Ahh, I was writing about what Facebook and Homeland Security and Mossad and Unit 8200 and Thiel and Zuckerberg are doing, and I juxtaposed the idea of putting these fascists’ names in Wikipedia to see their backgrounds, their allegiances, their families, their monied interests, schooling, etc.
You know, things like this:
The faces of Ebony and Ivory, misleadership class and the Zionist First brownshirt.
+–+
“Who determines what’s inaccurate? Who determines what’s false? Do you understand the problem here?” posed Johnson. Such was the gravity felt by Johnson on the issue, that he saw the need of reminding Mayorkas about the fundamental significance of the First Amendment to United States democracy — an implication, perhaps, that these basic rights should be maintained regardless of the changing digital landscape.
In response to Johnson’s fiery line of questioning, Mayorkas adamantly defended his agency’s actions, stating, “What we do is, we disclose the tactics that adverse nation-states are utilizing to weaponize misinformation.”
His claim, however, directly contradicted factual evidence outlined in the Missouri v. Biden case by Attorneys General Andrew Bailey of Missouri and Jeff Landry of Louisiana which found that government agencies continually caused the censorship of US citizens.
[Note: Understand the enemy’s family line, via WikiCIApedia: His father, Charles R. “Nicky” Mayorkas, was born in Cuba. He was a Cuban Jew of Sephardi (from the former Ottoman Empire, present-day Turkey and Greece) and Ashkenazi (from Poland) background. He owned and operated a steel wool factory on the outskirts of Havana. Nicky Mayorkas studied economics at Dartmouth College.
His mother, Anita (Gabor), was a Romanian Jew whose family escaped the Holocaust and fled to Cuba in the 1940s before leaving to the United States after the Cuban Revolution.]
+–+
And this:
Ahh, *uck-You-Berg, up his dirty meglomaniacal tricks. These Zionists are something else. Ya think I will stay on this bloody platform with the eye, voice, and feces scans *uck-err-berg has planned?
+–+
Social media behemoth Meta has disclosed intentions to patent a system that leverages voiceprints for user identification. Critics will likely raise eyebrows at this step, which they argue gives Meta unprecedented access to a deeply personal aspect of users’ identities: their voices. Meta Files Patent To Scan Users’ Voices To Make a “Voiceprint”
From WikiCIApedia:
Mark Elliot Zuckerberg was born on May 14, 1984, in White Plains, New York[9] to psychiatrist Karen (née Kempner) and dentist Edward Zuckerberg.[10] He and his three sisters (Arielle, Randi, and Donna) were raised in a Reform Jewish household[11][12] in Dobbs Ferry, New York.[13] His great-grandparents were Jewish emigrants from Austria, Germany, and Poland.[14] He attended high school at Ardsley High School before transferring to Phillips Exeter Academy. He was the captain of the fencing team.[15][16][17]
Facebook is evil, and alas, breath, butt, urine, fingerprint, eyeball, face, voice, feces, hair scan, this is how brownshirts and goosestepping billionaires and millionaires work. Is the world better off without them having never ever been born? Bats to the head? Sharpened pitchforks and boiling tar and poisoned tipped quills?
Then, of course, another worthless poisonous snake on planet earth:
A group of nearly 70 rights organizations from around the world have penned a letter to EU Internal Commissioner Thierry Breton, concerned that the EU’s new legislation might lead to internet shutdowns.
In the letter, they are urging Breton to clarify his recent statements and reassure the public that the bloc’s Digital Services Act (DSA) will not be turned into a tool to coerce online platforms into deleting “hateful content,” under threat of blocking them as punishment.
If the DSA is designed to, as the signatories put it, arbitrarily block major social networks which the EU finds are not immediately complying with “hate speech” takedown rules – then they view that as a violation of human rights protections found in international law.
Breton’s comments which upset the EFF, Access Now, ARTICLE 19, and over 60 other groups, were made in the context of recent mass civil unrest in France (the EU commissioner is a French politician). And one of the “solutions” to the social crisis the country was experiencing, Breton suggested, was to use the DSA to limit access to social sites.
Note: from WikiCIApedia:
Breton was born in the 14th arrondissement of Paris. His father was a civil servant in the agency responsible for developing nuclear energy.[4] He completed his middle and high school education at the École alsacienne in Paris and University-preparatory school classes for the Grandes écoles at Lycée Louis-le-Grand.[5]
Breton received a master’s degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science from École Supérieure d’Électricité (Supélec, now CentraleSupélec) in 1979 and later graduated from the Institut des hautes études de défense nationale (IHEDN).[6]
These are human stain, Mister Macron Rothschild and his techy boy. But on Substack, the winners there have locked me out of my account for this piece, more or less, and that is the way of fascism. I included the letter below, and noted that we need to stop being milquetoast fools, and respectful of these Zionist misanthropes.
