have proposed adding to the military budget). Gordon Adams—a man for whom I have a lot of respect, who was an OMB-type for a long, long time and knows more about the defense budget than probably anyone alive—said the truth the other day when he said: when Defense gets tons of money, it’s polluted, weakened, and turns into a place that can’t do its job. When it has periods of scarcity—and the better the scarcity, the deeper the scarcity, the better the Defense Department—it turns out to operate pretty well. So I think that’s stupid. I think it’s the Congress doing it because the Congress has become a wholly paid subsidiary of the military-industrial complex.
Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson
Good one from Whitney, Mike: V.P. Vance Rejects ‘Safe’ A.I. at Paris Summit
Mike Whitney
When conferences like this convene to discuss a cutting-edge technology, oftentimes, I think our response is to be too self-conscious, too risk averse. But never have I encountered a breakthrough in tech that so clearly caused us to do precisely the opposite. Our administration, the Trump administration, believes that AI will have countless revolutionary applications… And to restrict its development now would not only unfairly benefit incumbents in the space, it would mean paralyzing one of the most promising technologies we have seen in generations.
this administration will ensure that American AI technology continues to be the gold standard worldwide, and we are the partner of choice for others, foreign countries, and certainly businesses as they expand their own use of AI. Number two, we believe that excessive regulation of the AI sector could kill a transformative industry just as it’s taking off, and we’ll make every effort to encourage pro-growth AI policies. And I like to see that deregulatory flavor, making its way into a lot of the conversations this conference. Number three, we feel very strongly that AI must remain free from ideological bias and that American AI will not be co-opted into a tool for authoritarian censorship. …
The United States of America is the leader in AI, and our administration plans to keep it that way. The US possesses all components across the full AI stack, including advanced semiconductor design, frontier algorithms, and, of course, transformational applications…. And to safeguard America’s advantage, the Trump administration will ensure that the most powerful AI systems are built in the US with American designed and manufactured chips. (America must dominate AI because AI provides the means for domination.)
America wants to partner with all of you, and we want to embark on the AI revolution before us with the spirit of openness and collaboration. But to create that kind of trust, we need international regulatory regimes that foster the creation of AI technology rather than strangle it. And we need our European friends in particular to look to this new frontier with optimism rather than trepidation. (Note—Ignore the risks, damn the torpedoes)…
with the President’s recent executive order on AI, we’re developing an AI action plan that avoids an overly precautionary regulatory regime while ensuring that all Americans benefit from the technology and its transformative potential…..
Concerns About International Regulations
The US innovators of all sizes already know what it’s like to deal with onerous international rules…..
Ladies and gentlemen…. The AI future is not going to be won by hand-wringing about safety….
Now at this moment, we face the extraordinary prospect of a new industrial revolution, one on par with the invention of the steam engine or Bessemer steel, but it will never come to pass if overregulation deters innovators from taking the risks necessary to advance the ball… TRANSCRIPT: VP JD Vance’s Speech at Paris AI Summit 2025, Singju Post
Vance’s entire presentation was little more than an anti-regulation harangue designed to belittle anyone who failed to ascribe to his “Damn the torpedoes, all ahead full” philosophy. What the speech shows is that the Trump team believes that anyone who expresses the slightest support for modest oversight (of this potentially lethal technology) is a namby-pamby trying to block the path to the future. But what is so surprising about Vance’s analysis is that it appears to be the polar opposite of Musk’s. Musk has not expressed any such opposition to regulation or oversight; quite the contrary. As we’ve already shown, Musk feels quite strongly that we must reach international consensus on how AI should be regulated to ensure things don’t get out of hand. Mike Whitney
Back to the diritiest of the dirty — Jew. Oh those fucking Jews:
Some absolutely remarkable things have happened lately — since September 17 of last year, to be exact. That was when Israel carried out a barbaric terror campaign in Lebanon as it weaponised communication devices — pagers and walkie-talkies — to kill dozens and maim hundreds of Hezbollah officials and ordinary citizens with no ties to the Lebanese resistance.
It’s an act so depraved that even the former CIA chief Leon Panetta called it terrorism in no uncertain terms, “I don’t think there’s any question that it’s a form of terrorism.”
Yet, instead of feeling any sense of guilt or moral quandary about it, the Israelis — and their supporters — have since gone on to gloat about that unhinged act of terror at every opportunity possible. “Where’s your beeper/pager?” or some variant of this line has become a something of a favourite of pro-genocide Zionists in encounters online and offline.
Betar, a rabidly Zionist organisation with a sordid past of terrorism in Palestine openly tweeted to a pro-Palestine activist a death threat in the following words,
“1800 dollars to anyone who hands that jihadi a beeper.”