Then I went after the Zionists and Israelis Who Hate Humanity!
And, it is Jews’ god-given right to controlling global security:
If you frequently follow Israeli tech news, you have come to notice a pattern: Many of the startup nations’ CTOs, CEOs, and other founders and c-level executives started their tech careers in the IDF’s intelligence unit 8200. Though Unit 8200 is dubbed “ the foremost technical intelligence agency in the world”, there are plenty, and we mean plenty, of other units that the startup nation stars served in. We sat down with a few to learn more about their IDF journey, and how, though not in 8200, it had a pivotal impact on their careers as tech entrepreneurs. (source)
So, saying that it would be best if these nerds, these Eichmann’s, these Oppenheimers had never graced the face of the earth is VERY Boten at Substack, and FU Book.
Because . . . Come on, best if the world never had a Hitler or millions of Nazi’s, or Zelensky, or . . . .
In biblical times, communities appointed watchmen to guard the city against impending danger, whether it was thieves trying to make off with a town’s food supply or invading armies seeking to overthrow a kingdom.
God has assigned a similar Israeli group today to safeguard the global community against terrorism.
Staffed by young cyber experts, Unit 8200 is the largest arm of Israel’s military. According to the British think tank, Royal United Services Institute for Defense and Security Studies, “Unit 8200 is probably the foremost technical intelligence agency in the world and stands on a par with the NSA in everything except scale.”
Israel founded Unit 8200 way back in 1952 using primitive surplus American military equipment. The unit today plays a crucial role in thwarting terrorist activities. Among their stealth roles is tracking ISIS fighters who, once forced from the battlefield, burrowed into countries around the world.
In an interview with Ynet, Israeli Defense Forces Chief of Staff Gadi Eisenkot said, “We pass on information to countries when we know something is in the works.” Hence the elite group is now credited with spoiling sophisticated plots, including . . .
This is disgusting, racist, and part and parcel the Zionist First, Israel First, Jewish First mentality. And to attack it means, well, my Substack is GONE.
GONE:
You can see it today, read stuff, but I am locked out of publishing. Terminal Velocity.
Because, again, bat to the head, and all off them need bats to the head. Note that I am not going to hit them with my bat, nor am I calling anyone to go out there and attempt to break their security teams with a bat in order to bat their heads, but Substack is the way of the DoDo.
Of course, the world would have been better without these fascists. Bats to their heads, all of them, and their families. That’s just satire, man, polemics, bullshit grandstanding, and nothing more.
Sandberg was born in 1969 in Washington, D.C., to a Jewish family,[10][11] the daughter of Adele (née Einhorn) and Joel Sandberg, and the oldest of three children.[2][12] Her father is an ophthalmologist, and her mother was a college teacher of French language.[10]
These are tyrants and ctriminals, but again, propaganda in their favor makes that statement so far out of the fringe, that saying it or printing it means zero to them. Should they go the way of the DoDo? YES. But this is a Zero Call to Action.
All Billionaires are Criminals, and that includes the Happy Faces.
And, this is what gets me banned, man:
What the hell do pitchforks do? Machetes? Boiling tar? Come on, Nick, Billionaire states the obvious:
Is this illegal, then, juxtaposing Mossad and Unit 8200 and Dell and the Cloud Servers, with this?
There you have it. This isn’t exactly what I wrote in my Substack, and that Fascist organization, without notice, stopped me from accessing my posts, even cutting and pasting my drafts.
Yes, dear commissioner, please use lubrication when sodomizing free speech and free agency and free association and freedom of movement.
Dear Commissioner Breton,
We, the undersigned civil society organisations, are writing to request clarification concerning your recent comments suggesting that arbitrary blocking of online platforms could be an enforceable and justified measure under the Digital Services Act (DSA). These were made in response to remarks by French President Emmanuel Macron who raised the possibility of blocking access to social media platforms in relation to the ongoing civil unrest in the country. These comments could reinforce the weaponisation of internet shutdowns, which includes arbitrary blocking of online platforms by governments around the world.
According to international human rights law, internet shutdowns, including arbitrary blocking of online platforms that disregard procedural safeguards, violate human rights. The impacts are especially severe in contexts where people are most at risk of violence. In 2022, Access Now recorded 62 shutdowns during protests across the globe. Data shows a spike in their use to shroud violence and serious human rights abuse, such as brutal crackdowns on protesters. Research has also highlighted that network disruptions exacerbate the spread of misinformation, as people are denied access to alternative sources of verification channels.
Arbitrary blocking of online platforms and other forms of internet shutdowns are never a proportionate measure and impose disastrous consequences for people’s safety. The European Union fully recognises that internet shutdowns severely hinder the enjoyment of economic, social, and cultural rights, as well as civil and political rights. By no means should arbitrary blocking of Instagram, TikTok, or other social media platforms be viewed as a solution to any event or perceived crisis in a Member State or across the EU.
We therefore ask for clarification to confirm that the DSA does not, in fact, provide for the possibility of shutting down online platforms as a sanction for failing to remove “hateful content,” as implied by your comments. While the DSA allows for some temporary restrictions on access to services, these are last resort measures that may only be considered after repeated non-cooperation and non-compliance with this Regulation. In addition, they have to be backed by significant procedural safeguards to comply with international human rights standards. According to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), such procedural safeguards include providing advance notification of the blocking measures to affected parties and conducting an impact assessment of the measures in order to avoid their arbitrary or excessive effects. In addition, a blocking order has to be issued by an independent and impartial judicial body.
We also urge the European Commission to ensure that national implementation and enforcement of the DSA by Member States does not lead to an overly broad interpretation of DSA measures, which would go against the regulatory objectives of the law and violate the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. In particular, the draft law to secure and regulate digital space proposed in France (Projet de loi “Sécuriser et réguler l’espace numérique”) carries such risks. For instance, the proposal establishes a 24-hour deadline for content removal. It would also require browser-based website blocking, which is an unprecedented government censorship tool. These and several other proposed measures go far beyond the DSA requirements and contradict its goals by creating risks of censorship of legal content.
We look forward to hearing back from you and we remain at your disposal for any questions you may have.
Sincerely,
Signatories:
- Access Now
- Advocacy Initiative for Development (AID)
- Africa Media and Information Technology Initiative (AfriMITI)
- African Freedom of Expression Exchange (AFEX)
- AI Forensics
- AlgorithmWatch
- ARTICLE 19
- Asociația pentru Tehnologie și Internet (ApTI)
- 7amleh – The Arab Center for the Advancement of Social Media
- Bits of Freedom
- Bloggers Association of Kenya (BAKE)
- Centre for Democracy & Technology, Europe Office
- Change Tanzania Movement
- Civil Liberties Union for Europe
- Collectif Sassoufit
- Cyber Rights Organization
- digiQ
- Digital Rights Kashmir
- Digital Woman Uganda
- Državljan D / Citizen D
- DT Institute
- Ekō
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)
- Epicenter.works
- Eurasian Digital Foundation
- European Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ECNL)
- European Digital Rights (EDRi)
- European Network Against Racism (ENAR)
- Fundación Karisma
- Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte e.V. (GFF)
- HateAid
- Homo Digitalis
- i freedom Uganda Network
- Internet Protection Society (Russia)
- Internet Sans Frontières
- IT-Pol Denmark
- #jesuislà
- Justitia/Future of Free Speech
- Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet)
- Kijiji Yeetu, Kenya
- Koneta Hub
- La Quadrature du Net
- LastMile4d
- Life campaign to abolish the death sentence in Kurdistan
- Media Diversity Institute – Armenia
- Media Foundation for West Africa (MFWA)
- Mozilla
- Myanmar Internet Project
- Office of civil freedoms
- OpenMedia
- Open Observatory of Network Interference (OONI)
- OPTF (Session)
- Organization of the Justice Campaign
- Panoptykon Foundation
- Paradigm Initiative (PIN)
- Ranking Digital Rights
- RosKomSvoboda
- Securing Organizations with Automated Policymaking (SOAP)
- SMEX
- Stichting the London Story
- Superbloom (previously known as Simply Secure)
- Vrijschrift.org (Netherlands)
- Waag Futurelab (The Netherlands)
- Xnet, Institute for Democratic Digitalisation
- YODET
- Zaina Foundation
MEDIA CONTACT
If you would like to arrange an interview with one of our Access Now experts, have a question, or are interested in further information on any of our areas of focus, please contact press [at] accessnow [dot] org. Subscribe to receive media alerts.
RELATED
Paul Haeder, Author 