One terrorism sympathiser told a journalist,
“I hope your beeper doesn’t go off”, on live TV. A minister in the Netanyahu government tweeted a similar threat to the founder of the Hind Rajab Foundation: “Watch your pager.”
Deborah Lipstadt, who was Biden’s Special Envoy for Monitoring and Combating Antisemitism, rhetorically asked an interviewer,
while answering his question about Israel not being weaker in the aftermath of October 7. She was roundly applauded and cheered for her supposedly funny/clever remark at the pro-Israel event.
Bahraini and Emirati officials with Trump and Netanyahu at the signing of the Abraham Accords.
[So you are selling me Pegasus, right? Right?]
For the Indian government, which is the top buyer of Israeli weapons, Pegasus came in handy towards the fulfilment of its long-cherished dream and electoral promise.
It also helped Israel change India’s position in its favour at the UN. The aforementioned New York Times article states, “[I]n June 2019, India voted in support of Israel at the U.N.’s Economic and Social Council to deny observer status to a Palestinian human rights organization, a first for the nation.”
India had a long history of taking pro-Palestine positions at the UN, but the Narendra Modi-led right-wing Indian government is fast becoming a trusted Israel ally at international forums — helped undoubtedly by the weaponisation of a powerful spyware tool, as seen in the case of Gogoi.
In his book The Wandering Who? A Study of Jewish Identity Politics, Israeli-British musician and writer Gilad Atzmon tells the story of Victor Ostrovsky, a deserter former Mossad agent who grew a conscience later in his life and divulged sordid details of Israel’s espionage operations, much to the chagrin of Israeli society.
Ostrovsky made some startling revelations in a book, in particular about the existence of “sayanim” which means assistants or helpers (singular: sayan). The sayanim, who must be 100 percent Jewish, are Israel’s assets in foreign countries who can be mobilised in an instant into doing things for the benefit of Israel.
Atzmon quotes the following passage from Ostrovsky’s 1990 book By Way of Deception about the way the sayanim work to advance Israeli interests from their native countries:
The next day Ran S. delivered a lecture on the savanim, a unique and important part of the Mossad’s operation. Sayanim (assistants) – must be 100 percent Jewish. They live abroad, and though they are not Israeli citizens, many are reached through their relatives in Israel. An Israeli with a relative in England, for example, might be asked to write a letter telling the person bearing the letter that he represents an organization whose main goal is to help save Jewish people in the Diaspora. Could the British relative help in any way? … There are thousands of sayanim around the world. In London alone, there are about 2,000 who are active, and another 5,000 on the list. They fulfill many different roles. A car sayan, for example, running a rental agency, could help the Mossad rent a car without having to complete the usual documentation. An apartment sayan would find accommodation without raising suspicions, a bank sayan could get you money if you needed it in the middle of the night, a doctor sayan would treat a bullet wound without reporting it to the police, and so on. The idea is to have a pool of people available when needed who can provide services but will keep quiet about them out of loyalty to the cause. They are paid only costs.
To prove that Ostrovsky wasn’t making things up, Atzmon writes that “the Israeli government used every possible means to stop the publication of his books.” Further, Atzmon shares the following conversation between two Israeli journalists to cement Ostrovsky’s account of Mossad’s clandestine network as truthful:
In a radio interview Joseph Lapid, at the time a senior Israeli columnist, opened his heart and told the world what he thought of Ostrovsky: ‘Ostrovsky is the most treacherous Jew in modern Jewish history. And he has no right to live, except if he’s prepared to return to Israel and stand trial.’
Valerie Pringle, the journalist on the other side of the line, asked Lapid: ‘Do you feel it’s a responsible statement to say what you’ve said?Lapid: ‘Oh yes, I fully believe in that. And unfortunately the Mossad cannot do it because we cannot endanger our relations with Canada. But I hope there will be a decent Jew in Canada who does it for us.
Pringle: ‘You hope this. You could live with his blood on your hands?’
Lapid: ‘Oh no. It’s to…only it will not be his blood on my hands. It will be justice to a man who does the most horrible thing that any Jew can think of, and that is that he’s selling out the Jewish state and the Jewish people for money to our enemies. There is absolutely nothing worse that a human being, if he can be called a human being, can do’.
Lapid, later a member of Sharon’s cabinet, makes it very clear: to be a Jew is a deep commitment that goes far beyond any legal or moral order.
Instead of ostracisation as would happen in any civilised society after such egregious call for murder, Lapid would go on to serve as Israeli Minister of Law in Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s cabinet.
Paul Haeder, Author 